Cuidados paliativos: conhecimento de pacientes oncológicos e seus cuidadores / Palliative care: knowledge of cancer patients and their caregivers / Cuidados paliativos: conocimiento de los pacientes oncológicos y de sus cuidadores

Resumo O objetivo do estudo é verificar a percepção sobre cuidados paliativos, diretivas antecipadas de vontade e ordem de não reanimar de pacientes oncológicos e seus cuidadores, bem como a relação destes com os profissionais de saúde. Trata-se de pesquisa descritiva quantitativa, realizada entre 2018 e 2019 no Centro de Alta Complexidade em Oncologia de um hospital universitário brasileiro. A amostra contou com 200 participantes (100 pacientes oncológicos e 100 cuidadores informais). Os dados coletados foram armazenados no Microsoft Excel e processados pelo software SPSS. Foi possível observar o desconhecimento dos participantes sobre questões ligadas à terminalidade da vida, bem como o paradoxo entre discordância em relação à distanásia e concordância com a reanimação obstinada. Os resultados também atestam a importância dos profissionais de saúde na percepção dos cuidadores sobre a própria capacidade de exercer essa função.

Abstract The objective of this study is to verify the perception of palliative care, advance directives of will and do-not-resuscitate order of patients and their caregivers, as well as their relationship with health professionals. This is a quantitative descriptive research, carried out between 2018 and 2019 at the Center for High Complexity in Oncology of a Brazilian university hospital. The sample included 200 participants (100 cancer patients and 100 informal caregivers). The collected data were stored in Microsoft Excel and processed in the SPSS software. It was possible to observe the participants' lack of knowledge about issues related to the end of life, as well as the paradox of disagreeing with dysthanasia and agreeing with obstinate resuscitation. The results also attest to the importance of health professionals in the perception of caregivers about their own capacity to exercise this function.

Resumen Este estudio pretende comprobar la percepción sobre los cuidados paliativos, las directivas anticipadas de voluntad y el orden de no reanimar de los pacientes oncológicos y de sus cuidadores, así como su relación con los profesionales de la salud. Se trata de una investigación descriptiva cuantitativa, realizada entre el 2018 y el 2019 en el Centro de Alta Complejidad en Oncología de un hospital universitario brasileño. La muestra incluyó a 200 participantes (100 pacientes oncológicos y 100 cuidadores informales). Los datos recopilados se almacenaron en Microsoft Excel y se procesaron con el software SPSS. Se pudo observar la falta de conocimiento de los participantes sobre temas relacionados con la terminalidad de la vida, así como la incoherencia entre la desaprobación de la distanasia y la admisión de la reanimación obstinada. Los resultados también confirman la importancia de los profesionales de la salud en la percepción de los cuidadores sobre su propia capacidad para ejercer esta función.

Do-not-resuscitate and treatment limitation decisions - Six years of experience from a Portuguese General Intensive Care Unit

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE Treatment limitation, as well as do-not-resuscitate (DNR) directives, are difficult but important to improve patients' quality of life and minimize dysthanasia. We aimed to study the approach to withholding, withdrawal, and DNR decisions, patients' characteristics, and process documentation in a general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Portugal. METHODS A retrospective analysis of data regarding the limitation of treatment decisions collected from previously-designed forms and complemented by medical record consultation. RESULTS A total of 1602 patients were admitted to the ICU between 2011 and 2016. DNR decisions were documented in 127 cases (7.9%). Patients with treatment limitations were older and had higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II. The most frequent diagnosis preceding these decisions was sepsis (52.0%, n = 66); the most common main reason for limiting treatment was a poor prognosis of acute illness. Of the patients to whom a DNR was implemented, 117 (92.1%) died in the ICU (40.1% of the total number of ICU deaths), and hospital mortality was 100%. Participants in these decisions, as well as types of treatment withdrawn and their respective timings, were not registered in medical records. CONCLUSION Treatment limitation and DNR decisions were relatively common, in line with other Southern European studies, but behind Northern European and North American centers. Patients with these limitations were older and more severely ill than patients without such decisions. Documentation of these processes should be clear and detailed, either in specific forms or computerized clinical records; there is room for improvement in this area.

