The Multi-imaging Diagnostic Values of Aortic Diverticulum With the Comparison of Clinical Application / 中国循环杂志

Objective: To investigate the multi-imaging diagnostic values, especially MSCT technology in patients with congenital aortic diverticulum with its clinical application. Methods: The MSCT ifndings in 12 patients with congenital aortic diverticulum were retrospectively analyzed. Results: There were 9 patients with right aortic arch and 1 with left aortic arch, all of them having coexisted aberrant subclavian artery which initially dilated like aneurysm by diverticulum changing (Kommerell diverticulum), and there was 1 patient with incomplete double aortic arch with atresia of left arch combining retro-esophageal aortic diverticulum (RAD) and 1 patient with ducts diverticulum. Echocardiogram only made the suggestive diagnosis of speeding up blood lfow or right aortic arch in 4 patients. While MSCT accurately displayed the diverticulum for the location, morphology and with or without other complications. The post-eroanterior chest radiograph indicated “double aortic node” as the special sign in 8 patients. The echocardiogram, X-ray and MSCT for correctly diagnosing the aortic diverticulum were as 0, 72.7% and 100% respectively. Conclusion: MSCT is a rather ideal non-invasive diagnosing method for aortic diverticulum, meanwhile X-ray could also make suggestive diagnosis; if MSCT and X-ray joint with echocardiogram examination may provide the effective supplement for valve structure and hemodynamics condition in relevant patients.

A Rare Case of Stridor with a Right Sided Aortic Arch in a Libyan Patient.

A rare case of stridor with a right sided aortic arch is presented showing minimal or no change in circulatory pattern excepting for noisy breathing.

Tracheobronchial compression by right-sided aortic arch in a middle aged male.

Exertional dyspnoea is a common symptom among middle-aged population. Diagnostic evaluation of such patients is often challenging and confusing. We report a patient presenting with exertional dyspnoea and an obstructive ventilatory defect on spirometry that was refractory to bronchodilator therapy. Careful review of the chest radiograph and spirometry pointed towards variable intra-thoracic airways obstruction as a cause of dyspnoea. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the thorax and bronchoscopy established the diagnosis of a right-sided aortic arch resulting in tracheobronchial compression and tracheomalacia.