The Effect of Superior Rectus Re-recession for Dissociated Vertical Deviation

PURPOSE: When recurrent dissociated vertical deviation (DVD) is cosmetically objectionable after superior rectus recession is used to surgically treat DVD, inferior rectus resection or superior rectus re-recession should be considered. The effect of re-recession of the superior rectus was, therefore, evaluated as a treatment of recurrent DVD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 9 eyes from 7 patients who had undergone superior rectus re-recession as a second surgery due to recurrence after superior rectus recession for DVD. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period after re-recession of the superior rectus was 32.1 (22~66) months. The preoperative mean deviation was 16.0 prism diopters (PD), and the postoperative mean deviation was 4.9PD. According to the classification of recurrent DVD by Scott, the surgical results of five eyes were excellent (0~4PD), those of 2 eyes were good (10~14PD), and those of 2 eyes were fair. The mean corrected DVD was 4.1PD per 1 mm recession. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperatively, 7 of 9 eyes (77.7%) were aligned within 9PD. In cases of recurrent DVD, superior rectus re-recession yielded satisfactory results with minimum surgery on the superior rectus. The results of this study will be helpful in deciding surgical amount of superior rectus re-recession to be performed.

The Comparision of Outcomes Between Lateral Rectus Muscles Re-recession and Medial Rectus Muscles Resection in Recurrent Exotropia

PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes between bilateral lateral rectus muscles (BLR) re-recession and bilateral medial rectus muscles (BMR) resection in recurrent exotropia. METHODS: The medical records of patients with recurrent exotropia who underwent surgery for intermittent exotropia during the 6 years from January 2001 to December 2006 and followed up for more than 6 months were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: In group A, BLR recessions was performed at the first surgery and BLR re-recession was performed at the second surgery. In group B, BLR recession was performed at the first surgery and BMR resection at the second surgery. Success rates at the last follow-up after the second operation were 81.9% in Group A and 83.3% in Group B, showing no statical difference between the two groups. In group A, no significant underaction of the BLR was noted. Success rates were not statistically different between the 2 mm re-recessed subgroup and 3 mm re-recessed subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the notion that BLR re-recession successfully corrects recurrent exotropia without producing significant limitation of abduction.

Reoperations for Undercorrected Esotropia

For undercorrected esotropia after bilateral medial rectus(MR) recession, we performed unilateral or bilateral MR rerecession, unilateral rerecession or marginal myotomy of the recessed medial rectus muscle combined with lateral rectus(LR) resection, or unilateral LR resection. The correction of deviation was 15 delta in unilateral 2.0mm MR rerecession. Bilateral 2.0mm MR rerecession corrected 20 to 25 delta of esodeviation, but undercorrection was noted in one case. With unilateral 2.0mm rerecession or marginal myotomy of the recessed medial rectus muscle combined with 5.5mm or 8.0mm LR resection, the correction of deviation was 26 to 29 delta, and there was no under- or overcorrection. The corrective effect of this procedure was therefore greater and more stable than that of bilateral 2.0mm MR rerecession. Unilateral 8.0mm LR resection performed 3 months after bilateral MR recession showed correction of 15 delta, whereas the same procedure performed 3 weeks after bilateral MR rerecession showed correction of 24 delta. Unilateral LR resection procedure seems to be more efficacious for residual esotropia if performed as soos as possible within 3 months after sufficient bilateral MR recession or rerecession.