Rectopexia laparoscópica con técnica de Orr-Loygue para el tratamiento del prolapso rectal / Laparoscopic Orr-Loygue rectopexy with mesh for the treatment of rectal prolapse

Introducción: Existen múltiples alternativas para el tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal mediante procedimientos de fijación, resección o combinados. Si bien el abordaje perineal evita el acceso a la cavidad peritoneal, se acompaña de una tasa de recidiva mayor en relación al abordaje abdominal. Descripción: Se presenta una paciente de 66 años, histerectomizada por vía laparotómica, con un prolapso rectal externo y reductible de 1 año de evolución, sin incontinencia fecal ni constipación. La endoscopia preoperatoria descartó patología colónica asociada. Abordaje laparoscópico en posición de Trendelenburg lateralizado a la derecha. Como es habitual en estos casos se observa la presencia de dolicosigma y fondo de saco de Douglas profundo y se evidencia también la cicatriz de la cesárea. El procedimiento comienza con la apertura peritoneal a nivel del promontorio y la movilización de la unión rectosigmoidea, identificando el uréter izquierdo. Se continua la disección circunferencial tras la apertura de la reflexión peritoneal hasta la altura de la cúpula vaginal. La rectopexia se realiza según la técnica de Orr-Loygue mediante la fijación de la malla por una parte a ambas caras laterales del recto y por otra al promontorio sacro con puntos de polipropileno 2-0, cuidando de no lesionar los vasos ilíacos y los uréteres. Finalmente se cierra la reflexión peritoneal con poliglactina para aislar las mallas protésicas del contenido visceral. La paciente tuvo una buena evolución postoperatoria, otorgándose el alta a las 48 h. Tras 8 meses de seguimiento se encuentra asintomática, con tránsito digestivo y continencia fecal sin alteraciones. Conclusión: El abordaje laparoscópico para el tratamiento del prolapso rectal es seguro y ofrece las ventajas de la cirugía mini-invasiva. La rectopexia con malla protésica es un procedimiento técnicamente desafiante, aunque con mejores resultados alejados. (AU)

Introduction: There are multiple alternatives for the surgical treatment of rectal prolapse through fixation, resection or combined procedures. Although the perineal approach avoids access to the peritoneal cavity, it is associated with a higher recurrence rate than the abdominal approach. Description: The video shows a 66-year-old female patient, hysterectomized by laparotomy, with a 1-year history of reduciblefull-thickness rectal prolapse, without fecal incontinence or constipation. Preoperative endoscopy ruled out associated colonic pathology. The laparoscopic approach is done with the patient placed in Trendelenburg and tilted to the right. As usual in these cases, the presence of dolichosigma and deep Douglas pouch is observed, as well as the cesarean section scar. The procedure begins with the peritoneal opening at the level of the promontory and the mobilization of the rectosigmoid junction, identifying the left ureter. Circumferential dissection is continued after opening the peritoneal reflection up to the level of the vaginal vault. Rectopexy is performed according to the Orr-Loygue technique by fixing the mesh to both lateral aspects of the rectum on one side and to the sacral promontory on the other side with 2-0 polypropylene interrupted sutures, taking care not to injure the iliac vessels and ureters. Finally, the peritoneum is closed with a running suture with polyglactin to isolate the prosthetic mesh from the visceral content. The patient had a good postoperative outcome and was discharged at 48 h. After 8 months of follow-up, she is asymptomatic and has normal colonic transit and fecal continence. Conclusion: the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of rectal prolapse is safe and offers the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Prosthetic mesh rectopexy is a technically challenging procedure, although has better distant results. (AU)

AN EVALUATION OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ABDOMINAL MESH RECTOPEXY & DELORME'S PROCEDURE FOR RECTAL PROLAPSE AT TERTIARY HEALTH CARE CENTER.

Background: Rectal prolapse is protrusion of rectum through anal canal, and proccidentia ~ complete prolapse is the term used when full thickness rectal wall prolapse . 30 patients presenting with Materials and methods: mass per rectum were evaluated & diagnosed clinically as having rectal prolapse were included in the study. The recurrence rate for the abdominal mesh Results: rectopexy is considered to be lower than Perineal Delorme's procedure. There was no recurrence in the rectopexy group. There was 1 recurrence (10%) in Delorme's group. .Better outcomes achieved when treatment individualized to Conclusion: each patient. Abdominal rectopexy for patients who can tolerate laparotomy & significant constipation. .Delorme's considered in young patients with short prolapse but with acceptable recurrence rate.

