Fotobiomodulación con láser de baja intensidad en el tratamiento integral ortodóntico: reporte de un caso / Photobiomodulation with low intensity laser in comprehensive orthodontic treatment: report of a case

El apiñamiento dental es una maloclusión frecuen-te y junto con los requerimientos de estética dental son una causa habitual de la solicitud de tratamien-to ortodóncico. El tiempo que demanda y las moles-tias que pudiera ocasionar el tratamiento produce inquietud en los pacientes y un esfuerzo de los or-todoncistas para optimizar el tiempo y prevenir los efectos adversos. Los tratamientos odontológicos multidisciplinarios permiten una mejor respuesta estética, funcional y de estabilidad post tratamiento. El tiempo de alineación dentaria y finalización, en los pacientes tratados con láser de baja intensidad po-dría mejorar tanto los índices gingivales como la res-puesta al dolor. Adicionalmente, las corticales óseas de los pacientes con ortodoncia tratados con láser, podrían verse menos afectadas en comparación con las de los pacientes no tratados. Se presenta un caso de fotobioestimulación con láser de baja intensidad aplicado en un paciente en fase de alineación, que forma parte de un estudio prospectivo aleatorizado que se desarrolla en la FOUBA y fue aprobado por el comité de Ética de la institución. El paciente aceptó y firmó el consentimiento informado. Finalizada la etapa de alineación, se evaluó la efectividad de la te-rapia con láser de baja intensidad actualmente de-nominada fotobiomodulación en incisivos superiores en la fase de alineación para acelerar el movimiento dentario, la respuesta gingival, el dolor, el estado de la cortical alveolar vestibular y la estética del perfil (AU)

Dental crowding, which is a frequent malocclusion, and dental aesthetic requirements are a common cause for requesting orthodontic treatment. The time that the treatment requires and the inconvenience that it could cause worries the patient and makes orthodontists strive to optimize time and prevent adverse effects. Multidisciplinary treatments would allow a better aesthetic, functional and post-treatment stability response. The dental alignment and completion time in patients treated with low-intensity laser could improve both gingival indices and response to pain. Additionally, the bone cortical of orthodontic patients treated with laser could be less affected compared to those of untreated patients. A case of low-intensity laser photobiostimulation applied to a patient in the alignment phase is presented, which is part of a prospective randomized study carried out at FOUBA and was approved by the institution's Ethics Committee. The patient accepted and signed the informed consent. After the alignment phase, the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy actually called photobiomodulation in upper incisors in the alignment phase is evaluated to accelerate tooth movement; the gingival response; the pain; the vestibular alveolar cortical and the aesthetics of the profile (AU)

Comparative Evaluation of Duration of Extraction Space Closure and Degree of Root Resorption with Conventional and Self-Ligation Brackets

Introduction: Determination of difference between conventional and passive self?ligating brackets (SLBs) in respect of extraction space closure, patient perception and root resorption. Material and Methods: Eighty patients were divided into four groups of 20 each with age?sex?matched control using a simple randomisation technique and allocation concealment with a closed opaque envelope method. Group 1 consisted of conventional brackets with Connecticut New Archwire (CNA) wire mushroom loop, group 2 consisted of conventional brackets with TAD (AbsoAnchor, Korea) supported retraction, group 3 consisted of passive SLB with CNA archwires (Libral Traders, India) mushroom loop and group 4 consisted of passive SLB brackets with TAD (AbsoAnchor, Korea) supported retraction. The rate of retraction, root resorption and patient satisfaction were assessed. All conventional brackets (Orthox, USA) and passive SLBs (CaptainOrtho, India) had 0.018 Roth prescriptions with a slot size of 0.018 × 0.025. Results: Retraction was the fastest in group 2 with a mean of 1.266 ± 0.14 mm/4 week and a duration of 23.40 weeks. Similarly, group 4 showed the most sluggish movement with a mean of 1.182 ± 0.80 mm/4 weeks with a total duration of 25 weeks; howeverdifferencesce among groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.470). Conclusion: SLBs have advantage of better patient comfort, less pain and reduced chairside time. Though the present study found increased treatment duration with SLB along with friction mechanics, refuting the previous claims of reduced friction with SLBs, however, the difference was not statistically significant and results have to be extrapolated with caution and experience considering other advantages of SLBs.

Comparación de Brackets de Autoligado y Brackets Convencionales basada en la evidencia / Comparação baseada em evidências de colchetes autoligáveis ​​e colchetes convencionais / Evidence-based comparison of self-ligating and conventional brackets

Resumen Los brackets de autoligado son aquellos que incorporan un mecanismo de cierre que mantiene el arco en el interior de la ranura del bracket. Fueron creados principalmente para crear un sistema de menor fricción, permitiendo una mecánica de deslizamiento más eficiente y disminuir el tiempo de tratamiento. Objetivo: El objetivo de esta revisión es presentar de manera más estructurada y ordenada toda la información disponible respecto de los distintos aparatos de autoligado, ya sea activo o pasivo, comparando las cualidades entre sí y con los aparatos convencionales. Método: Se realizó una búsqueda mediante PubMed y Epistemonikos, sin importar idioma o año de publicación. Resultados: Se establecieron comparaciones tanto de brackets de autoligado activos con pasivos, como de brackets de autoligado con brackets convencionales en distintas situaciones clínicas. Conclusiones: Para la gran mayoría de situaciones clínicas, no existe una diferencia estadísticamente significativa, a excepción de la expresión de torque, en donde los brackets convencionales tienen una mayor ventaja.

Resumo Os braquetes autoligáveis são aqueles que incorporam um mecanismo de fechamento que mantém o fio dentro da ranhura do braquete. Eles foram criados principalmente para criar um sistema de menor atrito, permitindo uma mecânica de deslizamento mais eficiente e reduzindo o tempo de tratamento. Objetivo: O objetivo desta revisão é apresentar de forma mais estruturada e ordenada todas as informações disponíveis sobre os diferentes dispositivos autoligáveis, sejam eles ativos ou passivos, comparando as qualidades entre si e com os dispositivos convencionais. Método: A busca foi realizada usando PubMed e Epistemonikos, independentemente do idioma ou ano de publicação. Resultados: Foram comparadas braquetes autoligáveis ativos e passivos e braquetes autoligáveis convencionais em diferentes situações clínicas. Conclusões: Para a grande maioria das situações clínicas, não há diferença estatisticamente significativa, exceto para a expressão do torque, onde os braquetes convencionais apresentam maior vantagem.

Abstract Self-ligating brackets include a locking mechanism that holds the archwire in the bracket slot. They were created primarily to create a lower friction system, allowing for more efficient sliding mechanics and reducing treatment time. Objective: This review aims to present all the information available on different self-ligating devices, whether active or passive, in a structured and organized way. This paper sets out to compare their qualities with each other and with conventional devices. Method: A search was conducted in PubMed and Epistemonikos, regardless of language or year of publication. Results: Comparisons were made of both active and passive self-ligating brackets and self-ligating brackets with conventional brackets in different clinical situations. Conclusions No statistically significant difference was found in most clinical situations, except for torque expression, where conventional brackets have a more significant advantage.

Treatment of bimaxillary protrusion using intra- and extra-alveolar miniscrews associated to self-ligating brackets system

ABSTRACT Introduction: Moderate and severe bimaxillary protrusion impair the passive lip sealing and the facial and smile esthetics. The extraction of premolars can be avoided by the use of skeletal anchorage to retract both dental arches. This approach brings many advantages such as: prevents premolars extraction; simplifies orthodontic mechanics; there is no volume reduction of a premolar when smiling; control of overbite and gingival exposure. The utilization of this therapeutic approach, when associated with self-ligating brackets, can bring the possibility of spacing the appointments without damage to the treatment efficiency, and allows selection of the most appropriate torque prescriptions for each case. The intra-alveolar miniscrews are indicated for mild cases of bimaxillary protrusion, while extra-alveolar miniscrews may also be indicated for more severe cases. Objective: To report the treatment of three cases of mild, moderate and severe bimaxillary protrusion, in which intra- and extra-alveolar miniscrews were used, according to the retraction required. Conclusion: The retraction of both upper and lower dental arches using orthodontic intra- and extra-alveolar miniscrews, associated with self-ligating brackets, is an excellent tool to correct mild to severe bimaxillary protrusion, thus reducing the need of premolar extraction and simplifying the orthodontic management.

RESUMO Introdução: As biprotrusões moderadas e severas dificultam o selamento labial passivo, comprometem a estética facial e do sorriso. As extrações de pré-molares podem ser evitadas quando se utiliza a ancoragem esquelética como recurso para retrair ambas as arcadas. Essa abordagem traz as seguintes vantagens: evita que o paciente seja submetido ao processo da extração dos pré-molares; simplifica a mecânica ortodôntica; não reduz o volume de um pré-molar de cada lado no sorriso; e auxilia no controle da sobremordida e da exposição gengival. A utilização dessa terapêutica, quando associada aos aparelhos autoligáveis, possibilita maiores intervalos entre as consultas, sem comprometer a eficiência do tratamento, e permite a seleção dos torques mais adequados para essa mecânica. Os miniparafusos intra-alveolares podem ser utilizados na correção de biprotrusões mais suaves, enquanto os extra-alveolares podem ser indicados, também, nos casos mais severos. Objetivo: Relatar os tratamentos de três casos clínicos de biprotrusão leve, moderada e severa, respectivamente, efetuando a retração das arcadas em uma única fase, utilizando miniparafusos intra- e extra-alveolares, conforme a magnitude da retração necessária. Conclusão: A retração das arcadas superior e inferior com miniparafusos ortodônticos intra- e extra-alveolares associados aos aparelhos autoligáveis é um excelente recurso para a correção das biprotrusões de suave a severa, diminuindo a necessidade de extrações de pré-molares e simplificando a mecânica ortodôntica.

