Korean-Specific Parameter Models for Calculating the Risk of Down Syndrome in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy

The purpose of the current study was to propose a Korean-specific parameter set for calculating the risk of Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy and to determine the screening performances of triple and quadruple tests in Korean women. Using the data on triple or quadruple screening from three hospitals in Korea during 7 yr, we re-converted the concentrations of four serum markers to multiple of median values according to gestational age and maternal weight. After re-calculating the risk of Down syndrome in each pregnancy by multiplying maternal age-specific risk by the likelihood ratio values for the serum markers, screening performances and optimal cut-off values of triple and quadruple tests were analyzed. Among 16,077 pregnancies, 23 cases had Down syndrome (1.4/1,000 deliveries). Compared to the previous program, the tests with new parameters had improved screening performance. The triple and quadruple tests had detection rates of 65.2% and 72.7%, respectively, at a false-positive rate of 5%. The optimal cut-off value for the quadruple and triple tests was 1:250. We have presented a Korean-specific parameter set for Down syndrome screening. The proposed screening test using this parameter set may improve the performance of Down syndrome screening for Korean women.

Performance Characteristics of the UniCel DxI 800 Immunoassay for the Maternal Serum Quadruple Test, Including Median Values for Each Week of Gestation, in Korean Women / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: Maternal serum prenatal quadruple screening includes testing for alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), unconjugated estriol (uE3), and dimeric inhibin A (DIA). We evaluated quadruple screening using an automated platform and looked for any ethnic differences in the median values of each marker. METHODS: We measured the concentrations of each quadruple test analyte using the UniCel DxI 800 system (Beckman Coulter, USA) in 788 Korean mid-trimester maternal serum samples and calculated their median values using Benetech software (Benetech, Canada). We also compared the results with those obtained using the Immulite 2000 assay (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, USA) or ELISA (DSL, USA) in 442 samples. RESULTS: We obtained mid-trimester median values for each marker. The following are the comparative results for each test using the Immulite 2000 assay or ELISA (x) and the UniCel DxI 800 immunoassay (y): AFP, y=1.10x+0.01, r=0.925; uE3, y=0.28x+0.24, r=0.885; hCG, y=1.22x-3047.8, r=0.944; and DIA, y=0.86x+15.31, r=0.833. Assay results for each of the four markers showed good correlations. However, significant biases necessitated new median calculations of prenatal risk estimates in all four tests. CONCLUSIONS: We established gestational age-specific second-trimester median values for four markers in Korean samples using the UniCel DxI 800 immunoassay system. Despite significant bias, there were good correlations between the results obtained using the UniCel DxI 800 immunoassay and those obtained using the Immulite 2000 assay.