ABSTRACT
A depressão pode ser desenvolvida, agravada e/ou prevenida em função de alguns fatores como suporte familiar e motivos para viver, além da possibilidade de ser concebida como traço e estado depressivo. O objetivo principal desta pesquisa foi testar um modelo teórico preditivo (path analysis) do suporte familiar sobre traço/estado depressivo e sobre os motivos para viver, em uma amostra de 123 participantes, composta por dois grupos: pacientes do CAPS-AD e da ESF e, posteriormente, verificar as diferenças desses aspectos na amostra estudada. Foram aplicados uma ficha sociodemográfica, a Escala Baptista de Depressão - Adulto (EBADEP-A), Inventário de Percepção de Suporte Familiar (IPSF), Escala de Traço e Estado Depressivo (ETED) e Escala Brasileira de Motivos para Viver (BEMVIVER). O resultado da path analysis indicou que os motivos para viver são explicados pelo estado e traço depressivo e pelo suporte familiar. Os pacientes do CAPS-AD, tinham maiores níveis de sintomatologia depressiva e estado depressivo do que o grupo do ESF. Pacientes do ESF apresentaram médias maiores de suporte familiar e motivos para viver. Conclui-se que investir em estratégias que potencializem os motivos para viver e o suporte familiar podem reduzir os riscos de sintomatologia depressiva.
Depression can be developed, worsened and/or prevented depending on some factors such as: family support and reasons for living, in addition to the possibility of being conceived with a depressive trait and state. The main objective of this research was to test a predictive theoretical model (path analysis) of family support on the depressive trait/state and reasons for living, in a sample of 123 participants, composed of two groups: patients from the Psychosocial Care Center- Alcohol and Drugs (CAPS-AD) and the Family Health Strategy (ESF) and verify the differences of these aspects in the studied sample. A sociodemographic form, the Baptista Depression Scale -Adult (EBADEP-A), the Perceived Family Support Inventory (IPSF), Trait and Depressive State Scale (DTS) and the Brazilian Scale of Reasons to Live (BEMVIVER) were applied. The result of the path analysis indicated that the reasons for living are explained by the depressive state and trait and family support. CAPS-AD patients had higher levels of depressive symptoms and depressive state than the ESF group. ESF patients presented higher means of family support and reasons to live. It is concluded that investing in strategies that enhance the reasons to live and family support can reduce the risks of depressive symptoms.
La Depresión puede desarrollarse, agravarse y prevenirse dependiendo de factores como: apoyo familiar y razones para vivir, además puede de ser concebido con un rasgo y estado depresivo. El objetivo de esta investigación fue probar un modelo teórico predictivo del apoyo familiar sobre el rasgo/estado depresivo y las razones de vivir y verificar las diferencias de esos aspectos en la muestra estudiada, de 123 participantes compuesta por dos grupos: pacientes del Centro de Atención Psicosocial - Alcohol y Drogas (CAPS-AD) y la Estrategia de Salud de la Familia (ESF). Se aplicó un formulario sociodemográfico, Escala de Depresión de Baptista - Adulto (EBADEP-A), Inventario de Apoyo Familiar Percibido (IPSF), Escala de Rasgo y Estado Depresivo (DTS), Escala Brasileña de Razones para Vivir (BEMVIVER). El resultado del análisis indicó que las razones para vivir a ser explicadas por el estado y rasgo depresivo y por el apoyo familiar. Los pacientes CAPS-AD tenían niveles más altos de síntomas y estado depresivo que el grupo ESF. Los pacientes ESF presentaron mayores medios de apoyo familiar y razones para vivir. Se concluye que invertir en estrategias que potencien estas razones y apoyo familiar puede en la reducción de los riesgos de síntomas depresivos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Primary Health Care , Social Support , Secondary Care , Family , Depression , National Health Strategies , Life Change EventsABSTRACT
Abstract This study investigates the suicidal ideation and the possible causes for suicidal behaviour in the elderly. Subjects were 150 patients aged 65 and older who were evaluated using the sociodemographic data collection forms, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Suicidal Ideation Scale (SIS), Reasons for Living Inventory (RLI), and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). Of 150 patients, 72.7% were women and 27.3% were men, ages ranged from 65 to 88 years. Suicidal ideation was noted in 30.7% of patients. When the mean of BHS total score between patients with and without suicidal ideation and the mean of BHS subscale's feelings and expectations regarding the future and loss of motivation and hope in terms of subscales were evaluated between the groups with and without suicidal ideation, the scores had a significant difference. When RLI was evaluated in terms of total scores, the suicidal ideation mean score was 243.74 ± 32.28, while the non-suicidal ideation mean score was 267.27 ± 24.36. There was a significant relationship between the two groups. We found low level of education, low level of reasons for living and higher psychiatric morbidity (generalized anxiety disorder and comorbid depressive disorder) in with suicidal ideation in the elderly.
