ABSTRACT
Objetivo: El propósito del estudio in vitro fue comparar la precisión de la longitud de trabajo de Root ZX mini, Proper Pixi, Woodpex III y Raypex 6 utilizando limas de acero inoxidable VDW C-Pilot n.º 15 y de níquel-titanio Maillefer n.º15. Materiales y métodos: Este estudio fue experimental in vitro. La muestra fue de treinta y cinco conductos mesiovestibulares de primeras molares inferiores, con cuatro localizadores apicales electrónicos Root ZX mini, Proper Pixi, Woodpex III y Raypex6. La longitud real se determinó con un calibrador Vernier digital y la medición electrónica se realizó utilizando limas de acero inoxidable y de níquel-titanio. Resultados: Al comparar la longitud real y longitud electrónica, no se encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p < 0,05). Conclusiones: Se halló diferencias estadísticamente significativas al comparar la precisión de Root ZX mini, Proper Pixi, Woodpex III y Raypex 6 con limas de acero inoxidable; mientras que la precisión con limas de níquel-titanio no se vio afectada. (AU)
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the precision of the working length of Root ZX mini, Proper Pixi, Woodpex III and Raypex 6 using VDW C-Pilot No. 15 with Maillefer nickel titanium No. 15 and stainless steel files in mesiovestibular ducts of first lower molars. Materials and methods: This was an experimental in vitro study, including 35 mesiobuccal canals of lower first molars. The real length of 4 electronic apical locators, Root ZX mini, Proper Pixi, Woodpex III and Raypex6, was determined with a digital Vernier caliper, and electronic measurements were recorded using stainless steel and nickel titanium files. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the real and the electronic lengths of the different tools studied (p <0.05). Conclusions: Statistically significant differences were obtained when comparing the precision of Root ZX mini, Proper Pixi, Woodpex III and Raypex 6 with stainless steel files, while the precision of nickel titanium files was not affected. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Titanium , Dental Materials , Molar , Nickel , In Vitro TechniquesABSTRACT
Objective: this study aimed to evaluate the effects of irrigants and dry canal on the accuracy of electronic apex locator (EAL) in locating simulated root perforations. Material and methods: twenty singlerooted, mandibular premolars were decoronated at CEJ, and the contents were removed with a barbed broach. The canals were instrumented up to a size of 15 K-file. The roots were artificially perforated at 4 mm from the anatomic apex. The actual length (AL) up to the perforation site was determined. The electronic length (EL) of perforations was obtained by Root ZX mini and iRoot in the dry canal and in the presence of 5.2% NaOCl, SmearOff, and 0.9% sodium chloride using a size 20 K-file. The differences between the EL and AL of the perforations were calculated. Statistical analyses using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyse the data with the level of significance set at p <0.05. Results: there were significant differences in different canal conditions with both Root ZX mini and i Root. Measurements in dry canals were significantly longer for both apex locators (p <0.05). Measurements with NaOCl were significantly shorter for both apex locators (p < 0.05). Both apex locators produced significantly accurate values for Saline and Smear OFF (p < 0.05). Conclusions: in this study, both Root ZX mini and i Root were affected by different canal conditions. The most accurate measurements were seen in the presence of saline and SmearOFF. (AU)
Objetivo: este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar os efeitos de irrigantes e canal seco na precisão do localizador apical eletrônico (EAL) em localizar perfurações radiculares simuladas. Material e métodos: vinte pré-molares inferiores unirradiculares tiveram suas coroas removidas na altura da JEC e o tecido pulpar removido com um extirpa nervos. Os canais foram instrumentados até a largura de uma lima k 15. As raízes foram perfuradas artificialmente a 4 mm do ápice anatômico. O comprimento real (AL) até o local da perfuração foi determinado. O comprimento eletrônico (EL) das perfurações foi obtido pelo Root ZX mini e iRoot no canal seco e na presença de 5,2% de NaOCl, SmearOff e 0,9% de cloreto de sódio usando uma lima K tamanho 20. As diferenças entre o EL e o AL das perfurações foram calculadas. Análises estatísticas, utilizando os testes de sinais por postos de Friedman e Wilcoxon, foram realizadas para analisar os dados com o nível de significância estabelecido em p < 0,05. Resultados: houve diferenças significativas nas diferentes condições do canal, tanto no Root ZX mini quanto no i Root. As medidas em canais secos foram significativamente maiores nos dois localizadores apicais (p < 0,05). As medidas com NaOCl foram significativamente mais curtas para os dois localizadores apicais (p<0,05). Ambos os localizadores apicais produziram valores significativamente precisos para Saline e Smear OFF (p < 0,05). Conclusões: neste estudo, tanto o Root ZX mini quanto o i Root foram afetados por diferentes condições do canal. As medidas mais precisa foram observadas na presença de soro fisiológico e SmearOFF. (AU)
