ABSTRACT
O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar o perfil da Resiliência Psicológica (RP) em praticantes amadores de Beach Tennis (BT) em eventos competitivos e estabelecer parâmetros iniciais de RP por categorias do BT. Participaram 50 atletas com idade de 37,4 ± 7,92 anos. As coletas foram feitas via Google Forms® entre os meses de março a maio de 2022 durante as competições realizadas no Estado de Minas Gerais e Rio de Janeiro, sendo aplicada a Escala de Resiliência no Esporte (RS-Sp). O escore total da RS-Sp foi de 10,75 ± 1,57 pontos, sendo classificado como baixa, segundo o parâmetro para atletas brasileiros. Conclui-se o perfil de RPE em praticantes amadores de BT está abaixo do esperado para a medida podendo influenciar em menor capacidade de lidar com processos estressores advindos das situações esportivas (AU).
The aim of this study was to identify the profile of Psychological Resilience in amateur Beach Tennis practitioners in competitive events. Fifty athletes with age of 37.4 ±7.92 years participated. The Scale of Resilience in Sport (RS-Sp) was applied. The collections were made via Google Forms® between the months of March to May 2022 during the competitions held in the state of Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro. The total score of the SR-Sp was 10.75, ±1.57 points (low SR-Sp) according to the parameter for Brazilian athletes. It is concluded that Beach tennis practitioners presented lower PR indexes than expected for athletes, which can influence in a lower capacity to deal with stressful processes arising from sportive situations (AU).
El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar el perfil de la Resiliencia Psicológica (RP) en practicantes amateurs de Tenis Playa (BT) en eventos competitivos y establecer parámetros iniciales de RP para categorías de BT. Participaron 50 atletas con edad de 37,4 ± 7,92 años. Las colectas fueron realizadas vía Google Forms® entre los meses de marzo a mayo de 2022 durante competiciones realizadas en el Estado de Minas Gerais y Rio de Janeiro, siendo aplicada la Escala de Resiliencia en el Deporte (RS-Sp). La puntuación total de RS-Sp fue de 10,75 ± 1,57 puntos, siendo clasificada como baja, de acuerdo con el parámetro para los atletas brasileños. Se concluyó que los atletas de BT presentaron índices de RP inferiores a los esperados, lo que puede influir en una menor capacidad de lidiar con procesos estresantes derivados de situaciones deportivas (AU).
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Psychology, SportsABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: Resilience is the ability to adapt or recover after adverse situations. This study aimed to adapt and investigate evidence of the validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) for the Brazilian context. Method: The total sample comprised 1,937 people who participated in the study and the validity analysis was carried out with 1,480 people between 18 and 78 years of age. It was carried out using translation, back-translation, descriptive analysis, reliability analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Item Response Theory, the ROC curve and BRS correlation with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale - 10-item version (CD-RISC-10), the Social Support Perception Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 2-item version (PHQ-2), and sociodemographic data. Results: The results showed the adequacy of the Brazilian version of the BRS (BRS-BR), alpha of 0.80, omega = 0.81, one factor, good information capacity of the items (except for item 5) and correlation with the CD-RISC-10 (rho = 0.64), PHQ-2 (rho = - 0.38) and Social Support (rho = 0.14). There was also a correlation with sex (rho = 0.11), age (rho = 0.13), marital status (rho = 0.15) and schooling (rho = 0.15). The ROC curve shows a cutoff point at 10 points for low resilience and 21 points for high resilience. Conclusions: The investigation of the psychometric characteristics of the BRS-BR showed that the instrument can be useful for the evaluation of resilience in the Brazilian context.
Resumen Introducción: La resiliencia es la capacidad de adaptarse o recuperarse ante situaciones adversas. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo adaptar e investigar la evidencia de la validez de la Escala Breve de Resiliencia (BRS) para el contexto brasileño. Método: La muestra total fue de 1937 personas que participaron del estudio y el análisis de validez se realizó con 1480 personas entre las edades de 18 y 78 años. Se realizó con traducción, retrotraducción, análisis descriptivo, análisis de confiabilidad, análisis factorial confirmatorio, Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem, curva ROC y correlación BRS con la Escala de Resiliencia Connor-Davidson - versión de 10 ítems (CD-RISC-10), Apoyo Social Escala de percepción, cuestionario de salud del paciente - versión de 2 ítems (PHQ-2) y datos sociodemográficos. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron adecuación de la versión brasileña de BRS (BRS-BR), alfa de 0.80, omega = 0.81, un factor, buena capacidad de información de los ítems (excepto el ítem 5) y correlación con CD-RISC-10 (rho = 0.64), PHQ-2 (rho = - 0.38) y Apoyo Social (rho = 0.14). También hubo correlación con el sexo (rho = 0.11), la edad (rho = 0.13), el estado civil (rho = 0.15) y la escolaridad (rho = 0.15). La curva ROC muestra el punto de corte en 10 puntos para baja resiliencia y 21 puntos para alta resiliencia. Conclusiones: La investigación de las características psicométricas del BRS-BR mostró que el instrumento puede ser útil para la evaluación de la resiliencia en el contexto brasileño.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Resilient individuals have a comprehensive ability to adapt to various life circumstances. Psychological resilience predicts an individual’s physiological response to stress. The 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) is a widely used measure to quantify the level of self-perceived resilience. This study examined the psychometric properties of a Korean version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (10-item K-CD-RISC) on workers in Gumi, South Korea, exposed to hydrofluoric acid (HF). METHODS: The questionnaires included the 10-item K-CD-RISC and Beck Anxiety Inventor (BAI), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised-Korean version (IES-R-K), the Rosen-berg Self Esteem Scale (RSES), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). These were randomly distributed at 237 workplaces near the HF-spill site, in the Gumi 4 complex. The responses of 991 (67.3%) workers were analyzed. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis shown that a single-factor model was consistent with the original design of the 10-item CD-RISC. The scale also demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95). Scores on the scale reflected different levels of resilience with respect to personal factors (age, gender, marital status, and education and income levels) that are thought to be differentiated. Differences of resilience were also reflected by psychiatric symptoms (anxiety and depression). Moreover, the total score of scale positively correlated with RSES, whereas the IES-R-K, BAI, CES-D, and the PSS negatively correlated with the 10-item K-CD-RISC. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-item K-CD-RISC has good psychometric properties and is applicable for victims exposed to noxious chemical such as HF.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anxiety , Education , Hydrofluoric Acid , Inventors , Korea , Marital Status , Psychometrics , Resilience, Psychological , Self Concept , Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the relation among clinical nurses′resilience, emotional, the pressure load and self-efficacy with the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Methods A total of 449 nurse in Guangzhou were recruited to investigate by 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), Kessler 10 Scale (K10), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Chinese Stress Overload Scale (SOS). Results The average score was 23.6±6.7 for CD-RISC-10 , 24.4±8.2 for K10,24.7±5.7 for GSES , 63.3 ±16.6 for SOS ,and the individual vulnerability scoring was (31.2±10.0) points, events load was (32.0±7.5) points. High mental toughness of nurses in general self-efficacy scores higher than that of low mental toughness group (t=-8.53, P<0.01), in the K10 dated, S0S scores were lower than low mental toughness group (t=11.23, 7.70, P<0.01). Nurse relevant regression analysis results showed that gender, general self-efficacy, K10 dated, SOS as the main factors influencing nurses mental toughness, could explain 40%of variances. Conclusions The CD-RISC-10 can better reflect the level of clinical nurses′resilience, and the gender, self-efficacy were the main effects, as well as effectively predict the nurses′emotional distress and stress level. However how to improve the toughness of the clinical nurses need more research.
