ABSTRACT
Purpose: To assess different approaches in the management of aphakia in adults in Indian ophthalmologists via an online survey. Methods: A survey-monkey based online questionnaire was fielded to Indian ophthalmologists in accordance with the CHERRIES guidelines. We recorded participants’ demographics, practice settings, and preferred surgical options including the type of intraocular lens (IOL) preferred when encountering a case of aphakia in adults with and without adequate capsular support. Differences between anterior segment (AS) surgeons and vitreoretinal (VR) surgeons as well as differences between surgeons with more or less than 10 years of surgical experience were evaluated using analytic statistics. Results: Of the 481 surgeons who responded to the survey, 369 (77%) were AS surgeons and the remaining 112 (23%) were VR surgeons and represented all regions of India. When encountering posterior capsular rent during cataract surgery, a three-piece IOL in the ciliary sulcus was the most preferred (n = 275, 57%) when there was adequate capsular support, while a retrofixated iris-claw IOL (n = 91, 19%) was the commonest choice in eyes without adequate capsular support. With associated nucleus drop, 85% of surgeons preferred to refer the patient to a VR surgeon and left the eye aphakic. Multivariable logistic regression showed that VR surgeons were more than six times likely to prefer a scleral fixated intraocular lens (SFIOLs) [odds ratio (OR) = 6.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.4–12.5, P < 0.001] and surgeons with >10 years of experience were also twice more likely to prefer an SFIOL (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.2–4.9, P = 0.02). Conclusion: The choice of IOL in absence of capsular support in adult eyes differs between AS and VR surgeons and is also influenced by the surgeon’s experience.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes and complications between the eyes receiving retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (IOL) and scleral-fixated IOL (SFIOL) for post-cataract aphakia. Methods: Medical records of consecutive patients who had iris claw IOL and SFIOL surgery from January 2010 to March 2015, with > 1 year of follow up were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical technique was based on individual surgeon preference. The best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), previous surgery, surgical technique, and complications were analyzed. Results: Retropupillary iris claw IOL was fixated in 48 eyes (46%) and SFIOL was performed in 56 eyes. Iris claw was performed more frequently at the time of primary cataract surgery (56%) compared to SFIOL (14%) (P < 0.001). At 1 month postoperative, BCDVA was significantly better in the SFIOL group [0.7 ± 0.5 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in iris claw vs. 0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR in SFIOL, P < 0.001] but this difference did not persist at 1 year (0.4 ± 0.4 logMAR in iris claw vs. 0.3 ± 0.2 logMAR in SFIOL, P = 0.56). Eyes with iris claw IOL experienced significantly more postoperative iritis (17%), intraocular pressure spikes (10%), and ovalization of the pupil (16%). Conclusion: Retropupillary iris claw IOL fixation is as safe as SFIOL for visual rehabilitation of post-cataract aphakia. Visual rehabilitation following iris claw IOL might take longer than SFIOL. Ovalization of the pupil is the commonest adverse effect reported with this type of IOL design.