ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyze the diagnostic value of Michigan nerve screening Scale (MNSI), pain, touch and temperature detection combined with vibratory perception threshold (VPT) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).Methods:A total of 500 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who received inpatient treatment in Xinhua Hospital Chongming Branch Affiliated of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January to December 2018 were selected. Sixty four patients with DPN were enrolled in the DPN group, and the remaining 436 patients were enrolled in the no-DPN group. The clinical data and the results of MNSI scale, pain, touch and temperature detection thresholds and VPT of the two groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the clinical value of single and combined examination indicators in the diagnosis of DPN.Results:MNSI symptom questionnaire score and MNSI physical examination score in DPN group were higher than those in no-DPN group: (3.00 ± 1.35) scores vs. (1.69 ± 0.52) scores, (1.57 ± 0.50) scores vs. (1.01 ± 0.24) scores; the proportion of touch regression, pain regression and temperature regression was significantly higher than that in no-DPN group; and the levels of VPT in the DPN group was higher than that in the no-DPN group: (26.34 ± 5.03) V vs. (17.97 ± 6.82) V, there were statistical differences ( P<0.01). When the single index was diagnosed, the area under the curve (AUC) value of VPT was the highest (0.825), and significantly higher than the pain, touch and temperature detection ( P<0.01). The AUC value of VPT + MNSI in combined diagnosis was the highest (0.738), and the sensitivity and specificity of DPN diagnosis were 51.56% and 96.10%, respectively. Conclusions:Compared with MNSI scale score, sensory detection such as pain, touch and temperature, VPT has the best diagnostic efficiency for DPN, while combined with MNSI, the specificity can be further improved, but the sensitivity decreases, which is worthy of clinical attention.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To develop a Beijing norm of Memory and Executive Screening (MES) scale to facilitate its further promotion and application in the future.Methods:Study subjects were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including patients who visited the memory clinic of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University from March 20, 2017 to January 6, 2021, and normal people recruited simultaneously from community, and trained and qualified investigators conducted questionnaire surveys through face-to-face interviews. Then strict quality control, data collection and statistical analysis were performed.Results:A total of 607 participants were included, including 239 normal people, 293 individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), and 75 individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). There was a negative correlation between the scores of MES and age ( r=-0.19, P<0.001), but a positive correlation between scores of MES and education level ( r=0.29, P<0.001). The optimal cut-off value of this scale in Beijing was 86 points, the area under curve (AUC) of the cut-off value to distinguish MCI was 0.847 (normal people vs MCI) and 0.826 (SCD vs MCI), and after adding demographic variables, AUC showed slight increase (0.847 to 0.850 and 0.826 to 0.847), whereas the differences were not statistically significant ( Znormal peoplevsMCI=0.49, ZSCDvsMCI=1.21, P>0.05). And there was no statistically significant difference between MES and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scales in diagnostic power for normal people and people with MCI ( Zscale alone=1.03, Zafter adding demographic variables=1.13, P>0.05). Conclusions:The MES scale has a better distinguishing power for MCI, and its optimal cut-off value in Beijing is 86 points, which is different from previous studies. In the future, the sample size needs to be further expanded to verify this norm.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To correlate serum homocysteine (Hcy) level with psychiatric symptoms and social ability in patients with schizophrenia.Methods:A total of 143 patients with schizophrenia who received treatment in the Third Hospital of Quzhou from January 2018 to January 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly divided into abnormal Hcy group (Hcy ≥ 10) μmol/L, n = 46) and normal Hcy group (Hcy < 10 μmol/L, n = 97) according to different serum Hcy levels. Baseline data, the scores of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS) were compared between the two groups. The correlation between serum Hcy level and psychiatric symptoms and social ability was analyzed using the Pearson correlation analysis. Results:PANSS total score and BPRS total score were (77.86 ± 8.37) points and (94.47 ± 9.36) points, respectively