ABSTRACT
Abstract The National Quality Control Program in Mycology (PNCCM) of Argentina was establishedin 1996 to improve the quality of the mycological diagnosis, to help establish and to setup standardized procedures and continuous training of laboratory staff. The aim of this studywas to assess the effectiveness of the PNCCM in the 1996---2018 period. Data from the NationalMycology Laboratory Network (NMLN) and PNCCM database was used to estimate the increasein the number of controlled laboratories and jurisdictions, the percentage of participation, theimprovement in the quality of results and the adherence to the program. Satisfaction surveyswere performed to assess user satisfaction. The number of controlled laboratories increasedfrom 29 to 146; participation increased from 49% to 93% and general adherence was 72% inthe evaluated period (1996---2018). Improvement in the quality of the results was 15% for lowcomplexity samples; 7% for intermediate complexity samples and 14% for the identification ofhigh complexity strains. Up to 84% of the users consider the PNCCM to be ''very good'' and 16%''satisfactory''. These results show the importance of the PNCCM, which is widely accepted bymycological diagnostic laboratories from Argentina.
Resumen En 1996 se creó el Programa Nacional de Control de Calidad en Micología (PNCCM)de Argentina con el objetivo de mejorar la calidad del diagnóstico micológico, colaborar enel establecimiento de procedimientos estandarizados en aquellos laboratorios que carecen deellos y contribuir a la capacitación continua del personal.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del PNCCM en el período 1996-2018.Se utilizaron los datos de la base de la Red Nacional de Laboratorios de Micología (RNLM) ydel PNCCM para estimar el aumento en el número de laboratorios controlados y el porcentajede participación, la mejora de la calidad de los resultados y la adhesión al programa. Paraevaluar el grado de satisfacción de los usuarios, se analizaron las encuestas de satisfacción delos participantes. En el período evaluado, el número de laboratorios controlados aumentó de 29a 146, la participación aumentó de 49% a 93% y la adherencia general de los participantes fue del72%. La mejora de la calidad de los resultados de los laboratorios fue del 15% para muestras debaja complejidad, 7% para muestras de complejidad intermedia y 14% para la identificación decepas de alta complejidad. El 84% de los usuarios considera que el PNCCM es muy bueno y el 16%que es satisfactorio. Estos resultados evidencian la importancia del PNCCM, que es ampliamenteaceptado por los laboratorios que realizan diagnóstico micológico en nuestro país.
Subject(s)
Humans , Laboratories , Mycology , Argentina , Quality Control , Diagnostic Tests, RoutineABSTRACT
The ultimate goal of the quality control program for special periodic health examination agencies is to diagnose the health condition of a worker correctly, based on accurate examination and analysis skills, leading to protect the worker’s health. The quality control program on three areas, chemical analysis for biological monitoring since 1995, and pneumoconiosis, audiometric testing since 1996, has contributed to improve the reliability of occupational health screenings by improving the issues including standardization of testing methods, tools, diagnostic opinions, and reliability of analysis for biological monitoring. It has contributed to improving the reliability of occupational health monitoring by rectifying the following issues associated with previous monitoring: absence of standardized testing methods, testing tools that are not upgraded, mismatching diagnostic opinions, and unreliable results of biological specimen analysis. Nevertheless, there are issues in need of further improvement such as lack of expertise or the use of inappropriate method for health examination, and passive and unwilling participation in the quality control. We suggested solutions to these problems for each area of quality control program. Above all, it is essential to provide active support for health examiners to develop their expertise, while encouraging all the health screening agencies, employers, and workers to develop the desire to improve the system and to maintain the relevance.
Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Mass Screening , Methods , Occupational Health , Pneumoconiosis , Quality Control , Republic of KoreaABSTRACT
Objective:We propose a quality control plan which is suitable for the actual situation of our hospital and keep our CT equipment in a normal working condition, so that we can get the best image quality.Methods: According to “GB 17589-2011 Specification for quality assurance testing of X-ray computed tomography apparatus”, we can get quality testing data of GE Lightspeed VCT from different time.Results: The indicators in quarterly testing meet the requirements, and have little difference with ideal value. Meanwhile the testing indicators have no significant change after calibration. The indicators in half year testing meet the requirements, and have large difference with ideal value. Meanwhile the testing indicators have significant change after calibration. Conclusion: According to the test results, combined with the daily use of experience, we carry out the quality control program for the actual situation of our hospital. It reduces the failure rate of the equipment, and improves the picture quality of CT equipment.
ABSTRACT
In Korea, the quality control(QC) program forcytopathology was introduced in 1995. The program consists of a checklist for the cytolopathology departments, analysis data on all the participating institutions' QC data, including the annual data on cytologic examinations, the distribution of the gynecological cytologic diagnoses, as based on The Bethesda System 2001, and the data on cytologic-histolgical correlation of the gynecological field, and an evaluation for diagnostic accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy program has been performed 3 times per year with using gynecological, body fluid and fine needle aspiration cytologic slides. We report here on the institutional QC data and the evaluation for diagnostic accuracy since 2004, and also on the new strategy for quality control and assurance in the cytologic field. The diagnostic accuracy results of both the participating institutions and the QC committee were as follows; Category 0 and A: about 94%, Category B: 4~5%, Category C: less than 2%. As a whole, the cytologic daignostic accuracy is relatively satisfactory. In 2008, on site evaluation for pathology and cytology laboratories, as based on the "Quality Assurance Program for Pathology Services" is now going on, and a new method using virtual slides or image files for determining the diagnostic accuracy will be performed in November 2008.