Training ambidexterity – A survey-based analysis on the dexterity of ophthalmologists in performing standard ophthalmic procedures

Purpose: Our study was designed to determine ophthalmologists’ dexterity in performing standard ophthalmic procedures at various levels of expertise via a structured questionnaire. Methods: A structured questionnaire was administered via the Google platform from August 20 to September 19, 2022, to assess the perspectives and preferences of ophthalmologists concerning their proficiency in using their right hand, left hand, or both hands to perform routine tasks required in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery. Results: Two hundred and three participants took part in the survey. A majority (n = 162, 79.8%) of the clinicians considered themselves right?handed, nine (4.4%) considered themselves left?handed, and 32 (15.7%) considered themselves ambidextrous. Also, 86% (n = 174) of the participants considered ambidexterity an essential trait in the practice of ophthalmic medicine and surgery. The number of cataract surgeries performed had an impact on the comfort of using both hands for performing anterior vitrectomy (P < 0.001), injection of viscoelastic (P < 0.001), and toric marking (P < 0.05), but not on the performance of capsulorhexis and switching of foot pedals. The number of procedures carried out had an impact on the comfort of using both hands in gonioscopy (P < 0.001), 90 D evaluation (P < 0.001), and 20 D evaluation (P < 0.05). More years of experience had an impact on skills involving the use of both hands for slit lamp joystick usage (P < 0.05) and laser procedures (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Irrespective of a person’s handedness, trained ambidexterity in the required fields is achievable and has a significant impact on one’s ability to perform the required skill optimally and appropriately.

Can Right-Handed Surgeons Insert Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screws in much Comfortable Position? Right-Handedness Problem on the Left Side

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic pedicles have special and specific properties. In particular, upper thoracic pedicles are positioned in craniocaudal plane. Therefore, manipulation of thoracic pedicle screws on the left side is difficult for right-handed surgeons. We recommend a new position to insert thoracic pedicle screw that will be much comfortable for spine surgeons. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent upper thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation. In 15 patients, a total of 110 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted to the upper thoracic spine (T1–6) with classical position (anesthesiologist and monitor were placed near to patient’s head. Surgeons were standing classically near to patient’s body while patients were lying in prone position). In 18 patients, a total of 88 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted to the upper thoracic spine with the new standing position-surgeons stand by the head of the patient and the anesthesia monitor laterally and under patient’s belt level. All the operations performed by the same senior spine surgeons with the help of C-arm. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained to assess the screw placement. The screw malposition and pedicle wall violations were divided and evaluated separately. Cortical penetration were measured and graded at either : 1–2 mm penetration, 2–4 mm penetration and >4 mm penetration. RESULTS: Total 198 screws were inserted with two different standing positions. Of 198 screws 110 were in the classical positioning group and 88 were in the new positioning group. Incorrect screw placement was found in 33 screws (16.6%). The difference between total screw malposition by both standing positions were found to be statistically significant (p=0.011). The difference between total pedicle wall violations by both standing positions were found to be statistically significant (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Right-handedness is a problem during the upper thoracic pedicle screw placement on the left side. Changing the surgeon’s position standing near to patient’s head could provide a much comfortable position to orient the craniocaudal plane of the thoracic pedicles.

Can Right-Handed Surgeons Insert Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screws in much Comfortable Position? Right-Handedness Problem on the Left Side

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic pedicles have special and specific properties. In particular, upper thoracic pedicles are positioned in craniocaudal plane. Therefore, manipulation of thoracic pedicle screws on the left side is difficult for right-handed surgeons. We recommend a new position to insert thoracic pedicle screw that will be much comfortable for spine surgeons.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 33 patients who underwent upper thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation. In 15 patients, a total of 110 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted to the upper thoracic spine (T1–6) with classical position (anesthesiologist and monitor were placed near to patient’s head. Surgeons were standing classically near to patient’s body while patients were lying in prone position). In 18 patients, a total of 88 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted to the upper thoracic spine with the new standing position-surgeons stand by the head of the patient and the anesthesia monitor laterally and under patient’s belt level. All the operations performed by the same senior spine surgeons with the help of C-arm. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained to assess the screw placement. The screw malposition and pedicle wall violations were divided and evaluated separately. Cortical penetration were measured and graded at either : 1–2 mm penetration, 2–4 mm penetration and >4 mm penetration.RESULTS: Total 198 screws were inserted with two different standing positions. Of 198 screws 110 were in the classical positioning group and 88 were in the new positioning group. Incorrect screw placement was found in 33 screws (16.6%). The difference between total screw malposition by both standing positions were found to be statistically significant (p=0.011). The difference between total pedicle wall violations by both standing positions were found to be statistically significant (p=0.003).CONCLUSION: Right-handedness is a problem during the upper thoracic pedicle screw placement on the left side. Changing the surgeon’s position standing near to patient’s head could provide a much comfortable position to orient the craniocaudal plane of the thoracic pedicles.

The implication of using dominant hand to perform laryngoscopy: an analysis of the laryngoscopic view and blade-tooth distance

BACKGROUND: Existing laryngoscopes are designed to be handled by the left hand, whereas most healthcare professionals are right-handed. However, controlling the laryngoscope device requires considerable strength and refinement to control the blade. We examined the usefulness of a right-handed laryngoscope to validate its clinical applicability. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four patients for general anesthesia were involved. Laryngoscopy was performed twice for each patient, once using a conventional left-handed Macintosh No. 3 laryngoscope and once using a right-handed one, by 25 right-handed and 18 left-handed laryngoscopists. The perpendicular distance from the tip of the maxillary incisor to the flange of each blade was measured when the maximum visibility of the glottis was obtained. We compared the distances, chances of directly contacting the tooth, laryngoscopic views and subjective feeling of difficulty in handling device between the two laryngoscopes. RESULTS: For the right-handed laryngoscopists, distance varied significantly between the two laryngoscopes (5.0 ± 3.5 and 5.7 ± 3.7 mm [mean ± standard deviation] for the conventional and right-handed laryngoscopes, respectively [P < 0.001]). The right-handed laryngoscope was associated with a decreased chance of directly contacting the teeth (P = 0.001). Additionally, the right-handed laryngoscope provided a better view than the conventional one (P = 0.005). Conversely, most of the left-handed laryngoscopists felt that the procedure using a conventional laryngoscope was easier than with a right-handed one. CONCLUSIONS: When a right-handed laryngoscopist uses a right-handed laryngoscope, a better laryngoscopic view and a reduced chance of blade contact with the teeth can be achieved.

Analysis of Grip and Pinch Strength in Korean People / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: We wanted to investigate the grip and pinch strength of hands and establish the clinical normative data for Korean people. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 234 Korean males and 281 Korean females (age: 10 to 84) were tested. Grip strength and pinch strength were tested twice with 5 minute interval between tests. RESULTS: Generally, hand strength peaked at 30 to 39 of age for both males and females. The average grip strength was 48.8 kg for males and 28.23 kg for females and they were 11% stronger than 12 years before in both groups. Tip pinch strength peaked in the forties, but key pinch and tripod pinch peaked in the thirties. All the peak hand strength was obtained in the 30 to 39 age group of females. Among the pinch strengths, key pinch was the strongest. For the right-handed people, the grip and pinch strengths of the right hand were stronger than those of the left hand. However, for the left-handed people, the left hand was stronger than the right hand only for the tripod pinch (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: The hand strength of Koreans peaked in the 30 to 39 age group. Key pinch was the strongest among the three pinch strengths. Right-handed people have a stronger right hand than the left hand, but the left-handed people have almost the same hand strength in both hands, except for the tripod pinch.