Higher symptom score, larger residual rectocele, and lower rectal compliance predict failure of improvement after surgical treatment of rectocele

Background: Rectocele is a frequent finding in women and is usually asymptomatic. However, it is sometimes associated with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). While most patients with ODS due to rectocele respond well to conservative treatment, some may require surgical treatment. The aim of the study was to determine the predictors of failure of symptom improvement after rectocele repair. Methods: The study included adult women with rectocele who underwent surgical treatment by transperineal repair (TPR) or transvaginal repair (TVR). The preoperative and postoperative assessment was done using the Wexner constipation score, anorectal manometry, and defecography. Results: A total of 93 female patients with a mean age of 43.7 years were included. Among them, 65.6% of patients underwent TPR and 34.4% underwent TVR; 22 (23.7%) patients reported failure of significant improvement in ODS symptoms after surgery. The independent predictors of failure of improvement were higher preoperative Wexner score (odds ratio, OR: 1.4, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.09-1.84, p = 0.009), larger residual rectocele after repair (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.43-6.08, p = 0.003), and lower postoperative maximum tolerable volume (OR: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.907-0.992, p = 0.02). The predictive cutoff point for the preoperative Wexner score was 15. Conclusions: Patients with a preoperative Wexner score higher than 15 and larger residual rectocele after surgery may experience little improvement in symptoms after rectocele repair. Although TPR was associated with a poorer relief of symptoms than did TVR; it was not an independent predictor of failure. (AU)

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructive defecation with overt pelvic structural abnormalities / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) for obstructive defecation with overt pelvic structural abnormalities.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 31 obstructive defecation patients with overt pelvic structural abnormalities who were admitted to the Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from June 2014 to August 2020 were collected. There were 6 males and 25 females, aged 59(range, 32?81)years. All 31 patients underwent LVR through transabdominal approach. Observation indicators: (1) the Cleveland clinic constipation score (CCCS); (2) severity of obstructive defecation; (3) patients assessment of constipation quality of life (PAC-QoL). Follow-up was conducted using telephone interview and outpatient examination up to October 2021. One professional researcher assessed the constipation symptoms and quality of life of patients through outpatient interview or mobile software platform of Questionnaire Star. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range), and comparison before and after operation was conducted using the Wilcoxon sign rank test. Results:(1) The CCCS. All 31 patients underwent LVR for the first time and were followed up for 61.8(range, 11.0?87.0)months. The constipation symptoms of the 22 patients were improved. The CCCS of the 31 patients before surgery and at the last follow-up time were 15.8(range, 8.0?26.0) and 10.7(range, 2.0?20.0), respectively, showing a significant difference ( Z=?3.98, P<0.05). (2) Severity of obstructive defecation. The severity scores of frequency of bowel movements, difficult of bowel movements, sensation of incomplete defecation, abdominal distension or pain, time of each bowel movements, daily unsuccessful times of defecation, artificial assisted defecation for the 31 patients were 2.9(range, 1.0?4.0), 3.0(range, 1.0?4.0), 1.9(range, 0?3.0), 0.5(range, 0?3.0), 2.6(range, 2.0?4.0), 2.0(range, 0?4.0), 0.9 (range, 0?2.0) before surgery, versus 1.7(range, 0?4.0), 1.6(range, 0?4.0), 1.2(range, 0?4.0), 0.3(range, 0?3.0), 1.7(range, 0?3.0), 1.4(range, 0?3.0), 0.7(range, 0?2.0) after surgery, respectively. There were significant differences in the frequency of bowel movements, difficult of bowel movements, sensation of in-complete defecation, abdominal distension or pain, time of each bowel movements, daily unsuccessful times of defecation for the 31 patients before and after surgery ( Z=?3.38, ?3.80, ?2.54, ?2.31, ?3.64, ?2.75, P<0.05) and there was no significant difference in the artificial assisted defecation for the 31 patients before and after surgery ( Z=?1.31, P>0.05). (3) PAC-QoL. The score of physical discomfort, satisfaction, worries and concerns, psychological discomfort for the 31 patients were 2.3(range, 1.0?4.0), 3.2(range, 1.0?4.8), 2.2(range, 0.6?4.0), 1.8(range, 0.4?3.9) before surgery, versus 1.6(range, 0?4.0), 2.3(range, 0?4.0), 1.7(range, 0?4.0), 1.3(range, 0?4.0)after surgery, respectively, showing significant differences before and after surgery ( Z=?3.49, ?2.17, ?2.50, ?3.05, P<0.05). Conclusions:The long-term outcomes of LVR for obstructive defecation with overt pelvic structural abnorma-lities are satisfactory. Symptoms as frequency of bowel movements, difficult of bowel movements, sensation of incomplete defecation, abdominal distension or pain, time of each bowel movements and daily unsuccessful times of defecation will be significantly improved after LVR and the constipation quality of life of patients will be improved.

