ABSTRACT
Objective@#To analyze the clinical characteristics of recurrent thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) to probe the risk factors for recurrent thrombosis in patients with ET and PV.@*Methods@#The clinical data of 104 ET and PV patients with thrombosis in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from February 2001 to November 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Thrombosis reoccurred in 38 patients. Statistical analyses were performed by multivariate logistic regression for risk factors of recurrent thrombosis in ET and PV patients.@*Results@#Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 36.5% of patients with ET/PV, the total incidence rate in ET and PV patients was 9.8% patient-years, 12.3% patient-years and 5.7% patient-years in ET and PV respectively. There were a total of 56 re-thrombotic events, and 42.1% of events occurred within 1 year after the first thrombosis. The arterial re-thrombosis was 97.4% (most of acute coronary syndrome, ACS), and venous events was 2.6%. The most common cases of re-thrombosis were ACS in ET patients (18 cases, 64.3%), and cerebral infarction in PV patients (7 cases, 70.0%). The number of PV patients with 2 times or more re-thrombotic events was significantly higher than that of ET patients (9 cases, 90.0% vs 7 cases, 25.0%). The proportion of the patients with WBC>12.5×109/L or Hct>45%, and thrombosis history or splenomegaly and high risk thrombotic events were higher than those with a single thrombus (52.6% vs 31.8%; 50.0% vs 30.0%; 86.8% vs 13.6%; 84.2% vs 33.3%; 52.6% vs 15.2%; 94.7% vs 53.0%; P values were 0.036,0.046, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that thrombosis history (OR=13.697, P=0.025), splenomegaly (OR=13.301, P=0.034) and high risk stratification of thrombotic events (OR=44.618, P=0.025) were independent risk factors for recurrent thrombotic events.@*Conclusions@#ET and PV patients had a higher risk of re-thrombosis. The incidence of re-thrombosis in ET was higher than in PV, ACS was more common cases of re-thrombotic events; but PV patients were more susceptible to multiple re-thromboses than ET ones, also with more cerebral infarction. Previous thrombus history, splenomegaly and high risk stratification of thrombotic events were independent risk predictors for re-thrombosis of ET and PV patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics of recurrent thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) to probe the risk factors for recurrent thrombosis in patients with ET and PV. Methods: The clinical data of 104 ET and PV patients with thrombosis in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from February 2001 to November 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Thrombosis reoccurred in 38 patients. Statistical analyses were performed by multivariate logistic regression for risk factors of recurrent thrombosis in ET and PV patients. Results: Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 36.5% of patients with ET/PV, the total incidence rate in ET and PV patients was 9.8% patient-years, 12.3% patient-years and 5.7% patient-years in ET and PV respectively. There were a total of 56 re-thrombotic events, and 42.1% of events occurred within 1 year after the first thrombosis. The arterial re-thrombosis was 97.4% (most of acute coronary syndrome, ACS), and venous events was 2.6%. The most common cases of re-thrombosis were ACS in ET patients (18 cases, 64.3%), and cerebral infarction in PV patients (7 cases, 70.0%). The number of PV patients with 2 times or more re-thrombotic events was significantly higher than that of ET patients (9 cases, 90.0% vs 7 cases, 25.0%). The proportion of the patients with WBC>12.5×10(9)/L or Hct>45%, and thrombosis history or splenomegaly and high risk thrombotic events were higher than those with a single thrombus (52.6% vs 31.8%; 50.0% vs 30.0%; 86.8% vs 13.6%; 84.2% vs 33.3%; 52.6% vs 15.2%; 94.7% vs 53.0%; P values were 0.036,0.046, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that thrombosis history (OR=13.697, P=0.025), splenomegaly (OR=13.301, P=0.034) and high risk stratification of thrombotic events (OR=44.618, P=0.025) were independent risk factors for recurrent thrombotic events. Conclusions: ET and PV patients had a higher risk of re-thrombosis. The incidence of re-thrombosis in ET was higher than in PV, ACS was more common cases of re-thrombotic events; but PV patients were more susceptible to multiple re-thromboses than ET ones, also with more cerebral infarction. Previous thrombus history, splenomegaly and high risk stratification of thrombotic events were independent risk predictors for re-thrombosis of ET and PV patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Polycythemia Vera , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Thrombocythemia, Essential , ThrombosisABSTRACT
