Recomendaciones sobre diagnóstico, manejo y estudio de la infección del tracto urinario en pediatría: rama de Nefrología de la Sociedad Chilena de Pediatría. Parte 1 / Recommendations on diagnosis, management and study of the urinary tract infection in pediatrics: nephrology Branch of the Chilean Society of Pediatrics. Part 1

Resumen: La infección del tracto urinario (ITU) es una de las infecciones bacterianas mas frecuentes en la edad pediátrica, pero su diagnóstico y manejo se pueden ver complicados por lo inespecífico de sus sín tomas y signos de presentación, la dificultad en la interpretación de los exámenes, especialmente en niños mas pequeños, y por un pronóstico respecto a daño renal muchas veces incierto. En los últimos años, se ha evidenciado una modificación significativa en el enfoque diagnostico y terapéutico de esta patología, surgiendo la necesidad de actualizar las recomendaciones previas. El propósito de esta re vision es contribuir a reducir la variabilidad de la práctica clínica en el manejo de ITU en la población pediátrica, mejorando la detección y manejo de la patología estructural y otros factores de riesgo de daño renal, evitando acciones innecesarias en aquellos niños con bajo riesgo. En esta primera parte, se presentan las recomendaciones en cuanto a diagnóstico y manejo de la ITU en pediatría. En la segunda parte se detalla su estudio, prevención y seguimiento.

Abstract: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most frequent bacterial infection in pediatrics. However, its diagnosis and management can be complicated due to the nonspecific clinical presentation, the difficulty of exams interpretation, especially in younger children, and an uncertain prognosis regar ding renal damage. In recent years, significant worldwide change has come in treatment, diagnosis, and images studies, we have decided to update the current recommendations on UTI management published by the Pediatric Nephrology branch of Chilean Pediatrics Society in previous years. The purpose of these recommendations is to reduce the variability of clinical practice in management of UTI in our pediatric population, favoring diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the most ap propriate way, improving detection and management of structural pathology and other risk factors of renal damage, avoiding unnecessary actions in children with low risk. This first part includes diag nosis and treatment recommendations of urinary tract infection in pediatric age. In the second part the study, prevention and monitoring of urinary tract in pediatric age is detailed.

Pediatric Appropriate Evaluation Protocol for India (PAEP-India): Tool for Assessing Appropriateness of Pediatric Hospitalization

Objectives: To develop and assess Pediatric AppropriatenessEvaluation Protocol for India (PAEP-India) for inter-rater reliabilityand appropriateness of hospitalization.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: The available PAEP tools were reviewed and adaptedfor Indian context by ten experienced pediatricians followingsemi-Delphi process. Two PAEP-India tools; newborn (?28 days)and children (>28 days-18 years) were developed. These PAEP-India tools were applied to cases to assess appropriateness ofadmission and inter-rater reliability between assessors.Participants: Two sets of case records were used: (i) 274cases from five medical colleges in Delhi-NCR [?28 days (n=51);>28 days to 18 years (n=223)]; (ii) 622 infants who werehospitalized in 146 health facilities and were part of a cohort (n=30688) from two southern Indian states.Interventions: Each case-record was evaluated by twopediatricians in a blinded manner using the appropriate PAEP-India tools, and ‘admission criteria’ were categorized asappropriate, inappropriate or indeterminate.Main outcome measures: The proportion of appropriatehospitalizations and inter-rater reliability between assessors(using kappa statistic) were estimated for the cases.Results: 97.8% hospitalized cases from medical colleges werelabelled as appropriate by both reviewers with inter-rateragreement of 98.9% (k=0.66). In the southerm Indian set ofinfants, both reviewers labelled 80.5% admissions as appropriatewith inter-rater agreement of 96.1% (k= 0.89).Conclusions: PAEP-India (newborn and child) tools are simple,objective and applicable in diverse settings and highly reliable.These tools can potentially be used for deciding admissionappropriateness and hospital stay and may be evaluated later forusefulness for cost reimbursements for insurance proposes.