ABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: La cirugía robótica es una técnica en aumento tanto en Chile como en el mundo. Una de las áreas de la medicina que ha sido pionera en la introducción de esta nueva técnica es Urología, dónde ha crecido el interés en torno a la utilización de la cirugía robótica en cáncer de vejiga músculo invasor(CVMI). El objetivo de esta revisión es examinar la bibliografía disponible sobre el tema. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda no sistemática de la literatura utilizando la base de datos de Pubmed y MGH Treadwell library. En estas se utilizaron las palabras claves "Bladder cancer", Muscle-invasive bladder cancer", "Blader cancer epidemiology" , "Radical cistectomy" "Robot-assisted radical cistectomy", ¨Robotic surgery urology¨. Se aplicaron límites de publicaciones dentro de los últimos 10 años. DISCUSIÓN: El cáncer vesical es una enfermedad de alta prevalencia, aproximadamente el 25 % de ellos se presentan con CVMI al momento del diagnóstico. El tratamiento de estándar actualmente para CVMI la cistectomía radical con linfadenectomía pélvica extendida, derivación urinaria y quimioterapia neoadyuvante en ciertos casos. Buscando dar solución a las complicaciones de esta cirugía, surge el interés por utilizar la cirugía robótica en el tratamiento de CVMI a través de la cistectomía radical asistida por robot(CRAR). Actualmente se han publicado estudios con resultados que indican disminución de la morbilidad perioperatoria y menor estadía hospitalaria, manteniendo la eficacia oncológica de este procedimiento versus la cistectomía radical abierta(CRA). Otros estudios no han encontrado diferencias significativas entre las dos técnicas en cuanto a complicaciones. CONCLUSIÓN: Aún existe insuficiente experiencia y evidencia del uso de esta en cáncer de vejiga músculo-invasor pero los resultados actuales tienden a resultados no inferiores y positivos en cuanto a la CRAR versus la CRA.AU
METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature search using the Pubmed and MGH Treadwell library database. Key words "Bladder cancer", Muscle-invasive bladder cancer", "Bladder cancer epidemiology" , "Radical cystectomy" "Robot-assisted radical cystectomy", ¨Robotic surgery urology¨. were used. Limits of publications were applied within the last 10 years. DISCUSSION: Bladder cancer is a highly prevalent disease. Approximately 25% of patients present with MIBC at the time of diagnosis. The standard treatment currently for CVMI is radical cystectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy, urinary diversion and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in certain cases. In order to solve the complications of this surgery, there is an interest in the use of robotic surgery in the treatment of MIBC through robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Studies with results indicating decreased perioperative morbidity and shorter hospital stay have been published, maintaining the oncological efficacy of this procedure versus open radical cystectomy (ORC). Other studies have found no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of complications. CONCLUSION: There is still insufficient experience and evidence of its use in m
Subject(s)
Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , CystectomyABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinic efficacy of two section and three leaves approach on laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) or robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).Methods A retrospective statistical analysis collected a total of 103 cases with bladder cancer undergoing LRC or RARC,from Jan 2013 to Dec 2015 in our center.Those patients were divided into two groups,including two section and three leaves approach group (46 cases) and conventional group (57 cases).The two section,which means that to cut lateral prostate gland and lateral vesical gland respectively,the three leaves include lateral lobe of lateral vesical gland (superior vesical arteries and veins),medial lobe of lateral vesical gland and lateral prostate gland.In two groups,whose age ranged from 35 to 84 years,the median age were (63.3 ± 9.8) years and (63.7 ± 9.1) years,respectively.The median BMI values were (23.2 ± 2.9) kg/m2 and (23.0 ± 2.2) kg/m2,respectively.The occurrence of history of abdominal surgery were 4 (8.7％) cases and 9(15.8％) cases,respectively.In two section and three leaves approach,the ASA scores of 1,2,3 were found in 5,35,6 cases,respectively.In conventional group,the ASA scores of 1,2,3 were found in 12,38,7 cases,respectively.The difference between two groups in age distribution,BMI value,ASA score,history of abdominal surgery,urinary diversion,surgical methods,pathological staging and grading had no statistical significance (P ＞ 0.05).Then,the operation time,the blood loss and the time to remove drainage tube,et al of the above two groups were compared.Patients with BMI≥24 kg/m2 in the two groups were 24 cases and 20 cases,respectively,following the strategy based on BMI ≥24 kg/m2 and BMI ＜ 24 kg/m2 to compare the difference of subgroups in the operation time and the bleeding amount,for the purpose of corroborating the applied effectiveness of two section and three leaves approach compared with the conventional measure on LRC or RARC for patients with BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2.Results All endoscopic operations were completed successfully.No conversion was recorded.In two groups,the median operation time were (255.1 ± 99.3) min and (284.2 ± 171.3) min,respectively,the difference was statistically significant (P =0.011).The blood loss was (233.1 ± 196.9)ml and (272.0 ±268.8) ml,respectively(P =0.009).The time to remove drainage tube were (10.6 ± 5.0) d and (9.9 ± 4.4) d,respectively (P =0.880).In addition,the difference in the intraoperative blood transfusion rate(10.9％ vs.21.1％),occurrence of lymph fistula (13.0％ vs.17.5％),gastric extubation time [(4.3 ± 1.9) d vs.