in the abnormal Hcy group, and (74.37 ± 7.94) points and (90.35 ± 9.26) points, respectively in the normal Hcy group. There were significant differences in PANSS total score and BPRS total score between the two groups ( t = 2.41, 2.47, both P < 0.05). SDSS total score was significantly higher in the abnormal Hcy group than in the normal Hcy group [(11.75 ± 2.38) points vs. (10.53 ± 2.28) points, t = 2.88, P < 0.05]. Pearson correlation analysis showed that serum Hcy level was positively correlated with PANSS positive subscale score ( r = 0.73, P < 0.001), general mental symptom score ( r = 0.43, P = 0.032) and PANSS total score ( r = 0.53, P = 0.027), but it was not correlated with PANSS negative symptom score ( P > 0.05). Serum Hcy level was positively correlated with BPRS excitement subscale score ( r = 0.42, P = 0.037) and hostility subscale score ( r = 0.37, P = 0.047), but it was not correlated with anxiety, blunted affect, unusual thought content subscale scores and BPRS total score (all P > 0.05). Conclusion:Serum Hcy level is correlated with psychiatric symptoms and social ability in patients with schizophrenia. The higher the level of Hcy, the more severe the psychiatric symptoms, and the higher the degree of social disability.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To develop a negative emotion screening scale for inpatients(NESSI) and test its validity and reliability.Methods:Based on our previous studies and the theory model of psychological stress, the original item pool was established through literature review, expert interviews and patient consultation.The first version of NESSI was constructed by Delphi method, then initially tested in 421 inpatients followed by the project analysis and reliability test. After those above, the formal scale was developed and tested in 318 inpatients followed by confirmatory factor analysis and reliability test.Finally, 7-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7), 9-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), anger state expression scale (SAS) and simplified Chinese version of fear of disease progression scale(FoP-Q-SF) were used to test the criterion validity.Results:After exploratory factor analysis, 17 items were retained in the final scale, which can be categorized into four dimensions: fear of illness, depression, somatization and anger, which could explain 63.49% of the total variation.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting degree of each factor model was good and met the requirements of reference value (χ 2/ df=2.949, RMR=0.044, CFI=0.929, NFI=0.897, IFI=0.930, TLI=0.915, PGFI=0.655, RMSEA=0.078). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.925, and the Cronbach's α coefficient of the four factors ranged from 0.762 to 0.898.The criterion validity showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the scale and the four criterion scales ( r= 0.574-0.805, all P<0.01). Conclusion:The NESSI scale has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a psychological problem screening tool among non-psychiatric inpatients.
ABSTRACT
RESUMO Objetivos Calcular a prevalência de sintomatologia depressiva pré-natal em grávidas de baixo risco, no termo da gestação, avaliar seus preditores e desfechos materno-fetais. Para tal, avaliar-se-á a aplicabilidade da Escala de Rastreio de Depressão Pós-Parto (PDSS 24) nessa fase da gravidez. Métodos A PDSS 24 e um questionário sociodemográfico, psicossocial e médico (antecedentes obstétricos e patológicos) foram autoaplicados a 403 grávidas (37-40 semanas de gestação), com idade média de 30,5 anos (DP = 4,67). Por meio do processo clínico, foram recolhidos dados de resultados materno-fetais. Resultados A PDSS 24 possui propriedades psicométricas adequadas para a deteção de sintomatologia depressiva pré-natal. A prevalência de sintomatologia depressiva pré-natal foi de 41,7%. Grávidas com níveis de escolaridade inferiores, não casadas, cuja gravidez não foi planejada e com antecedentes de acontecimentos de vida significativos apresentam risco duas vezes superior de sintomatologia depressiva no período pré-natal. Grávidas cujo apoio social percebido ao longo da gravidez não correspondeu ao desejado e com história prévia de depressão apresentam cerca de três vezes maior risco sintomatologia depressiva no período pré-natal. Para desfechos materno-fetais (pré-eclâmpsia, restrição de crescimento fetal, Apgar 1º/5º minuto, tipo de parto, percentil de peso, oligoâminos e necessidade de cuidados intensivos), as diferenças foram não significativas. Conclusão O rastreio da depressão pré-natal deve ser realizado na gravidez. Porém, no termo da gestação o uso da PDSS 24 como ferramenta de deteção de sintomatologia depressiva deve ser feito com cautela. A elevada prevalência de sintomas relacionados com o sono nessa fase da gestação pode conduzir ao sobre diagnóstico, usando a PDSS 24.
ABSTRACT Objectives The aims of the study were to estimate the prevalence of depressive symptomatology in full-term pregnancy (low risk), evaluate their predictors and maternal-fetal outcomes. To this end, the applicability of Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS 24) will be evaluated, at full-term pregnancy. Methods PDSS 24 and a sociodemographic, psychosocial, pathological and obstetrical background questionnaire were self-administered to 403 pregnant women (37-40 weeks gestation), with a mean age of 30.5 years (SD = 4.67). Data from maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes were collected from the patient clinical process. Results PDSS 24 revealed adequate psychometric properties to screening depressive symptomatology in full-term pregnancy. The prevalence of depressive symptomatology was 41.7%. Pregnant women with lower study levels, who weren't married, whose pregnancy was unplanned and with a previous history of significant life events present twice the risk to present depressive symptomatology. Pregnant women who hadn't received the desired social support in pregnancy and with a history of depression present about a 3-fold increased risk to present depressive symptomatology. For maternal-fetal outcomes (pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, Apgar score at 1st/5th minute, type of delivery, weight percentile, oligohydramnios and need for neonatal intensive care), the differences were not significant. Conclusion Screening for prenatal depression should be conducted during pregnancy. However, in full-term pregnancy women, the use of PDSS 24 as a screening tool for depressive symptomatology should be done with caution. The high prevalence of sleep-related symptoms, in full-term pregnancy, may lead to overdiagnosis, using PDSS 24.
ABSTRACT
Objective To verify the criteria validity and effectiveness of the QCSS-E for screening of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia with Alzheimer's type (DAT) among the elderly in community. Methods With stratified convenient sampling,1 298 elderly aged 55 and over recruited from Wuxi community,who finished the clinical interviews,laboratory examination and psychological tests such as QCSS-E,ADL, MMSE, ADAS-cog, CDR, and Core Neuropsychological Test. Then they were divided into health control group( HC),MCI group and DAT group by the diagnostic criteria of Peterson’s MCI and DSM-5 AD dementia. The criteria validity and screening efficacy of QCSS-E were verified and the optimal cut off value for detecting MCI and DAT were explored. Results There were statistically significant differences in age,education level,marital status,family structure,occupation,and scores of MMSE,ADAS-cog,CNT,and QCSS-E total score and domain scores among three groups (all P<0. 01). The total score and every domains score of QCSS-E were significantly correlated with test scores such as MMSE,ADAS-cog and CNT (all P<0. 01). Using the total QCSS-E score to discriminate MCI from health control,the area under the curve (AUC) was 83. 5%. When the cut off value was 74. 5,the accuracy rate of classification was the highest (75. 0%). Using the total QCSS-E score to discriminate DAT from health control,the AUC was 83. 5%. When the cut off value was 64. 5,the accuracy rate of classification was the highest (94. 2%). Conclusion The QCSS-E has better criteria validity and higher effectiveness in screening MCI and DAT.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To verify the criteria validity and effectiveness of the QCSS-E for screening of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia with Alzheimer's type (DAT) among the elderly in community.@*Methods@#With stratified convenient sampling, 1 298 elderly aged 55 and over recruited from Wuxi community, who finished the clinical interviews, laboratory examination and psychological tests such as QCSS-E, ADL, MMSE, ADAS-cog, CDR, and Core Neuropsychological Test.Then they were divided into health control group(HC), MCI group and DAT group by the diagnostic criteria of Peterson’s MCI and DSM-5 AD dementia.The criteria validity and screening efficacy of QCSS-E were verified and the optimal cut off value for detecting MCI and DAT were explored.@*Results@#There were statistically significant differences in age, education level, marital status, family structure, occupation, and scores of MMSE, ADAS-cog, CNT, and QCSS-E total score and domain scores among three groups (all P<0.01). The total score and every domains score of QCSS-E were significantly correlated with test scores such as MMSE, ADAS-cog and CNT (all P<0.01). Using the total QCSS-E score to discriminate MCI from health control, the area under the curve (AUC) was 83.5%. When the cut off value was 74.5, the accuracy rate of classification was the highest (75.0%). Using the total QCSS-E score to discriminate DAT from health control, the AUC was 83.5%. When the cut off value was 64.5, the accuracy rate of classification was the highest (94.2%).@*Conclusion@#The QCSS-E has better criteria validity and higher effectiveness in screening MCI and DAT.
ABSTRACT
Abstract: With standardized screening tools, research studies have shown that developmental disabilities can be detected reliably and with validity in children as young as 4 months of age by using the instruments such as the Ages and Stages Questionnaire. In this review, we will focus on one tool, the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, to illustrate the usefulness of developmental screening across the globe.