RESUMO OBJETIVO Decisões de limitação terapêutica (DLT) e de não reanimação (DNR) são difíceis, mas importantes, visando melhorar a qualidade de vida dos doentes e minimizar distanásia. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a abordagem das DNR e DLT, as características dos doentes e a documentação dessas decisões numa Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente (Ucip) em Portugal. MÉTODOS Análise retrospectiva dos dados referentes a DLT e DNR, recolhidos a partir de formulários previamente elaborados e complementados por consulta de processo clínico. RESULTADOS Um total de 1.602 doentes foi internado na Ucip entre 2011 e 2016. DNR foi documentada em 127 casos (7,9%). Doentes com DLT eram mais velhos e tinham um Simplified Acute Physiology Score II mais elevado. O diagnóstico mais frequente que precedeu essas decisões foi sepse (52,0%, n=66); A razão mais comum para limitar o tratamento foi mau prognóstico da doença aguda. Dos doentes nos quais a DNR foi implementada, 117 (92,1%) morreram na Ucip (40,1% do total de óbitos na Ucip) e a mortalidade hospitalar foi de 100%. Os intervenientes nessas decisões, bem como os tipos de tratamento retirados, não foram rotineiramente registrados. CONCLUSÃO As DLT e DNR foram relativamente comuns, em consonância com outros estudos do sul da Europa, mas atrás dos centros do norte da Europa e da América do Norte. Os doentes com essas limitações eram mais velhos e mais gravemente doentes. A documentação dessas decisões deve ser clara e detalhada, seja em formulários específicos, seja em registros clínicos informatizados. Há espaço para melhorias nessa área.

Efeitos de um programa de cuidados paliativos nas tendências de utilização da unidade de terapia intensiva e ordens de não reanimar durante hospitalizações terminais. Análise de séries temporais interrompidas / Effect of a palliative care program on trends in intensive care unit utilization and do-not-resuscitate orders during terminal hospitalizations. An interrupted time series analysis

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os efeitos da implantação de um programa de cuidados paliativos no estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar e na utilização da unidade de terapia intensiva em hospitalizações terminais. Método: Os dados de todos os pacientes que faleceram em um hospital terciário brasileiro, entre maio de 2014 e setembro de 2016, foram coletados de forma retrospectiva. Analisamos a frequência do estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar e de admissões à unidade de terapia intensiva entre os casos de óbito hospitalar. Utilizou-se análise de séries temporais interrompidas para avaliar as diferenças, em termos de tendências de estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar e de admissões à unidade de terapia intensiva antes (15 meses) e após (12 meses) a implantação do programa de cuidados paliativos. Resultados: Analisamos um total de 48.372 admissões ao hospital, dentre as quais 1.071 óbitos no hospital. Os óbitos foram precedidos de ordens de não reanimar em 276 (25,8%) casos e ocorreram admissões à unidade de terapia intensiva em 814 (76%) casos. O estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar aumentou de 125 (20,4%) para 151 (33%) casos, na comparação entre os períodos antes e após a implantação do programa de cuidados paliativos (p < 0,001). Ocorreram admissões à unidade de terapia intensiva em 469 (76,5%) e 345 (75,3%) dos casos, respectivamente, nos períodos pré e após a implantação do programa de cuidados paliativos (p = 0,654). A análise de séries temporais confirmou tendência ao aumento do estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar de 0,5% por mês antes da implantação para 2,9% ao mês após a implantação (p < 0,001), demonstrando-se tendência à diminuição de utilização da unidade de terapia intensiva, de uma tendência a aumento de 0,6% ao mês, antes da implantação do programa, para diminuição de -0,9% ao mês no período, após a implantação (p = 0,001). Conclusão: A implantação de um programa de cuidados paliativos se associou com tendência ao aumento no estabelecimento de ordens de não reanimar e à diminuição do uso da unidade de terapia intensiva durante hospitalizações terminais.

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of the implementation of a palliative care program on do-not-resuscitate orders and intensive care unit utilization during terminal hospitalizations. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for all patients who died in a tertiary hospital in Brazil from May 2014 to September 2016. We analyzed the frequency of do-not-resuscitate orders and intensive care unit admissions among in-hospital deaths. Interrupted time series analyses were used to evaluate differences in trends of do-not-resuscitate orders and intensive care unit admissions before (17 months) and after (12 months) the implementation of a palliative care program. Results: We analyzed 48,372 hospital admissions and 1,071 in-hospital deaths. Deaths were preceded by do-not-resuscitate orders in 276 (25.8%) cases and admissions to the intensive care unit occurred in 814 (76%) cases. Do-not-resuscitate orders increased from 125 (20.4%) to 151 (33%) cases in the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods, respectively (p < 0.001). Intensive care unit admissions occurred in 469 (76.5%) and 345 (75.3%) cases in the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods, respectively (p = 0.654). Interrupted time series analyses confirmed a trend of increased do-not-resuscitate order registrations, from an increase of 0.5% per month pre-implementation to an increase of 2.9% per month post-implementation (p < 0.001), and demonstrated a trend of decreased intensive care unit utilization, from an increase of 0.6% per month pre-implementation to a decrease of -0.9% per month in the post-implementation period (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The implementation of a palliative care program was associated with a trend of increased registration of do-not-resuscitate orders and a trend of decreased intensive care unit utilization during terminal hospitalizations.

