ABSTRACT
Abstract This study outlines the profile of research productivity grant holders of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)] in the field of pediatric dentistry. A cross-sectional study with data collected from the Brazilian academic curriculum vitae database. The eligibility criterion was being a research productivity grant holder in pediatric dentistry from 2018 to 2020. In the period of interest, 215 individuals were research productivity grant holders in the field of dentistry, 33 of whom had graduate degrees (specialization, master's or doctorate) in pediatric dentistry. The period of scientific production and work concluded of advising of scientific initiation, master, doctoral and post-doctoral degrees was 2010 to 2020. Descriptive analysis was performed and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze associations (5% significance level) between productivity grant level (2, 1D, 1C, 1B or 1A) and year of obtainment of the doctoral degree. The VOSviewer (version 1.6.17) was used to present graphically the interinstitutional collaborations. The sample was composed of Level 2 researchers (66.7%), women (66.7%), researchers linked to institutions in the southeastern region of Brazil (81.8%), with a doctoral degree concluded prior to 2002 (51.5%), began working as a professor at a higher education institution prior to 2007 (78.8%) and the title of full professor (45.5%). No significant association was found between productivity grant level and year of conclusion of the doctoral degree (p = 0.10). Median (interquartile range) of scientific articles was 119 (37-312). The prevalence of citations (57.52%) and JCR articles (62.76%) was higher among female researchers. In conclusion, CNPq research productivity grant holders in pediatric dentistry are essentially represented by females from the southeast region of the country (UFMG and USP). However, males have proportionally greater productivity.
Resumo Este estudo traça o perfil dos pesquisadores bolsistas de produtividade do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) da área de odontopediatria. Pesquisa transversal com dados coletados na base de currículos acadêmicos brasileiros. Os critérios de elegibilidade abrangeram os pesquisadores bolsistas de produtividade de 2018 a 2020. Foram identificados 215 pesquisadores bolsistas de produtividade na área de odontologia, dos quais 33 com pós-graduação (especialização, mestrado ou doutorado) em odontopediatria. O período de produção científica e trabalho de orientação concluído de iniciação científica, mestrado, doutorado e pós-doutorado foi de 2010 a 2020. Foi realizada análise descritiva e o teste de Kruskall-Wallis foi utilizado para verificar associações (nível de significância de 5%) entre nível da bolsa de produtividade (2, 1D, 1C, 1B ou 1A) e ano de obtenção do grau de doutor. O programa VOSviewer (versão 1.6.17) foi utilizado para identificar colaborações interinstitucionais. A amostra foi composta por pesquisadores de Nível 2 (66,7%), mulheres (66,7%), pesquisadores vinculados a instituições da região sudeste do Brasil (81,8%), com doutorado concluído antes de 2002 (51,5%), começaram a atuar como professor em instituição de ensino superior anterior a 2007 (78,8%) e o título de professor titular (45,5%). Não foi encontrada associação significativa entre nível de bolsa de produtividade e ano de conclusão do doutorado (p = 0,10). A mediana (intervalo interquartil) de artigos científicos foi de 119 (37-312). A prevalência de citações (57,52%) e artigos do JCR (62,76%) foi maior entre as pesquisadoras. Em conclusão, os pesquisadores bolsistas de produtividade em Odontopediatria do CNPq são representados essencialmente por mulheres da região sudeste do país. No entanto, os homens apresentaram produtividade proporcionalmente maior.
ABSTRACT
Objective:Combined with the development and application of the hospital's current scientific research fund management information system, this paper explores how to further improve the informatization of scientific research fund management.Methods:Through the analysis of the service condition of four information systems, this paper identifies and illustrates problems existed in the process of informatization of scientific research funds.Results:There are some problems in the information system of scientific research funds, such as the failure to realize the " full life cycle" informatization of scientific research funds management, the uneven quality of information system, and lack of top-level design of management team. Route-cause analysis is conducted.Conclusions:It is suggested that the top-level design of information management at the national level, the reform of internal control system in hospitals, the cultivation of inter-disciplinary talent, and the increase of publicity should be taken to improve the informatization management of scientific research funds and improve the efficiency of funds utilization.