Laparoscopic Rectopexy – A New Management for Rectal Prolapse at the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation

Introduction:Rectal prolapse is a debilitating and unpleasant condition adversely affecting the quality of life. It is a distal displacement of the rectum through the pelvic diaphragm that produces pressure symptoms on other pelvic organs causing fecal incontinence, obstructive defecation, or even strangulation. Different perineal and abdominal approaches have been described for surgical correction of rectal prolapse. Laparoscopic Rectopexy has been proven to be an effective treatment for rectal prolapse. Objective:LPR has recently been practiced as a method of treatment for rectal prolapse at GPHC. This study aims to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of the patients who underwent Laparoscopic Rectopexy in the effort to highlight this practice in Guyana and the Caribbean. Design /Method:The study design includes a retrospective review and prospective follow-up of a series of 4 patients who underwent LPR at GPHC for rectal prolapse. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors surrounding the procedure were recorded and analyzed.Results:All patients were males of 29-52 years of age. One (1) Patient was a smoker and One (1) used alcohol. Two (2) patients had a previous perineal approach for rectal prolapse that recurred. No comorbidities were recorded. All patients had complete rectal procidentia. Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy was done for each patient. None of the cases were converted. All patients were fully ambulant by postoperative day one and all were discharged by postoperative day three. No short-term recurrence was recorded for three patients; the fourth patient did not complete the six months postoperative period. Conclusion: Laparoscopic Rectopexy was successfully pioneered at GPHC as a method of management for rectal prolapse with good outcomes

The effect of laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) based on pelvic anatomy for rectal internal mucosal prolapse / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) based on pelvic anatomy for rectal internal mucosal prolapse.Methods From Mar 2009 to Sep 2011.37 patients (group A) received taparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair based on pelvic anatomy,and group B (n =41) received laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair combined with PPH.Constipation level,degree of internal prolapse,relapse and postoperative complications were assessed in 5 years after operation.Results 5 years after operation,the relief of constipation and the improvement of internal prolapse in group B were better than in group A [(-0.4 ± 0.9) cm vs.(-1.0 ± 1.1) cm,t =2.370,P =0.020].The recurrence rate in group B was statistically lower than that in group A (10％ vs.30％,x2 =4.995,P =0.025).Grade Ⅰ to Grade Ⅲ complications between the two groups was not statistically different (11％ vs.12％,x2 =0.037,P =0.848).Conclusions The effect of laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair combined with PPH based on pelvic anatomy for rectal internal mucosal prolapse was superior to laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch repair.

Laparoscopic Posterolateral Rectopexy for the Treatment of Patients With a Full Thickness Rectal Prolapse: Experience With 63 Patients and Short-term Outcomes

