Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery ; (12): 28-34, 2024.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1009104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To compare the effectiveness of O-arm navigation and C-arm navigation for guiding percutaneous long sacroiliac screws in treatment of Denis type Ⅱ sacral fractures.@*METHODS@#A retrospective study was conducted on clinical data of the 46 patients with Denis type Ⅱ sacral fractures between April 2021 and October 2022. Among them, 19 patients underwent O-arm navigation assisted percutaneous long sacroiliac screw fixation (O-arm navigation group), and 27 patients underwent C-arm navigation assisted percutaneous long sacroiliac screw fixation (C-arm navigation group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, causes of injuries, Tile classification of pelvic fractures, combined injury, the interval from injury to operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The intraoperative preparation time, the placement time of each screw, the fluoroscopy time of each screw during placement, screw position accuracy, the quality of fracture reduction, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared, postoperative complications were observed. Pelvic function was evaluated by Majeed score at last follow-up.@*RESULTS@#All operations were completed successfully, and all incisions healed by first intention. Compared to the C-arm navigation group, the O-arm navigation group had shorter intraoperative preparation time, placement time of each screw, and fluoroscopy time, with significant differences ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in screw position accuracy and the quality of fracture reduction ( P>0.05). There was no nerve or vascular injury during screw placed in the two groups. All patients in both groups were followed up, with the follow-up time of 6-21 months (mean, 12.0 months). Imaging re-examination showed that both groups achieved bony healing, and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). During follow-up, there was no postoperative complications, such as screw loosening and breaking or loss of fracture reduction. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in pelvic function between the two groups ( P>0.05).@*CONCLUSION@#Compared with the C-arm navigation, the O-arm navigation assisted percutaneous long sacroiliac screws for the treatment of Denis typeⅡsacral fractures can significantly shorten the intraoperative preparation time, screw placement time, and fluoroscopy time, improve the accuracy of screw placement, and obtain clearer navigation images.


Subject(s)
Humans , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Retrospective Studies , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Bone Screws , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Postoperative Complications , Neck Injuries
2.
Chinese Journal of Traumatology ; (6): 48-59, 2023.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-970966

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE@#Combined anterior and posterior ring (APR) fixation is classically performed in Tile B2 and C1 injuries to achieve superior biomechanical stability. However, the posterior ring (PR) is the main weight bearing portion that is responsible for weight transmission from the upper parts of the body to the lower limbs through the sacrum and the linea terminalis. It is hypothesized that isolated PR fixation can achieve comparable radiological and clinical outcomes to APR fixation. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the two fixation principles in managing Tile B2 and C1 injuries.@*METHODS@#Our study included 20 patients with Tile B2 injuries and 20 patients with Tile C1 injuries. This study was a randomized control single-blinded study via computerized random numbers with a 1:1 allocation by using random block method. The study was performed at a level one trauma center. A total of 40 patients with Tile B2 and C1 injuries underwent combined APR or isolated PR fixation (Group A and B, respectively). Matta & Tornetta radiological principles and Majeed pelvic scoring system were used for the assessment of primary outcomes and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included operative time, amount of blood loss, intraoperative assessment of reduction, need of another operation, length of hospital stay, ability to weight bear postoperatively and pain control metrics. We used student t-test to compare the difference in means between two groups, and Chi-square test to compare proportions between two qualitative parameters. We set the confidence interval to 95% and the margin of error accepted to 5%. So, p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.@*RESULTS@#The mean follow-up duration was 18 months. The operative time (mean difference 0.575 h) and the intraoperative blood loss (mean difference 97.5 mL) were lower in Group B. Also, despite the higher frequency of rami displacement before union in the same group, there were no significant differences in terms of radiological outcome (excellent outcome with OR = 2.357), clinical outcome (excellent outcome with OR = 2.852) and postoperative complications assessment (OR = 1.556) at last follow-up.@*CONCLUSION@#The authors concluded that isolated PR fixation could favorably manage Tile B2 and C1 pelvic ring injuries with Nakatani zone II pubic rami fractures and intact inguinal ligament. Its final radiological and clinical outcomes and postoperative complications were comparable to combined APR fixation, but with less morbidity (shorter operation time, lower amount of blood, and no records of postoperative wound infection).


Subject(s)
Humans , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Bone Screws , Retrospective Studies , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Spinal Fractures , Treatment Outcome
3.
Chinese Journal of Trauma ; (12): 303-307, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-745055

ABSTRACT

Currently,the internal fixation methods for unstable sacral fractures mainly include posterior tension band screw plate fixation,sacroiliac screw fixation,lumbopelvic fixation and triangular osteosynthesis.The purpose of the above internal fixation is to correct the deformity of the pelvic ring and lumbosacral joint and rebuild its stability,but incorrect selection will increase the risk of loosening or breakage of the internal fixation.However,there are no clear guidelines on how to select appropriate internal fixation according to different fracture types.To this end,the author discussed the selection of internal fixation method,the technique of screw placement,the new auxiliary instrumentation technology as well as internal fixation related infection so as to provide reference for the treatment of unstable sacral fractures.

4.
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma ; (12)2004.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-584380

ABSTRACT

With ever-increasing knowledge of biomechanics and anatomy of pelvis,more and more findings have been made on the integrated sacroiliac joint system.The sacroiliac complex plays a very important role i n the functions of pelvis due to its specia l biomechanical features.The sacro iliac screw internal fixation is bio mechanically superior to other fixation methods.[

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL