ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Urban barrier-free facilities are imperfect in China, but visually impaired people need barrier-free facilities urgently. OBJECTIVE: To understand the public’s cognition and problems about urban barrier-free facilities, and put forward improvement suggestions by researching the application status of barrier-free facilities in Shijiazhuang (taking tactile ground surface indicator as an example). METHODS: One hundred and eighteen citizens and 51 ordinary sanitation workers at Shijiazhuang were randomly selected, and underwent cognitive survey by questionnaire. Meanwhile, 60 visually impaired persons were tactile ground surface indicator using survey by questionnaire. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Most citizens, sanitation workers and visually impaired person have a certain understanding of tactile ground surface indicator, but the awareness rate is still low. Totally 7% citizens and 18% sanitation workers did not know the tactile ground surface indicator, and the travel rate of visually impaired people was extremely low, only 38% visually impaired person were able to travel frequently. More than 50% people thought that the tactile ground surface indicator had not actually effect. Only 19% citizens were more satisfied with the supervision, maintenance and maintenance of the tactile ground surface indicator. 56% visually impaired people believed that it had no practical effect, and 42% visually impaired people said that their travel range was less than 1 km. It means that the public cognition rate and the tactile ground surface indicator utilization rate are low. We also put forward improvement suggestions from three aspects: Strengthening publicity education and training, rehabilitation training for the visually impaired persons, strengthen construction and maintenance, so as to protect the rights and interests for disabled people, promote them return to society and improve their quality of life.
ABSTRACT
Small group training, that is “A rehabilitation class to prepare patients for their return to society,” was created for 5 patients with higher brain dysfunction who had not yet returned to normal daily life after undergoing individual cognitive training, in order to provide them with a better insight into their disease, and to improve their communication abilities and interpersonal skills. The class consisted of 10 sessions (each session lasting 2 hours and 30 minutes) over a 4-month period, which consisted of an opening address, a short lecture, social skills training, tea time, and recreation. Before and after the class, the patients and their families were asked to complete the Dysexecutive Questionnaire, and any decrease in the difference in the scores between the patients and families suggested that the class had enhanced the patients' self awareness. The Baum test showed the patients having an increased interest in the outside world and a tendency to also have more internal energy. The Clinical Global Impression, as evaluated by the patients' families, indicated an improvement in all patients. We therefore consider this rehabilitation class to help prepare patients for their return to society to be useful as one step to encourage an increased social participation in patients suffering from a higher brain dysfunction.