A Retrospective Study on the Decision to Prohibit Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients with Premenarcheal Cancer in a University Hospital

OBJECTIVE: Whether to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or do-not-resuscitate (DNR) is not only a medical problem but also a decision that should be made carefully with self-autonomy in accordance with life values. We conducted a retrospective observational study to identify the characteristics of current CPR and DNR at a practical level. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from medical records with regard to the clinical status of DNR decision in 356 patients with cancer who expired between October 2014 and September 2015 in Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital. RESULTS: DNR was decided significantly more frequently in patients with solid cancers than in patients with hematological cancer (87.7% vs. 71.4%, P=0.003). No other significant factor influenced the DNR decision in this study. The main persons who signed the DNR consent form were mostly sons or daughters (60.7%), never the patients themselves. The median time from the DNR order to death was longer in the ward than in the intensive care unit (ICU; 3.0 days vs. 1.0 days). The mean time from the DNR order to death was 6.6 days (median, 2 days). Among the patients with a DNR order, 110 (36.7%) were hospitalized in the ICU and 73 (24.3%) were treated with ventilator support. CONCLUSION: Most patients expired 6.6 days after DNR permission was given and could not decide their treatment plan by themselves. For better end-of-life care, the sensitive DNR decision with consideration of the individualized environment of the patient for life-sustaining treatment should be settled in Korea.

Treatment of Patients with Cancer in a Secondary Hospital in Korea / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate treatment of cancer patients at a secondary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed with electronic medical records of cancer patients admitted to a secondary hospital from January 1, 2009 through September 31, 2017. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were studied. Sixty-nine patients were hospitalized for supportive care after receiving a surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy at a tertiary hospital, 58 patients for other supportive care, 53 patients for symptom control, 16 patients with a decision not to take active cancer treatment, and 27 patients for treatment of cancer that was diagnosed during their hospital stay. Among 75 patients who were discharged to other institutions, 50 were transferred to tertiary hospitals, 10 to long-term care hospitals, eight to hospice hospitals, four to nursing homes and two to secondary hospitals. Comorbidities were found in 120 patients (53.8%). For patients who consulted with more than one department, more consultations were for non-cancer diseases than cancer. Seventy-three patients had a do-not-resuscitate order. CONCLUSION: For treatment of cancer patients, it is needed to establish a cooperation system among medical institutions and provide comprehensive management including treatment of comorbidities.

Frecuencia de órdenes de no reanimación en un hospital universitario de cuarto nivel de complejidad / Do-not-resuscitate orders frecuency in a fourth level university Hospital

Las órdenes de no reanimación (ONR) surgen luego de la introducción de la reanimación cardiopulmonar (RCP) en la práctica clínica como una alternativa para los pacientes que, por diferentes motivos, no eran candidatos para recibir este tipo de manejo médico. Con el tiempo se han incrementado las decisiones de no reanimar a los pacientes, posiblemente por el envejecimiento de la población, el aumento en la prevalencia de patologías oncológicas o una mayor sensibilización de los médicos en cuanto a los desenlaces de los pacientes que son llevados a una RCP. De acuerdo con lo anterior, se desarrolló este estudio con el objetivo de conocer y describir la frecuencia de las ONR y RCP en los pacientes que murieron en un hospital de cuarto nivel en la ciudad de Bogotá. Igualmente, se describieron las características demográficas de estos pacientes.

After the introduction of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation into clinical practice, non-resuscitation orders emerged as an alternative for those patients that, for several reasons, were not candidates to receive this type of medical treatment. Over time the non-resuscitation orders have increased in number, possibly due to the aging of the population, an increase in the prevalence of oncological pathologies or greater awareness of the physicians regarding the outcomes of the patients being carried to a CPR. According to the above, this study was developed with the objective of knowing and describing the frequency of ONR and CPR in patients who died in a 4th level hospital in the city of Bogotá. Likewise, the demographic characteristics of these patients were described.

Impact of Biomedical Ethics Awareness and Ethical Values in Nursing Student on Their Attitudes towards DNR / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify how nursing students' awareness of biomedical ethics and ethical values affect their attitudes towards a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. METHODS: This cross-sectional correlation study was conducted with 275 nursing students enrolled at two universities in North Chungcheong Province and North Gyeongsang Province of South Korea. Data were collected in April 2017 using a self-reported questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise multiple regression with the SPSS/WIN 23.0 program. RESULTS: The students' attitudes towards DNR were positively correlated with attitudes that seek ethical values but negatively correlated with their biomedical ethics awareness. The explained variance for attitudes towards DNR was 20%, which was significant (F=13.01, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that nursing students' biomedical ethics awareness and ethical values were associated with their attitudes towards DNR. Curriculum organization and various educational programs should be developed and applied to help nursing students develop ethical values and awareness of biomedical ethics.