Resumo Este estudo tem por objetivo investigar os fatores que levam à ideação suicida e às possíveis causas para o comportamento suicida em idosos. Foram estudados 150 pacientes com idade igual ou superior a 65 anos, que foram avaliados utilizando os formulários de coleta de dados sociodemográficos, Escala de Depressão Geriátrica (EDG), Escala de Ideação Suicida (EIS), Inventário de Razões para Viver (IRV) e Escala de Desesperança de Beck (EDB). De 150 pacientes, 72,7% eram mulheres e 27,3% homens , com idades de 65 a 88 anos. A ideação suicida foi observada em 30,7% dos pacientes . Ao se avaliar a média da pontuação total de EBD entre pacientes com e sem ideação suicida e a média dos sentimentos e expectativas da subescala EBD em relação ao futuro e perda de motivação e esperança em termos de subescalas entre os grupos com e sem ideação suicida, a pontuação teve uma diferença significativa. Quando o IRV foi avaliado em termos de pontuações totais, o escore médio de ideação suicida foi de 243,74 ± 32,28, enquanto o escore médio de ideação não suicida foi de 267,27 ± 24,36. Houve uma relação significativa entre os dois grupos. Fatores de risco para ideação suicida em idosos foram desesperança, baixo nível de educação, baixo nível de razões para viver, distúrbio de ansiedade generalizada e transtorno depressivo comórbido.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Suicide/psychology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Suicidal Ideation , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Turkey , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
Background: Chronic mental illnesses like Schizophrenia, Bipolar Affective Disorder, Depression, Alcoholism have a negative impact on the quality of life and affect the reasons for living in such patients. This study was done to find out how the quality of life affects the reasons for living in such chronic patients. Aim: To study the Quality of life and Reasons for living in patients suffering from chronic mental illness. Materials and methods: 60 patients suffering from chronic mental illness were selected as subjects. WHO Quality of Life - BREF scale and Reasons for Living inventory are used in this study. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean RFL score for Males was 151.52. Mean RFL score for females was 133.28. Strong Positive Co-relation was seen between RFL and Quality of life Domains with significant p-values (<0.05). Conclusion: Females have more Fear of Suicide and Psychological domain in quality of life whereas, Males have more Reasons for Living, Survival and Coping Beliefs, Responsibility to Family, Child Related Concerns, Fear of Social Disapproval, Moral Objections, Physical health, Social relationships and environmental domains.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: This research examined the predicting roles of reasons for living and social support on depression, anxiety and stress in Malaysia. Method: This research was carried out on a sample of 263 participants (age range 12-24 years old), from Klang Valley, Selangor. The survey package comprises demographic information, a measure of reasons for living, social support, depression, anxiety and stress. To analyse the data, correlation analysis and a series of linear multiple regression analysis were carried out. Results: Findings showed that there were low negative relationships between all subdomains and the total score of reasons for living and depression. There were also low negative relationships between domain-specific of social support (family and friends) and total social support and depression. In terms of the family alliance, self-acceptance and total score of reasons for living, they were negatively associated with anxiety, whereas family social support was negatively associated with stress. The linear regression analysis showed that only future optimism and family social support found to be the significant predictors for depression. Family alliance and total reasons for living were significant in predicting anxiety, whereas family social support was significant in predicting stress. Conclusion: These findings have the potential to promote awareness related to depression, anxiety, and stress among youth in Malaysia.
Subject(s)
Young Adult , Depression , Anxiety , Mental Health , Social SupportABSTRACT
Este trabajo tiene como objetivo identificar las razones por las cuales algunas personas desplazadas prefieren vivir y afirman su existencia. Para ello se hizo un estudio cuantitativo descriptivo, con un diseño descriptivo transversal con una muestra de tipo intencionado de 100 personas entre los 18 y los 81 años en condición de desplazamiento forzado. Para recolectar la información se utilizó el Inventario de razones para vivir (I.R.V.) (Linehan, Goodstein, Nielsen & Chiles, 1983; Bascarán, Bobes, Bousoño, Portilla & Sáiz, 2006). Los resultados indican que las habilidades de afrontamiento (55%), la responsabilidad con la familia (16%) y el miedo al suicidio (10%) protegen las personas de cometer actos suicidas, incluso en condiciones de estrés elevado.
This work aims to identify the reasons for living in displaced persons through a descriptive quantitative research. It uses a cross-sectional design with a sample of 100 persons which ages were between 18 and 81 years. They all were in forced displacement conditions. To collect the information it was used Cuestionario de razones para vivir (reasons for living inventory) (Linehan, Goodstein, Nielsen & Chiles, 1983; Bascarán, Bobes, Bousoño, Portilla & Sáiz, 2006). Results show that coping skills (55%), responsibility with family (16%), and the fear to suicide (10%) protect people from suicide acts; even in high stress situations.