Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-207564

ABSTRACT

Background: Management of critically ill obstetric patients involve intensive monitoring in intensive care unit. In present scenario there are significant number of obstetric patients with sepsis, tropical diseases and medical illness that require ICU care. The aim of this study was to evaluate in more detail the non-haemorrhagic causes of obstetric ICU admissions and to identify and adopt high risk strategies as prime learning objective.Methods: It is a prospective ongoing study conducted in 50 patients in SGRDUHS, Amritsar from December 2016 to October 2019, who were admitted in obstetric ICU, out of them 30 cases were attributed to non-haemorrhagic obstetric causes. All demographic parameters along with gestational age, diagnosis on admission, intervention done prior to shift to ICU and details of treatment given in ICU were evaluated. Patient outcome, review of mortality and area of improvement were also noted.Results: Majority of the patient (70.1%) were admitted in 3rd trimester. Obstetric sepsis (13.33%), infective diseases (16.66%), tropical conditions (16.66%), medical disorders (26.66%) and hypertensive disorders (26.66%) were the major causes of admission to obstetric ICU. There were 33.3% mortalities observed in present study and 40% were due to respiratory failure. In ICU mechanical ventilation was done in 63.3% cases and blood products were given in 33.3% of patients.Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach is ideal to handle non-haemorrhagic situations especially related to medical disorders and tropical diseases. Review of the ICU admissions and periodic audit can improve management of morbidities as well as reduce maternal mortalities.

2.
Rev. argent. mastología ; 38(139): 62-79, oct. 2019. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1116520

ABSTRACT

Introducción El cáncer de mama hereditario es el 10% de los cánceres mamarios a expensas principalmente de los genes brca 1 y 2. La identificación de pacientes de Alto Riesgo inicia el proceso de Asesoramiento Genético en Oncología (ago). Objetivo Presentar nuestra experiencia inicial de Asesoramiento Genético, evaluando las Estrategias de Reducción de Riesgo y las variables que influyeron en la toma de decisiones. Material y método Se analizaron en forma retrospectiva los registros clínicos de las pacientes consideradas de Alto Riesgo Heredo Familiar (arhf) que concurrieron a la consulta desde junio del año 2000 a enero de 2019. Las variables analizadas fueron: edad, antecedente personal de cáncer de mama, antecedentes familiares de cáncer de mama y ovario, derivación a ago, concurrencia a la consulta, solicitud de test genético, realización del mismo y Estrategia de Reducción de Riesgo adoptada. Resultados Analizamos 420 pacientes, 228 (54%) con cáncer de mama y 192 (46%) sanas. Fueron derivadas a ago 335 (80%) de las cuales concurrieron 224 (67%). Se les solicitó estudio genético a 195 (87%); de ellas 164 (84%) pudieron realizarlo, con el siguiente resultado: 46 fueron brca positivas, 90 negativas y 22 con Variantes de Significado Incierto. Se realizaron 68 (16%) Mastectomías de Reducción de Riesgo, 293 pacientes (70%) ingresaron en Vigilancia, 1 paciente en Quimioprevención y 58 pacientes (14%) quedaron pendientes. El 67% de las pacientes brca positivas eligieron cirugía. El estado brca positivo y la edad menor de 50 años fueron variables independientes significativas para la conducta quirúrgica. Conclusiones Las pacientes de Alto Riesgo deben ser tratadas en equipos multidisciplinarios a fin de optimizar el proceso de Asesoramiento Genético. La decisión de la Estrategia de Reducción de Riesgo puede estar influenciada por la edad, el antecedente personal de cáncer y un resultado brca mutado


Introduction Hereditary breast cancer is 10% of breast cancers at the expense mainly of the brca 1 and 2 genes. The identification of High Risk patients begins the process of Genetic Counseling in Oncology Objective We present our initial experience in the Genetic Counseling process, evaluating the Risk Reduction Strategies and the variables that influenced decision making. Materials and method We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of patients considered to be High Risk Family Inheritance (arhf) who attended the consultation from June 2000 to January 2019. The variables analyzed were: age, personal history of breast cancer, family history of breast and ovarian cancer, referral to ago, attendance at the consultation, request for genetic testing, performance of the same and Risk Reduction Strategy adopted. Results We analyzed 420 patients, 228 (54%) with breast cancer and 192 (46%) healthy. 335 (80%) were referred to ago, 224 (67%) attended. 195 (87%) were asked for a genetic study and 164 (84%) were able to do it. Of these, 46 were brca Positive, 90 Negative and 22 with Variants of Uncertain Meaning. 68 (16%) Risk Reduction Mastectomies were performed, 293 (70%) chose Surveillance, 1 patient in Chemoprevention and 58 patients (14%) pending. 67% of brca + patients chose surgery. Positive brca status and age under 50 years were significant independent variables for surgical behavior. Conclusions High-risk patients should be treated in multidisciplinary teams in order to optimize the genetic counseling process. The decision of the Risk Reduction Strategy may be influenced by age, personal history of cancer and a mutated brca result


Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms , Genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL