ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the differences of clinical features between aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP) and general retinopathy of prematurity (GROP) and to find the risk factors of APROP.Method:From January 2014 to December 2018, newborns with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) hospitalized in our hospital were retrospectively studied. According to the diagnosis criteria of APROP, the newborns were assigned into GROP group and APROP group. Their clinical data, treatment and perinatal data were collected. SPSS 18.0 was used to compare the differences between the two groups.Result:A total of 127 newborns were included in the study, 107 in the GROP group and 20 in the APROP group. 91.6% (98/107) infants with gestational age (GA) <32 w were in the GROP group and 95.0% (19/20) in the APROP group. 84.1% (90/107) infants with birth weight (BW) <1 500 g were in the GROP group and 90.0% (18/20) in the APROP group. No significant differences existed of GA and BW between the two groups. 53.3% (57/107) infants in the GROP group received ≥2 times of blood transfusion, significantly lower than 85.0% (17/20) in the APROP group ( P<0.05). Mechanical ventilation (MV) was used in 81.3% (87/107) infants in the GROP group with most duration less than 7 days (69.2%, 74/107). MV was used in all infants in the APROP group with most duration longer than 7 days (65.0%, 13/20). The APROP group had significantly longer MV duration than the GROP group ( P<0.05). Some of the GROP group received laser photocoagulation therapy and all had good prognosis. Most of the APROP group received intravitreal injection and some of them combined with laser photocoagulation. The majority of them had favorable prognosis. Conclusion:The APROP group and the GROP group have similar general clinical characteristics. Increased blood transfusion and elongated MV duration may be risk factors for APROP.