ABSTRACT
Objective:To establish a performance evaluation index system and evaluation method for young scientists in hospitals, and to provide reliable evidence for management departments in evaluating, selecting outstanding young scientists and formulating tailored training programs.Methods:Literature analysis, expert consultation, analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis were adopted in this article to evaluate the scientific research performance of young scientists in hospitals.Results:The scientific research data of young scientists under 45 years of age in Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2015 to 2019 were collected, and their scale efficiency and technical efficiency were analyzed by using index system and its weight and propose the improvement measures to achieve the purpose of evaluation and reform.Conclusions:This method is useful for the effective evaluation of the young scientists in the hospital, and is helpful to improve the level of scientific research management, as well as realize the virtuous circle of matching the input and output of scientific and technological innovation.
ABSTRACT
Objective Fuwai Spider Track Map (FSTM) is a scientific performance appraisal system established by the scientific research department of Fuwai Hospital.This study aimed to apply FSTM to the ranking and evaluation of scientific and technological influence and competitiveness of tertiary hospitals in China,comparison also conducted with othertraditional systems.Methods Tertiary hospitals consecutively selected as the national top 100 tertiary hospitals for 4 years from 2014 to 2017,according to the scientific and technological influence ranking list published in the official website of the Institute of Medical Information of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,were included.Total score,number of hospital staff and beds of these hospitals,accessed from the official website,were taking into account as reference data.Re-evaluation and ranking using FSTM was performed to evaluate and rank the scientific and technological influence and competitiveness.Besides,comparison analysis with traditional methods was conducted to identify the differences and similarities,advantages and disadvantages.Results The total quantity index and the per capita index represent the total research productivity and effectiveness,in other words,scientific and technological influence and competitiveness,respectively.The FSTM may integrate both indexes and avoid the disadvantages of single dimension evaluation.Conclusions Unlike the static results of traditional system,as a 3-dimentional method,FSTM may not only perform comprehensive but also evaluation of type,stratification and classification.It makes the hospitals in same type more comparable and provides multiple references for decision makers bv offering guidance and reference for the evaluation objects.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the development and optimization of scientific research performance evaluation system (SRPES) in affiliated hospitals of university.Methods Take Xi'an Jiaotong University Second Affiliated Hospital as an example,summarize and conduct statistical analysis of SRPES data in past ten years.Results Along with the development and optimization of SRPES,the hospital makes a breakthrough in personnel training,the development of discipline construction is remarkable,the scientific research output also presents a better development trend.Conclusions Continuing navigation and improvement of SRPES and incentive policies play an important role in guiding the development of scientific research with stated objectives.
ABSTRACT
Objective The ‘Spider Track Map (Fuwai)’is an innovative tool for comprehensive evaluation of scientific research performance.It was developed jointly by the Science & Research de partment and Medical Research & Biometrics Center in Fuwai Hospital.This tool aims to evaluate the development of scientific performances in 3 consecutive years of targeted departments,which will be considered to assess the technological competitiveness of each department.Methods The key variables were the number of projects,funding,awards,publications and patents during the last three years.After standardization,the weighted sum of those variables was calculated.Then the ‘Spider Track Map (Fuwai) ’ could be generated and the evaluation conclusion would be obtained after stratification.Results The ‘Spider Track Map (Fuwai)’ method had been used to evaluate the scientific research performance in 2015.The excellent research departments had been successfully elected and rewarded.Conclusions Beside the excellent department election,the method can also identify different feature of performance including improved,retrogressive,high efficiency or no changes.This multidimensional tool provides the reference to administrators for scientific commendation and reward and also the guid ing and alerting for specific department.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the research performance based on DEA and to provide the corresponding development measures for medical subjects in hospital.Methods Based on the analysis of medical subjects at Peking University People's Hospital,this paper explored the evaluation index system of medical subjects.The output-oriented DEA was selected and applied in the performance evaluation.Results We figure out that the DEA ratio of every medical subject with the established method in the program of DEAP Version 2.1.Conclusions The method based on DEA can reflect the performance of medical subjects,and the analysis of the evaluation results can provide the management department of hospital with evidences and references for policy making of medical subjects' development.
ABSTRACT
Objective Implementing the scientific research performance evaluation indicator system constructed to evaluate the situation of scientific research performance conducted by two basic Departments during the 12th Five-Year period in a general hospital.To understand the practical applicability of the scientific evaluation index system,and also propose comments and suggestions based on the comparison between assessment score and actual research situation in the departments.Methods Based on the database of scientific research management information platform,collect related research data from two basic departments of the hospital in latest five years.Using SPSS software to conduct statistical analysis on the total score of the first and two indicators,as well as the specific indicators of the three indicators,according to the performance evaluation index system and the weight built by the hospital.Results The index system can basically reflect the general information of scientific research input and output in the department,however,some indicators cannot truly reflect the index importance and the differences between the index weight is not significant,so it is necessary to make amendment based on demonstration.Conclusions Hospital should dynamically update the index system to make them match the developing strategy of the hospital,also important to combine them with research stimulation to guarantee more scientific management and better service to the research development of hospitals.
ABSTRACT
O presente artigo expressa as reflexões que vimos desenvolvendo a respeito dos indicadores de produção intelectual da comunidade científica brasileira, com atenção especial ao livro. Como pesquisadores credenciados em Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação Física, vinculada à Área 21 na Grande Área da Saúde, privilegiamos aqui o debate relativo às características, limites e possibilidades dos indicadores para a apreciação qualitativa da produção intelectual, em particular para aquela veiculada pelas Ciências Humanas e Sociais no campo da saúde, para este caso, as subáreas sociocultural e pedagógica da Educação Física
This paper presents some views we have been developing about the indicators of the intellectual production of the Brazilian scientific community, among them we have paid particular attention to books. As researchers from postgraduate programs in Physical Education, in Area 21 from the Big Area of Health, we have privileged the debate on the indicators' features, limits and possibilities for a qualitative appreciation of the intellectual production in particular for those being published in the Social and Human Sciences in the field of health, in this case, the socio-cultural and pedagogical sub-fields of Physical Education
En el presente trabajo presentamos algunas reflexiones que hemos hecho sobre los indicadores de la producción intelectual de la comunidad científica brasileña con atención para el libro. Nosotros como pesquisadotes participantes de programas de postgrado en Educación Física, Area 21 de la Gran Area de la Salud, nosotros enfocamos la discusión acerca de las características, limites y posibilidad de los indicadores para una apreciación cualitativa de la producción intelectual, en particular aqueja difundida en las Ciencias Sociales y Humanas en el campo de la salud, especialmente de las subáreas sociocultural y pedagógica de la Educación Física