Subject(s)
Sodium Hypochlorite , Bicuspid , Dental Equipment , Oral and Dental Hygiene ProductsABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the auto apical reverse motion of Tri Auto ZX at working length determined by Dentaport Root ZX. Study design: Cross-sectional design. Place and duration of study: Department of Operative Dentistry, Islamic International Dental College, and the duration of study was 6 months. Materials and methods: Total 72 extracted teeth were used in the present study and standard access cavities were prepared in all the teeth. For in vitro working of Dentaport Root ZX and Tri Auto ZX an apparatus was designed which used normal saline as the conducting medium to ensure free movement of ions between electrodes of electronic apex locator (EAL). Working length was measured electronically using Dentaport Root ZX and noted as Electronic length (EL). The canals were then prepared using Protpaer files till F2 using Tri Auto ZX and the length at which it starts auto apical revere motion (AAR) was noted as AAR. Results: EL showed a mean of 14.69 ± 1.137 mm and SD of 1.137. Measurement at which Tri Auto ZX started its AAR motion showed that the minimum length of canal was 12.5 mm and maximum length was 17.5 mm with a mean of 14.687 ± 1.089 and SD of 1.087. The difference of root canal length measurements taken by EL and AAR motion of Tri Auto ZX showed a minimum difference of -1.5 mm and a maximum of 1 mm with mean difference of -0.014 ± 0.4819 mm. Out of 72 extracted teeth that were used in the present study the difference between EL and AAR was insignificant (p<0.05). Conclusion: In this study it was also established that not only Root ZX is capable of correct determination of the working length but its canal preparation module i.e. Tri Auto ZX is also capable of preparing the canal at the length determined by Root ZX.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate performance of digital radiographic and two electronic apex locators, Propex II and Root ZX in root canal length determination in primary molars. Methods: 25 primary molars were divided into two groups, G1 without root resorption and G2 with root resorption. The exams were performed using all methods by two experienced examiners, with 1-week interval. The gold standard was determined by visual examination. The methods were statistically analyzed regarding the values of reproducibility and correlated with the gold standard by Pearson´s correlation coefficient. Results: The root canal length determination coincided with gold standard in 22.7% for Root ZX, 17.5% for Propex II and 12.5% for digital radiography. Correlation values were higher in G1, the Root ZX presented the highest values. In G2 the digital radiography showed the lowest correlation. In G1, the intra-examiner reproducibility values ranged from 0.925 to 0.523, and interexaminer 0.863 to 0.670. In G2, the values of intra-examiner reproducibility ranges from 0.864 to 0.097, and inter was 0.774 to 0.379. Conclusion: It was concluded that the methods performance varying according to examiner's experience. The Root ZX presented the highest reproducibility and accuracy.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o desempenho in vitro de radiografia digital e de dois localizadores apicais eletrônicos, Propex II e Root ZX na determinação do comprimento de canal em molares decíduos. Métodos: Foram selecionados 25 molares decíduos divididos em dois grupos, G1, sem reabsorção radicular e G2 com reabsorção radicular. Os exames foram realizados utilizando todos os métodos por dois examinadores experientes, com intervalo de 1 semana. O padrão ouro foi determinada por exame visual. Os métodos foram analisados estatisticamente em relação aos valores de reprodutibilidade e correlacionada com o padrão ouro pelo coeficiente de correlação de Pearson. Resultados: A determinação de comprimento de canal coincidiu com padrão-ouro em 22,7% para o Root ZX, 17,5% para Propex II e 12,5% para a radiografia digital. valores de correlação foram maiores no G1, o Root ZX apresentou os maiores valores. Em G2 da radiografia digital apresentou a menor correlação. No G1, os valores de reprodutibilidade intra-examinador variou 0,925-0,523 e interexaminadores 0,863-0,670. No G2, os valores da reprodutibilidade intra-examinador varia 0,864-0,097, e inter era 0,774-0,379. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que o desempenho dos métodos varia de acordo com a experiência do examinador. O Root ZX apresentou maior reprodutibilidade e precisão.