ABSTRACT
Resumen El presente trabajo tuvo como propósito conocer el nivel de resiliencia en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios de una institución de educación superior pública del estado de Jalisco, México. Además de ello, se analizó la relación y diferencia entre la resiliencia y las variables de sexo, edad y nivel socioeconómico. Para medir la variable de interés se utilizó la Escala de Resiliencia desarrollada por Wagnild y Young (1993) en su versión traducida y adaptada al español por Heilemann, Lee y Kury (2003), la cual está constituida por 25 reactivos en escalamiento tipo Likert. Los resultados muestran niveles altos de resiliencia en los estudiantes universitarios, no encontrándose diferencias significativas entre las variables carrera, sexo y edad de los estudiantes. Se concluye que la resiliencia alta es una característica muy generalizada en la mayoría de los estudiantes universitarios. Finalmente, se sugiere la ampliación de la línea de investigación con otros tamaños muestrales y otro tipo de carreras, así como la ejecución de trabajos que relacionen a la resiliencia con otras variables psicosociales no contempladas en el estudio.
Abstract This paper aimed to know the level of resilience from a sample of university students in a public institution of education in the state of Jalisco, Mexico. In addition to that, the relationship and difference between resilience and the variables of gender, age and socioeconomic status were analyzed. For this research, it was used the Resilience Scale developed by Wagnild and Young (1993) in the version translated and adapted to Spanish by Heilemann, Kury and Lee (2003), which consists of 25 reagents in the Likert scaling. This was used to measure the variable of interest. The results show high levels of resilience in university students and there were no significant differences between the career, sex and age variables. It was concluded that high resilience is a very generalized characteristic in the majority of college students. Finally, further research with other sample sizes and other careers is highly recommended. Likewise, the works, not included in this study, that relate resilience to other psychosocial variables are recommended as well.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To synthesize the mental resilience of Chinese children tested with the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents (RSCA)to evaluate its status as well as the research status. Methods:Four Chinese elec-tronic databases including China Biology Medicine disc (CBM),VIP Database,China National Knowledge Infra-structure (CNKI)and WangFang Database were searched from database established to December 2014. Literatures that reported the mental resilience status of Chinese children tested with RSCA were included. A statistical formula was used to synthesize means and standard deviations to get a total score;the standard mean difference (SMD)and 95% confidence interval (95%CI)of scores measured with RSCA scale were used to conduct meta-analyses usingthe software of Review Manager 5. 2 for comparison between different subgroups. Results:Thirty-nine studies with 16 493 children were included for the final analysis. Quantitative synthesis results showed that the average total score of Chinese children was (3. 3 0. 6 ). The status of psychological resilience was at a good level. The average psychological resilience scores of girls,not left-behind children,urban children,Han children and not-only-child were higher than those of boys [SMD (95%CI):-0. 09 (-0. 14--0. 05 )],left-behind children [SMD (95%CI):-0. 37(-0. 56--0. 19)],rural children [SMD (95%CI):0. 26(0. 13 -0. 38)],minority children [SMD (95%CI):0. 12(0. 04-0. 21)]and only-children [SMD (95%CI):0. 30(0. 16-0. 44)]respectively. Conclusion:The mental resilience of Chinese children is modest with internal diversity.
ABSTRACT
Dentre os instrumentos desenvolvidos para o estudo da resiliência, a Escala de Resiliência para Adultos (Resilience Scale for Adults RSA) tem demonstrado potencial para explicar e intervir em fenômenos psicossociais relacionados ao trabalho. Assim, o presente estudo teve como objetivo investigar algumas propriedades de validade fatorial da RSA para adultos servidores públicos. Portanto, focaliza adultos inseridos na condição de trabalhador em um meio organizacional. Análise fatorial confirmatória foi levada a cabo. Os resultados apontaram a confirmação da estrutura da RSA, mantendo-se composta por seis fatores: Percepção de si Mesmo, Futuro Planejado, Competência Social, Estilo Estruturado, Coesão Familiar e Recursos Sociais. Suas propriedades de validade e fidedignidade para aplicação entre trabalhadores a tornam um instrumento útil para subsidiar decisões de gestão organizacional. As implicações, limitações e contribuições do estudo são discutidas, com sugestões para pesquisas futuras...
