ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the reference interval of neonatal nutrition assessment biochemical factor,including total protein (TP),serum albumin (ALB),serum prealbumin (PA) and serum retinol binding protein (RBP).Methods From December 2016 to August 2017,403 serum specimens were collected from health neonates in Hunan Children's Hospital and the serum concentration of TP,ALB,RBP and PA was detected.The results of each item were grouped according to sex and age,and then the reference interval of each item was established.Results When data was separated by gender of each item,there was no statistical significance between each group of each item (P ＞ 0.05).For the TP,ALB and RBP,separating the data of each item by weeks,there were also no statistical significance between each group (P ＞ 0.05).But there was statistical difference between one week old group and the rest groups in the data of PA (P ＜ 0.05).The normal reference interval of neonatal serum total protein,albumin,retinol binding protein and pre-albumin are as follow:(40.69-65.72) g/L,(28.77-42.3) g/L,(12.13-33.19) mg/L,(42.26-161.52) mg/L (no more than 7 days old) and (59.05-170.23) mg/L (range from 8 to 28 days old).Conclusions We can establish the reference interval of TP,ALB and RBP without differentiating gender and weeks.But for the PA,the reference interval of one-week-old neonate needs to differentiate from other neonates.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the relationships between serum concentration of RBP-4 and inflammatory factors,insulin resistance in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.Methods20 patients newly diagnosed with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT),27 patients newly diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM) and 50 subjects with normal glucose tolerance(NGT) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study.Additionally,another subset analysis was performed,subjects were divided on the basis of BMI into normal weight (NW) and overweight or obesity (OW/OB).Serum RBP-4 was measured with ELISA;serum concentrations of hs-CRP,free fatty acids (FFA),triglyeride(TG),total cholesterol (TC) and insulin were measured in fasting status.Insulin resistance was assessed by HOMA-IR.ResultsLn(HOMA-IR) and the concentrations of FFA,ln(hs-CRP) in IGT or in GDM were significantly higher than that of NGT(P＜0.05).In the group of OW/OB,FFA[(0.90±0.31)mmol/L vs (0.71±0.28)mmol/L,t＝2.73,P＜0.05)],ln(hs-CRP)(0.62±1.00 vs -0.17±1.07,t＝2.90,P＜0.05),ln(HOMA-IR),lnRBP(0.56±0.27 vs 0.30±0.14,t＝2.86,P＜0.05)were significantly higher than that of NW.In the group of GDM,lnRBP-4 showed a positive relationship with FFA (r＝0.231,P＜0.05)and ln(hs-CRP) (r＝0.237,P＜0.05).There was a positive relationship between lnRBP-4 and FFA(r＝0.371,P＜0.05) or ln(hs-CRP)(r＝0.247,P＜0.05) in the group of OW/OB,but no association in the group of NGT,IGT or NW.There was no relationship between lnRBP-4 and ln(HOMA-IR) in IGT,GDM and NW,while in the group of NGT and OW/OB,lnRBP-4 showed a positive relationship with ln(HOMA-IR) (r＝0.276,0.290,P＜0.05).In a multiple linear regression analysis,ln(hs-CRP),FFA or ln(HOMA-IR) was not the independent factor of lnRBP-4 in any group.ConclusionsIn patients with gestational diabetes mellitus,lnRBP-4 may be a new marker of inflammation.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the relationships between serum concentration of RBP-4 and the parameters of inflammatory, lipid metabolism, insulin resistance in patients with T2DM. Methods 71 patients newly diagnosed with T2DM and 34 subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Additionally, another subset analysis was performed. Subjects were divided into normal weight (NW) and overweight or obesity (OW/OB) group on the basis of BMI. Serum RBP-4 was measured with ELISA. Serum concentrations of hs-CRP, free fatty acids (FFA), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC) and insulin were measured in fasting status. Insulin resistance was assessed by HOMA-IR. Results Ln (HOMA-IR) and the concentrations of TG, FFA, In(hs-CRP) in T2DM were significant-ly higher than that of NGR group[1.20±0.38 vs 0.76±0.34,(2.74±2. 20)mmol/L vs (1.88±1.41),(0. 80±0. 29)mmol/L vs (0.61±0.22)retool/L,0.62±1.00 vs -0. 17±1.07] . InRBP-4 showed a positive relationship with In (HOMA-IR) ( r =0. 382, P <0. 05), but no association with TC, TG, FFA and In(hs-CRP). In the group of T2DM, InRBP-4 showed a positive relationship with FFA ( r =0. 242, P <0.05) and In (hs-CRP) ( r =0.346, P <0.01), but no association with TC, TG and In (HOMA-IR). There were no relationships between InRBP-4 and In (HOMA-IR), TC, TG, FFA and In (hs-CRP)in NW, while in OW/OB group, InRBP-4 showed a positive relationship with In (HOMA-IR) ( r =0. 290,P < 0. 05 ) and In (hs-CRP) ( r = 0. 295, P <0.05 ), but no association with TC, TG and FFA. In a mul-tiple linear regression analysis, In( hs-CRP), TC, TG, FFA or In(HOMA-IR) was not the independent de-terminant of InRBP-4 in any group. Conclusion In patients with T2DM, InRBP-4 is positively correlatedwith In (hs-CRP) and FFA, and it may be a new marker of inflammation.