ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the application of B-mode ultrasound in objective evaluation and dynamic monitoring of scar.Methods:The subjects were patients with scar in the outpatient and inpatient department of plastic surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March 2018 to June 2020. According to the type of scar, they were divided into 3 groups: 21 patients in the normal scar group, 23 patients in the hypertrophic scar group, and 15 patients in the keloid group. All 59 patients were regularly scanned by B-mode ultrasound for scar images and the scar thickness was measured.Results:B-mode ultrasonic images of scars were analyzed in each group: The echo intensity of dermis of normal scar was uneven, hypertrophic scar and keloid dermis showed obvious hypoecho, and some cases of keloid presented a small amount of blood flow. There was no significant change in the ultrasonic images of scar in each group within 1 year. Changes in scar thickness were observed in each group. The normal scar thickness did not change significantly within 1 year. The thickness of hypertrophic scar showed a trend of first increasing and then stabilized within 1 year.Conclusions:B-mode ultrasound can assist to identify different scar types according to ultrasonic performance. B-mode ultrasound can be used to measure scar thickness objectively and accurately and monitor the dynamic changes of scars.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the relationship between scar uterine stress and scar thickness/position by using finite element method, so as to study risk factors of scar uterus rupture. Methods Firstly, SolidWorks was used to establish a three-dimensional (3D) model of the uterus with variable scar thickness and position based on uterine size of the pregnant woman at 40th week of gestation, and then the intrauterine pressure was set in the ANSYS software with pressure range of 4.83-23.9 kPa to calculate the uterine stress. Results During the contraction process, the maximum stress was located in uterine scar, the maximum stress on the uterus with scar thickness smaller than 3 mm was greater than tensile strength of the uterus; 3 mm was used as thickness limit of the lower uterine body. If the thickness was smaller than 3 mm, cesarean section should be selected immediately. Otherwise, transvaginal delivery could be selected. When the scar thickness was 3.0 mm, the maximum stress experienced by the uterus decreased at first and then increased with the distance from the uterine floor increasing. The stress at the uterine scar was the smallest when the distance from the uterine floor was 295 mm; when the scar was 285-305 mm from the uterine floor, the ultimate stress on the scar was smaller than its tensile strength, and it was safer to choose a vaginal delivery. Conclusions Risk factors of scar uterine rupture were studied based on ANSYS finite element analysis. The analysis results were consistent with the clinical data, which provided analysis method and theoretical guidance for the choice of delivery method in clinic.
ABSTRACT
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the thickness of the scar and relative thinning of the uterinewall following conventional LSCS closing technique versus new closing technique (modified mattress Suture) and any additional surgical procedure in each group.Methods: A total of sixty patients undergoing primary caesarean for obstetric indications and who were willing for the study were included. In 30 patients uterus was closed by conventional double layer technique (the first layer is suturing with absorbable suture in a continuous running fashion. After first layer is complete, a second continuous stitch is used to invert the first layer, inverting stitch may be horizontal or vertical using same suturing material) and in 30 patient uterus was closed by new modified mattress technique. In both groups same suture material (vicryl 1-0) was used. Measurement of the thickness of scar site and corresponding posterior wall thickness was done following 6 months of caesarean section.Results: The possible parameters of better technique i.e., the mean scar thickness is more and relative as well as percentage thinning is less with this new technique of uterine closure although statistically not significant. Conclusions: Modified mattress suture technique is a single step procedure and gives the feel of double layer uterine closure. Hence the time taken, material. Used and the cost involved will be less along with excellent hemostasis.
ABSTRACT
Background: Over the time the caesarean delivery rate has significantly increase worldwide from 18.2% in 2002 to 30.3% in 2012. In parous women, previous caesarean section has been found to be the most common indication for caesarean delivery in as high as 67% cases. Unsecure prediction of the integrity of the scarred LUS during labor appears to be one of the reasons for high repeat caesarean rates. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment scar before labour for deciding whether it is a reliable safeguard for trial of labour or not in a woman having previous one caesarean delivery.Methods: This study was a prospective observational study, carried out on 108 pregnant women having previous one CS, gestational age >37, singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation. Trans-abdominal USG was done to measure scar thickness. Trial of labour was given to each patient irrespective of scar thickness. Pregnancy outcome were noted in terms of successful VBAC or emergency LSCS and compared with scar thickness. Correlation between sonographic and intra-operative finding of scar were noted.Results: Result shows strong correlation between scar thickness and successful trial of labour. Scar thickness increases chances of successful vaginal deliveries.Conclusions: Sonographic assessment of previous scar has a practical application to predict the thickness and thinness of previous scar and can be taken as a reliable safeguard for trial of labour after previous cesarean but cut off value above which vaginal delivery could be considered safe is yet to be identified.
