ABSTRACT
Resumen: Objetivo: El European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) estratifica el riesgo quirúrgico en cirugía cardiaca de manera fácil y accesible; se validó en Norteamérica con buenos resultados, pero en muchos países de Latinoamérica se utiliza rutinariamente sin validación previa. Nuestro objetivo fue validar EuroSCORE en pacientes con cirugía valvular en el Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez (INCICh) de México. Métodos: Se aplicaron los modelos de EuroSCORE aditivo y logístico para predecir mortalidad en pacientes con cirugía valvular de marzo de 2004 a marzo de 2008. Se usó la prueba de bondad de ajuste de Hosmer-Lemeshow para evaluar la calibración. Se calculó el área bajo la curva ROC para determinar la discriminación. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1,188 pacientes con edades de 51.3 ± 14.5 años, 52% mujeres. Hubo diferencias significativas en la prevalencia de los factores de riesgo entre la población del INCICh y del EuroSCORE. La mortalidad total fue de 9.68% con predichas de 5% y 5.6% por EuroSCORE aditivo y logístico. De acuerdo a EuroSCORE aditivo tenían riesgo bajo 11.3%, intermedio 52.9% y alto 35.9%; para estos grupos la mortalidad fue de 0.7%, 6.4% y 17.4% contra las predichas de 2%, 3.9% y 7.64%. La prueba de Hosmer-Lemeshow tuvo una p < 0.001 para ambos modelos, y el área bajo la curva ROC de 0.707 y de 0.694 para EuroSCORE aditivo y logístico. Conclusión: En el INCICh el 88.7% de los pacientes con cirugía valvular tuvieron riesgo intermedio a alto y EuroSCORE subestimó el riesgo de mortalidad.
Abstract: Objective: The EuroSCORE (European System for cardiac operative risk evaluation) stratifies cardiac risk surgery in easy and accessible manner; it was validated in North America with good results but in many countries of Latin America is used routinely without prior validation. Our objective was to validate the EuroSCORE in patients with cardiac valve surgery at the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez (INCICh) in México. Methods: EuroSCORE additive and logistic models were used to predict mortality in adults undergoing cardiac valve surgery from march 2004 to march 2008. The goodness of fit test of Hosmer-Lemeshow was used to evaluate the calibration. The area under the ROC curve was calculated to determinate discrimination. Results: We included 1188 patients with ages of 51.3 ± 14.5 years, 52% women. There were significant differences in the prevalence of risk factors among the INCICh and the EuroSCORE populations. Total mortality was 9.68% versus 5% and 5.6% predicted by additive and logistic EuroSCORE. According to additive EuroSCORE the risk was low in 11.3%, intermediate in 52.9% and high in 35.9%; for these groups the mortality was .7%, 6.34% and 17.4% against those predicted of 2%, 3.9% and 7.64%. Hosmer-Lemeshow test had a P < .001 for both models and the area under the ROC curve was .707 and .694 for additive and logistic EuroSCORE. Conclusion: In the INCICh 88.7% of patients with cardiac valve surgery had intermediate to high risk and EuroSCORE underestimated the risk of mortality.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Risk Assessment , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/mortality , MexicoABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:This study was designed to compare hydroxyethylstarch (HES) to albumin in high-risk surgery patients infused over 72 h peri-operatively; hemodynamic changes, oxygen transport parameters, blood gases, blood coagulation, blood loss, blood use, outcome, and costs were compared. METHODS:High-risk surgical patients undergoing high-risk abdominal, cranial, and orthopaedic surgery were treated with 6% HES (130/0.4; n = 41) or 20% albumin (n = 19).The goal of volume therapy was to maintain a normal cardiac index (CI; 3.0 L/min/m2) over 72 h peri-operatively. RESULTS:The hemodynamic and cardiac effects of 6% HES were superior to 20% albumin.HES reduced disturbances in blood coagulation, blood loss, and blood use as compared to albumin. Volume therapy with HES and albumin improved patient outcomes.Use of HES resulted in a significant cost reduction compared to albumin. CONCLUSIONS:Volume replacement with 6% HES and 20% albumin in surgery over 72 h peri-operatively improved hemodynamic parameters and oxygen transport to normal values.HES provides a cost-effective alternative to albumin in surgery with improved efficacy and safety.
Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Coagulation , Gases , Hemodynamics , Orthopedics , OxygenABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:This study was designed to compare hydroxyethylstarch (HES) to albumin in high-risk surgery patients infused over 72 h peri-operatively; hemodynamic changes, oxygen transport parameters, blood gases, blood coagulation, blood loss, blood use, outcome, and costs were compared. METHODS:High-risk surgical patients undergoing high-risk abdominal, cranial, and orthopaedic surgery were treated with 6% HES (130/0.4; n = 41) or 20% albumin (n = 19).The goal of volume therapy was to maintain a normal cardiac index (CI; 3.0 L/min/m2) over 72 h peri-operatively. RESULTS:The hemodynamic and cardiac effects of 6% HES were superior to 20% albumin.HES reduced disturbances in blood coagulation, blood loss, and blood use as compared to albumin. Volume therapy with HES and albumin improved patient outcomes.Use of HES resulted in a significant cost reduction compared to albumin. CONCLUSIONS:Volume replacement with 6% HES and 20% albumin in surgery over 72 h peri-operatively improved hemodynamic parameters and oxygen transport to normal values.HES provides a cost-effective alternative to albumin in surgery with improved efficacy and safety.
Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Coagulation , Gases , Hemodynamics , Orthopedics , OxygenABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A doença oncológica per se é uma condição que muitas vezes influencia no tratamento dispensado ao paciente. O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar o desfecho hospitalar de pacientes oncológicos e não oncológicos submetidos à procedimentos cirúrgicos eletivos com alto risco de óbito. MÉTODO: Estudo de coorte prospectivo observacional, realizado em UTI de hospital terciário no período de 01 de abril a 31 de julho de 2005. Foram coletados dados demográficos, escore APACHE II, MODS, variáveis hemodinâmicas, laboratoriais e avaliadas complicações definidas como re-operação, necessidade de ventilação mecânica, transfusão sangüínea e uso de cateter de artéria pulmonar no pós-operatório desses pacientes. Todos foram acompanhados até alta ou o óbito hospitalar. Para variáveis numéricas foi utilizado o teste t de Student e Mann-Whitney, para variáveis categóricas o teste do Qui-quadrado sendo considerado significativo o valor de p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos no estudo 119 pacientes, 43 não oncológicos e 76 oncológicos, 52,9 por cento eram do sexo feminino. A média de idade foi 65,1 ± 14,1 anos, o escore médio de APACHE II 16,5 ± 5,8 e a mediana do MODS de 3 (2-6). A duração mediana da intervenção cirúrgica foi de 5 (3,3-7) horas e a mortalidade na UTI e hospitalar foram 10,9 por cento e 25,2 por cento, respectivamente. Os pacientes oncológicos apresentaram maiores tempos de internação hospitalar e de internação antes da cirurgia, sendo estes resultados estatisticamente significativos. A mortalidade hospitalar dos pacientes oncológicos não foi superior a dos pacientes sem neoplasia (22,4 por cento versus 30,2 por cento, p = 0,32). CONCLUSÕES: Nesta observação os pacientes oncológicos, submetidos à procedimentos cirúrgicos de alto risco, apresentaram mortalidade semelhante aos pacientes não oncológicos com gravidade de doença similar.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oncologic diseases are conditions that have influence in the treatment offered to affected patients. The aim of this study was to compare hospitalar outcome of oncologic and non oncologic patients submitted to high risk elective surgery. METHODS: Prospective, observational cohort study realized in an ICU of a tertiary hospital during the period between 04/01/2005 and 07/31/2005. Demographic data, APACHE II and MODS scores and laboratorial and hemodynamic variables were collected and complications like re-intervention need for mechanical ventilation, red blood cell transfusions and pulmonary artery catheter use during the post-operative period were evaluated. All patients were followed until hospital discharge or death. T student and Mann Whitney tests were used to compare numerical variables. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. A p < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: 119 patients were included in the study. 43 were oncologic and 76 were non-oncologic. 52.9 percent were female. Mean age was 65.1 ± 14.1 years. Mean APACHE II score was 16.5 ± 5.8 and MODS median was 3 (2-6). Median length of surgery was 5 (3.3-7) hours and ICU and hospital mortality were 10.9 percent and 25.2 percent, respectively. Oncologic patients had greater length of hospital stay and length of stay before surgery. These results were statistically significant. Hospital mortality of oncologic patients was not greater than non-oncologic patients (22.4 percent versus 30.2 percent, p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, oncologic patients submitted to high risk surgery had the same mortality rate as non-onconlogic patients with similar disease severity.