ABSTRACT
O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar in vitro a precisão de dois localizadores foraminais: Endus (Gnatus, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil) e Root ZX (J. Morita, Tokyo, Japão). Material e Método: Trinta e dois dentes caninos permanentes humanos foram selecionados para o estudo. Após a realização da abertura coronária e preparo do terço cervical e médio, procedeu-se à determinação do comprimento real do dente pelo método visual, com introdução de um instrumento tipo K #10 até ser visto na saída foraminal sob magnificação de 16x com microscópio óptico de luz (DF Vasconcelos, São Paulo, Brasil). Para medição eletrônica, os dentes foram inseridos em um molde de alginato e as medidas realizadas com os dois localizadores foraminais até a saída do forame apical (0,0mm). Resultados: Os resultados evidenciaram um índice de precisão de 96,8% e 91,6% para os localizadores Gnatus e Root ZX, respectivamente. Conclusão: Ambos os localizadores apicais eletrônicos testados apresentaram alto índice de precisão na determinação do limite apical.
The aim of this study was to compare in vitro the precision of two locators foraminal: Endus (Gnatus, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil) and Root ZX (J. Morita, Tokyo, Japan). Methods: Thirty-two canine teeth permanent humans were selected for the study, and, after effectuate the coronary opening and preparation of the cervical and middle third, proceeded to the determination of the real length of the tooth by the visual method, introducing an instrument file K #10 until be seen in foraminal exit under magnification of 16x optical light microscope (DF Vasconcelos, São Paulo, Brazil). For electronic measurement, the teeth were embedded in an alginate mold and electronic measurements with the two locators foraminal to the actual output of the apical foramen (0,0mm). Results: The results showed a 96.8% and 91.6% accuracy rates for the locators Gnatus and Root ZX, respectively. Conclusion: Both electronic apex locators tested presented high index of precision in the precise of determination in the apical limit.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of working length (WL) determination of four electronic apex locators (EALs), namely, Root ZX (RZX), Elements diagnostic unit and apex locator (ELE), SybronEndo Mini Apex locator (MINI) and Propex pixi (PIXI) using Stainless steel (SS) and nickel-titanium (NiTi) hand files. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between canal length determination by SS and NiTi files of 4 EALs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted, single rooted human teeth were decoronated and the canal orifice flared. The actual length (AL) was assessed visually, and the teeth were embedded in an alginate model. The electronic length (EL) measurements were recorded with all four EALs using SS and NiTi files at '0.5' reading on display. The differences between the AL and EL were compared. RESULTS: The results obtained with each EAL with SS and NiTi files were compared with AL. A paired sample t test showed that there was a statistical significant difference between EAL readings with SS and NiTi files for RZX and MINI (p < 0.05). The accuracy of RZX, ELE, MINI and PIXI within +/- 0.5 mm of AL with SS/NiTi files were 93.3%/70%, 90%/91.7%, 95%/68.3%, and 83.3%/83.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that Root ZX was statistically more accurate with NiTi files compared to SS files, while MINI was statistically more accurate with SS files compared to NiTi files. ELE and PIXI were not affected by the alloy type of the file used to determine WL.