Tratamiento de Clase II con Ortodoncia Sistema Damon y gomas intermaxilares en etapas tempranas de tratamiento / Treatment of Class II with Orthodontics Damon System and elastics in early stages of treatment

La técnica ortodóncica de baja fricción utiliza brackets pasivos de autoligado con una serie de arcos superelásticos que mantienen las fuerzas aplicadas sobre las piezas dentarias a nivel de la "biozona o zona fuerza óptima". La utilización de gomas intermaxilares ligeras (2 onzas o 56,68 g) en estos tratamientos, desde etapas iniciales, sobre todo en pacientes en crecimiento, permite obtener resultados muy favorables en cuanto a la resolución de la maloclusión de Clase II. Objetivo: evaluar el tratamiento de Ortodoncia de un paciente Clase II esqueletal con sobremordida, sin realizar exodoncias de premolares y utilizando elásticos intermaxilares en fases iniciales de tratamiento. Materiales y método: se presenta el caso clínico de un paciente de sexo masculino de 11 años, de Clase II esqueletal con sobremordida y apiñamiento dentario anterior superior e inferior moderado, con su diagnóstico y evaluación completos pre y post tratamiento y control y seguimiento al año. El tratamiento se realiza con brackets autoligantes (técnica de Damon). Resultados: se obtiene la corrección completa de la Clase II y la sobremordida, alcanzando los objetivos deseados de estética facial y función, en oclusión y desoclusiones, con buen desarrollo de las basales y conservación de la altura de las corticales alveolares a nivel de los caninos. Conclusión: Mediante los recursos terapéuticos disponibles en la actualidad y evaluando al niño en etapas tempranas, podremos combinar diferentes tratamientos para alcanzar los objetivos propuestos en menor tiempo y con óptimos resultados en una maloclusión de Clase II con sobremordida con biotipo mesofacial (AU)

The low friction orthodontic technique uses passive self-ligating brackets with a series of superelastic arches that maintain the forces applied to the dental pieces at the "Biozone or Optimal Force Zone". The use of inter maxillary light elastics (2 ounces or 56.68 yr.) from the initial stages in growing patients, yields very favorable results in terms of correction of Class II malocclusion. Objective: To assess the orthodontic treatment of a skeletal Class II patient with overbite, without extraction of premolars and using elastic in the early stages of treatment. Materials and methods: an 11 year old male skeletal Class II patient with overbite and moderate crowding in upper and lower anterior teeth, with complete diagnostic and evaluation before and after treatment and with annual control. For the treatment, self-ligating brackets (Damon technique) were employed. The results: Total correction of Class II condition and overbite was obtained. The desired goals of facial aesthetics and correct function were attained in occlusion and desocclusion, as well as development of the osseous basis and conservation of the canine alveolar cortical height. Conclusion: Through the employment of therapeutic resources available at present and following up the child through his developmental stages, it is possible to combine different treatments to achieve the proposed objectives in a shorter time with excellent results in mesofacial type patients with Class II malocclusion and deep overbite (AU)

Stability comparison of two different dentoalveolar expansion treatment protocols

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the longitudinal stability of the conventional straight-wire system after the use of a quad-helix appliance with Damon self-ligating system in patients with Class I malocclusion. Methods: 27 adolescent patients were evaluated at three different periods: pre-treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2) and three years post-treatment (T3). Group 1 included 12 patients (with a mean age of 14.65 year) treated with Damon 3MX bracket system; and Group 2 included 15 patients (with a mean age of 14.8 year) who underwent orthodontic treatment with Roth prescribed brackets after expansion with Quad-Helix appliance. Relapse was evaluated with dental cast examination and cephalometric radiograph tracings. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM-SPSS for Windows software, version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A p-value smaller than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were significant increases in all transverse dental and postero-anterior measurements (except for UL6-ML mm in Group 1) with active treatment. There was some significant relapse in the long-term in inter-canine width in both groups and in the inter-first premolar width in Group 2 (p< 0.05). Significant decrease in all frontal measurements from T2 to T3 was seen for both groups. Upper and lower incisors significantly proclined in T1-T2 (p<0.05), however no relapse was found for both groups. When two systems were compared, there was no significant difference for the long-term follow-up period. Conclusion: Conventional (quad-helix appliance with conventional brackets) and Damon systems were found similar with regard to the long-term incisor positions and transverse dimension changes of maxillary arch.

RESUMO Objetivo: comparar a estabilidade longitudinal após o tratamento de pacientes com má oclusão de Classe I usando o sistema Straight-wire convencional - depois da expansão com aparelho quadri-hélice - e o sistema autoligável Damon. Métodos: 27 pacientes adolescentes foram avaliados em três períodos distintos: pré-tratamento (T1), pós-tratamento imediato (T2) e três anos pós-tratamento (T3). O Grupo 1 incluiu 12 pacientes (com idade média de 14,65 anos) tratados com o sistema de braquetes Damon 3MX e o Grupo 2 incluiu 15 pacientes (com idade média de 14,8 anos), submetidos a tratamento ortodôntico com braquetes prescrição Roth após expansão com aparelho quadri-hélice. A recidiva foi avaliada por meio de exame dos modelos de estudo e traçados cefalométricos. A análise estatística foi realizada com o software IBM-SPSS para Windows, versão 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Valores de p< 0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. Resultados: após o tratamento ativo, ocorreu aumento significativo em todas as medidas transversais dentárias e posteroanteriores (exceto para a UL6-ML mm, no Grupo 1). Em longo prazo, ocorreu recidiva significativa (p< 0,05) na distância intercaninos em ambos os grupos, e na distância interprimeiros pré-molares no Grupo 2. De T2 para T3, observou-se diminuição significativa em todas as medidas frontais, para ambos os grupos. De T1 para T2, os incisivos superiores e inferiores sofreram vestibularização significativa (p< 0,05); porém, nenhuma recidiva ocorreu em qualquer um dos dois grupos. Ao se comparar os dois sistemas, não foi encontrada qualquer diferença significativa no período de acompanhamento em longo prazo. Conclusão: o sistema convencional (aparelho quadri-hélice e braquetes convencionais) e o sistema Damon apresentaram desempenho semelhante, em longo prazo, em termos das posições dos incisivos e das mudanças ocorridas na dimensão transversal da arcada superior.

The effects of bracketless invisible appliance, self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket on periodontal indices and inflammatory cytokine levels in gingival crevicuiar fluid in adult patients / 实用口腔医学杂志

Objective:To investigate the effects of bracketless invisible appliance(BI),self-ligating bracket(SB) and conventional brackets(CB) on periodontal indices(PI) and inflammatory cytokine levels in gingival crevicular fluid(GCF) in adult orthodontic patients.Methods:90 orthodontic patients were randomly divided into CB,SB and BI groups(n =30).The subjects in the 3 groups accepted invisalign,Demon Q self-ligating brackets and conventional MBT brackets respectively.Plaque index(PLI),probing depth (PD) and interleukin-13 (IL-3),tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-a) in GCF were analyzed before treatment,l,3 and 6 months after treatment,and after appliance removed respectively.Results:1 to 6 months after treatment,PI,IL-β and TNF-α rose constantly in CB and SB groups and reached to their top 6 months after treatment.There were no statistical differences between CB and SB groups 1 months after treatment,while PI,IL-β and TNF-α of SB group were lower than those of CB group 3 and 6 months after treatment and after therapy completed.PLI、IL-1 β and TNF-α of BI group were significantly increased 6 months after treatment.However,each index of BI group was significantly reduced compared with SB and CB groups after treatment.Conclusion:The SB has fewer disadvantages on peridentium than CB,while the BI is more conductive to protect the periodontal health status than SB and CB.

Self Ligating Brackets: The Present And Future

Self-ligating brackets encompass fast popularity over the past several decades and had various advantages with regard to the efficiency, effectiveness, and stability of treatment when compare with conventional brackets. Self ligating brackets are basically two main types, according to the design of the locking mechanism, the dimensions of the slot, and the dimensions of the arch wires; they are passive and active. Active self-ligating brackets have a spring clip that stores energy to press against the archwire for rotation and torque control. Self-ligating brackets appear to be the beneficiary of the most recent studies as their design and engineering can offer the clinician the ability to take advantage of our better understanding of arch wire/bracket interactions. Since we know the impact of different bracket –arch wire combinations on the resistance to sliding, it is now possible for us to select the best combination depending upon the case.

Forças, momentos e coeficiente de atrito em teste de três pontos e em teste de resistência ao deslizamento com braquetes autoligáveis e fios 0.014" utilizando um novo dispositivo / Forces, moments and coefficient of friction in three-bracket bending test and in resistance to sliding test with self-ligating brackets and wires 0.014'' using a new device