ABSTRACT
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is the most common obstetric surgery performed world-wide. The objective of this study was to correlate the antenatal sonographic lower uterine segment (LUS) scar thickness in women with previous one cesarean section with intra operative LUS scar grading.Methods: A Prospective observational study was conducted from December 2014 to November 2015. In a tertiary care center. 200 pregnant women from ANC clinic with previous one LSCS were recruited. Transabdominal USG done between 36-38 weeks. LUS thickness was measured from bladder wall-myometrium interphase and myometrium-chorioamniotic membrane inter phase. Intraoperative grading of LUS scar was done. Based on grading of scar participants were assigned into scar dehiscence group (grade III and IV LUS scar) and non-dehiscence group (Grade I and II LUS scar).Results: Mean LUS thickness was 3.41±0.623 mm (range: 2-7 mm). Mean LUS thickness in the scar dehiscence group and non-dehiscence group was 2.98±0.55 mm and 3.48±0.60 mm (P value < 0.05) respectively. A cut off value of 3.5 mm was derived from ROC with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 92.6%, 54.3%, 24.0%, 97.8%, respectively. The present study reported 27 (13.5%) cases of scar dehiscence.Conclusions: Ultra-sonographic evaluation of LUS thickness correlated significantly with intraoperative LUS appearance. USG evaluation of LUS can be used as a screening test to predict the LUS scar integrity. Risk of dehiscence is increased in women with thin LUS i.e. sonographic LUS thickness of < 3.5 mm and needs to be further evaluated. Women with previous one LSCS with thick LUS i.e. sonographic LUS thickness of > 3.5 mm, can be counselled regarding TOLAC if not contraindicated.
ABSTRACT
Background: Conventional closure of uterus has been known to bear risk of scar dehiscence and scar rupture in subsequent pregnancies and thus, a study was conducted to compare the outcome of uterine closure with modified mattress manner and running manner and to establish a better method of uterine closure during caesarean section. Objective was to compare the conventional single layer running sutures and single layer modified mattress sutures for closure of uterus in caesarean section and find out which method is superior.Methods: This prospective interventional study was carried out in Dhiraj Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Vadodara. 60 pregnant women in the study criteria were equally divided randomly into 2 groups. Uterine closure was done in single layered sutures, one by running sutures and other group by modified mattress sutures.Results: Uterine scar thickness on 8th day and 6 months post-operatively was significantly more in single layered suturing by modified mattress suture compared to running suture (p <0.05).Conclusions: Uterine closure by single layered modified mattress suture is better in comparison to conventional single layer running suture.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Estimation of the anterior lower uterine segment (LUS) thickness difference who underwent prior cesarean delivery measured with transvaginal sonography at or after 36 gestational weeks (sonographic thickness) and a ruler during elective cesarean section (operation thickness) Methods: One hundred sixty women who underwent prior cesarean delivery had the thickness of their LUS measured with transvaginal sonography at or after 36 gestational weeks. The LUS thickness was measured with a ruler during elective cesarean section. We compared group I whose LUS was fairly well visualized 4 cm or more from the uterine cervix to group II which had less than 4 cm. RESULTS: The mean sonographic thickness of LUS was 1.7 0.8 mm and that of operation thickness was 1.9 0.5 mm. The mean difference of the two (thickness difference) was 0.5 0.5 mm. In 31.3% the sonographic thickness was same as the operation thickness and in 70.7% of the total with 0.5 mm or less difference, the sonographic thickness could be regarded as accurate. The thickness difference with the sonographic thickness with 2 mm or more was smaller than those with 1 mm or less (0.4 0.5; 0.6 0.6) and that of group I was smaller than that of group II (0.4 0.4; 0.9 0.6) (p< .05). CONCLUSION: The thickness difference was 0.5 0.5 mm and it was smaller when the LUS thickness is 2 mm or over, clearly visible 4 cm or over from the cervix.