Development and reflection of revisional bariatric surgery / 中华消化外科杂志

Obesity is one of the most challenging global public health issues, and more than half of adults in Chia are overweight or obese. Obesity has been shown to be a risk factor for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, colon cancer and other specific cancers, and has become a serious threat and even a danger to the health and quality of life of the nation. With the mature development of bariatric surgery in the last 20 years, it is now widely recognized for its effectiveness and safety in the treatment of obesity and related metabolic diseases, as well as improving patients′ life expectancy and quality of life. However, previous data from the literatures suggest that some patients require revisional surgery after bariatric surgery, with the incidence of revisional bariatric surgery as 5% to 50%. The main reasons for revisional bariatric surgery are poor post-operative outcomes, including the lack of significant weight loss, weight regain and no significant improvement or even recurrence of associated metabolic disease, and other reasons include the development of anaemia, malnutrition and long-term chronic pain. Currently, there is only the East Asian expert consensus on revised bariatric surgery proposed by Chinese Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery in 2018. However, there are still no uniform standards regarding the indications, contraindications and surgical modalities of revisional bariatric surgery in clinical practice. The authors summarize the latest researches of revisional bariatric surgery, in order to provide the guidance value for clinical practice.

Comparison of split skin thickness graft survival in diabetic and non-diabetic ulcer

Background: Split skin grafting is widely used surgical procedure for the treatment of ulcers. Graft survival depends on number of factors like vascularity, wound infection etc, diabetes is associated with endothelial dysfunction, neuropathy, wound infection which collectively affect the graft survival. Objective of this study was to compare the amount of graft uptake, the post-operative complications and survival of split thickness skin graft in diabetic and non-diabetic ulcer.Methods: In our prospective comparative study total 112 patients with ulcer were included of which 56 were diabetic and 56 were non-diabetic. All of them underwent split skin grafting as part of their wound management. Comparison was made between two groups in terms of amount of graft uptake, post-operative wound infection, revisional surgery, donor site infection.Results: Compared with non-diabetics, diabetics have significantly less graft uptake (p<0.001). out of 56 patients in diabetic group 4 (66.7%) underwent revisional surgery, out of 56 patients in non-diabetic group 2 (33.3) patients underwent revisional surgery (p value is <0.68) which is statistically insignificant. 3 (60%) out of 56 in diabetic group developed post-operative graft infection, 2 (40%) out of 56 in non-diabetic group developed graft infection (p=1, not significant). One patient in the study developed donor site infection. Among 112 cases, only 1 case had donor site infection with diabetic.Conclusions: Diabetes is associated with poor graft uptake and post-operative complication rates in patients undergoing split skin grafting.

Re-Banding vs Sleeve Gastrectomy: Technical Reports and Treatment Outcomes of Two Procedures after Removal of Eroded Adjustable Gastric Band

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to present surgical techniques and treatment outcomes of re-banding and sleeve gastrectomy after removal of eroded adjustable gastric band. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was performed to study re-banding or LSG as revisional surgery for band erosion. Technical advancement we adopted included adhesiolysis of liver edge and cardia, retrogastric tunneling, and stapling away from fibrotic cardia. Main outcome measures were success of therapeutic strategies, morbidity, and body mass index (BMI), percentage excess weight loss [%EWL] before and after revision. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, a total of 11 patients underwent revisional surgery. Male to female was ratio was 1:10. Six patients underwent revisional sleeve gastrectomy, and five patients underwent re-banding. One patient in sleeve gastrectomy group was diagnosed to have minor leak on CT scan, and recovered by conservative management. The median BMI of the six patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy was 29.5 kg/m² (27.9 kg/m²–40.8 kg/m²), their median follow-up was 24.8 months (6.5–54.7 months), and their BMI and %EWL at last follow-up was 24.4 kg/m² (22.5 kg/m²–34.6 kg/m²) and 78.4% (19.2%–110.2%) respectively. The median BMI of the five patients who underwent rebanding was 27.3 kg/m² (26.1 kg/m²–41.4 kg/m²), their median follow-up was 16.5 months (4.5–36.4 months), and their BMI and %EWL at last follow-up was 23.5 kg/m² (22.0 kg/m²–30.1 kg/m²) and 83.9% (36.4–123.3%) respectively. CONCLUSION: With advanced surgical techniques we adopted, both re-banding and sleeve gastrectomy are safe and effective as a revisional procedure after removal of eroded gastric band.

Cirugía revisional por estenosis post gastrectomía vertical laparoscópica / Revisional surgery for stenosis following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Introducción: La cirugía bariátrica revisional se realiza para modificar o reparar alguno de los tipos de cirugía para perder peso, entre ellos la gastrectomía vertical laparoscópica (GVL). La revisión de procedimientos bariátricos se hace necesaria entre el 10 al 25 por ciento de los pacientes, ya sea por baja de peso insuficiente o por complicaciones, siendo la estenosis una de ellas. Posterior a una GVL, el bypass gástrico en Y de Roux (BPG) es la intervención quirúrgica más requerida para la conversión. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir una serie de 5 pacientes que tuvieron cirugía revisional por estenosis posterior a una GVL. Material y Métodos: Entre enero de 2006 y marzo de 2013, en 770 pacientes consecutivos se realizó GVL. Los pacientes fueron incluidos en un protocolo prospectivo. Cinco pacientes tuvieron cirugía revisional con conversión a BPG por estenosis posterior a la GVL. Tres pacientes fueron operados de GVL en nuestro hospital, los otros 2 provenían de otros centros hospitalarios. Resultados: En los 5 pacientes con cirugía revisional la edad promedio fue 39,8 +/- 15,7 años. Cuatro pacientes fueron mujeres (80 por ciento). El promedio IMC antes de GVL fue 37,0 +/- 2,1 kg/m² y del IMC antes del BPG fue 29,4 +/- 5,4 kg/m². El BPG fue laparoscópico en 3 casos y abierto en 2. No hubo complicaciones, ni mortalidad. Conclusiones: La conversión a bypass gástrico en Y de Roux es un tratamiento efectivo para la estenosis posterior a una GVL.

