Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Indian Pediatr ; 2013 September; 50(9): 839-846
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-169967

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the unit cost of level II neonatal intensive care treatment delivered through public hospitals and its fiscal implications in India. Design: Cost analysis study. Setting: Four Special Care Newborn Units (SCNUs) in public sector district hospitals in three Indian states, i.e. Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, for the period 2010. Methods: Bottom-up economic costing methodology was adopted. Health system resources, i.e. capital, equipment, drugs and consumables, non-consumables, referral and overheads, utilized to treat all neonates during 2010 were elicited. Additionally, 360 randomly selected treatment files of neonates were screened to estimate direct out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure borne by the patients. In order to account for variability in prices and other parameters, we undertook a univariate sensitivity analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Unit cost was computed as INR (Indian national rupees) per neonate treated and INR per bed-day treatment in SCNU. Standardized costs per neonate treatment and per bed day were estimated to incorporate the variation in bed occupancy rates across the sites. Results: Overall, SCNU neonatal treatment costs the Government INR 4581 (USD 101.8) and INR 818 (USD 18.2) per neonate treatment and per bed-day treatment, respectively. Standardized treatment costs were estimated to be INR 5090 (USD 113.1) per neonate and INR 909 (USD 20.2) per bed-day treatment. In the event of entire direct medical expenditure being borne by the health system, we found cost of SCNU treatment as INR 4976 (USD 110.6) per neonate and INR 889 (USD 19.8) per bed-day. Conclusions: Level II neonatal intensive care at SCNUs is cost intensive. Rational use of SCNU services by targeting its utilization for the very low birth weight neonates and maintenance of community based home-based newborn care is required. Further research is required on cost-effectiveness of level II neonatal intensive care against routine pediatric ward care.

2.
Indian J Pediatr ; 2009 Sept; 76(9): 937-939
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-142373

ABSTRACT

Objective. The study was conducted to find out whether there is any significant difference in outcome if low birth weight babies weighing between 1500g and 1800g are managed by keeping them with their mothers, i.e., without special care neonatal unit (SCNU) admission. Methods. It was a retrospective study for which data was collected from past medical record section of 6 months duration from 01.07.06 to 31.12.06, Medical College, Kolkata. The subject of the study was babies born with weight between 1500g and 2000g, divided into 2 groups. Group A representing babies born between weight 1500g and 1800g, groups B representing babies born between 1801g and 2000g. The groups were compared with regard to four variable namely average material age, sex of the babies, singleton or twin pregnancy, mode of delivery and gestational maturity. Test of one proportion was used for statistical analysis of outcome. Results. Total number of live born babies in group A were 198 and in group B 223. Two group were comparable with respect to average maternal age (23.7 yr), sex distribution, singleton or twin pregnancy and number of cesarian section or vaginal delivery and proportion of small for gestational age (SGA) babies. In both the group 13 babies required SCNU admission after being given to their mothers in the postnatal ward. No significant difference in outcome was observed between the groups. Conclusion. We conclude that the recommended guidelines for giving institutional care to babies below 1800g may be lowered down to 1500g. However, more babies should be evaluated prospectively, over a longer duration of time, before changing the standard guidelines.


Subject(s)
Adult , Birth Weight , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , India , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Male , Maternal Age , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, Multiple , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL