Molecular Genetic Analysis of the Ryanodine Receptor Gene (RYR1) in Korean Malignant Hyperthermia Families / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is genetically heterogeneous, with mutations in the gene encoding the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RYR1) at 19q13.1 accounting for up to 80% of the cases. However, the search for known and novel mutations in the RYR1 gene is hampered by the fact that the gene contains 106 exons. We aimed to analyze mutations from the entire RYR1 coding region in Korean MH families. METHODS: We investigated seven affected MH individuals and their family members. The entire RYR1 coding region from the genomic DNA was sequenced, and RYR1 haplotyping and mutational analysis were carried out. RESULTS: We identified nine different RYR1 mutations or variations from seven Korean MH families. Among these, five previously reported mutations (p.Gly248Arg, p.Arg2435His, p.Arg2458His, p.Arg2676Trp, and p.Leu4838Val) and four novel variations of unknown significance (p.Arg2508Cys, p.Met4022Val, p.Glu2669Lys, and p.Ala4295Val) were identified. In two families, two variations (R2676W & M4022V, R2435H & A4295V, respectively) were identified simultaneously. Four of the observed nine mutations or variations were located outside the hotspot region of RYR1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that RYR1 is a main candidate gene in Korean MH families, and that comprehensive screening of the entire coding sequence of the RYR1 gene is necessary for molecular genetic investigations in MH-susceptible individuals, owing to the presence of RYR1 mutations or variations outside of the hotspot region.

A Double Mutation of the Ryanodine Receptor Type 1 Gene in a Malignant Hyperthermia Family with Multiminicore Myopathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: At least 100 Ryanodine receptor type 1 (RYR1) mutations associated with malignant hyperthermia (MH) and central core disease (CCD) have been identified, but 2 RYR1 mutations accompanying multiminicore myopathy in an MH and/or CCD family have been reported only rarely. METHODS: Fifty-three members of a large MH family were investigated with clinical, histopathologic, RYR1 mutation, and haplotyping studies. Blood creatine kinase (CK) and myoglobin levels were also measured where possible. RESULTS: Sequencing of the entire RYR1 coding region identified a double RYR1 mutation (R2435H and A4295V) in MH/CCD regions 2 and 3. Haplotyping analysis revealed that the two missense heterozygous mutations (c.7304G>A and c.12891C>T) were always present on a common haplotype allele, and were closely cosegregated with histological multiminicores and elevated serum CK. All the subjects with the double mutation showed elevated serum CK and myoglobin, and the obtained muscle biopsy samples showed multiminicore lesions, but only two family members presented a late-onset, slowly progressive myopathy. CONCLUSIONS: We found multiminicore myopathy with clinical and histological variability in a large MH family with an unusual double RYR1 mutation, including a typical CCD-causing known mutant. These results suggest that multiminicore lesions are associated with the presence of more than two mutations in the RYR1 gene.