Introduction: Revisional bariatric surgery is performed to alter or repair one of the many types of weight loss surgery, including laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The revision of bariatric procedures is required between 10 to 25% of patients operated, either by insufficient weight loss or complications, including stenosis. After a LSG, the Roux- en- Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the most requested surgery for conversion. The aim of this study was to describe a series of 5 patients who had revisional surgery for stenosis following LSG. Material and Method: Between January 2006 and March 2013, in 770 consecutive patients was performed LSG. Patients were included in a prospective protocol. Five patients had revisional surgery with conversion to RYGBP for stenosis following LSG. In three patients the initial LSG was performed in our hospital, the other 2 were from other hospitals. Results: In the 5 patients with revisional surgery mean age was 39.8 ± 15.7 years. Four patients were women (80%). The average BMI before LSG was 37.0 ± 2.1 kg/m2 and BMI before RYGBP was 29.4 ± 5.4 kg/m2. The RYGBP was laparoscopic in 3 cases and opened in two. There were no complications, and no mortality. Conclusions: Conversion to RYGBP is an effective treatment for stenosis following a LSG.

Revision Osteosynthesis after Failed Surgery for Scaphoid Nonunion

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of revision osteosynthesis using Herbert screw fixation combined with autogenous cancellous bone grafting for scaphoid nonunions after failed primary surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients who underwent revision osteosynthesis for a scaphoid nonunion after a mean of 13.6 months following primary surgical failure were studied. There were 9 waist fractures and 3 proximal fractures. The revision osteosynthesis was performed using autogenous iliac cancellous bone grafting combined with Herbert screw fixation. RESULTS: Union was achieved in 11 of 12 cases. The results of eleven united cases were clinically satisfactory at the mean follow up of 16.9 months after revision. The motion range of wrist joint improved: average flexion was 51degrees, average extension was 65degrees, average radial deviation 15degrees, and average ulnar deviation was 21degrees. CONCLUSION: Herbert screw fixation and autogenous iliac cancellous bone grafting was proved to be a useful method as a revisional operation for a scaphoid nonunion after failed primary surgery.

The Results of Revisional Surgery for the Failed Endonasal DCR

PURPOSE: This large case study evaluated the success rate of revisional surgery and the causes of failed endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with long-term follow-ups. METHODS: One hundred nine patients (114 eyes) who underwent revisional surgery for a failed endonasal DCR at the Department of Ophthalmology, Guro Hospital, Korea University between January 1995 and January 2005 were included in this retrospective study. We evaluated the causes of failed endonasal DCR and their success rates of revisional surgeries. RESULTS: The causes of surgical failure were membranous obstruction (83 eyes), granuloma (22 eyes), synechia (11 eyes), common canalicular obstruction (11 eyes), functional block (7 eyes), and canalicular obstruction (1 eye). The revisional surgeries were silicone tube intubation after granuloma removal, synechiolysis and membranectomy using Nd:YAG laser and trephination of canalicular obstruction, and endonasal conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) for the parts of functional block and the canalicular obstruction. The overall success rates of the revisional surgeries were 83.3% (95/114 eyes). The mean follow-ups period was 18.97 months (range, 9~113 months). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large case study in Korea on revisional surgery with long-term follow-ups, as far as we know. The overall success rates of endonasal DCR after receiving simple revisional surgery were comparable to those of the standard external DCR.

The Results of Revisional Surgery for the Failed Endonasal DCR

PURPOSE: This large case study evaluated the success rate of revisional surgery and the causes of failed endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with long-term follow-ups. METHODS: One hundred nine patients (114 eyes) who underwent revisional surgery for a failed endonasal DCR at the Department of Ophthalmology, Guro Hospital, Korea University between January 1995 and January 2005 were included in this retrospective study. We evaluated the causes of failed endonasal DCR and their success rates of revisional surgeries. RESULTS: The causes of surgical failure were membranous obstruction (83 eyes), granuloma (22 eyes), synechia (11 eyes), common canalicular obstruction (11 eyes), functional block (7 eyes), and canalicular obstruction (1 eye). The revisional surgeries were silicone tube intubation after granuloma removal, synechiolysis and membranectomy using Nd:YAG laser and trephination of canalicular obstruction, and endonasal conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) for the parts of functional block and the canalicular obstruction. The overall success rates of the revisional surgeries were 83.3% (95/114 eyes). The mean follow-ups period was 18.97 months (range, 9~113 months). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large case study in Korea on revisional surgery with long-term follow-ups, as far as we know. The overall success rates of endonasal DCR after receiving simple revisional surgery were comparable to those of the standard external DCR.