End-of-Life Care Practice in Dying Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Order: A Single Center Experience / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: End-of-life (EoL) decisions are challenging and multifaceted for patients and physicians. This study was aimed to explore how EoL care is practiced for patients with a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients who died after agreeing to a DNR order in 2016 at a university hospital. Characteristics including cause of death, intensity of EoL care, and other factors were reviewed and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Of total 375 patients, 170 patients (45.3%) died with malignancies, and 205 patients (54.6%) with other causes involving the central nervous system (19.2%), pulmonary (14.7%), cardiologic (6.7%) and infectious (6.4%) conditions. Both the cancer and non-cancer patient groups showed a short duration from DNR to death (median 3 days vs 2 days, P=0.629). An intensive care group comprising patients who received one or more intensive treatments such as ventilator (n=205) showed a higher number of non-cancer patients and a shorter duration from DNR to death than a group that withheld treatment before DNR (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: EoL decisions were made very late by both cancer and non-cancer patients. About half of the patients did not have cancer, and two-thirds of them decided DNR during intensive treatment. To make a good EoL decision, a shared decision making with patients should be done at an earlier stage.

Do not attempt resuscitation orders at the emergency department of a teaching hospital / Ordens de não ressuscitação no serviço de emergência de um hospital universitário

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify factors associated with not attempting resuscitation. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at the emergency department of a teaching hospital. The sample consisted of 285 patients; in that, 216 were submitted to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 69 were not. The data were collected by means of the in-hospital Utstein Style. To compare resuscitation attempts with variables of interest we used the χ2 test, likelihood ratio, Fisher exact test, and analysis of variance (p<0.05). Results: No cardiopulmonary resuscitation was considered unjustifiable in 56.5% of cases; in that, 37.7% did not want resuscitation and 5.8% were found dead. Of all patients, 22.4% had suffered a previous cardiac arrest, 49.1% were independent for Activities of Daily Living, 89.8% had positive past medical/surgical history; 63.8% were conscious, 69.8% were breathing and 74.4% had a pulse upon admission. Most events (76.4%) happened at the hospital, the presumed cause was respiratory failure in 28.7% and, in 48.4%, electric activity without pulse was the initial rhythm. The most frequent cause of death was infection. The factors that influenced non-resuscitation were advanced age, history of neoplasm and the initial arrest rhythm was asystole. Conclusion: Advanced age, past history of neoplasia and asystole as initial rhythm were factors that significantly influenced the non-performance of resuscitation. Greater clarity when making the decision to resuscitate patients can positively affect the quality of life of survivors.

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar fatores associados à não realização de ressuscitação. Métodos: Estudo transversal realizado no serviço de emergência de um hospital universitário. A amostra foi composta por 285 pacientes, dos quais 216 foram submetidos à ressuscitação cardiopulmonar, e 69 não tiveram esta conduta. Os dados foram coletados por meio do in-hospital Utstein Style. Para comparar as tentativas de ressuscitação e as variáveis de interesse, utilizaram-se o teste do χ2, a razão de verossimilhança, o teste exato de Fisher e a análise de variância (p<0,05). Resultados: A não ressuscitação foi considerada injustificável em 56,5% dos casos, sendo que 37,7% não queriam ressuscitação e 5,8% foram encontrados mortos. Do total de pacientes, 22,4% tiveram parada cardíaca prévia, 49,1% eram independentes para Atividades de Vida Diária, e 89,8% tinham alguma história pregressa; 63,8% estavam conscientes, 69,8% estavam respirando e 74,4% tinham pulso palpável à admissão. A maioria dos eventos (76,4%) ocorreu no hospital, e a causa presumida de parada foi insuficiência respiratória em 28,7% e, em 48,4%, o ritmo inicial foi atividade elétrica sem pulso. A causa mais frequente de morte foi infecção. Os fatores que influenciaram na não realização de ressuscitação foram idade avançada, história de neoplasia e assistolia como ritmo inicial de parada. Conclusão: Idade avançada, história de neoplasia e assistolia como ritmo inicial foram os fatores que influenciaram significativamente na não realização de ressuscitação. Maior clareza na decisão de reanimar pode afetar positivamente a qualidade de vida dos pacientes.

Percepção de pacientes oncológicos sobre terminalidade de vida / Perception of oncology patients on the terminality of life / Percepción de los pacientes oncológicos sobre la terminalidad de la vida

Resumo Objetivou-se analisar, por meio de pesquisa descritiva, a percepção de pacientes oncológicos diante da terminalidade da vida. Aplicou-se questionário para 100 pacientes oncológicos, dos quais 85% desconheciam testamento vital/diretivas antecipadas de vontade, 81% desconheciam cuidados paliativos e 70% desconheciam ordem de não reanimar. Após esclarecimento sobre os termos empregados, 62% concordariam em elaborar testamento vital/diretivas antecipadas de vontade, 82% concordariam em receber cuidados paliativos no domicílio e 64% em ser reanimados em qualquer situação, mas a maioria (73%) discordou da prática de distanásia. Apenas 11% referiram inadequação na forma de comunicação de seu diagnóstico pelo médico. A presença de metástases suscitou reflexão mais ampla sobre terminalidade da vida. Os resultados permitem inferir que é necessário incentivar a discussão sobre terminalidade da vida na população durante a assistência aos pacientes, bem como estimular o debate sobre o assunto durante a formação de profissionais de saúde.