O objetivo principal do estudo é comparar o teste em 3 pontos com braquetes com o teste de resistência ao deslizamento utilizando um novo dispositivo que realiza a mensuração simultânea do coeficiente de atrito, das forças e dos momentos nos braquetes de ancoragem e da força de desativação no braquete desalinhado, exercidos por fios ortodônticos. Os objetivos secundários foram desenvolver o dispositivo e comparar, no teste em 3 pontos: (i) a influência, nas grandezas e no coeficiente de atrito cinético, da variação da simetria nas distâncias inter-braquetes, do tipo de braquete de ancoragem (canino ou 2º pré-molar), do deslocamento (3 ou 5mm) do braquete central, do sentido do desalinhamento (vestibular ou lingual) do braquete central e da marca de fio-braquete; (ii) as 3 formas de cálculo do coeficiente de atrito cinético; (iii) os 10 ciclos, para vestibular ou lingual, para verificar se eles são semelhantes ou não entre si. Foram utilizados braquetes autoligáveis (dentes 13, 14 e 15) e fios 0.014'' NiTi e CuNiTi das marcas Aditek e Ormco. O teste de resistência ao deslizamento foi realizado no desalinhamento lingual, nos dois deslocamentos e na configuração simétrica. O teste em 3 pontos com braquetes foi realizado no desalinhamento lingual e vestibular, nos dois deslocamentos e na configuração simétrica e assimétrica. Por meio da ANOVA, foram comparados, entre os dois tipos de teste: (A) as grandezas e o coeficiente de atrito e (B) o coeficiente de atrito gerado apenas no braquete de 2º pré-molar. Utilizando-se do mesmo teste estatístico foram comparados, no teste em 3 pontos com braquetes: (A) na configuração...

The main objective of the study is to compare the three-bracket bending test with the resistance to sliding test using a new device that performs simultaneous measurement of coefficient of friction, the forces and moments on the anchor brackets and deactivation force in misaligned bracket, exercised by orthodontic wires. Secondary objectives were to develop the device and compare, in the three-bracket bending test: (i) the influence, on the physical quantities and on the kinetic friction coefficient, of the variation of the symmetry in the inter-bracket distance, of the type of anchor bracket (canine or 2nd premolar), of displacement (3 or 5mm) and misalignment (buccal or lingual) of the central bracket, and of the wire and bracket brand; (ii) the three ways to calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction; (iii) the 10 cycles, for buccal or lingual, to see if they are similar or not. Self-ligating brackets were used (teeth 13, 14 and 15) and wires 0.014 '' NiTi and CuNiTi of Aditek and Ormco brands. The resistance to sliding test was conducted on the lingual misalignment, on both displacements and on symmetrical configuration. The three-bracket bending test was held at the lingual and vestibular misalignment, at both displacements and at the symmetrical and asymmetrical configuration. Through ANOVA, were compared, between the two types of tests: (A) the quantities and the coefficient of friction and (B) the coefficient of friction generated only in the second premolar bracket. Using the same statistical test were compared, in three-bracket bending test: (A) in symmetrical configuration, the quantities and the coefficient of friction arising from the variation in the wire and bracket brands, displacement, misalignment and the type of bracket; (B) the quantities...

Effect of passive self-ligating bracket placement on the posterior teeth on reduction of frictional force in sliding mechanics / 대한치과교정학회지

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the static (SFF) and kinetic frictional forces (KFF) in sliding mechanics of hybrid bracket systems that involve placing a conventional bracket (CB) or active self-ligating bracket (ASLB) on the maxillary anterior teeth (MXAT) and a passive SLB (PSLB) on the maxillary posterior teeth (MXPT). METHODS: The samples consisted of two thoroughbred types (group 1, anterior-CB + posterior-CB; group 2, anterior-ASLB + posterior-ASLB) and four hybrid types (group 3, anterior-CB + posterior-PSLB-type 1; group 4, anterior-CB + posterior-PSLB-type 2; group 5, anterior-ASLB + posterior-PSLB-type 1; group 6, anterior-ASLB + posterior-PSLB-type 2) (n = 13 per group). After maxillary dentition alignment and maxillary first premolars removal in the stereolithographically-made typodont system, a 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel wire was drawn through the right quadrant of the maxillary arch at 0.5 mm/min for 5 min. The SFF and KFF were measured with a mechanical testing machine and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Four different categories of SFF and KFF were observed among all groups (all p < 0.001). Group 1 demonstrated the highest SFF and KFF; groups 4 and 3 were second and third highest, respectively. The fourth category included groups 2, 5, and 6. Placing PSLBs on the MXPT resulted in significant SFF and KFF reductions in cases with CBs on the MXAT, but not in cases with ASLBs on the MXAT. CONCLUSIONS: These data might aid in the development of a hybrid bracket system that enables low-friction sliding of an archwire through the MXPT.

The Effects of Quick Self-ligating System on Enlarging Maxillary and Alveolar Arch / 昆明医科大学学报

Objective To analyze the effects of self-ligating bracket on enlarging the maxillary alveolar arch and to investigate the the non-extraction treatment programs.Methods All patients were used heat activated basic and precise theory for the orthodontist in order to make a plan fordeveloping nickel-titanium wire,then assessed by occlusalplane analysis method.The maxillary model andcephalometric radiographs were collected and measured before the treatment.The data of the resultswereanalyzed.Results After the treatment,the increase of the width of the dental arch was related to the /FMA,crowding degree and canines initial position.The increase of arch length was related to the ∠ANB,crowding degree,malocclusion classification,canines initial position andthe second molar eruption.Conclusion The essential factors include the crowding degree of arch,∠FMA,∠ANB,the angle of the anterior teeth,malocclusion classification,canines initial position andthe second molar eruptioncan affect the result of non-extraction quick self-ligating bracket appliance treatment on enlarging the maxillary alveolar.

