ABSTRACT
Abstract This study aimed to assess the impact of the implementation of a rapid multiplex molecular FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FRP) on the medical management of immunocompromised patients from a community general hospital. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, and before-after study. Two periods were evaluated: before the implementation of the FRP (pre-FRP) from April 2017 to May 2018 and after the implementation of the FRP (post-FRP) from January to July 2019. The inclusion criteria were immunocompromised patients over 18 years of age with suspected acute respiratory illness tested by conventional diagnostic meth-ods (pre-FRP) or the FilmArray™ Respiratory Panel v1.7 (post-FRP). A total of 142 patients were included, 64 patients in the pre-FRP and 78 patients in the post-FRP. The positive detec-tion rate was significantly higher in the post-FRP (63% vs. 10%, p <0.01). There were more patients receiving antimicrobial treatment in the pre-FRP compared with the post-FRP period (94% vs. 68%, p <0.01). A decrease in beta-lactam (89% vs. 61%, p <0.01) and macrolide (44% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) prescriptions were observed in the post-FRP. No differences were observed in oseltamivir use (22% vs. 13%, p = 0.14), changes in antimicrobial treatment, hospital admission rate, days-reduction in droplet isolation precautions, hospital length of stay (LOS), admission to intensive care unit (ICU), LOS in ICU, treatment failure and 30-day mortality. The implementa-tion of the FRP impacted patient care by improving diagnostic yield and optimizing antimicrobial treatment in immunocompromised adult patients.
Resumen El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el impacto de la implementación del panel respiratorio FilmArray® (FRP), un sistema automatizado de PCR multiplex, en el estándar de cuidado de pacientes adultos inmunocomprometidos en un hospital general. Es un estudio retrospectivo de un único centro con diseno antes/después. Los periodos evaluados fueron abril 2017-mayo 2018, previo a la implementación del FRP (pre-FRP), y enero 2019-julio 2019, luego de la implementación (post-FRP). Los criterios de inclusión fueron pacientes mayores de 18 años inmunocomprometidos con sospecha de infección respiratoria aguda a los que se les realizó, en pre-FRP, diagnóstico por métodos convencionales, y en post-FRP, el panel respiratorio FRP versión 1.7. Se incluyeron un total de 142 pacientes, 64 en pre-FRP y 78 en post-FRP. La tasa de positividad fue significativamente mayor en post-FRP frente a pre-FRP (63 vs. 10%, p<0,01). Hubo más pacientes con tratamiento antimicrobiano en pre-FRP que en post-FRP (94 vs. 68%, p <0,01). En pre-FRP hubo más pacientes tratados con betalactámicos (89 vs. 61%, p <0,01) y macrólidos (44 vs. 13%, p < 0,01). No se observaron diferencias significativas en el uso de oseltamivir (22 vs. 13%, p = 0,14), cambios en los tratamientos, número de hospitalizaciones, uso de aislamientos, duración de la estadía hospitalaria, ingreso a la unidad de cuidados intensivos, estadía en dicha unidad, falla de tratamiento y mortalidad a 30 días. El uso de FRP contribuyó a la atención del paciente mejorando el rendimiento diagnóstico y optimizando la terapia antimicrobiana en pacientes adultos inmunocomprometidos.
ABSTRACT
Background@#Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among children worldwide however, local data on the etiologic diagnosis of ARI are limited. @*Objectives@#To determine the prevalence and the most commonly detected respiratory pathogens using a multiplex PCR assay, known as the Respiratory Panel, among hospitalized children with ARI and compare their clinical and laboratory differences. @*Methods@#This is a cross sectional study of children with ARI who were tested with a multiplex PCR assay. Retrospective chart review was done on these patients admitted from January 2018 to February 2020. @*Results@#There were 47 charts reviewed, mean age was 4.2 years old. Out of 47 patients, 36 (76.6%) tested positive for a pathogen. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) being the most common followed by Influenza A/H1-2009 and Human metapneumovirus (hMPV). Two patients had viral co-infections and no bacteria were detected on all subjects. 61.7% patients were started on antibiotics on admission. Fever and cough were the most common sign and symptom, respectively. Normal WBC (68% with neutrophilic predominance) and platelet were detected in 72.3% and 70.2% of patients, respectively; 50% of patients had normal CRP and 60.5% had abnormal findings on chest x-ray. Only the presence of chest x-ray findings was found to have a higher probability of yielding a positive Respiratory Panel p=0.27. @*Conclusion@#Among admitted patients with ARI, 76.6% tested positive for a respiratory pathogen. All were caused by viruses presenting as nonspecific manifestations – fever and cough. Clinical manifestations, CBC and CRP showed no association with the Respiratory Panel result while abnormal chest x-ray had a higher probability of yielding a positive Respiratory Panel result.
Subject(s)
Multiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the value of nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the rap-id detection of pathogens in children with severe pneumonia. Methods We prospectively enrolled the pa-tients with severe community-acquired pneumonia admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Shang-hai Children′s Hospital from January 2017 to June 2018. The sputum for PCR were collected within 24 h after PICU admission. Both nested PCR and routine microbiological methods were performed. Respiratory Panel (R-Panel) based on nested PCR could detect 17 kinds of respiratory pathogen at the same time. Results A total of 65 patients were enrolled in this study and the samples were detected using both R-Panel and routine microbiological method. (1) A total of 15 patients (23. 08 %) showed positive routine microbiological de-tection including 13 cases with virus-positive and 2 cases with mycoplasma-positive; (2) A total of 38 pa-tients (58. 46%) showed positive results using R-Panel within 2 h including 46 cases with virus-positive and 5 cases with mycoplasma-positive. The mainly primary infection was human rhinovirus and enterovirus in 15 cases (23. 08%),followed by adenovirus in 10 cases (15. 38%); and the positive rate of 2 or more patho-gens was 18. 46% (12/65);(3) The rate of adenovirus-positive using R-Panel was significantly higher than that using routine microbiological methods (15. 38 % vs. 4. 62%,χ2 ＝4. 188,P＝0. 041); the sensitivity of R-Panel for detection of adenovirus,respiratory syncytial virus,and parainfluenza virus was significantly high-er than those of routine microbiological methods (100% vs. 30%,χ2 ＝107. 692;50. 00% vs. 16. 67%,χ2 ＝ 24. 442;100% vs. 80%,χ2 ＝22. 222;100% vs. 40%,χ2 ＝85. 714; all P <0. 001). Conclusion R-Panel using nested PCR is a rapid,sensitive,and specific method for the detection of pathogens in children with severe community acquired pneumonia,which is valuable for targeted therapy in time.