(4.0 ± 1.9) d],time for flatus recovery [(3.9 ±1.2) d vs.(3.7 ± 1.7) d],the incidence of perioperative complications (26.1％ vs.36.8％) and postoperative hospital stay [(13.3 ± 5.5) d vs.(13.5 ± 4.8) d] were no statistical significance (P ＞0.05).The results of comparisons for patients with BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2 between subgroups included the operation time were (264.3 ± 68.1) min and (298.5 ± 80.2) min,respectively.The blood loss were (247.8 ± 199.4) ml and (295.3 ± 204.5) ml,respectively,both of them were statistical significance (P ＜0.05).The two section and three leaves approach was significantly better than those patients operated by conventional method.Conclusions Compared with conventional method undergoing LRC or RARC,two section and three leaves approach could shorten operative time and reduce the blood loss markedly,especially for patients with BMI≥24 kg/m2.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) with total intracorporeal othotopic ileal neobladder (TIOIN).Methods A consecutive series of 4 patients (2 male,2 female),who underwent RARC with TIOIN by a single surgeon,were included in the retrospective study,between March 2017 and June 2017.Their age ranged from 59 to 71 years,which the mean age was (65.7 ± 4.9) years.Preoperative urinary CT scan,cystoscopic examination and transurethral resection of bladder tumor were performed for diagnosis.Among these,2 patients underwent side-to-side bowel anastomosis using a linear stapler,while hand-sewn anastomosis was performed in the other 2 patients.The detubularized bowel segment was arranged in a U shape,and then the two medial borders were closed to create the posterior wall of the neobladder,which completed a partial U shape and anastomosed with the end of urethra.After placing the single J stents into the ureter,the uretero-neobladder was anastomosed.To close the urine reservoir,each border of the U-shaped segment was folded again and sutured to form a sealed pouch.Results All operations were performed successfully.The average operation time for RARC was 93.2 min (ranging 79-117 min).The average operation time for urinary diversion was 214.2 min (ranging 163-251 min).The mean estimated blood loss was 304.5 ml (ranging 200-400 ml).The mean hospital stay was 20.5 d (ranging 13-32 day).The number of dissected lymph node ranged from 11 to 16 (mean 3.7 ± 2.6).All the surgical margins were negative.The time for postoperative out-of-bed activity and bowel function recovery was 2-3 days and 3-4 days,respectively.The single-J stents were removed 1 months after operation,generally.No urine leakage was noticed after removing the drainage tube and catheter.The lymph leakage was observed in one case,which was resolved 15 days post-operatively after given nutrient therapy.The performance of urinary continence was satisfactory,except one patient complained about the nocturnal incontinence.After the regular pelvic exercise,the symptom improved two months after the operation.Hydronephrosis and intestinal leakage were not observed.Conclusions Our initial experience showed that RARC with TIOIN is feasible and alterative for experienced surgeon.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) with total intracorporeal othotopic ileal neobladder (TIOIN).Methods A consecutive series of 4 patients (2 male,2 female),who underwent RARC with TIOIN by a single surgeon,were included in the retrospective study,between March 2017 and June 2017.Their age ranged from 59 to 71 years,which the mean age was (65.7 ± 4.9) years.Preoperative urinary CT scan,cystoscopic examination and transurethral resection of bladder tumor were performed for diagnosis.Among these,2 patients underwent side-to-side bowel anastomosis using a linear stapler,while hand-sewn anastomosis was performed in the other 2 patients.The detubularized bowel segment was arranged in a U shape,and then the two medial borders were closed to create the posterior wall of the neobladder,which completed a partial U shape and anastomosed with the end of urethra.After placing the single J stents into the ureter,the uretero-neobladder was anastomosed.To close the urine reservoir,each border of the U-shaped segment was folded again and sutured to form a sealed pouch.Results All operations were performed successfully.The average operation time for RARC was 93.2 min (ranging 79-117 min).The average operation time for urinary diversion was 214.2 min (ranging 163-251 min).The mean estimated blood loss was 304.5 ml (ranging 200-400 ml).The mean hospital stay was 20.5 d (ranging 13-32 day).The number of dissected lymph node ranged from 11 to 16 (mean 3.7 ± 2.6).All the surgical margins were negative.The time for postoperative out-of-bed activity and bowel function recovery was 2-3 days and 3-4 days,respectively.The single-J stents were removed 1 months after operation,generally.No urine leakage was noticed after removing the drainage tube and catheter.The lymph leakage was observed in one case,which was resolved 15 days post-operatively after given nutrient therapy.The performance of urinary continence was satisfactory,except one patient complained about the nocturnal incontinence.After the regular pelvic exercise,the symptom improved two months after the operation.Hydronephrosis and intestinal leakage were not observed.Conclusions Our initial experience showed that RARC with TIOIN is feasible and alterative for experienced surgeon.