ABSTRACT
Resumo: Introdução: O crescimento socioeconômico de um país acontece por meio do desenvolvimento de ciência e tecnologia, e, por isso, a parceria com o terceiro setor é positiva ao auxiliar o financiamento de projetos científicos. Objetivos: Assim, o presente estudo objetiva avaliar as formas de captação de recursos mais utilizadas pelos docentes de Medicina para a execução de seus estudos científicos e verificar se há o reconhecimento do terceiro setor como opção para tal obtenção. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo transversal analítico com abordagem quali-quantitativa, construído por meio do uso de um formulário individual aplicado aos docentes do curso médico de cinco instituições do ensino superior do Norte/Nordeste do Brasil. Os dados obtidos foram analisados por estatísticas descritiva e analítica. Resultados: Participaram 138 professores, de ambos os sexos, com idade média ± 43,2 anos. A pesquisa mais comumente desenvolvida pelos docentes foi a básica (56,1%); 68,8% utilizaram recursos próprios para o desenvolvimento de seus estudos; 18,8% obtiveram recursos de entidades de apoio à pesquisa; 75,4% conheciam alguma fundação de amparo à pesquisa, e as mais citadas foram a Fapespa (26,9%) e o CNPq (26,9%); 13,8% relataram conhecer sites e empresas multinacionais que fomentam projetos de pesquisas, mas somente 2,2% submeteram sua iniciativa às chamadas públicas em instituições internacionais para captação; quando perguntados sobre o terceiro setor, seus fundamentos e atores definidos pela legislação, o estudo apontou uma falta de conhecimento, com 100% de inadequação nas respostas sobre tais entidades; quanto à parceria entre o terceiro setor e o Estado, 83,3% sinalizaram desconhecimento;100% dos entrevistados desconhecem os critérios para uma entidade integrar tal setor, ao mesmo tempo que 76,8% afirmaram que a falta de orientação dos conceitos do ramo não é entrave para a captação de recursos às pesquisas. Conclusão: A maioria dos docentes utilizava recursos próprios para a realização de seus projetos, seguidos pelo uso de recursos públicos. Ademais, grande parte dos profissionais não reconheceu o terceiro setor como fonte patrocinadora, carecendo de informações que lhes possibilitassem desenvolver atividades de forma ampla e com as diversas oportunidades existentes, oferecidas por entidades desse setor.
Abstract: Introduction: The socio-economic growth of a country is reflected by the development of science and technology. Partnership with the third sector is therefore positive in terms of financial support for scientific projects. Objective: Accordingly, the present study aims to evaluate the most commonly used methods of fundraising by medical professors to conduct their scientific studies and whether there is recognition of the third sector as an option for such fundraising. Method: A cross-sectional analytical study with a qualitative and quantitative approach. The data were collected using an individual form, applied to medical course professors from five different universities in the north of Brazil, and analyzed using descriptive-analytical statistics. Results: The study included 138 professors, of both sexes, with an average age of ± 43.2 years. The type of research most commonly performed by professors was basic (56.1%); 68.8% used their own resources to develop their studies; 18.8% obtained funds from research support entities; 75.4% knew of a research support foundation, primarily FAPESPA (26.9%) and CNPQ (26.9%); 13.8% reported knowledge of websites and multinational companies that promote research projects, but only 2.2% submitted their initiative to public calls for funding from international institutions; when asked about the third sector, its fundamentals and actors defined by legislation, the study indicated a lack of knowledge, with 100% of inadequate answers about such entities; regarding partnership between the third sector and the State, 83.3% signaled ignorance; 100% of the interviewees were unaware of the criteria for an entity to be part of the sector, while 76.8% stated that lack of orientation about the concepts of the area is not an obstacle to raising funds for research. Conclusion: Most professors use their own funds to carry out their projects, followed by the use of public funds. Furthermore, most professionals did not recognize the third sector as a source of sponsorship, lacking information that would allow them to develop broad activities and enjoy the various opportunities offered by entities in this sector.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Research Design/statistics & numerical data , Organizations , Research Financing , Fund Raising , Cross-Sectional Studies , Faculty, MedicalABSTRACT
Objective:Combined with the hospital's optimization of expenditure management measures, this paper discusses how to enable scientific research personnel with appropriate discretion right to use scientific research funds and further improve the efficiency of the use of scientific research funds under the background of the reform of Release, manage and service.Methods:Through the implementation of information management system, policy revision, reconstruction of the approval process of expenditure, integration of multi department management resources and other ways, the efficiency of expenditure has been improved.Results:After optimizing the management of expenditure, the management efficiency and the efficiency of scientific research personnel is improved, the burden of scientific research personnel is reduced, and the expected effect of expenditure management is achieved.Conclusions:The optimization of expenditure management can improve the efficiency of expenditure to some extent, but more reform is still needed to promote the development of scientific research.