Abstract With the aim of analysing the perception of cancer patients towards the end of life, a questionnaire was applied to 100 oncologic patients, of which 85% were unaware of living will/advance directives, 81% were unaware of the terms palliative care and 70% were unaware of order to not reanimate. After clarifying the meaning of the terms used, 62% agreed to make living will/advance directives, 82% to receive palliative care at home and 64% to be reanimated in any situation, but the majority (73%) disagreed with the practice of futility. Only 11% reported inadequacies in the communication of their diagnosis by the physician. The fact of having metastases elicited a broader reflection on the termination of life. The results allow to infer that it is necessary to encourage the discussion about termination of life to the population during patient care, as well to promote the respective training to health professionals since the undergraduate course.

Resumen Con el fin de analizar la percepción de los pacientes con cáncer frente al final de su vida, a través de una investigación descriptiva, se aplicó un cuestionario a 100 pacientes de cáncer, entre los cuales el 85% desconocía las directivas anticipadas de voluntad, el 81% desconocía los términos de cuidados paliativos y el 70% desconocía la orden de no reanimar. Después de la clarificación del significado de los términos utilizados, el 62% estaba de acuerdo para elaborar su testamento vital/directivas anticipadas de voluntad, el 82% para recibir los cuidados paliativos en el hogar y el 64% para ser restablecido en cualquier situación, pero la mayoría (73%) no estuvo de acuerdo con la distanasia. Tan sólo el 11% consideró inadecuada la comunicación del diagnóstico por el médico. El hecho de portar metástasis amplió la reflexión sobre el final de la vida. Los resultados muestran que es necesario fomentar la discusión del final de la vida en la población durante la atención al paciente, y promover la respectiva formación a los profesionales de la salud desde el pregrado.

The Association between End-of-Life Care and the Time Interval between Provision of a Do-Not-Resuscitate Consent and Death in Cancer Patients in Korea / Journal of the Korean Cancer Association, 대한암학회지

PURPOSE: We explored the relationship between the use of each medical intervention and the length of time between do-not-resuscitate (DNR) consent and death in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 295 terminal cancer patients participated in this retrospective study. Invasive interventions (e.g., cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, and hemodialysis), less invasive interventions (e.g., transfusion, antibiotic use, inotropic use, and laboratory tests), and the time interval between the DNR order and death were evaluated. The subjects were divided into three groups based on the amount of time between DNR consent and death (G1, time interval ≤ 1 day; G2, time interval > 1 day to ≤ 3 days; and G3, time interval > 3 days). RESULTS: In general, there were fewer transfusions and laboratory tests near death. Invasive interventions tended to be implemented only in the G1 group. There was also less inotrope use and fewer laboratory tests in the G3 group than G1 and G2. Moreover, the G3 group received fewer less invasive interventions than those in G1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.84; 3 days before death, and OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.59; the day before death). The frequency of less invasive interventions both 1 and 3 days before death was significantly lower for the G3 group than the G1 (p ≤ 0.001) and G2 group compared to G1 (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Earlier attainment of DNR permission was associated with reduced use of medical intervention. Thus, physicians should discuss death with terminal cancer patients at the earliest practical time to prevent unnecessary and uncomfortable procedures and reduce health care costs.

Changes of Nursing Activities on Patients with DNR Orders / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify the changes to nursing activities of nurses on patients with DNR (Do-Not-Resuscitate) order and factors associated to the changes. METHODS: Data were collected using a structured questionnaire for 173 nurses at general hospitals. Logistic regression analysis was performed on the data using SAS 9.4. RESULTS: With 39 nursing activities, an average of 60.4 (34.9%) nurses reported an increase in the activities, 102.4 (59.2%) no change and 10.1 (5.9%) a drop. The activity increase was the greatest in the social area, and the physical area was where the activities decreased the most. The activity increase was associated knowledge competency (9 items), attitudes (2 items), practical competency (4 items) and work load (14 items were). CONCLUSION: To offer systematical care for DNR patients, it is necessary to expand nurses' knowledge through end-of-life education and adjust their workload and provide a support system at the department level.

Changes in Life-sustaining Treatment in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients after Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: This study investigated changes in life-sustaining treatments in terminally ill cancer patients after consenting to a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed to select terminally ill cancer patients who were treated at the oncology unit of the Asan Medical Center, a tertiary hospital in South Korea and died between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. RESULTS: The median (range) age of the 200 patients was 59 (22~89) years, and 62% (124 persons) were male. Among all patients, 83.5% were aware of their medical condition, and 47.0% of the patients had their DNR order signed by their spouses. The median of the patients' hospital stay was 15 days, and time from admission to DNR decision was 10 days. After signing a DNR order, 35.7~100% of the life-sustaining treatments that had been provided at the time of the DNR decision making were administered. The most commonly discontinued interventions were transfusion (13.5%), blood test (11.5%) and parenteral nutrition (8.5%). CONCLUSION: It is necessary to define the scope of life-sustaining treatments for DNR patients. Treatment guidelines should be established as well to secure terminal patients' death with dignity after their consent to a DNR order, thereby avoiding meaningless life-sustaining treatments and allowing administration of active terminal care interventions.