PURPOSE: Although numerous procedures have been proposed for the treatment of patients with a rectal prolapse, the most effective operation has not yet been established. Minimal rectal mobilization can prevent constipation; however, it is associated with increased recurrence rates. We describe our novel method for a laparoscopic posterolateral rectopexy, which includes rectal mobilization with a posterior-right unilateral dissection, suture fixation to the sacral promontory with a polypropylene mesh (Optilene), and a mesorectal fascia propria that is as wide as possible. The present report describes our novel method and assesses the short-term outcomes of patients. METHODS: Between June 2014 and June 2017, 63 patients (28 males and 35 females) with a full-thickness rectal prolapse underwent a laparoscopic posterolateral (LPL) rectopexy. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and postoperative complications in those patients. The outcome of surgery was determined by evaluating the answers on fecal incontinence questionnaires, the results of anal manometry preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, the patients’ satisfaction scores (0–10), and the occurrence of constipation. RESULTS: No recurrence was reported during follow-up (3.26 months), and 3 patients reported postoperative complications (wound infection, postoperative sepsis, which was successfully treated with conservative management, and retrograde ejaculation). Compared to the preoperative baseline, fecal incontinence at three months postoperatively showed an overall improvement. The mean patient satisfaction score was 9.55 ± 0.10, and 8 patients complained of persistent constipation. CONCLUSION: LPL rectopexy is a safe, effective method showing good functional outcomes by providing firm, solid fixation for patients with a full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Synthetic Versus Biological Mesh-Related Erosion After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: This review reports the incidence of mesh-related erosion after ventral mesh rectopexy to determine whether any difference exists in the erosion rate between synthetic and biological mesh. METHODS: A systematic search of the MEDLINE and the Ovid databases was conducted to identify suitable articles published between 2004 and 2015. The search strategy capture terms were laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, laparoscopic anterior rectopexy, robotic ventral rectopexy, and robotic anterior rectopexy. RESULTS: Eight studies (3,956 patients) were included in this review. Of those patients, 3,517 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) using synthetic mesh and 439 using biological mesh. Sixty-six erosions were observed with synthetic mesh (26 rectal, 32 vaginal, 8 recto-vaginal fistulae) and one (perineal erosion) with biological mesh. The synthetic and the biological mesh-related erosion rates were 1.87% and 0.22%, respectively. The time between rectopexy and diagnosis of mesh erosion ranged from 1.7 to 124 months. No mesh-related mortalities were reported. CONCLUSION: The incidence of mesh-related erosion after LVR is low and is more common after the placement of synthetic mesh. The use of biological mesh for LVR seems to be a safer option; however, large, multicenter, randomized, control trials with long follow-ups are required if a definitive answer is to be obtained.

Laparoscopic Vaginal Suspension and Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic procedures for the treatment of patients with a rectal prolapse have gained increasing worldwide acceptance because they have lower recurrence and better functional outcome than perineal procedures. Nevertheless, ideal surgical methods are still not available. We propose a new surgical technique, laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy, for correcting a full-thickness rectal prolapse and/or middle-compartment prolapse. This study assessed the short-term outcomes for patients who underwent laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy. METHODS: Between April 2014 and April 2016, 69 female patients underwent laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy to correct a rectal prolapse. Demographics, medical histories, and surgical and follow-up details were collected from their medical records. In addition to the clinical outcome, we repeated defecation proctography and a questionnaire regarding functional results three months after surgery. RESULTS: No major morbidities or no mortalities occurred. The defecation proctography confirmed excellent anatomical result in all cases. Of 7 patients with combined middle-compartment prolapses, we observed good anatomical correction. During follow-up, full-thickness recurrence occurred in one patient. Preoperative fecal incontinence was improved significantly at 3 months (mean Wexner score: 12.35 vs. 7.71; mean FISI: 33.29 vs. 21.07; P < 0.001). Analysis of responses to the fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQOL) questionnaire showed overall improvement at 3 months compared to the preoperative baseline (mean pre- and postoperative FIQOL scores: 12.11 vs. 14.39; P < 0.004). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy is a new combined procedure for the treatment of patients with rectal prolapses. It has excellent functional outcomes and minimal morbidity and can correct and prevent middlecompartment prolapses.

Laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch elevation associated with the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) for complete rectal prolapse in adults / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To analyze postoperative effect of a new rectopexy technique with Douglas pouch elevation for complete rectal prolapse (CRP) in adults.Methods From January 2010 to May 2011, 52 CRP cases were treated by rectopexy with Douglas pouch elevation.In terms of different surgical techniques, patients were divided into two groups : Group A (n =28) received laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch elevation;and Group B (n =24) received laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch elevation combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH).Rectal prolapse, constipation, and fecal incontinence in the two groups were assessed respectively before surgery, and on the 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery, postoperative complications were evaluated with severe grading of surgical complications.Results Symptoms of rectal prolapse disappeared at half a year after surgery in all patients, and relapsed to different extent afterwards.However, two years after operation, the status of rectal prolapse in Group B tended to be stable.The trend of constipation after surgery was consistent with that of rectal prolapse.In addition, fecal continence improved gradually on half a year after surgery in the two groups and recovered to the optimal status in the first postoperative year.However, in the second year, the results of fecal incontinence reduced slightly in Groups A, and Group B became stable.Two years after surgery, four cases in Groups A relapsed while there was no recurrence in Group B.Difference of Grade I to Grade Ⅲ complications among the two groups was statistically insignificant (x2 =0.05, P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions The clinical effect of laparoscopic rectopexy with Douglas pouch elevation associated with the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) is better than that without PPH for female and male CRP patients with severe symptoms.

Prolapso rectal, abordaje laparoscópico: un tratamiento simple y efectivo / Rectal prolapse, laparoscopic approach: a simple and effective treatment

Antecedentes: El prolapso rectal es una afectación poco frecuente. La elección del procedimiento depende de la edad y estado del paciente. El abordaje abdominal ofrece mejores resultados funcionales y menor recidiva. La laparoscopía, en los últimos, años ha agregado las ventajas de una técnica mínimamente invasiva favoreciendo una rápida recuperación. Objetivos: Evaluar los resultados de una serie de pacientes con prolapso rectal que fueron abordados por laparoscopía, utilizando una técnica de promontopexia simple y efectiva. Material y Métodos: Se diseño un estudio retrospectivo, observacional y longitudinal de una serie sucesiva de casos, durante el período comprendido entre diciembre de 2001 a marzo de 2011. Se evaluaron 25 pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente con diagnóstico de prolapso total de recto mediante abordaje laparoscópico. Los resultados anátomo-funcionales se evaluaron antes y después de la cirugía con una escala diseñada especialmente. Se analizaron como variables la corrección anatómica del prolapso, la recurrencia, los resultados funcionales, el índice de conversión, el riesgo anestesiológico, el tiempo quirúrgico, la morbilidad, y la mortalidad. Se definió recidiva a la aparición de prolapso completo luego de la cirugía. Considerando por separado la recidiva mucosa. Resultados: Se incluyeron 25 pacientes, 15 de sexo femenino y 10 masculino. La media de edad de la serie fue de 51.4 (18-87) años. 17 (68%) pacientes tenían constipación y 8 (32%) incontinencia. En 20 casos se realizó rectopexia sola sin resección, en los 5 casos restantes se agrego resección sigmoidea a la fijación. El tiempo operatorio medio fue 110 min (50-155); sin complicaciones intraoperatoria ni conversiones. La morbilidad temprana fue 4% por un caso de hemoperitoneo postoperatorio. No registrándose morbilidad alejada ni mortalidad. La media de la estadía hospitalaria fue de 2,6 (6-1) días. Con una media de seguimiento de 39 (6-96) meses...

Background: Rectal prolapse is a rare affectation. The choice of procedure depends on the age and condition of the patient. The abdominal approach offers better functional results and recurrence. Laparoscopy in recent years has added benefits of a minimally invasive technique favoring a rapid recovery. Objectives: Evaluate the results of a series of patients with rectal prolapse who were approached by laparoscopy technique using a simple and effective promontopexy. Material and Methods: It was designed a retrospective, observational and longitudinal a successive series of cases during the period from December 2001 to March 2011. We evaluated 25 patients who underwent surgery with a diagnosis of rectal prolapse by total laparoscopic approach. The anatomical and functional results were evaluated before and after surgery with a specially designed scale. Variables were analyzed as anatomical correction of prolapse, recurrence, functional results, the conversion rate, the risk anesthesiologist, surgical time, morbidity and mortality. Recurrence was defined as the apparition of complete prolapse after surgery. Considering separately mucosa recurrence. Results: We included 25 patients, 15 female and 10 male. The mean age of the series was 51.4 (18-87) years. Seventeen (68%) patients had constipation and 8 (32%) incontinence. In 20 patients underwent resection rectopexy alone without resection. In the remaining five cases were added to the fixing sigmoid resection. The mean operative time was 110 min (50-155), without intraoperative complications or conversions . Early morbility was 4% for a case of postoperative hemoperitoneum, without registration of morbility or mortality remote. The mean hospital stay was 2.6 (6-1) days. With a mean follow up of 39 (6-96) months. Were recorded three mucosal prolapse that were resolved with elastic ligatures...