ABSTRACT
RESUMO Mensurar o impacto do investimento em pesquisas contribui para a compreensão do alcance dos resultados nos sistemas de saúde e para o direcionamento de recursos para áreas prioritárias. Este estudo avaliou o impacto na dimensão 'avanços no conhecimento' produzido pelas pesquisas em saúde financiadas pelo Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Institucional do Sistema Único de Saúde (Proadi-SUS), no período de 2009 a 2014, no Brasil. Trata-se de pesquisa avaliativa, que utilizou o modelo adaptado de avaliação de pesquisas em saúde da Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS), a partir de análise documental dos registros de acompanhamento de projetos e relatórios de prestação de contas apresentados pelas instituições executoras das pesquisas. Foram investidos R$ 66,49 milhões em 46 pesquisas, em 12 áreas temáticas, distribuídas em cinco tipos de estudos, principalmente em cardiologia. Foram identificados produtos de 28 projetos (60,8%). Observou-se potencial avanço do conhecimento no campo das doenças crônicas. A transferência dos conhecimentos gerados por essas pesquisas e o impacto do investimento nas categorias tomada de decisão informada e benefícios ao setor saúde não foram mensurados e permanecem como desafios para a efetiva avaliação do programa. Estudos que avaliem a aplicação das evidências produzidas na prática clínica e na gestão podem contribuir para a compreensão da medida do impacto das pesquisas financiadas pelo Proadi-SUS em outras dimensões.
ABSTRACT Measuring the impact of investment in research can contribute to a better understanding of the achievement of results in health systems and to guide the management of resources for priority areas. This study sought to evaluate the impact of 'advances in knowledge' produced by research on health funded by the Support Program for the Institutional Development of the Unified Health System (Proadi-SUS) between 2009 and 2014 in Brazil. It is an evaluative investigation based on the institutional records of project monitoring and accountability reports presented by the research institutions. The impact analysis used some of the indicators proposed by the adapted health research evaluation model of the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS). The global investments were of R$ 66.49 million in 46 investigations and identified 12 subject areas, distributed in five types of studies. The main area was cardiology. The impact analysis identified the results of 28 projects (60.8%). It was possible to observe potential advances in knowledge in the field of chronic non-infectious diseases. The transfer of knowledge generated by these surveys and the impact of investing on informed decision-making and health sector benefits have not been measured and remain challenges for an effective evaluation of the program. Studies that evaluate the use of evidence produced in clinical practice and management can help understand the impact of research funded by the Proadi-SUS in other dimensions.
ABSTRACT
Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar o perfil das pesquisas científicas financiadas no Distrito Federal provenientes das chamadas públicas do Programa Pesquisa para o SUS: Gestão Compartilhada em Saúde (PPSUS/DF) e Programa de Fomento a Pesquisa Científica da ESCS/FEPECS, no período de 2008 a 2017. O estudo é analítico e documental, abrangendo o universo das pesquisas financiadas nesses dois Programas. As variáveis foram: ano, título, tema de pesquisa da Agenda Nacional de Prioridades de Pesquisas em Saúde (ANPPS), setor de aplicação, instituição e valor financiado. No período de 2008 a 2017, 73 projetos foram financiados pelos cinco editais do PPSUS/DF. O valor total foi de aproximadamente oito milhões de reais. Em relação à ESCS/FEPECS, entre 2008 a 2017, foram financiados 85 projetos pelos dez editais lançados. O valor total foi de 2,3 milhões de reais. Concluiu-se que o perfil das pesquisas científicas permitiu uma análise crítica das temáticas dos projetos. Recomenda-se que os próximos editais adotem como prioridade de pesquisa as três principais causas de óbitos, o processo de organização e avaliação de linhas de cuidados, serviços de saúde e redes de atenção.
Abstract This article analyzes the profile of research conducted in the Federal District of Brazil funded through public calls for proposals issued by the Research for the SUS Program: shared health management/Federal District (PPSUS/DF) and a research support program run by the Superior School of Health Sciences, maintained by the Health Sciences Teaching and Research Foundation (ESCS/FEPECS, acronym in Portuguese). A document analysis was undertaken of all research funded by the PPSUS/DF and ESCS/FEPECS's Research Support Program between 2008 and 2017 using the following variables: year, title, research themes of the National Agenda for Health Research Priorities (ANPPS, acronym in Portuguese), implementing organization, area of application of research, and amount of funding. PPSUS/DF funded 73 projects with a total investment of approximately R$8 million, while ESCS/FEPECS funded 85 projects with a total investment of R$2.3 million. This study provides a critical analysis of the research themes supported by ESCS/FEPECS and PPSUS/DF between 2008 and 2017. It is recommended that future calls for proposals should prioritize the three leading causes of death in the Federal District and the organization and evaluation of healthcare services.
Subject(s)
Humans , Biomedical Technology/economics , Health Services Research/organization & administration , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Research Support as Topic , Brazil , Inventions/economics , Health Services Research/economics , National Health Programs/economicsABSTRACT
Objective Through combing the existing problems in the management policy of scientific research funds,this paper puts forward some constructive suggestions in reality.Methods Summarize the characteristics of scientific research fund management policies in related documents published in recent years,and systematically analyze the problems encountered in practical work.Resuits This paper points out some problems that will be encountered when carrying out the management policies of scientific research funds,further putting forward the policy suggestions.Conclusions Regulations of management for scientific research projects at the national level keep pace with times and are of great significance.In the process of implementation,it will be more scientific,reasonable and effective if there were more specific policy guidance,fully consideration on the mental labor value of scientists and wide application of information technology.
