Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science ; (12): 78-81, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-451827

ABSTRACT

Team-oriented scientific project competition-based ideas and measures in teaching of Medical Information Analysis course were studied by introducing non-medical cases into discussion and analysis , simulating brain storm conference , and supplementing team competition .

2.
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management ; (4): 289-292, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-450401

ABSTRACT

The acceptance assessment is an important part of research project management.By analyzing the content,methods,process and model of the current acceptance assessment of medical research projects in China,we summarized and elaborated the main problems in the medical research management.By referring to the mature practices of some other countries,we proposed the solutions to improve the quality of acceptance assessment in China,i.e.,balancing the qualitative and quantitative assessment,improving the quality of peer-review,constructing information platform,introducing independent third party assessment and construing the overall process evaluation system.Our study may provide important reference for constructing the high-quality evaluation system of medical research projects in China.

3.
Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management ; (4): 391-394, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-430502

ABSTRACT

In order to evaluate the overall situation of projects granted by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) in the 11th five-year plan period,the data about applications and approved NSFC projects at Cancer Institute and Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CIH CAMS) were analyzed and compared with those of the 10th five-year plan period.It showed that the number of granted NSFC projects increased and the structure of program type maintained during the 11th five-year plan period.The program researchers were younger and had better education background.The quality and quantity of both the General Program projects and Young Scientists Fund projects were at high level.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL