Straminipilous organisms growing on herbivorous pirapitinga (Piaractus brachypomus) and carnivorous piranha (Pygocentrus nattereri) from Poland / Organismos stramenophila em crescimento na herbívora pirapitinga (Piaractus brachypomus) e na carnívora piranha (Pygocentrus nattereri) da Polônia

We investigated the growth of straminipilous organisms on the skin, muscles and liver of herbivorous pirapitinga (Piaractus brachypomus) and carnivorous piranha (Pygocentrus nattereri) in water of three different eutrophication levels. Sixteen straminipilous organism species were found growing on the investigated body parts of both species of fish used as baits. The higher number of species was found on the baits of carnivorous species (15) when compared with the ones from the herbivorous pirapitinga (10 species). The highest number of straminipilous organisms species developed on the skin of both species of fish. The highest number of species of straminipilous organisms was observed growing in the water of the BiaBa river (middle eutrophication), while the lowest number occurred in the baits of vessels with water from the Dojlidy pond (low eutrophication).

Investigamos o crescimento de organismos stramenophila sobre a pele, músculos e fígado da herbívora pirapitinga (Piaractus brachypomus) e da carnívora piranha (Pygocentrus nattereri) em águas de três diferentes níveis de eutrofização. Dezesseis espécies de organismos stramenophila foram encontradas crescendo sobre as partes do corpo investigadas de ambas as espécies de peixes utilizadas como cobaias. O maior número de espécies foi encontrado em cobaias de espécies carnívoras (15), quando comparado com o da herbívora pirapitinga (10 espécies). A maioria das espécies de organismos stramenophila desenvolveu-se sobre a pele de ambas as espécies de peixes. O maior número de espécies de organismos stramenophila foi observado em crescimento nas águas do rio BiaBa (eutrofização do meio), enquanto o número mais baixo ocorreu em cobaias de vasos com água do lago de Dojlidy (eutrofização baixa).

Aspectos ecológicos de endoparasitos de piranha vermelha (Pygocentrus nattereri, Kner, 1860) proveniente do rio Cuiabá / Ecological aspects of endoparasites in red piranha (Pygocentrus nattereri Kner, 1860) from Cuiabá river, Mato Grosso, Brazil

This study evaluated the infrapopulations of parasites in red piranha (Pygocentrus nattereri) from theCuiabá river, Mato Grosso, Brazil. One hundred sixty-four specimens of red piranha were captured and examined in the period from October to December, 2007 in Barão de Melgaço, Mato Grosso, Brazil. The parasitism was reviewed by data of prevalence, localization, mean intensity of infection, and abundancefor each group of parasite found. In the examined fishes, nematodes (Eustrongylides spp., Contracaecum spp,. and Procamallanus spp.) and pentastomids were found. Among the examined fishes, 141 (86 percent) presented parasitism by at least one species of parasite; from those, 23 (14 percent) by nematodes identified as Eustrongylides spp., 106 (64.6 percent) by Contracaecum spp., 55 (33.5 percent) by Procamallanus spp., and 90 (54.9 percent) by pentastomids. About the localization of the parasites, from the 23 fishes positive to the infection by Eustrongylides spp., 19 (82.6 percent) presented larvae in the muscle, two (8.7 percent)in the celomatic cavity, and two (8.7 percent) in the air bladder. From the 106 fishes positive to the infection by larvae of Contracacecum spp., 105 (99 percent) presented the celomatic cavity as the locus of parasitism, and one (0.9 percent) presented the parasitism in the air bladder. All the fishes positives to the infection by Procamallanus spp., presented the intestine as parasitism site. From the 90 fishes parasited by pentastomids, 41 (45.6 percent) presented the parasitism in the muscle, 17 (18.9 percent) in the celomatic cavity, and 32 (35.6 percent) in the air bladder. The mean intensities of infection by larvae of Contracaecum spp. and Eustrongylides spp., Procamallanus spp., and pentastomids were 1.04; 3.93; 2.27; and 3.72 parasites per fish, respectively, and the abundance values were 0.14; 2.54; 0.76; and 2.04 parasites per fish, respectively.