Among the instruments developed for studying resilience, the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) has shown a potential to explain and intervene in psychosocial work-related phenomena. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the factorial validation of the RSA to adults who are civil servants. Therefore it focalize adults that experience the work condition in the organizational environment. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The results indicated that the RSA six-factor solution was confirmed with factors named: Perception of Self, Planned Future, Social Competence, Structured Style, Familiar Cohesion and Social Resources. Its validity and reliability for use among workers make it useful to support management decisions. The implications, limitations and contributions of the study are discussed, with suggestions for future research...
Entre los instrumentos desarrollados para el estudio de la resiliencia, la Escala de Resiliencia para Adultos (Escala de Resiliencia para Adultos RSA) ha mostrado potencial para explicar e intervenir en los fenómenos psicosociales relacionados con el trabajo. Por lo tanto, el presente estudio tuvo como objetivo investigar algunas propiedades de validez factorial de la RSA para adultos servidores públicos. Por lo tanto, con adultos insertados na condición de trabajador en el ambiente organizacional. Un análisis factorial confirmatoria fue aplicado. Los resultados indican la confirmación de la estructura de RSA, quedando integrada por seis factores: Percepción de sí Mismo, Futuro Planeado, Competencia Social, Estilo Estructurado, Cohesión Familiar y Recursos Sociales. Su validez y fiabilidad para su uso entre los trabajadores la convierten en una herramienta útil para apoyar las decisiones de gestión de la organización. Se discuten las implicaciones, limitaciones y contribuciones del estudio, con sugerencias para investigaciones futuras...
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Public Sector , Resilience, Psychological , Occupational Groups/psychologyABSTRACT
Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in nurses in China.Methods Item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of CD-RISC was conducted.A total of 1 084 nurses were randomly divided into 2 groups using random number table.One group was used to revise CD-RISC and the other to evaluate its reliability and validity.Results Confirmatory factor analysis of the original RSA showed thatx2/df,RMSEA,GFI,AGFI,CFI were 6.714,0.103,0.804,0.764,and 0.718,respectively.The number of item was reduced to 21 based on exploratory factor analysis results,including three factors which explained 54.034％ of the total variance.Factor loading ranged from 0.490 to 0.755.Coefficient of internal consistency ranged from 0.688 to 0.930 and the 4 week test-retest reliabilities ranged from 0.825 to 0.917.The factor scores were closely correlated with the total scores with correlation coefficient ranging from 0.683 to 0.943.The factors were closely correlated with each other with correlation coefficient ranging from 0.564 to 0765.The confirmatory factor analysis of the revised CD-RISC showed that x2/df,RMSEA,GFI,AGF,CFI were 3.304,0.065,0.902,0.878,and 0.913 respectively.The total scores and all factors were negatively correlated with depression and anxiety and somatization.Conclusions The revised CD-RISC has good psychometric properties and can be used to measure the resilience of nurses.