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, recurrent thrombosis, and fetal loss. Antiphospholipid antibodies are a family of autoantibodies that recognize various combinations of phospholipids, phospholipid-binding proteins, or both. APS can occur in the absence of underlying or associated disease (primary APS) or in combination with other diseases (secondary APS). The exact pathogenic mechanism by which these antibodies cause thrombosis is not known; however, several hypotheses, such as activation of platelet and endothelial cells and interference with the coagulation system, have been proposed. Diagnosis is based on the presence of at least one clinical and laboratory criterion each, according to International Consensus Statement on preliminary classification criteria. However, APS can be diagnosed in individuals even in the absence of some of the classification criteria. Clinical manifestations involve different organs and systems such as the blood vessels, central nervous system, skin, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, heart, and placenta. The unifying mechanism of all these manifestations is thrombosis, either arterial or venous. Skin manifestations are varied and although not included in the diagnostic criteria, may be the presenting feature of this syndrome. Therefore all dermatologists should investigate the possibility of APS when cutaneous findings are related to venous or arterial thrombosis. The risk of thrombosis cannot be predicted, and therefore treatment is not initiated until a thrombotic event occurs. Indefinite anticoagulation is prescribed once a thrombotic event occurs. Prognosis depends on the severity of the clinical manifestations and so, knowledge of the presentation of this disease is important for early detection and prompt treatment to prevent life-threatening consequences of this catastrophic disease process.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: determinar si la presencia de valores persistentemente positivos de anticuerpos antifosfolipídicos (AAF) está relacionada con trombosis recurrente en el seguimiento de pacientes con síndrome antifosfolipídico (SAF). Métodos: se analizaron 141 pacientes con SAF (criterios de Sapporo). Los valores de anticoagulante lúpico (AL) y anticuerpos anticardiolipina (AAC) fueron definidos como persistentemente positivos cuando más del 75% de las determinaciones fueron positivas durante el seguimiento (los AAF fueron medidos en cinco o más ocasiones). La trombosis en el seguimiento fue definida como una trombosis recurrente en pacientes con episodios trombóticos previos o nuevos episodios en aquellos pacientes con pérdidas fetales previas. Resultados: ochenta y nueve pacientes presentaban SAF primario, 34 asociado a lupus eritema-toso sistémico (LES), 14 con síndrome similar al lupus, 3 con síndrome de Sjogren y 1 con enfermedad de Beh
Objective: to determine if the presence of persistently positive valúes of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies is related with recurrent thrombosis in the follow-up of patíent with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Patients and Methods: 141 patients with APS (Sapporo's criteria) were analyzed. Lupus antico-agulant (LAC) valúes and anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) were defined as persistently positive when more than 75% of determinations were positive during the follow-up (aPL were measured on 5 or more occasions). Thrombosis in the follow-up was defined as a recurrent thrombosis in patient with previous thrombotic events or new events in those patients with previous fetal losses. Results: 89 patients suffered from primary APS, 34 associated to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 14 to SLE-like, 3 to Sjogren's syndrome, and 1 to Behcet's disease. 56% liad a history of thrombosis, 29% of fetal losses, and 15% both thrombosis and fetal losses. Median time of follow-up and between the diagnosis and the last aPL determination was 68 months and 65 months (9-180), respectively. Median of determinations by patient was 8 (5-27). 31 patients suffered from thrombosis in the follow-up, 28 of them in form of recurrent thrombosis. 58 (41%) patients liad persistently positive aPL during follow-up, thus: 23 (39,65%) aCL IgG y LAC, 12 (20,7%) LAC, 8 (13,8%) aCL IgG, 5 (8,6%) aCL IgM, aCL IgG y LAC, 4 (6,9%) aCL IgM, 3 (5,1%) aCL IgG y aCL IgM y 3 (5,1%) aCL IgM y LAC, respectively. Risk for recurrent thrombosis during follow-up was increased in persistently positive aPL patients (OR 3,53; 95% CI 1,53-8,16; p=0,003) compared with transiently positive aPL patients. This higher risk was attributable to persistently positive LA (OR 3,87; 95% CI 1,68-8,91; p=0,002) and persistently positive aCL IgG (OR 2,91; 95% CI 1,25-6,75; p=0,02). The profile of persistently positive aPL related with the appearance of thrombosis during follow-up was the combination of IgG aCL & LA (OR 3,51; 95% CI 1,36-9,09; p=0,01). Conclusions: the risk of thrombosis during follow-up is increased in patients with persistently positive aPL, specially in those with the combination of IgG aCL & LA.