Subject(s)
Humans , Alloys , Hand , Reading , Stainless Steel , ToothABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of working length (WL) determination of four electronic apex locators (EALs), namely, Root ZX (RZX), Elements diagnostic unit and apex locator (ELE), SybronEndo Mini Apex locator (MINI) and Propex pixi (PIXI) using Stainless steel (SS) and nickel-titanium (NiTi) hand files. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between canal length determination by SS and NiTi files of 4 EALs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted, single rooted human teeth were decoronated and the canal orifice flared. The actual length (AL) was assessed visually, and the teeth were embedded in an alginate model. The electronic length (EL) measurements were recorded with all four EALs using SS and NiTi files at '0.5' reading on display. The differences between the AL and EL were compared. RESULTS: The results obtained with each EAL with SS and NiTi files were compared with AL. A paired sample t test showed that there was a statistical significant difference between EAL readings with SS and NiTi files for RZX and MINI (p < 0.05). The accuracy of RZX, ELE, MINI and PIXI within +/- 0.5 mm of AL with SS/NiTi files were 93.3%/70%, 90%/91.7%, 95%/68.3%, and 83.3%/83.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that Root ZX was statistically more accurate with NiTi files compared to SS files, while MINI was statistically more accurate with SS files compared to NiTi files. ELE and PIXI were not affected by the alloy type of the file used to determine WL.
Subject(s)
Humans , Alloys , Hand , Reading , Stainless Steel , ToothABSTRACT
This study was to evaluate in vivo the accuracy of three electronic apex locators (EALs) in determining working length (WL) using hand files and a wear technique. Thirty two premolars that were completely formed apically and that were scheduled for extraction for orthodontic reasons from patients between ages of 15 and 20 years old were included. Electronic measurement of WL was performed using the EAL according to the manufacturers instructions. The following three EAL were used: A. Root ZX II; B. Raypex 5, and C. Propex II. There were significant difference (p=0.0002) when comparing median differences among the three EAL. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between Root ZX II vs. Raypex 5 and Root ZX II vs. Propex II (p=0.0044; p=0.0002), while between aypex 5 and Propex II, there were no statistically significant differences with respect to the accuracy of the EAL in determining WL (p=0.1087). The present findings suggest that Root ZX II presented the highest agreement rate for determining the final WL...
Estudio fue evaluar in vivo la exactitud de tres localizadores apicales electrónicos(LAEs) para determinar la longitud de trabajo (LT) usando instrumentos manuales y una técnica de desgaste. Treinta y dos premolares con formación apical completa e indicados para extracción por razones ortodóncicas de pacientes de edad entre 15 y 20 años fueron incluidos en el estudio. Seusaron tres LAE; A. Root ZX II; B. Raypex 5, y C. Propex II. Se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0.0002) cuando se compararon las medianas entre los tres LAE. El análisismostró diferencias entre Root ZX II vs. Raypex 5 y Root ZX II vs. Propex II (p=0.0044; p=0,0002), mientras queentre Raypex 5 y Propex II, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la determinación de la LT (p=0.1087). Los presentes hallazgos sugieren que Root ZX II mostró la mayor exactitud para determinar la LT final...
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Young Adult , Tooth Apex/anatomy & histology , Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Odontometry/instrumentation , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Electrical Equipment and SuppliesABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare in vivo the accuracy of two electronic foramen locators (EFLs) based on different operation systems - Root ZX and Propex II. Ten healthy adult patients needing premolar extractions due to orthodontic reasons participated in the study, providing a sample of 17 noncarious, non-restored, vital teeth (n= 24 canals). After coronal access preparation and cervical preflaring and prior to tooth extraction, the root canal length was measured alternating the two EFLs. All measurements were performed with K-files well fitted to the canal diameter at the level that each EFL indicated the apical foramen in their display (APEX or 0.0). The last K-file were fixed in place with cyanoacrylate, the tooth was extracted, and the apical 4 mm of each root were resected to measure the distance between the file tip and the apical foramen. The mean errors based on the absolute values of discrepancies were 0.30 ± 0.29 mm (Root ZX) and 0.32 ± 0.27 mm (Propex II). Analysis by the Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed no statistically significant differences between the electronic canal measurements performed with the EFLs (p=0.587). The apical foramen was accurately located in 75% (Root ZX) and 66.7% (Propex II) of the cases, considering a ±0.5 mm error margin, with no statistically significant difference by the chi-square test. Despite having different measurement mechanisms, both EFLs were capable of locating the apical foramen with high accuracy in vivo. Under the tested clinical conditions, Root ZX and Propex II displayed similar results.