Opinions of Brazilian resuscitation instructors regarding resuscitation in the delivery room of extremely preterm newborns / Opiniões dos instrutores de reanimação brasileiros quanto à reanimação em sala de parto de em recém-nascidos pré-termo extremos

Abstract Objective: To describe the opinions of pediatricians who teach resuscitation in Brazil on initiating and limiting the delivery room resuscitation of extremely preterm infants. Method: Cross-sectional study with electronic questionnaire (Dec/2011-Sep/2013) sent to pediatricians who are instructors of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics, containing three hypothetical clinical cases: (1) decision to start the delivery room resuscitation; (2) limitation of neonatal intensive care after delivery room resuscitation; (3) limitation of advanced resuscitation in the delivery room. For each case, it was requested that the instructor indicate the best management for each gestational age between 23 and 26 weeks. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: 560 (82%) instructors agreed to participate. Only 9% of the instructors reported the existence of written guidelines at their hospital regarding limitations of delivery room resuscitation. At 23 weeks, 50% of the instructors would initiate delivery room resuscitation procedures. At 26 weeks, 2% would decide based on birth weight and/or presence of fused eyelids. Among the participants, 38% would re-evaluate their delivery room decision and limit the care for 23-week neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit. As for advanced resuscitation, 45% and 4% of the respondents, at 23 and 26 weeks, respectively, would not apply chest compressions and/or medications. Conclusion: Difficulty can be observed regarding the decision to not resuscitate a preterm infant with 23 weeks of gestational age. At the same time, a small percentage of pediatricians would not resuscitate neonates of unquestionable viability at 26 weeks of gestational age in the delivery room.

Resumo Objetivo: Descrever opiniões dos pediatras que ensinam reanimação no Brasil a respeito de iniciar e limitar a reanimação em sala de parto de neonatos pré-termo extremos. Método: Estudo transversal com questionário eletrônico (dez/11-set/13) enviado aos instrutores do Programa de Reanimação Neonatal da Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria com três casos clínicos hipotéticos: 1) decisão de iniciar ou não a reanimação; 2) limitação ou não dos cuidados intensivos após a reanimação em sala de parto; 3) limitação ou não da reanimação avançada em sala de parto. Para cada caso foi solicitada a indicação da conduta para cada idade gestacional entre 23-26 semanas. A análise foi descritiva por meio da frequência das respostas. Resultados: Consentiram em participar 560 (82%) instrutores. Apenas 9% afirmaram existir em seu hospital norma escrita sobre quando não iniciar a reanimação em sala de parto. Com 23 semanas, 50% dos instrutores fariam a reanimação em sala de parto e com 26 semanas 2% baseariam sua decisão no peso ao nascer e/ou na abertura da fenda palpebral. Dos entrevistados, 38% reavaliariam sua decisão e limitariam o cuidado na UTI a medidas de conforto para nascidos de 23 semanas reanimados na sala de parto. Quanto aos procedimentos de reanimação avançada, 45% e 4% com 23 e 26 semanas, respectivamente, não indicariam tais manobras. Conclusão: Observa-se dificuldade na opção de não reanimar neonatos com 23 semanas de gestação e, ao mesmo tempo, um pequeno percentual de pediatras não reanima, na sala de parto, neonatos cuja viabilidade não é questionada (26 semanas).

Ordem de não reanimar pacientes em fase terminal sob a perspectiva de médicos / Terminally ill patients' do not resuscitate orders from the doctors' perspective / La orden de no reanimar a los pacientes en fase terminal bajo la perspectiva de los médicos

Ordem de não reanimar consiste na manifestação expressa da recusa de reanimação cardiopulmonar por paciente com doença avançada em progressão. Objetivou-se descrever a atitude dos médicos em relação à ordem de não reanimar e à necessidade de sua normatização. Foi aplicado questionário a 80 médicos inscritos na delegacia do Conselho Regional de Medicina de Joaçaba/SC, Brasil. Verificou-se que 90% dos participantes conheciam o significado dessa ordem, 86,2% concordavam em acatá-la, 91,2% consideravam importante seu registro em prontuário e 92,5% consideravam oportuna a emissão de normatização a respeito. Concluiu-se que a maioria dos médicos tinha conhecimento sobre Ordem de Não Reanimar, concordava em respeitá-la, valorizava seu registro em prontuário e desejava a normatização por parte dos órgãos competentes.

The do-not-resuscitate order is the explicit statement by patients with advanced disease in progression refusing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study aimed to describe the attitude of physicians in relation to the this order and the need for its regulation. A questionnaire was applied to 80 physicians in the medical bureau of the Regional Council of Medicine of Joacaba/SC, Brazil. It was found that 90% of the respondents knew the meaning of do-not-resuscitate, 86.2% agreed to respect it, 91.2% considered it important to be registered in medical records and 92.5% understood as opportune the issuance of a regulation in this regard. It was concluded that most doctors knew about the do-not-resuscitate order, agreed to respect it, valued its registration in medical records and wanted its regulation by the relevant bodies.

