ABSTRACT
@#Objective To compare the long-term durability of valved homograft conduit (VHC) in patients with Ross and non-Ross right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction. Methods Patients who underwent RVOT reconstruction using VHC in Fuwai Hospital from January 2008 to October 2020 were retrospectively included. Patients who received Ross RVOT reconstruction were allocated to a Ross group and patients who received non-Ross RVOT reconstruction were allocated to a non-Ross group. The survival and reintervention-free rates of the two groups were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test. The propensity score matching analysis was performed on the patients who completed ultrasound follow-up in the two groups, and the VHC dysfunction-free rate was compared between the two groups. Results A total of 243 patients were enrolled, including 142 males and 101 females, with a median age of 6 years (4 months to 56 years). There were 77 patients in the ROSS group and 166 patients (168 operations) in the non-ROSS group. The cardiopulmonary bypass time in the Ross group was shorter than that in the non-Ross group (175.4±45.6 min vs. 200.1±83.5 min, P=0.003). Five patients in the non-Ross group died early after the operation. The follow-up was available in 231 patients (93.1%), with the average follow-up time of 61.7±44.4 months. During the follow-up, 5 patients in the non-Ross group died. The 12-year survival rate was 100.0% in the Ross group and 93.2% in the non-Ross group (log-rank, P=0.026). In addition, 1 patient in the Ross group and 7 patients in the non-Ross group received VHC reintervention. There was no significant difference in the reintervention-free rate between the two groups (log-rank, P=0.096). Among the 73 patients in the Ross group and 147 patients in non-Ross group who were followed up by ultrasound after discharge, 45 patients (20.5%) developed VHC dysfunction. Before matching, the long-term durability of VHC in the Ross group was better than that in non-Ross group (10-year VHC dysfunction-free rate: 66.6% vs. 37.1%, log-rank, P=0.025). After the propensity score matching, 64 patients included in each group, and there was no statistical difference in the long-term durability of VHC between the two groups (10-year VHC dysfunction-free rate: 76.3% vs. 43.0%, log-rank, P=0.065). In the subgroup analysis, the 10-year VHC dysfunction-free rate in the Ross group was higher than that in the non-Ross group (71.0% vs. 20.0%, log-rank, P=0.032) among patients aged<6 years at surgery. However, there was no significant difference in the 10-year VHC dysfunction-free rate between the two groups (53.7% vs. 56.7%, log-rank, P=0.218) among patients aged ≥6 years at surgery. Conclusion After the propensity score matching analysis, the long-term durability of VHC has no significant difference between the Ross group and non-Ross group. The long-term durability of VHC after Ross surgery is superior to that of non-Ross surgery in patients aged<6 years at surgery.
ABSTRACT
Introducción El procedimiento de Ross para el tratamiento de la valvulopatía aórtica se ha utilizado durante décadas. A pesar de sus resultados alentadores, ciertos interrogantes han limitado su uso masivo; su durabilidad es uno de los principales motivos de preocupación. Objetivo Analizar los resultados de la cirugía de Ross en nuestro centro. Material y métodos El presente es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. De julio de 1995 a mayo de 2008, 198 pacientes fueron sometidos a cirugía de Ross; en todos ellos se empleó la técnica de reemplazo de la raíz aórtica. Los eventos asociados con la válvula se analizaron con el método de Kaplan-Meier. Para el análisis de las variables se emplearon el log-rank test y el modelo de Cox. Resultados La edad media fue de 39 ± 13 años; el 77% eran hombres. La cirugía fue indicada por estenosis aórtica (58%) e insuficiencia aórtica (42%). La mortalidad hospitalaria fue del 2,5% (5 pacientes). El seguimiento a 10 años fue completo en el 93% para los primeros 165 pacientes. La sobrevida a los 10 años fue del 94,8% (IC 95% 89-98). La libertad de endocarditis a los 10 años fue del 95% (IC 95% 84-98) y la libertad de eventos relacionados con la válvula a los 10 años fue del 91% (IC 95% 86-96). Cinco pacientes requirieron reoperación, 4 de ellos por disfunción del autoinjerto y enfermedad de otras válvulas. Conclusiones La cirugía de Ross es una técnica quirúrgica con una tasa baja de eventos a los 13 años y debe ser considerada para el tratamiento de la enfermedad valvular aórtica en pacientes seleccionados.
Background The Ross procedure has been used for decades for the treatment of aortic valve disease. Despite the promising outcomes of this technique, its limited durability is one of the major drawbacks against its massive indication. Objective To analyze the outcomes of the Ross procedure in our oenter. Material and Methods We conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of patients. From July 1995 to May 2008, 198 patients underwent Ross procedure with aortic root replacement technique. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the events associated with the valve, and the variables were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox model. Results Mean age was 39± 13 years and 77% were raen. The procedure was indicated due to aortic stenosis (58%) and aortic regurgitation (42%). In-hospital mortality was 2.5% (5 patients). Complete follow-up at 10 years was achieved in 93% of the first 165 patients. Survival at 10 years was 94.8% (95% CI, 89-98) After 10 years, 95% (95% CI, 84-98) of patients did not present endocarditis and 91% (95% CI, 86-96) had no valve-related events. Five patients required reoperation, 4 due to autograft dysfunction and disease of other valves. Conclusions Ross procedure has a low event rate after 13 years and should be considered for the treatment of aortic valve disease in selected patients.