ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ （AGREE Ⅱ）tool， and to study the attention situation of the included Chinese patent medicines in China's National Reimbursement Drug List in the guidelines/consensus. MethodThe data of CNKI，VIP，Wanfang Data，SinoMed，PubMed and Cochrane from the inception of the databases to October 2021 were searched to collect the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation. Then，the diagnosis and treatment standards and recommended Chinese patent medicines were extracted. Two researchers assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines/consensus with AGREE Ⅱ tool independently. The quality of reports was evaluated by Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare （RIGHT） Statement. The recommended Chinese patent medicines in the guidelines/consensus were compared with those in the National Reimbursement Drug List. ResultEleven consensus and 2 guidelines were included，involving 794 experts. The scores of AGREE II were clarity of presentation（59.0%），scope and purpose（44.0%），stakeholder involvement（23.1%），rigor of development （12.1%），applicability （11.1%），and editorial independence （8.3%） from high to low. Five articles were recommended at B level（recommended after revision） and 8 articles were at C level （not recommended）. The average scores of RIGHT Statement were as follows：basic information （93.59%），background （57.69%），evidence （18.46%），recommendations （20.88%），review and quality assurance （19.23%），funding，declaration and management of interests （0.00%）， and other information （0.00%）. The included guidelines/consensus recommended a total of 27 Chinese patent medicines，among which 20 were included in the National Reimbursement Drug List，with 4 species of Class A and 16 species of Class B， accounting for 74.1% of all recommended Chinese patent medicines. Ten purgative Chinese patent medicines in the National Reimbursement Drug List were recommended by the guidelines/consensus，accounting for 50% of all purgative drugs， and 8 were not recommended. There were prescriptions for purgation， for promoting digestion and removing food stagnation， for clearing heat and purging fire，and for warming the middle and dissipating cold，Tibetan medicine and Mongolian medicine. ConclusionBy the AGREE Ⅱ assessment，the methodological quality of the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation included in this study needed to be improved in the future. The report quality evaluated with RIGHT Statement was low. Most drugs included in the National Reimbursement Drug List were paid attention in the TCM diagnosis and treatment guidelines/consensus of constipation. Moreover，the drugs included in the National Reimbursement Drug List could basically fulfill the clinical needs reflexed from the guidelines/consensus recommendations. However， the reasons of some drugs failing to be included in the National Reimbursement Drug List needed to be studied in the future.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Through analyzing development statue of integrative coronary heart disease clinical practice guidelines, we aim to provide a reference baseline for the future study. Methods: Databases including CBM, CNKI, WanFang, VIP were searched for published integrative coronary heart disease clinical practices. The website medlive.cn was also used as supplementary. The reporting tool for clinical practice guidelines RIGHT statement was used to evaluate the reporting quality. Results: A total of nine relevant clinical practice guidelines or experts consensuses were included, covering five integrative treatment therapy guidelines of PCI or CABG perioperative period, three myocardial infarction guidelines and one atherosclerosis guideline. Experts consensus methods were adopted in seven guidelines, the remining two guidelines used the evidence-based guidelines development methods. The evaluation of RIGHT statements showed that most guidelines reported complete information in"Basic information"and"Background"domain, however, they usually failed to provide enough description in"Evidence", "Recommendations", "Review and quality assurance", "Funding and declaration and management of interests"and"Other information"parts. Conclusion: Although some achievements have been reached in the development of integrative coronary heart disease clinical practice guidelines, the development methods and quality of reporting still needs further improvements. Researchers should explore more specific Chinese medicine guideline development methods and tools in the future.