ABSTRACT
Objective: to describe the scientific production related to diabetes in Peru between 1996 and 2015. Methods: Bibliometric study. Scientific papers on diabetes published between 1996 and 2015 were identified by authors with Peruvian affiliation in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) andScopus databases. The variables of interest were extracted manually We present descriptive results and collaborative networks. Results: We found 81 publications, 75.3% were original articles, of which none evaluated public health interventions and 60.7% received foreign funding; 55.6% had an author affiliated with the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH), and 65.4% had a foreign author. Five clusters of international collaboration networks could be distinguished, all with the participation of the UPCH. Conclusion: Peruvian scientific production related to diabetes is low, with an absence of studies evaluating public health interventions, and with collaboration networks focused on UPCH.
Objetivo: describir la producción científica en diabetes en Perú entre 1996 y 2015. Métodos: Estudio bibliométrico. Se identificaron publicaciones científicas sobre diabetes que tuvieran algún autor con filiación peruana, en las bases de datos Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) y Scopus, entre 1996 y 2015. Se extrajeron manualmente las variables de interés. Se presentaron los resultados descriptivos y las redes de colaboración. Resultados: Se encontraron 81 publicaciones, el 75,3% fueron artículos originales, de las cuales ninguno evaluó intervenciones en salud pública y 60,7% recibieron financiamiento extranjero. El 55,6% tuvieron algún autor afiliado a la Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH), y el 65,4% algún autor extranjero. Se puedo distinguir cinco conglomerados de redes de colaboración internacional, todos con participación de la UPCH. Conclusión: La producción científica peruana en diabetes ha sido baja, con ausencia de estudios que evalúen intervenciones en salud pública, y con redes de colaboración centradas en la UPCH.
Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Diabetes Mellitus , Research Financing , International Cooperation , Medicine in Literature , Research , Cooperative BehaviorABSTRACT
The factor that how the research funding is managed and used is very important for the progress and quality of research projects.With the continuous increase in the degree of supervision for the research fund,the attention to scientific research funding in hospital is also gradually raised.The problems of mismanaged and misuse research fund has been highlighted.The current study,based on the characteristics of medical research,comprehensively analyzed the existing problems of medical research funding in use and management from the point of view of research management.To solve these problems,we proposed suggestions and countermeasures to improve the use and management of research funding,and continued to improve the management of research funding.
ABSTRACT
With the country's increasing investment in scientific research,research funding corruption cases frequently occurred to researchers and research funding management have sounded the alarm.In these cases,not only a few scientific elites become prisoners,as well as part of the management people related to scientific research projects,such as finance,purchasing personnel,also get involved for varieties of reasons,for profit.This paper,according to the requirements for scientific research funding management,analyzes the current major problems and the reasons in management process of scientific research funding,to further explore appropriate countermeasures to strengthen and standardize the management of scientific research funding.
ABSTRACT
Researchers subjective emphasis on application for the project,contempt to complete the project.To safeguard the research projects carried out smoothly and successfully completed,improve hospital credibility,the hospital in many ways to strengthen the scientific research project management,such as creating a strong scientific and academic atmosphere,the establishment of preresearch funds,hospital research,enhance service awareness,the establishment of the project evaluation system to strengthen the management of project mid-term and node title,funds management,effectively promoted the development of the hospital research.
ABSTRACT
Since the positive listing system for prescription drug reimbursement has been introduced in Korea, the number of pharmacoeconomic evaluation studies has increased. However it is not clear if the quality of pharmacoeconomic evaluation study has improved. Due to the lack of randomized clinical studies in Korean health care setting, Korean economic evaluation studies have typically integrated the local cost data and foreign clinical data. Therefore methodological issues can be raised in regard to data coherence and consistency. But the quality of data was not questiened and the potential bias has not been investigated yet. Even though changes in policy have encouraged the undertaking of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, there is few public-side funding for validation study of cost-effectiveness models and data. Several companies perform economic evaluation studies to be submitted on behalf of their own products, but do not want the study results to be disclosed to the academic community or public. To improve the present conduct of pharmacoeconomic evaluations in Korea, various funding sources need to be developed, and, like other multidisciplinary areas, the experts in different fields of study should collaborate to ensure the validity and credibility of pharmacoeconomic evaluations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Economics, Pharmaceutical/legislation & jurisprudence , Formularies as Topic , Korea , Pharmaceutical Preparations/economics , Technology Assessment, BiomedicalABSTRACT
The paper analyzes the current situation of the application of the peer review system in the management of medical research funding of the army and, in view of existing shortcomings, puts forward some specific measures of improvement, including bettering methodology, enhancing efficiency, and guaranteeing openness and impartiality.