Surgical Treatment of Rectal Prolapse

Rectal prolapse is defined as a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anus. Although rectal prolapse was recognized as early as 1500 BC, the optimal surgical procedure is still debated. The varied operative procedures available for treating rectal prolapsed can be confusing. The aim of treatment is to control the prolapse, restore continence, and prevent constipation or impaired evacuation. In elderly and high-risk patients, perineal approaches, such as Delorme's operation and Altemeier's operation, have been preferred, although the incidence of recurrence and the rate of persistent incontinence seem to be high when compared with transabdominal procedures. Abdominal operations involve dissection and fixation of the rectum and may include a rectosigmoid resection. From the late twentieth century, the laparoscopic procedure has been applied to the treatment of rectal prolapse. Current laparoscopic surgical techniques include suture rectopexy, stapled rectopexy, posterior mesh rectopexy with artificial material, and resection of the sigmoid colon with colorectal anastomosis with or without rectopexy. The choice of surgery depends on the status of the patient and the surgeon's preference.

A Case of Penetration of Mesh after Rectopexy and This Was Found by Colonoscopy / 대한소화기내시경학회지

Rectal prolapse is a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anal canal. Since rectal prolapse is a surgical disease, it is mostly diagnosed and treated at the surgical department. However, when surgical complications occur or they are suspected after an operation for colorectal disease, colonoscopy may now have a role in diagnosing the actual status of the problem. We present here the case of penetration of mesh at the distal rectum that was incidentally diagnosed by colonoscopy and the patient had previously undergone presacral rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Only one such case has been reported abroad and there has been no such case report in Korea. We report here on a case for which colonoscopy had a crucial role in diagnosing an occult complication after a colorectal operation that used a prosthesis.

Laparoscopic Rectopexy with Peritoneal Strips for Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To explore the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic rectopexy with peritoneal strips for severe complete rectal prolapse (SCRP) in children. Methods From August 2004 to October 2008,6 patients (aged 2 to 6 years with a mean of 3.5) with SCRP were treated in our hospital. The clinical data of the patients were reviewed. Under the laparoscope,two L-shaped peritoneal strips with the pedicle were cut from the incrassated and slack peritoneum of the pelvic cavity on bilateral sites of the rectum,and then were folded and sutured with the lateral wall of the free rectum with the ends being stitched on the fascia in front of the sacral promontory to suspend the rectum. Afterwards,the incisal margin of the peritoneum was sutured together with the anterior wall of the rectum in order to embed the peritoneal strips and reconstruct the pelvic peritoneum. Results All of the 6 cases of laparoscopy were completed successfully with a mean operation time of (120?24) min (ranged from 95 to 210 min). The blood loss was less than 10 ml in all of the cases. The patients received a mean of 28-month follow-up (range,6 to 54 months),during the period,none of them had recurrence or abnormal bowel movement. Conclusions Laparoscopic rectopexy with peritoneal strips is an effective and satisfactory treatment for SCRP with minimal invasion,quick recovery and a low-recurrence rate.

Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to eveluate the early results of the laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse. METHODS: From May 1999 to July 2001, laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSR) was successfully performed in 26 patients and the results were compared to those of 5 patients with open suture rectopexy (OSR) and 6 patients with open resection rectopexy (ORR). Preoperative and postoperative functional assessment included Wexner's incontinence score, constipation score, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: Immediate postoperative morbidity was minimal in all groups. Bowel function was resumed significantly sooner (P=0.001), the numbers of the analgesics injection were significantly fewer (P<0.001) and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (P<0.001) in the LSR than in the open groups. Postoperatively, the anal resting and squeezing pressures increased slightly and Wexner's incontinence score decreased significantly in all groups of patients. Constipation score decreased slightly in all groups of patients after surgery. There was one mucosal prolapse recurrence after surgery in the LSR. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse can be performed safely. Recovery is uneventful and of shorter duration after the laparoscopic than after the open approach. Functional results are obtained similarly with both approaches.