O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar, in vivo, a precisão de dois localizadores eletrônicos foraminais (LEFs) baseados em diferentes mecanismos de funcionamento, Root ZX e Propex II, na determinação do forame apical, sendo utilizados nos mesmos dentes. Após o acesso coronário e o pré-alargamento, e anteriormente à exodontia, os comprimentos de 24 canais radiculares foram determinados eletronicamente alternando-se os dois LEFs. As odontometrias foram realizadas até que os dispositivos apontassem o FA (APEX), utilizando-se limas tipo-K ajustadas. O último instrumento utilizado foi fixado em posição, o dente extraído e os 4,0 mm apicais de cada canal desgastados de forma a possibilitar a determinação da distância entre a ponta dos instrumentos e o forame apical. Os erros médios em função dos valores absolutos das discrepâncias foram, respectivamente, 0,30 ± 0,29 mm (Root ZX) e 0,32 ± 0,27 mm (Propex II). A análise estatística realizada por meio do teste de Wilcoxon para amostras pareadas demonstrou a semelhança entre as determinações do forame apical realizadas pelos dois LEFs (p=0,587). O comprimento radicular até o forame apical foi corretamente determinado em 75% (Root ZX) e 66,7% (Propex II) dos casos, considerando margem de ± 0,5 mm, sem diferenças estatísticas quando analisados pelo teste qui-quadrado. Os LEFs avaliados e consequentemente seus mecanismos de funcionamento, foram capazes de determinar o comprimento dos canais radiculares com precisão em condições in vivo. Nas condições do presente estudo, Root ZX e Propex II apresentaram resultados semelhantes.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Young Adult , Electronics , Root Canal Therapy , Tooth ExtractionABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of the Root ZX in teeth with simulated root perforation in the presence of gel or liquid type endodontic irrigants, such as saline, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine liquid, 2% chlorhexidine gel, and RC-Prep, and also to determine the electrical conductivities of these endodontic irrigants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A root perforation was simulated on twenty freshly extracted teeth by means of a small perforation made on the proximal surface of the root at 4 mm from the anatomic apex. Root ZX was used to locate root perforation and measure the electronic working lengths. The results obtained were compared with the actual working length (AWL) and the actual location of perforations (AP), allowing tolerances of 0.5 or 1.0 mm. Measurements within these limits were considered as acceptable. Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate significance. Electrical conductivities of each irrigant were also measured with an electrical conductivity tester. RESULTS: The accuracies of the Root ZX in perforated teeth were significantly different between liquid types (saline, NaOCl) and gel types (chlorhexidine gel, RC-Prep). The accuracies of electronic working lengths in perforated teeth were higher in gel types than in liquid types. The accuracy in locating root perforation was higher in liquid types than gel types. 5.25% NaOCl had the highest electrical conductivity, whereas 2% chlorhexidine gel and RC-Prep gel had the lowest electrical conductivities among the five irrigants. CONCLUSIONS: Different canal irrigants with different electrical conductivities may affect the accuracy of the Root ZX in perforated teeth.
Subject(s)
Chlorhexidine , Edetic Acid , Electric Conductivity , Electronics , Electrons , Peroxides , Root Canal Irrigants , Sodium Hypochlorite , Tooth , Urea , WaxesABSTRACT
Aim: To evaluate comparatively the radiographic and electronic root canal length determination in primary molars. Methods: 128 canals from 66 primary molars were selected. The root of each tooth was cut open on the occlusal face, and the real tooth length (RTL) was measured and the gold standard working length (WL) was determined by subtracting 1 mm from this measurement. The teeth were then placed in a plastic receptacle holding alginate and saline for the electronic determination of the root length using a Root ZX apex locator. The radiographic determination of the WL was obtained by subtracting 1 mm from the measurement highest cusp to the root apex appearing in the radiography. The data were analyzed statistically by the Chi-square test at a 5% significance level. Results: There was statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between each tested method and the gold standard. The Root ZX apex locator and the radiographic method presented satisfactory results in 75.78% and 54.68% of the cases, respectively. Conclusions: The Root ZX apex locator is a reliable method to determine the WL of primary teeth, since it showed greater accuracy than the radiographic method.