Resumen: Mediante el uso de herramientas de evaluación estandarizada, algunos estudios de investigación han demostrado que discapacidades de desarrollo se pueden detectar con fiabilidad y validez en niños desde los 4 meses de edad mediante el uso de los instrumentos estandarizados como el Ages and Stages Questionnaire (Cuestionario de las Edades y Etapas). Para ilustrar la utilidad de la evaluación del desarrollo infantil a escala global, en este trabajo se revisará la herramienta Ages and Stages Questionnaire.
Subject(s)
Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Developmental Disabilities/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Objective To assess and compare the Beck Depression Inventory-II ( BDI-Ⅱ) , Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression Subscale ( HADS-D) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ( CES-D) as screening instruments for depression in patients with epilepsy .Methods One hundred and seventeen patients diagnosed with epilepsy were evaluated by BDI-Ⅱ, HADS-D and CES-D, the performance of BDI-Ⅱ, HADS-D and CES-D was evaluated by ROC curve .Results There were 33 epileptics with depression .The sensitivity and specificity of BDI-Ⅱfor the diagnosis of depression was around 90% for critical value 16, the sensitivity of CES-D was more than 80%for critical value 15, and specificity was 72.6%.The sensitivity and specificity of HADS-D was more than 80%for critical value 9, and the sensitivity of HADS-D was 91.3% for critical value 7, and specificity was 76.8%.Three instruments showed a negative predictive value of over 90%.Comparisons of the areas under the ROC curve for these instrument were not statistically significant difference (all P>0.05).Conclusion HADS-D is a brief efficient screening instruments to identify depression in patients with epilepsy .
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the value of differential diagnosis for subcortical ischemic vascular dementia(SIVD)and Alzheimer's disease(AD)with memory and executive screening(MES) scale. Methods Fifty SIVD and 50 AD patients treated in the outpatient and wards of the Department of Neurology,Fuxing Hospital,Capital Medical University from June 2012 to November 2013 were enrolled retrospectively. They were enrolled in either a SIVD group or an AD group. Fifty healthy subjects in Yuetan community of Fuxing hospital were selected as a control group at the same period. The age,sex and education level of the subjects in the 3 groups were matched. The Mini-Mental State Examination( MMSE) and MES were used to measure all subjects and were compared;receiver operating characteristic curves was used to analyze the radio of memory and executive part for SIVD and AD discrimination. Results (1)There was no significant difference in total MMSE score between the SIVD group and the AD group(20. 6 ± 5. 5 vs. 20. 6 ± 3. 3;P>0. 05).(2)There were significant differences in each MES indexes among the patients of the 3 groups(all P>0. 05). The 1,3,4 and 5 scores for the sentence memory in the SIVD group were significantly higher than those of the AD group. There were significant differences(all P0. 05).(3)When MES-R was≥0. 7,the sensitivity and specificity of differentiating SIVD were 76. 7% and 83. 3%,and the total score of MMSE for differentiating the sensitivity and specificity of SIVD were 40. 0% and 0. 7%. Conclusion The differences of MES reflecting sentence memory and executive part may better distinguish the patients with SIVD and AD.
ABSTRACT
Objective To develop a Quick Cognitive Screening Scale for Elder(QCSS-E) and examine its reliability and validity.Methods In the light of rating model of MMSE and MoCA,a screening scale was developed to assess cognitive function,which contained 47 items across twelve domains.Five hundred community subjects were interviewed with the QCSS-E,then 150 subjects were retested after two weeks,and 75 subjects were assessed with MMSE and CCAS.The test-retest reliability,internal consistency reliability,empirical validity and constmct validity of QCSS-E were calculated.Results The test-retest reliability and Cronbach's α coefficient were 0.972 and 0.814 for QCSS-E total score,0.656-0.911 and 0.679-0.746 for domain scores.There were low to moderate correlation of 0.133-0.612 among domain scores,correlation domain scores with total score ranged from 0.303-0.664.QCSS-E scores decreased with increasing agc,increased with the level of education increasing,and decreased with the aggravation of brain damage.The QCSS-E was significantly correlated with MMSE(r=0.886) and CCAS (r=0.899).Factor analysis got two factors accounting for 49.4％ of variance,which were named vulnerability factor and resistance to damage factor.Conclusion The stability,internal consistency,and validity of the QCSS-E are good and meet with psychometric standard.
