Prevalence of Different Clinical Variants of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children 1–18 Years of Age in Tertiary Care Hospital of North India

Introduction: Childhood nephrotic syndrome has an incidence of 90–100 per million population of India. This study was conducted with the primary objective of studying the prevalence of different clinical variants of childhood nephrotic syndrome (new-onset steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome/infrequent relapsing nephrotic syndrome [IFRNS]/frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome [FRNS]/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome [SDNS]/steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome [SRNS]), while the secondary objectives were to estimate the prevalence of use of steroid-sparing drugs in those with FRNS and SDNS. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of all patients referred to renal diseases clinic at Government Medical College, Jammu, was done. Records of 61 children of 1–18 years of age fulfilling the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children criteria for nephrotic syndrome attending to our nephrology clinic were reviewed over 1 year period. Standard definitions for new-onset nephrotic syndrome, IFRNS, FRNS, SDNS, and SRNS were used. Steroid-sparing drugs used were levamisole in FRNS and low-dose SDNS whereas cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and tacrolimus in high-dose SDNS. Results: Among nephrotic syndrome, patients mean age of presentation was 5.95 years, with M: F ratio of 1.77:1. Infrequent relapsers (27.9%) were the most prevalent clinical variant followed by steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (24.6%) and new-onset nephrotic syndrome (21.3%). Prednisolone alone was successful in achieving remission in 50.8% of total cases and less commonly involving use of other immunosuppressants with prednisolone such as levamisole (23%), cyclophosphamide (9.8%), and tacrolimus in (3.3%). However, prednisolone in combination with cyclophosphamide and then MMF was used in 14 (23%) in an aim to achieve full remission, but full remission was achieved in 48 (78.7%). Conclusion: In the present study, clinical profile of children with nephrotic syndrome was concordant with typical nephrotic syndrome in children. Pattern of nephrotic syndrome differs in our population in terms of increased number with SDNS and response to treatment did not differ significantly from other studies.

Bone mineral density in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.

Objective. To observe the influence of prednisolone treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Methods. Duel-energy X-ray absorptiometry of lumbar spine (L1-L4) was performed on 40 patients (18 first episode and 22 relapsers) of steroid sensitive idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Results. Patients of first episode and relapsers had comparable values of mean age, weight, height, body mass index, serum calcium, phosphate, spine area, bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD. Relapsing nephrotic syndrome patients received significantly higher mean total cumulative dose of prednisolone in comparison to first episode (p<0.001). The BMD Z-scores were normal in 39 of 40 (97.5%) patients. On regression analysis, it was found that both BMC and BMD did not correlate with cumulative dose of prednisolone, when other co-variants such as age, weight, height and spine area were adjusted. Conclusion. Bone mineral density in steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome is unaffected by cumulative dose of prednisolone therapy both in first episode as well as relapser group of patients.

Management of HCV infection: Current issues and future options.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common cause of chronic liver disease (CLD). Presently the standard regime comprises a combination of PEG-IFN and ribavirin. Sustained virologic response (SVR) is defined as the absence of HCV RNA in the serum six months after the end of treatment . With standard treatment, in patients with genotype1 infections, SVR lies between 42% to 56%, whereas for genotypes 2 and 3 the SVR is from 76% to 82%. Thus, a large percentage of patients fail to achieve SVR even with improvised standard treatment. Such patients may be divided initially into relapsers and nonresponders. The decision to re-treat should be based on the presence of clinical, virological and histological factors that predict the possibility of successful outcome with further therapy. Both the type of previous therapy and previous response are very important factors in guiding re-treatment. The development of new therapeutic agents is critical for further improvement in the management of chronic hepatitis C as current therapeutic options have rather low efficacy in certain subgroups, such as those with HCV genotype 1 or patients with advanced liver disease, and most probably in nonresponders and relapsers. Moreover, pegylated IFNa and/or ribavirin are associated with frequent side effects and have a negative impact on the patient’s quality of life. Therefore, the development of new effective and safe drugs is a matter of significant clinical importance.

Using pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis patients infected with hepatitis c virus genotype 1: are nonresponders and relapsers different populations?

The combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) and ribavirin is currently the best treatment for chronic hepatitis C, providing a sustained virological response (SVR) in 54 percent-63 percent of patients. In patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, the SVR rate is 42 percent-52 percent. To evaluate the treatment efficacy of this drug combination, we conducted an open, prospective study of 58 consecutive treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and treated at a university hospital, comparing those presenting an SVR (SVRs), nonresponders (NRs), and relapsers (RELs). Among the intent-to-treat patients, an end-of-treatment virological response was achieved in 69 percent of the sample as a whole and in 52 percent of the SVRs. We found that being an SVR was significantly associated with mild fibrosis (p = 0.04) and with undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 12 and 24 of treatment (p < 0.0001). Comparing the SVR and REL groups, we observed that being older than 40 was significantly associated with being a REL (p = 0.04). Being an NR was found to be associated with severe fibrosis and moderate inflammatory infiltrates (portal or periportal). In the polytomous logistic regression, no independent factors were associated with the REL group when compared with the SVR group. We conclude that RELs and NRs differ in comparison with SVRs. The RELs accounted for 17 percent of the sample. The HCV RNA test results at weeks 12 and 24 of treatment, although independent predictors of non-response (OR: 4.8 and 8.2, respectively), did not differ between SVRs and RELs.