ABSTRACT
Considerada como una articulación glinglimoartrorial, la Articulación Témporo-mandibular (ATM) realiza todos los movimientos en el espacio, sin presentar ningún signo o síntoma en condiciones normales, sin embargo en presencia de anomalías manifiesta ruidos, partiendo de este enfoque nos centramos a analizar si estos ruidos articulares se encuentran relacionados con la oclusión dental, específicamente con la presencia de interferencias oclusales en el lado de no trabajo, en adultos de ambos sexos de entre 20 - 40 años de edad totalmente dentados. De esta forma 31 participantes que presentaron ruidos articulares en los diferentes movimientos mandibulares, fueron evaluados en cuanto a la clase de Angle, guías laterales, presencia de guía canina normal y presencia o ausencia de función de grupo. Analizando clínicamente la presencia de interferencias en el lado de no trabajo y comprobando estas interferencias en articulador semiajustable (ASA) tipo Bioart. Los datos obtenidos fueron analizados en el programa SPSS versión XX, revelando una relación entre los ruidos articulares y la presencia de interferencias oclusales en el lado de no trabajo, sin embargo, evidenciando cierta relación entre la presencia de interferencias oclusales con género, presente con mayor prevalencia en el género masculino que en femenino.
Considered as a glinglymoarthrodial articulation, the temporomandibular joint) (TMJ) is both a hinging and a sliding joint. In a healthy condition the joint doesn't show any particular sign or symptom, however if there is a dysfunction it will present noises during jaw movement. Starting from this principle, we analyzed if the TMJ dysfunction sounds are connected to dental malocclusion, focusing on occlusal interferences in the non-working side, in patients between 20 and 40 years of age. Thirty-one patients presented articular noises during jaw movement, so we proceeded to evaluate Angle class (molar relationship), lateral guidance, normal canine guidance and the presence or absence of group function. Clinically, we analyzed the presence of interferences in the non-working side and we studied them using a Semi-adjustable Articulator (ASA) (Bioart). The data, evaluated using the program SPSS Version XX, revealed a clear relation between articular noises and interferences in the non-working side, however the population of men showed a higher rate of occlusal interferences than that of women.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Temporomandibular Joint/anatomy & histology , Dental Articulators , Mandibular Condyle , Skull Base/anatomy & histology , Dentistry , MalocclusionABSTRACT
Introducción: la férula oclusal tipo Míchigan (FOM) es un dispositivo usado frecuentemente para el manejo de pacientes con bruxismo. La literatura menciona el uso del arco facial para el montaje de modelos en el articulador semiajustable, sin embargo el beneficio de este en la elaboración de las FOM aún es controvertido. Por lo tanto el objetivo de esta investigación fue comparar el registro de número de puntos de contacto y el tiempo de ajuste entre las FOM elaboradas con y sin el uso del arco facial en pacientes con diagnóstico de bruxismo. Métodos: se elaboraron 90 férulas entregadas a 45 pacientes de la Clínica de Rehabilitación Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), previo diagnóstico de bruxismo. Las dos férulas elaboradas (una con modelos montados con arco facial y otra sin él), se compararon en el articulador y clínicamente. Se registró el número de puntos de contacto obtenidos en ambas férulas y el tiempo de ajuste requerido. Las comparaciones se hicieron con la prueba estadística de Wilcoxon y significancia menor a 0,05. Resultados: la media de puntos de contacto en boca de las férulas con el uso del arco fue superior (11,67) a la de sin uso del arco (11,58) sin diferencias significativas (p = 0,799). El tiempo de ajuste fue superior en las férulas elaboradas sin arco (51 s) que con arco (33 s), sin diferencias significativas (p = 0,332). Conclusión: no existen diferencias significativas con el uso del arco facial o sin él para la elaboración de las FOM en pacientes bruxómanos.
Introduction: Michigan occlusal splints (MOS) are frequently used for the management of patients with bruxism. The literature mentions the use of face bows for mounting models in semi-adjustable articulators, but its benefit in the production of MOS is still controversial. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the record of number of contact points and mounting time between MOS made with and without face bows in patients diagnosed with bruxism. Methods: a total of 90 splints were made and distributed among 45 patients diagnosed with bruxism at the Oral Rehabilitation Clinic of Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP). The two splints (one made with a face bow mounted model and the other one without it) were compared at the articulator and clinically. The number of obtained contact points was recorded in both splints as well as the time needed for mounting. The comparisons were made with Wilcoxon statistical test and a significance level lower than 0.05. Results: the splints with face bows showed a greater average of contact points in the mouth (11.67) compared with the ones without face bows (11.58), with no significant difference (p = 0.799). Mounting time was higher in the splints made without face bows (51 s) compared with the ones with face bows (33 s), with no significant difference (p = 0.332). Conclusion: there are no significant differences in using face bows for developing MOS in bruxism patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Occlusion , Mouth Protectors , BruxismABSTRACT
Context: The precision of an arbitrary face-bow in accurately transferring the orientation of the maxillary cast to the articulator has been questioned because the maxillary cast is mounted in relation to arbitrary measurements and anatomic landmarks that vary among individuals. Aim: This study was intended to evaluate the sagittal inclination of mounted maxillary casts on two semi-adjustable articulator/face-bow systems in comparison to the occlusal cant on lateral cephalograms. Materials and Methods: Maxillary casts were mounted on the Hanau and Girrbach semi-adjustable articulators following face-bow transfer with their respective face-bows. The sagittal inclination of these casts was measured in relation to the fixed horizontal reference plane using physical measurements. Occlusal cant was measured on lateral cephalograms. SPSS software (version 11.0, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Repeated measures analysis of variance and Tukey's tests were used to evaluate the results (P < 0.05). Results: Comparison of the occlusal cant on the articulators and cephalogram revealed statistically significant differences. Occlusal plane was steeper on Girrbach Artex articulator in comparison to the Hanau articulator. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was found that the sagittal inclination of the mounted maxillary cast achieved with Hanau articulator was closer to the cephalometric occlusal cant as compared to that of the Girrbach articulator. Among the two articulators and face-bow systems, the steepness of sagittal inclination was greater on Girrbach semi-adjustable articulator. Different face-bow/articulator systems could result in different orientation of the maxillary cast, resulting in variation in stability, cuspal inclines and cuspal heights.
Subject(s)
Dental Articulators , Dental Equipment , Dental Occlusion , Models, Dental , Humans , Malocclusion/surgery , Oral Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: In the Protar articulator, the models are almost parallel with the Camper's plane. The ultrasonic-based ARCUSdigma system is basis for the determination of dynamic function parameters with so-called "articulator related registration". PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the sagittal condylar guidance angles found by use of the wax protrusive records in a semi-adjustable articulator(KaVo Protar 7) with those found by use of the Axiograph(ARCUSdigma). 83 volunteers with intact dentition participated in this study after obtainment of informed consent. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The sagittal condylar guidance angles were measured and estimated statistically by semi-articulator and Axiograph. All the readings were in degrees. No control was used in this project. To test whether there was a significant difference between the 2 independent samples, paired t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were carried out(p=.05). RESULTS: 1. The mean results for the wax protrusive records were as follow: right side (32.65 degrees, SD 16.48); left side (33.27 degrees, SD 17.49). 2. The mean results for the Axiograph were as follow: right side (32.26 degrees, SD 7.00); left side (33.07 degrees, SD 7.58). 3. There was no statistical difference on the wax protrusive records and Axiograph(p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Both methods of wax protrusive records and Axiograph are clinically acceptable for measuring the sagittal condylar guidance angles in semi-adjustable articulators.