ABSTRACT
RESUMEN La infección intraabdominal posoperatoria, es un problema de salud a escala mundial y precisa de atención multidisciplinaria para corregirla. Su complejidad radica en el diagnóstico precoz y la relaparotomía para controlarla. Es una complicación de la cirugía abdominal, cuya atención clínico quirúrgica integral compete a cirujanos generales, cirujanos pediátricos, obstetras, proctólogos, urólogos, imagenólogos, anestesiólogos e intensivistas. Se impone por tanto en los médicos tratantes, el dominio de aspectos esenciales, como parte de la superación profesional permanente y continuada que les permita garantizar la necesaria calidad atencional del afectado, como única vía para disminuir las altas tasas de morbilidad y mortalidad debido a esta temida afección.
ABSTRACT Postoperative intra-abdominal infection is a global health problem and requires multidisciplinary care to correct it. Its complexity lies in the early diagnosis and relaparotomy to control it. It is a complication of abdominal surgery, whose comprehensive clinical surgical care is the responsibility of general surgeons, pediatric surgeons, obstetricians, proctologists, urologists, imaging specialists, anesthesiologists, and intensivists. Therefore, the mastery of essential aspects is necessary on the treating doctors, as part of the permanent and continuous professional improvement that allows them to guarantee the necessary quality of care of the affected, as the only way to reduce the high rates of morbidity and mortality due to this dreaded condition.
ABSTRACT
Background: Relaparotomy after emergency surgery is a catastrophic situation associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Incidence is highly variable depending not only on hospital set up but also on the patient’s characteristics as well as on the initial surgery and postoperative care given. This study was thus, planned to identify the indications, procedure, risk factors and outcomes of relaparotomy so that timely intervention can lower incidence and morbidity.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in department of general surgery, Gandhi Medical College and associated Hamidia Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. All patients irrespective of age and sex, who have undergone emergency re-exploration of the abdomen during the period of hospitalization after the first operation and discharge of patients. Data were recorded in pre-validated case record form.Results: 32 cases of relaparotomy were identified. All patients had emergency laparotomy as primary surgery. Majority of patients required relaparotomy for anastomotic site leak in 16 cases (50%) followed by intestinal obstruction in 10 cases (31%), hemorrhage in 4 cases (16%) while the least cause being intra-abdominal sepsis in 2 cases (6.2%). Relaparotomy was associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Out of 32 patients, 4 (12.5%) patients died.Conclusions: Relaparotomy is a rare complication and a lifesaving procedure for patients. Calculative experience guided decision on relaparotomy can decrease the incidence of morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure.
ABSTRACT
Background: Relaparotomy in obstetrics following caesarean section or laparotomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality and hence, considered as maternal near miss. Selection of patient for the same is crucial. This study was done to know the incidence, indications, the risk factors, intraoperative procedures and mortality rates of relaparotomy.Methods: A retrospective analysis of relaparotomy after primary obstetric surgery over a period of two and half years (June 2016 to November 2018) was done in department of obstetrics and gynecology of Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, India.Results: During study period 28 cases of relaparotomy (18 inhouse and 10 referred cases) were identified. The incidence of relaparotomy was 0.24%. Intraperitoneal hemorrhage (39.2%) was commonest indication of reoperations followed by PPH (17.8%), rectus sheath hematoma (14.8%) and burst abdomen (10.7%). Obstructed labor (32.1%) was commonest indication of primary cesarean. Hysterectomy was required in 8 cases (25.7%), evacuation of blood for hemoperitoneum was required in another 8 cases. Most cases of hemorrhage were reopened within 24 hours, whereas most case of the rectus sheath hematoma, burst abdomen, and broad ligament hematoma were reopened between 5-9 days.Conclusions: Relaparotomy is often a lifesaving procedure. Decision to perform and manage relaparotomy should always be done by senior obstetricians. Meticulous surgical techniques to secure hemostasis at time of primary surgery should be adopted. Strict postoperative vigilance, is of utmost importance for early detection of intraperitoneal hemorrhage and other complications requiring relaparotomy as timely intervention.