La orden de no reanimar es la manifestación expresa de rechazo de la reanimación cardiopulmonar por parte de pacientes portadores de una enfermedad avanzada en progresión. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir la actitud de los médicos con respecto a esta orden y la necesidad de su regulación. Se aplicó un cuestionario a 80 médicos (50% del total) inscriptos en el distrito del Consejo Regional de Medicina de Joaçaba, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Se encontró que el 90% de los encuestados conocían el significado de esta orden, el 86,2% estaban de acuerdo en cumplirla, el 91,2% consideraban importante el registro en el historial médico y el 92,5% juzgaban oportuna la existencia de una regulación al respecto. Se concluyó que la mayoría de los médicos tenía conocimiento de la orden de no reanimar, estaba de acuerdo en respetarla, valoraba su registro en el historial médico y deseaba su regulación por parte de las instituciones competentes.

Percepção de profissionais de saúde sobre o processo de tomada de decisão na assistência a pacientes pediátricos / Health professionals' perceptions about the decision-making process in the care of pediatric patients

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar as percepções de médicos, enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem sobre sua participação no processo de tomada de decisão de limitação de suporte de vida, em pacientes pediátricos terminais, comparando por categoria profissional. Métodos: Estudo transversal realizado em unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica de hospital público universitário, terciário, com a participação de médicos, enfermeiros e técnicos de enfermagem. Foi usada a Escala de Voz da MacArthur Admission Experience Survey para avaliar e quantificar a percepção dos profissionais que assistiram 17 pacientes pediátricos em limitação de suporte de vida, nas primeiras 24 horas após o desfecho de cada paciente. Todos os profissionais que atuavam na unidade (n=117), potencialmente elegíveis para a pesquisa, receberam o Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido previamente à ocorrência dos casos. Resultados: Participaram 25/40 (62,5%) médicos, 10/17 (58,8%) enfermeiros e 41/60 (68,3%) técnicos de enfermagem, representando 65% dos profissionais elegíveis. A taxa de devolução dos questionários pelos médicos foi maior que a dos técnicos (p = 0,0258). Houve registro de percepção de falta de voz nas três categorias profissionais, em taxas variáveis, porém menos percebida pelos médicos do que pelos enfermeiros e técnicos (p < 0,00001); entre estes últimos, não houve diferença (p = 0,7016). Nas três categorias profissionais, foram assinalados os três itens que compõem a subescala. Em duas das três afirmativas, houve diferença significativa entre médicos e enfermeiros (p = 0,004), e entre médicos e técnicos (p = 0,001). Em uma das afirmativas, não houve diferença entre as três categorias profissionais. Conclusão: Houve percepção de falta de voz no processo de tomada de decisão, em taxas variáveis, nas três categorias de profissionais que assistiram pacientes pediátricos terminais em limitação de suporte de vida, sendo os médicos os que expressaram menor percepção de coerção.

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the perceptions of physicians, nurses and nursing technicians of their participation in the decision-making process surrounding life support limitation in terminally ill pediatric patients, with comparisons by professional category. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary public university hospital with the participation of physicians, nurses and nursing technicians. The MacArthur Admission Experience Survey Voice Scale was used to assess and quantify the perceptions of professionals who assisted 17 pediatric patients with life support limitation within 24 hours after the outcome of each patient was determined. All professionals working in the unit (n = 117) who were potentially eligible for the study received a free and informed consent form prior to the occurrence of the cases studied. Results: Study participants included 25/40 (62.5%) physicians, 10/17 (58.8%) nurses and 41/60 (68.3%) nursing technicians, representing 65% of the eligible professionals identified. The questionnaire return rate was higher for physicians than technicians (p = 0.0258). A perceived lack of voice was reported in all three professional categories at varying rates that were lower for physicians than for nurses and nursing technicians (p < 0.00001); there was no difference between the latter (p = 0.7016). In the three professional categories studied, three subscale items were reported. For two of the three statements, there were significant differences between physicians and nurses (p = 0.004) and between physicians and nursing technicians (p = 0.001). For one of the statements, there was no difference among the three professional categories. Conclusion: Respondents perceived a lack of voice in the decision-making process at varying rates across the three categories of studied professionals who assisted terminally ill pediatric patients with life support limitation, with physicians expressing lowered rates of perceived coercion.