Measurement Analysis of the Frictional Resistance Between Tandem Archwire and Different Self-ligating Brackets / 昆明医科大学学报

Objective To measure the dynamic and static frictional resistances between different self-ligating orthodontic brackets and different combination of tandem archwires.Methods On standard model the upper right quadrant Damon Q self-ligating brackets was pasted as team A,3M Smart clip self-ligating brackets as team B and Forestadent Quick 3.0 self-ligating brackets as team C respectively.Nickel-titanium archwires of 0.012 inch and 0.016 inch and two nickel-titanium archwires of 0.014 inch were applied to simulate sliding in the brackets and measure the friction changes in brackets and archwires,so as to explore the frictional resistance between different combination of the tandem archwires and different self-ligating brackets.Results When using the combination of two 0.014-inch nickel-titanium tandem archwires,the static frictional resistances was significantly different (P＜ 0.05):team A ＜team B ＜team C while the kinetic frictional resistance was also significantly different (P＜0.05):team A ＜team B ＜team C,When using the combination of 0.012-inch and 0.016-inch nickel-titanium tandem archwires,the static frictional resistances was significantly different (P＜0.05):team A＜team B＜team C,while the kinetic frictional resistance was also significantly different (P＜0.05):team A＜team B＜team C.Gonclusion There are different frictional resistance in different kind of self-ligating brackets and different combination of the tandem archwires.The combination of two 0.014-inch nickel-titanium tandem archwire applied to Forestadent Quick 3.0 self-ligating brackets has the biggest frictional resistance while the combination of 0.012-inch and 0.016-inch nickel-titanium tandem archwire applied to the Damon Q self-ligating brackets has the lowest frictional resistance,which enables the teeth to move at the fastest speed and facilitates the following use of the edgewires.

Mandibular changes during initial alignment with SmartClip self-ligating and conventional brackets: A single-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial / 대한치과교정학회지

OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that SmartClip self-ligating brackets are more effective than conventional brackets for initial mandibular alignment and identify influential factors. METHODS: Fifty patients were randomly allocated to two equal treatment groups by using an online randomization program: self-ligating group (SmartClip brackets) and conventional group (Gemini brackets). The archwire sequence was standardized. Changes in anterior irregularity index, intercanine width, and intermolar width were assessed on plaster models at 8th and 16th weeks. Changes in incisor position and inclination were assessed on lateral cephalometric radiographs at 16 weeks. Intragroup and intergroup comparisons were performed with paired t-test and Student's t-test, respectively. Multiple linear regression was performed to identify variables affecting improvement in anterior ambiguity. RESULTS: Data of 46 patients were analyzed; those missing an appointment (n = 2) or showing bracket breakage (n = 2) were excluded. Incisor inclination (p 0.05) increased at 8 and 16 weeks in both the groups; no significant intergroup differences were noted (p > 0.05). Initial anterior irregularity index and intercanine width change were significantly associated with improvement in anterior irregularity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The null hypothesis was rejected. Bracket type has little effect on improvement in anterior ambiguity during initial mandibular alignment.

Mandibular changes during initial alignment with SmartClip self-ligating and conventional brackets: A single-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial / 대한치과교정학회지

OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that SmartClip self-ligating brackets are more effective than conventional brackets for initial mandibular alignment and identify influential factors. METHODS: Fifty patients were randomly allocated to two equal treatment groups by using an online randomization program: self-ligating group (SmartClip brackets) and conventional group (Gemini brackets). The archwire sequence was standardized. Changes in anterior irregularity index, intercanine width, and intermolar width were assessed on plaster models at 8th and 16th weeks. Changes in incisor position and inclination were assessed on lateral cephalometric radiographs at 16 weeks. Intragroup and intergroup comparisons were performed with paired t-test and Student's t-test, respectively. Multiple linear regression was performed to identify variables affecting improvement in anterior ambiguity. RESULTS: Data of 46 patients were analyzed; those missing an appointment (n = 2) or showing bracket breakage (n = 2) were excluded. Incisor inclination (p 0.05) increased at 8 and 16 weeks in both the groups; no significant intergroup differences were noted (p > 0.05). Initial anterior irregularity index and intercanine width change were significantly associated with improvement in anterior irregularity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The null hypothesis was rejected. Bracket type has little effect on improvement in anterior ambiguity during initial mandibular alignment.

