ABSTRACT
Objective The purpose of this article is to summarize and review the current status of the construction of clinical research evaluation systems in domestic public hospitals,identify existing problems in the evaluation system,and propose development strategies and suggestions.Methods Retrieved relevant articles,dissertations and policies from the past five years(2018-2022),screened the titles,viewed the full texts of 52 selected papers and their references,and summarized them.Results The"five-only"indicators have long been an important indicator for evaluating clinical research in public hospitals,but in today's scientific research environment and policy environment,the"five-only"evaluation system has revealed its utilitarian draw-backs and gradually evolved into a hindrance to scientific research.It is urgent to break through the"five-only"orientation and establish a clinical research evaluation system oriented towards"transforming and applying transformation of scientific research achievements".Conclusion The evaluation system for clinical research should break the previous"five-only"evaluation model based on quantity-oriented scientific research evaluation.We can draw on the framework of the research output,influence,and environment indicators in the UK's REF Excellence Framework model,combine the American APT system and the Chinese STEM indicator dimensions,explore multi-outcome evaluation,integrate developmental indicators,and continuously improve the indica-tor system and application methods in practice to promote the development of clinical research in public hospitals.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveBy investigating the awareness situation of scientific research integrity among scientific researchers， their behavior and attitudes towards scientific research integrity， and the reasons for the occurrence of scientific research integrity， to identify the key influencing factors and risk points， and propose targeted management ideas for scientific research integrity construction. MethodsA web-based questionnaire was used to survey the awareness of scientific research integrity policies， behavior and attitude， and reasons for dishonest behavior in scientific research among scientific researchers at a tertiary A hospital. ResultsA total of 1，385 questionnaires were recovered， with 1，253 valid questionnaires. There were 246 males and 1，007 females， aged between 20 and 60 years old， with an average age of （37.98±8.97） years old. The average awareness rate of policies related to scientific research integrity was 39.44%. Scientific researchers believe that the top three risk points for dishonest behavior in scientific research were paper submission， entrusting third-party services， and the use of research funds. According to the different scientific research work involved by different survey subjects， the respondent population was set up with the attributes of the personnel in the basic information of the survey content on attitudes toward violating scientific research behavior norms， and was divided into four groups. The awareness situation of scientific research integrity policies was negatively correlated with the attitudes towards dishonest behavior in scientific research in the first and third groups. Publication of SCI papers and the awareness situation of scientific research integrity policies were negatively correlated with attitudes towards dishonest behavior in scientific research in the second group. Age and publication of SCI papers were related to attitudes towards dishonest behavior in scientific research in the fourth group， which were negatively correlated with the publication of SCI papers and positively correlated with age. ConclusionThe learning and training， and the rate of policy awareness of scientific research integrity were not high， and the awareness of scientific research integrity policies should be further improved. There are still risks and problems in the key links of scientific research activities， and it is necessary to strengthen the integrity management of the whole process of scientific research activities， establish the correct scientific values of scientific researchers， improve the scientific research evaluation system， and create a good scientific research environment.
ABSTRACT
The training of clinical theory and scientific research thinking is very important for postgraduates of neurology,however,of which,problems are existing,such as the low level of scientific research and the imperfect system.Based on the experience of postgraduate training in the hospital,the authors put forward some improving measures,specifically,to arouse the interest of scientific research,to build the scope of scientific research,to improve the comprehensive strength of personal scientific research,to establish the guarantee mechanism of scientific research and to perfect the system of graduation evaluation.Practice shows that these measures has promoted the enthusiasm and subjective initiative of neuroscience academic postgraduates for scientific research,improved the quality of postgraduate education,and formed a certain basic and clinical research output.
ABSTRACT
Object To establish a proper research evaluation system for level-two general hospital.Method By using Delphi method,experts were invited by letter to review research evaluation indices for three times.Result Totally 62 indices were weighted and evaluated,including two primary-degree indices,14 secondary-degree indices,and 46 third-degree indices. A research evaluation system was preliminarily established in a level-two general hospital.Conclusion The evaluation system is simple and practicable,and can reflect the main aspects of research in the leveltwo general hospitals.