ABSTRACT
La depresión postparto (DPP) puede ser difícil de detectar, principalmente porque las madres no informan los síntomas depresivos que pueden estar sintiendo a los profesionales de salud. El objetivo de este estudio fue poner a prueba la versión en español de la Escala de Depresión Postparto (PDSS) en una población de mujeres de Arica, Chile. El muestreo incluyó una muestra por conveniencia de 179 mujeres con dos o más semanas de postparto que asistieron a Consultorios de Atención Primaria. Se obtuvieron datos sobre características socio-demográficas y reproductivas y se aplicó el PDSS para pesquisar DPP. El 46,4 por ciento de las mujeres presentaron síntomas significativos de DPP. Pensamientos suicidas y Pérdida del yo fueron los síntomas más mencionados (34,1 por ciento y 26,3 por ciento, respectivamente). La gran mayoría de las participantes obtuvo un índice de inconsistencia de respuesta bajo; lo que indica que el cuestionario fue entendible. Se obtuvo un coeficiente de confiabilidad (Alfa de Cronbach) de .96. Seis de las siete dimensiones del PDSS-versión en español contribuyeron excelentemente a clasificar las participantes con depresión de las sin depresión. La validez de constructo se exploró a través del grado de interrelación entre escalas, encontrándose una alta correlación entre éstas. El análisis de factores reveló ocho componentes en la matriz con varianza explicada de 67,85 por ciento. Se concluye que el PDSS-versión en español obtuvo una adecuada confiabilidad al ser puesto a prueba en esta población. Se recomienda seguir poniendo a prueba este instrumento en mujeres de otras regiones de Chile.
Postpartum depression (PPD) can be difficult to detect; mainly because mothers do not report depressive symptoms they may be feeling to health care providers. The objective of this study was to test the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS) Spanish version in a group of women in Arica, Chile. The convenience sample included 179 women with 2 or more weeks postpartum attending Primary Care Clinics. Data on reproductive and sociodemographic characteristics were obtained. The PDSS was utilized for assessment of PPD. Symptoms of postpartum depression was found among 46.4 percent of the women. Suicidal thoughts and Loss of self were the most commonly reported symptoms (34.1 percent and 26.3 percent respectively). The majority of the participants obtained a low Inconsistent Responding Index, indicating that the scale was understood. A reliability coefficient of .96 was obtained (Cronbach Alpha). Six of the seven dimensions of the PDSS-Spanish Version distinguished between groups by depression status. Construct validity was tested using degree of interrelatedness among the scales, identifying those correlated highly with each other. Factor analysis revealed eight components with explained variance of 67.85 percent. It is concluded that the PDSS-Spanish Version obtained an adequate reliability in this population. Recommendation is for further assessment of this tool among women in other regions of Chile.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Evaluation Studies as Topic , ChileABSTRACT
@#ObjectiveTo analyze application of screening and assessment scales for senile dementia in China.MethodsVarieties of screening and assessment scales were found in the studies on screening and assessment of senile dementia in China, as well as their common features and epidemiological results. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods was used in the analysis.ResultsMini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is preferred tool in screening and Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL) is the secondary.ConclusionThe future research direction should include: studying the appropriate boundary value in MMSE for China; optimizing the combination of screening scale and developing more appropriate screening tool.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish the bedside screening scale for cognition examination in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.Methods The modified mini-mental status examination(MMMSE)(revised by the Neurology Department of Hua Shan Hospital)was applied to examine the recognition function of SLE pa- tients.The results were compared with those of the traditional mini-mental status examination(MMSE).Results MMSE examination results showed that NPSLE score was lower than that of normal control group(P＜0.01),no significant difference was found between NPSLE patients and SLE control group(P＞0,05),and the completion time was longer than SLE control group and normal control group(P＜0.01);but no significant difference was found between SLE control group and normal control group.The result of MMMSE examination showed that the score of NPSLE group was lower than that of SLE control group and normal control group(P＜0.01),and the completion time was longer than SLE control group and normal control group(P＜0.01);but the score of SLE control group was lower than the normal control group,and its completion time was longer than normal control group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.01).Conclusion MMSE is the most widely used dementia scale,but it is not sensitive in demonstrating the impairment of recognition function.The several items we added to the MMMSE can detect recognition impairment more sensitively,and ean be very easily applied,costs less time(within 10 minutes).Therefore,it can be used for SLE bedside screening.