ABSTRACT
After abdominal surgery some patient's needs relaparotomy for complications developed postoperatively. Aim of this study was to determine the risk factors causing re-laparotomy, the indications, management and outcomes of relaparotomy admitting in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department in Faridpur Medical College Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital where all complicated patients are referred for management from surrounding districts hospital. It was a cross sectional study done during the period of January 2011 to December 2011, All the cases among which relaparotomy were done after primary surgery were recorded using a protocol prepared for the study. Data was analyzed. Total 6304 patients were admitted in emergency way in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of Faridpur Medical College Hospital. Among them 1864 patients undergone emergency operations, here 15 patients needed re-laparotomy. The incidence of re-laparotomy was 0.80%. Indications of relaparotomy included internal hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), retained foreign body, incorrect diagnosis at first laparotomy, intraabdominal collection of pus and urine, Rectus sheath haematoma and burst abdomen. Often more than one procedure was needed to manage the cases. Re-laparotomy causes much morbidity & mortality with increase in hospital stay and cost. Careful selection of cases for primary operation, expertise of the surgeon, good surgical technique and careful postoperative follow-up can reduce the need for re-laparotomy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analysis the 10 cases of relaparotomy for intractable hemorrhage after emergency postpartum hysterectomy with massive transfusion. METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 2008, relaparotomies for intractable hemorrhage and unstable vital sign after emergency postpartum hysterectomy with massive transfusion were performed on 10 patients. Medical records were reviewed and detailed to collect clinical data including patients' clinical status, causes of bleeding, duration from hysterectomy to relaparotomy, bleeding sites, procedures for bleeding control, amount of transfusions, complications and prognosis. RESULTS: In relaparotomies, the points of bleeding were identified in all cases and multiple bleeding foci than one bleeding focus were found, and procedures for bleeding control were performed. In 8 cases, the bleeding were controlled successfully and these patients recovered without long term sequales. But in the other 2 cases, although the bleeding controls were successful during relaparotomy and bleeding amount decreased after relaparotomy, but bleeding amount increased the next day and angiographic embolizations were performed. These patients died due to multi-organ failure and continued bleeding. In one of these cases, the endotracheal intubation had been done on arrival at our hospital with postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery at private clinic. In another case, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed on arriving at our hospital with intractable bleeding after postpartum subtotal hysterectomy in other hospital. CONCLUSION: In most cases, bleeding controls for intractable bleeding after postpartum hysterectomy were successful during and after relaparotomy in spite of development of dilutional coagulopthy due to massive transfusion, and resulted in rapid recovery and good prognosis. Even though dilutional coagulopthy was developed because of massive transfusion, relaparotomy was safe and effective procedure for management of intractable hemorrhage after emergency postpartum hysterectomy with clotting factor replacement. If personnel and adequate clotting factor replacement are available, relaparotomy should not be delayed for management of intractable hemorrhage and unstable vital sign after emergency postpartum hysterectomy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Emergencies , Hemorrhage , Hysterectomy , Intubation, Intratracheal , Medical Records , Postpartum Hemorrhage , Postpartum Period , Prognosis , Vital SignsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There has been a general feeling among surgeons that recurrence or metastasis following a curative gastric resection is a hopeless surgical proposition. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical features and significance of relaparotomy following a gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: Fifty-six cases of relaparotomies following resection for 53 gastric cancer patients, which were performed over a nine-year period, were investigated retrospectively. On preoperative diagnosis, there were 17 cases of remnant and anastomotic recurrence, 15 cases of intestinal obstruction, 7 cases of cholecystitis, 7 cases of rectosigmoid obstruction, 5 cases of E-loop obstruction and 5 cases of other diseases. RESULTS: Of all the laparotomies eleven cases (19%) were non-recurrence, benign diseases and forty-six (81%) were recurrence. In the 17 cases of remnant and anastomotic recurrence, re-resection was possible in 13 (76%) and major postoperative complications developed in 4 cases with 2 cases of death within one month. Also 6 of 7 re-resected cases which was stage I at first operation were still alive well. In 15 cases of mechanical obstruction, 5 cases were non-recurrence and 10 cases involved recurrence, of which 6 had a bypass or enterostomy and 4 an exploration only. All cholecystitis cases had a cholecystectomy; metastasis was found in 2 cases. Rectal obstruction and E-loop obstruction all involved recurrence and a palliative resection was possible in only one case of each type of obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: In a relaparotomy of remnant and anastomotic recurrence, most of the survival-improving re-resection cases were in stage I at the first operation. In late-onset cholecystitis tumor recurrence should be suspected and a relaparotomy of the malignant obstruction, with bypass and ostomy procedure, can be justified for symptomatic relief.