Ortodoncia acelerada y ortodoncia de transito expreso (OTE)®, un concepto contemporáneo de alta eficiencia / Accelerated orthodontics and express transit orthodontics (ETO)®, a contemporary concept of high efficiency

Resumen Acelerar un tratamiento de Ortodoncia permite disminuir los riesgos naturales de desmineralización del esmalte, compromiso periodontal y reabsorción radicular, además de contribuir a tener pacientes mas satisfechos y profesionales con consultas mas eficientes. Varios métodos se han evaluado para mejorar la rata, magnitud y estabilidad del movimiento ortodóncico, entre ellos están, abordajes quirúrgicos, bioquímicos, farmacológicos y terapia con láser. Por otro lado, en el panorama mecánico, la evolución de los sistemas de brackets ha permitido que lleguen al mercado sistemas contemporáneos que garantizan mejores abordajes biológicos por lo menos desde el punto de vista de niveles de fuerza. La sumatoria de aproximaciones diagnósticas de alta calidad, mecanoterapias eficientes y complementos de orden físico y/o biológico y quirúrgico para acelerar los movimientos es lo que llamamos Ortodoncia de Tránsito Expreso (OTE)®, la cual es una alternativa importante para tratamientos de alta calidad y eficiencia. El propósito de esta revisión de literatura, es analizar las nuevas aproximaciones para acelerar el movimiento dentario desde el abordaje biológico, físico y quirúrgico, en sinergia con un complemento mecánico, ya sea con sistemas de Autoligado pasivo convencional o personalizado.

Accelerated Orthodontic treatment can reduce risks of enamel demineralization, root resorption and periodontal problems, and contribute to have more satisfied patients and professionals with more efficient practices. Several methods have been evaluated to improve the rate, magnitude and stability of orthodontic movement, which include surgical, biochemical, pharmacological and laser therapy approaches. Furthermore, in the mechanical scope, the evolution of brackets systems has allowed contemporary systems to reach the market which guarantee better biological approaches at least from the point of view of strength levels. The sum of high quality diagnostic approaches, efficient mechanics and physical and / or biological and surgical accessories in order to accelerate the movement is what we call Express Transit Orthodontics (OTE)®, which is an important alternative for high quality and efficient treatments. The purpose of this literature review is to analyze new approaches to accelerate tooth movement from the biological, physical and surgical approach, in synergy with a mechanical complement, either conventional or customized self-ligature systems.

Pain experience during initial alignment with self-ligating and conventional brackets

The aim of this study was to compare the pain experience among orthodontic patients treated with self-ligating brackets SmartClip® (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) and conventional brackets Victory series® (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA). We used a controlled clinical trial study design to compare 69 patients treated with self-ligating to 70 patients treated by conventional brackets. The nickel-titanium archwires 0.012-in were engaged after bonding both arches on the first day; and the visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the pain experience of subjects for the first seven treatment days. The pre-treatment dental study models were assessed by the Little’s irregularity index to quantify the groups’ malalignment characteristics. The self-ligating brackets reported lower pain experience than the conventional group on the first five treatment days. However, the sixth day showed 1.75 mm higher visual analogue score than conventional brackets, with almost equal pain level on the seventh day. The group differences throughout the first week were neither clinically nor statistically significant. The pain experiences in both groups decreased steadily from the third treatment day to the end of the first week of treatment. Based on the study findings, the pain experience during initial alignment is not influenced by the brackets’ ligation type. The pain experience tends to decrease steadily from the third treatment day to the end of the first week of treatment irrespective of the bracket type used.

Comparación de la resistencia al deslizamiento en brackets deautoligado y brackets convencionales ligados con ligadura elastomérica convencional y ligaduras de baja fricción / Comparison of resistance to sliding produced by self-ligating

Introducción: es importante para el ortodoncista conocer la resistencia al deslizamiento (RD) generada por el método de ligado usado durante la fase de cierre de espacio con mecánica de deslizamiento. El objetivo es comparar in vitro la RD de un tipo de bracket de autoligado con un tipo de bracket convencional combinado con ligaduras elastoméricas de baja fricción y ligaduraelastomérica convencional. Métodos: se utilizaron brackets de autoligado SmartClip (3M®) y brackets convencionales Gemini (3M®), dostipos de ligadura elastomérica de baja fricción Slide (Leone®), Synergy (RMO®) y un tipo de ligadura elastomérica convencional Sani-Tie(GAC®). Los sistemas de ligación de los brackets fueron probados con alambre de acero inoxidable calibre 0,019 × 0,025″. La resistencia al deslizamiento de la combinación bracket/alambre/ligadura fue medida con un modelo experimental de tres brackets cementados en una placa acrílica, montada en una máquina Instron. Cada combinación fue probada 9 veces consecutivas en estado seco. Resultados: los brackets Gemini (3M®) con ligadura convencional Sani-tie (GAC®), reportaron valores promedio de 67,3 g y los brackets Gemini (3M®) con ligadura de baja fricción siliconada Synergy (RMO®) de 84,6 g. Los brackets SmartClip (3M®) y Gemini (3M®) con ligadura elastomérica debaja fricción Slide (Leone®) tuvieron valores promedio similares de 5,0 y 5,4 g, respectivamente, sin diferencias significativas (p = 0,999).Conclusiones: las ligaduras elastoméricas de baja fricción Slide (Leone®), mostraron fuerzas de resistencia al deslizamiento similares alos brackets de autoligado Smartclip (3M).