ABSTRACT
Objective To examine the reliability and validity of Chinese revision of connor-davidson resilience scale(CD-RISC) in Chinese college students.Methods 1610 college students were tested with CD-RISC.783 of them took a more test by BFI and SCL-90 at the same time.After three weeks,83 students were retested by CD-RISC.Results (1) The results of confirmatory factor analysis (x2/df =6.632,RMSEA =0.059,GFI =0.934,AGFI =0.915,CFI =0.927,NFI =0.915) indicated that the three-factor model reasonably fitted Chinese college students.(2) The Cronabach α coefficients of the CD-RISC and three factors called adaptability,tenacity and autonomy were 0.914,0.865,0.784,0.767 respectively; the mean inter-item correlation coefficients of them were 0.364,0.417,0.425,0.398 respectively; the Guttman split-half coefficients were 0.888,0.843,0.707,0.650 respectively; the retest-reliability coefficients were 0.856,0.742,0.777,0.747.(3) The scores of the total scale of CDRISC and three factors were significantly correlated to BFI and SCL-90(P＜0.01).There were significant differences between the low-resilient group and the high-resilient group in every index of BFI and SCL-90.(4) There were significant differences between male and female students in CD-RISC and factor tenacity and autonomy(male:2.77±0.60,2.70-±0.74,2.65±0.68;female:Z70±0.53,2.62±0.67,2.54±0.62; P＜0.05).Conclusion The Chinese version of CD-RISC is a reliable and valid method for assessing resilience in Chinese college students.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo explore the factorial structure of Chinese revision of connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) in Chinese college students.MethodsA total of 1534 college students were recruited for this study.After item analysis,half of the sample was used for exploratory factor analysis and the other for confirmatory factor analysis.ResultsThe Chinese revision of CD-RISC contained 19 items.Exploratory factor analysis showed that three factors were better:adaptability,tenacity and autonomy.And the results of confirmatory factor analysis ( x2/df =3.83,RMSEA =0.06,GFI =0.92,AGFI =0.90,CFI =0.92,NFI =0.89) indicated that this model provided a reasonable good fit for Chinese college students.ConclusionThis study indicate that the three-factor model of CD-RISC is adaptable to Chinese college students.
ABSTRACT
Objective To research the reliability and validity of resilience scale for adults(RSA)in military students.Methods RSA, depression, anxiety and somatization of Self-report Symptom Checklist 90(SCL-90)were applied in this survey to 616 military students.Results ①A 5-factor structure of resilience was showed by explorative factor analysis.Each item had a factor loading between 0.423～0.834, and the total variance explained at 58.439%.②The correlations between the subscales of the RSA were all obvious positive, ranging from 0.228～0.580；and the correlations between subscales of the RSA and total resilience were all obvious positive, ranging from 0.565～0.789.③There was a obvious negative correlation between total depression, anxiety and somatization and total resilience, the correlation coefficient was-0.437(n=593, P=0.000).④Tbe reliability coefficient of the RSA was 0.91, and the respective dimensions had Cronbach's alphas between 0.52～0.86.Conclusion The results show that RSA has acceptable reliability and validity in military students.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) measures various aspects of psychological resilience in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other psychiatric ailments. This study sought to assess the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (K-CD-RISC). METHODS: In total, 576 participants were enrolled (497 females and 79 males), including hospital nurses, university students, and firefighters. Subjects were evaluated using the K-CD-RISC, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were examined as a measure of reliability, and convergent validity and factor analysis were also performed to evaluate validity. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest reliability were 0.93 and 0.93, respectively. The total score on the K-CD-RISC was positively correlated with the RSES (r=0.56, p<0.01). Conversely, BDI (r=-0.46, p<0.01), PSS (r=-0.32, p<0.01), and IES-R scores (r=-0.26, p<0.01) were negatively correlated with the K-CD-RISC. The K-CD-RISC showed a five-factor structure that explained 57.2% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The K-CD-RISC showed good reliability and validity for measurement of resilience among Korean subjects.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Depression , Firefighters , Reproducibility of Results , Resilience, Psychological , Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the Asian Resilience Scale’s preliminary revision, reliability and validity in college students of China. Methods: 646 students were investigated with the Asian Resilience Scale and the short form of NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Results: ①Three factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and explained 47.1% of variance. ②Confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit between the data and the construct of scale, ?2/df=2.36,RMSEA= 0.055,GFI=0.923,CFI=0.908,NNFI (TLI)=0.894. ③The Cronbach’s ? coefficients, split-half and retest reliability of the total scores were 0.865, 0.836 and 0.894 respectively. ④The total score of the Asian Resilience Scale was significantly negatively correlated with neuroticism and positively correlated with extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness and conscientiousness. Conclusion: Reliability and validity of the Asian Resilience Scale’s revised Chinese version is corresponded with psychometric standard, and it could be used to assess the resilience of Chinese college students.