Clinical Characteristics of Oncologic Patients with DNR Decision at a Tertiary Hospital / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to identify clinical characteristics of oncologic patients at a point when they signed their do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. METHODS: From January through December 2014, we retrospectively analyzed the records of 197 patients who passed away after agreeing to a DNR order in the hemato-oncology department of a tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Of all, 121 patients (61.4%) were male and 76 (38.6%) were female, and their average age was 58.7 years. Ninety-four patients (47.7%) had gastrointestinal cancer. The ECOG performance status at admission was grade 3 in 76 patients (36.5%) and grade 4 in 11 (5.6%). The patients' mean hospital stay was 20 days. The mean duration from the admission to DNR decision was 13 days, and the mean duration from DNR decision to death was seven days. CONCLUSION: Study results indicate that a decision on signing or refusing a DNR order was made by medical staff mostly based on the opinions of patients' guardians rather than the patients themselves. This suggests that patients' own wishes are not well respected. Thus, it is urgent to establish institutional devices to enhance cancer patients' autonomy regarding DNR and to define an adequate timing for withdrawal of treatments.

Effect of Timing of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders on the Clinical Outcome of Critically Ill Patients / 대한중환자의학회지

BACKGROUND: Many physicians hesitate to discuss do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders with patients or family members in critical situations. In the intensive care unit (ICU), delayed DNR decisions could cause unintentional cardiopulmonary resuscitation, patient distress, and substantial cost. We investigated whether the timing of DNR designation affects patient outcome in the medical ICU. METHODS: We enrolled retrospective patients with written DNR orders in a medical ICU (13 bed) from June 1, 2014 to May 31, 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: early DNR patients for whom DNR orders were implemented within 48 h of ICU admission, and late DNR patients for whom DNR orders were implemented more than 48 h after ICU admission. RESULTS: Herein, 354 patients were admitted to the medical ICU and among them, 80 (22.6%) patients had requested DNR orders. Of these patients, 37 (46.3%) had designated DNR orders within 48 hours of ICU admission and 43 (53.7%) patients had designated DNR orders more than 48 hours after ICU admission. Compared with early DNR patients, late DNR patients tended to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining management (18.9% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.072). DNR consent forms were signed by family members instead of the patients. Septic shock was the most common cause of medical ICU admission in both the early and late DNR patients (54.1% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.131). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (83.8% vs. 81.4%, p = 0.779). Late DNR patients had longer ICU stays than early DNR patients (7.4 ± 8.1 vs. 19.7 ± 19.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes are not influenced by the time of DNR designation in the medical ICU. The late DNR group is associated with a longer length of ICU stay and a tendency of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. However, further studies are needed to clarify the guideline for end-of-life care in critically ill patients.

Effect of Timing of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders on the Clinical Outcome of Critically Ill Patients / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: Many physicians hesitate to discuss do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders with patients or family members in critical situations. In the intensive care unit (ICU), delayed DNR decisions could cause unintentional cardiopulmonary resuscitation, patient distress, and substantial cost. We investigated whether the timing of DNR designation affects patient outcome in the medical ICU. METHODS: We enrolled retrospective patients with written DNR orders in a medical ICU (13 bed) from June 1, 2014 to May 31, 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: early DNR patients for whom DNR orders were implemented within 48 h of ICU admission, and late DNR patients for whom DNR orders were implemented more than 48 h after ICU admission. RESULTS: Herein, 354 patients were admitted to the medical ICU and among them, 80 (22.6%) patients had requested DNR orders. Of these patients, 37 (46.3%) had designated DNR orders within 48 hours of ICU admission and 43 (53.7%) patients had designated DNR orders more than 48 hours after ICU admission. Compared with early DNR patients, late DNR patients tended to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining management (18.9% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.072). DNR consent forms were signed by family members instead of the patients. Septic shock was the most common cause of medical ICU admission in both the early and late DNR patients (54.1% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.131). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (83.8% vs. 81.4%, p = 0.779). Late DNR patients had longer ICU stays than early DNR patients (7.4 ± 8.1 vs. 19.7 ± 19.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes are not influenced by the time of DNR designation in the medical ICU. The late DNR group is associated with a longer length of ICU stay and a tendency of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. However, further studies are needed to clarify the guideline for end-of-life care in critically ill patients.

Do-not-resuscitation in Terminal Cancer Patient / 한국호스피스완화의료학회지

For patients who are near the end of life, an inevitable step is discussion of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, which involves patients, their family members and physicians. To discuss DNR orders, patients and family members should know the meaning of the order and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) which includes chest compression, defibrillation, medication to restart the heart, artificial ventilation, and tube insertion in the respiratory tract. And the following issues should be considered as well: patients' and their families' autonomy, futility of treatment, and the right for death with dignity. Terminal cancer patients should be informed of what futility of treatment is, such as a low survival rate of CPR, unacceptable quality of life after CPR, and an irremediable disease status. In Korea, two different law suits related to life supporting treatments had been filed, which in turn raised public interest in death with dignity. Since the 1980s, knowledge of and attitude toward DNR among physicians and the public have been improved. However, most patients are still alienated from the decision making process, and the decision is often made less than a week before death. Thus, the DNR discussion process should be improved. Early palliative care should be adopted more widely.