Introduction: It is important for the orthodontist to be familiar with the sliding resistance (SR) generated by the ligation method used during the space closure phase with sliding mechanics. The objective of this article is to make an in vitro comparison of the SR produced by a self-ligating bracket and a conventional bracket in combination with low-friction and conventional elastomeric ligatures. Methods: SmartClip (3M®) self-ligating brackets and Gemini (3M®) conventional brackets were used, as well as two typesof low-friction elastomeric ligature: Slide (Leone®) and Synergy (RMO®), and one type of conventional elastomeric ligature: Sani-Tie(GAC®).The brackets ligation systems were tested with stainless steel wire of 0.019 × 0.025” caliber. Sliding resistance of the bracketwire-ligature combination was measured with an experimental model of three brackets bonded in an acrylic plate mounted on an Instron machine. Each combination was tested nine consecutive times in dry state. Results: The Gemini (3M®) brackets with a conventionalSani-Tie (GAC®) ligature reported mean values of 67.3 g, while the Gemini (3M®) brackets with low-friction Synergy (RMO®) silicone ligature obtained mean values of 84.6 g. The SmartClip (3M®) and Gemini (3M®) brackets with low-friction Slide (Leone®) elastomeric.

Self- Ligating Brackets - A Review.

Self-ligating brackets are ligatureless bracket systems that have a mechanical device built into the bracket to close off the edgewise slot. These brackets secure passive or active ligation mechanism that ensures consistent full bracket engagement. Reduced friction between archwire and bracket allows more rapid tooth movement. This results in good control of tooth position through an adequately dimensioned bracket. A review of self-ligation in general has been highlighted in this article

Avaliação do atrito em braquetes autoligáveis submetidos à mecânica de deslizamento: um estudo in vitro / Evaluation of friction in self-ligating brackets subjected to sliding mechanics: an in vitro study

INTRODUÇÃO: o atrito gerado na interface braquete/fio durante a mecânica de deslizamento pode reduzir a eficiência da movimentação ortodôntica. O método de ligação do fio ao braquete exerce importante papel na determinação desse atrito. MÉTODOS: o presente estudo comparou a força de atrito gerada por quatro tipos de braquetes autoligáveis (Time®; Damon 2®; In-Ovation R® e Smart Clip®) com um grupo de braquetes ortodônticos convencionais (Dynalock®) associados a ligaduras elásticas tradicionais (Dispens-A-Stix®), que serviu como grupo controle. A força de atrito estático foi mensurada através da máquina universal de ensaios EMIC® DL 500 com dois fios de aço inoxidável com secção transversal 0,018" e 0,017" x 0,025". RESULTADOS: a análise de variância ANOVA e o teste de Tukey mostraram baixos níveis de atrito nos quatro braquetes autoligáveis associados ao fio 0,018" (P<0,05). Entretanto, os resultados observados quando os braquetes autoligáveis foram testados com fios 0,017" x 0,025" mostraram alta resistência ao deslizamento nos grupos de braquetes autoligáveis ativos.

INTRODUCTION: Friction generated at the bracket/archwire interface during sliding mechanics can reduce the efficiency of orthodontic movement. The ligation method employed to tie the archwire to the bracket plays an important role in determining this friction. METHODS: This study compared the frictional force generated by four different types of self-ligating brackets (Time™, Damon 2™, In-Ovation R™ and Smart Clip™) with a group of conventional orthodontic brackets (Dynalock™) that require the use of traditional elastomeric ligatures (ExDispens-A-Stix™), which served as the control group. Static friction force was measured using an EMIC DL™ 500 universal testing machine using stainless steel round 0.018-in and rectangular 0.017x0.025-in archwires. RESULTS: ANOVA and Tukey's test showed low levels of friction in the four self-ligating brackets in tests with the 0.018-in wire (P <0.05). However, the results noted when the self-ligating brackets were tested using 0.017x 0.025-in archwires showed high resistance to sliding in the self-ligating groups.

The feature, classification and development of self-ligating brackets / 实用口腔医学杂志

Self-ligating brackets have been developed for decades. Now more and more orthodontists are using self-ligating appliance systems, because they have the following advantages over conventional orthodontic brackets: less friction between the archwires and the brackets;simple clinical operation;comfortable for patients. This review introduces the self-ligating brackets' feature, classification and several self-ligating brackets applied in clinic.