ABSTRACT
Ricin is a highly toxic plant protein produced by the seeds of the castor plant. It belongs to the ribosome inactivating proteins (RIP) family and causes cell death by inhibiting the protein synthesis activity of ribosome. Ricin takes a unique pathway called "retrograde trafficking pathway" to enter the cytosol, where it interacts with ribosome and then exerts its inhibitory activity. No effective antidote agents have been developed for the treatment of ricin poisoning. In this paper, the structure, cell trafficking process, toxicological mechanism and the research progress in ricin antitoxin agents are reviewed.
ABSTRACT
Ricin is a highly toxic plant protein produced by the seeds of the castor plant. It belongs to the ribosome inactivat-ing proteins(RIP)family and causes cell death by inhibiting the protein synthesis activity of ribosome. Ricin takes a unique pathway calledretrograde trafficking pathwayto enter the cytosol,where it interacts with ribosome and then exerts its inhibitory activity. No effective antidote agents have been developed for the treatment of ricin poisoning. In this paper,the structure,cell trafficking process, toxicological mechanism and the research progress in ricin antitoxin agents are reviewed.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare regeneration of motor fibers with that of sensory fibers by end to side neurorrhaphy and compare the effect of end to side neurorrhaphy with that of end to end neurorrhaphy. Methods: 20 SD rats were randomly divided into two groups: group A and group B. In group A, the right peroneal nerve was sectioned and the distal end was sutured laterally to the tibial nerve; in group B, the right peroneal nerve was sectioned and sutured with end to end neurorrhaphy. All left sides of two groups were used as control. Retrograde transportation of HRP was observed after 28 weeks. Results: The labelled neurons were also found in the anterior horn of the spinal cord and the spinal ganglia. Conclusion: The regenerative nerve fibers had motor fibers as well as sensory fibers by end to side neurorrhaphy. The effect of end to side neurorrhaphy is not as good as that of end to end neurorrhaphy. [