ABSTRACT
This study aimed to describe endoscopic anatomy of the seminal tract and summarize our experience of transutricular seminal vesiculoscopy (TSV) guided by real-time transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) in managing persistent hematospermia. A total of 281 consecutive patients with persistent hematospermia who underwent TSV with or without real-time TRUS were enrolled in this single-center, prospective, observational study. The median follow-up period was 36.5 (range: 8.0-97.5) months. TSV was successfully performed in 272 (96.8%) patients. The approach of a 4.5/6 F rigid vesiculoscope entering the seminal tract was categorized into four types on the basis of endoscopic presentation of the ejaculatory duct orifice and verumontanum. Seven (2.6%), 74 (27.2%), 64 (23.5%), and 127 (46.7%) patients had Types I (through the ejaculatory duct in the urethra), II (through the ejaculatory duct in the prostatic utricle), III (transutricular fenestration through a thin membrane), and IV (real-time transrectal ultrasound-guided transutricular fenestration) approach, respectively. In patients who successfully underwent surgery, bleeding occurred in the seminal vesicle in 249 (91.5%) patients. Seminal vesiculitis, calculus in the prostatic utricle, calculus in the ejaculatory duct, calculus in the seminal vesicle, prostatic utricle cysts, and seminal vesicle cysts were observed in 213 (78.3%), 96 (35.3%), 22 (8.1%), 81 (29.8%), 25 (9.2%), and 11 (4.0%) patients, respectively. Hematospermia was alleviated or disappeared in 244 (89.7%) patients 12 months after surgery. Fifteen patients had recurrent hematospermia, and the median time to recurrence was 7.5 (range: 2.0-18.5) months. TSV guided by TRUS may contribute to successful postoperative outcomes in managing persistent hematospermia.
ABSTRACT
With the continuous improvement of living conditions, increasing attention is being drawn to the genitourinary health of males, which has boomed the development of uroandrology in recent years. Refractory hemospermia, infertility, and perineal pain are commonly seen in some male patients, and mainly relied on medical imaging for diagnosis in the past, which, however, has a high pseudopositive rate and cannot give an etiological explanation. Patients with these diseases often adopt conservative treatments such as medication and physiotherapy, often with poor prognosis, and those suffering frequent recurrence used to be treated by transurethral resection, laparoscopic surgery or open surgery, which are now rarely employed due to their high rate of postoperative complications, slow recovery, and easy recurrence. In recent years, transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy has gained a wide application in the diagnosis and treatment of the above-mentioned uroandrological diseases and shown its advantages of high clinical effectiveness and low incidence of complications. The review updates on the indications, methods, skills and clinical application of transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Andrology/trends , Hemospermia , Postoperative Complications , Recurrence , Seminal Vesicles/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We summarized our experience in transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy (TSV) for recurrent hemospermia by introducing surgical techniques, intraoperative findings, and treatment outcomes. TSV was performed in 419 patients with an initial diagnosis of persistent hemospermia at Shanghai Changhai Hospital (Shanghai, China) from May 2007 to November 2015. TSV was successfully performed in 381 cases (90.9%). Hemospermia was alleviated or disappeared in 324 (85.0%) patients by 3 months after surgery. Common intraoperative manifestations were bleeding, obstruction or stenosis, mucosal lesions, and calculus. Endoscopic presentation of the ejaculatory duct orifice and the verumontanum was categorized into four types, including 8 (1.9%), 32 (7.6%), 341 (81.4%), and 38 (9.1%) cases in Types A, B, C, and D, respectively. TSV is an effective and safe procedure in the management of seminal tract disorders. This study may help other surgeons to become familiar with and improve this procedure. However, further multicentric clinical trials are warranted to validate these findings.
ABSTRACT
Objective To detect the feasibility and safety of applying all-seeing needle in transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy.Methods Retrospective analysis was made with clinical data of 32 patients of hemospermia treated with transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy using all-seeing needle from March 2016 to January 2018.The patients'age was (38.8 ± 8.7) years (27-60 years) and the course of disease was (7.1 ±3.3) months (2-15 months).Ultrasound before operation showed heterogeneous echo,or expansion of the seminal vesicle.MRI showed hemorrhage of the seminal vesicle,or abnormal signal of the seminal vesicle.Patients had levofloxacin or mosisasin anti-infection therapy more than one month and remained uncovered.The operation was performed under subarachnoid anesthesia,and the patients took the lithotomy position.The F4.8 all-seeing needle entered the posterior urethra,the verumontanum was found,and the saline was slowly pushed with a syringe to maintain a clear view.Then,the ejaculatory duct opening was searched on both sides of the verumontanum.If the ejaculatory duct opening cannot be found in the normal position,we entered the needle into the prostatic utricle to find the possible ectopic opening.If the ejaculatory duct opening was still not found,at the 5 and 7 o'clock positions in the prostatic utricle,the needle was probed and punctured into the side wall of the ejaculatory duct.Visible puncture with all-seeing needle can effectively avoid penetrating blood vessels and reduce damage to tissues during puncture.In this study,the ejaculatory duct opening got accessed on the verumontanum in 14 cases,through ectopic openings within the prostatic utricle in 2 cases,and through artificial establishment in 5 and 7 o'clock positions within prostatic utricle in 16 cases.After entering the ejaculatory duct and seminal vesicle,we explored the cavities of the seminal vesicles.For stones or polyps,after replacing the outer sheath to F8,F1.9 stone retrieval basket was applied to remove stones or polyps,followed by rinsing the seminal vesicles with normal saline,0.02％ nitrofurazone,and then 160,000 units of gentamicin into each seminal vesicle.For hemorrhage,after clearing up the blood,seminal vesicles were also washed with normal saline,nitrofurazone,and perfused with gentamicin.In the operation,prostatic utricle stone was found in 5 cases,and seminal vesicle stone was found in 7 cases.One case of seminal vesicle polyp was observed,and in 19 cases,seminal vesicle hemorrhage was seen.Results All the operations were accomplished successfully,the operation time was (55.0 ± 11.3) min (35-82 min).There was no rectal injury or urethral injury during operation.The postoperative catheter was removed at 2 days postoperatively and the patients discharged on the 4th day after surgery.The length of hospital stay was (6.3 ± 0.7) days (5-7 days).One patient had mild hematuria after removal of the urethral catheter and got improved spontaneously;one case developed epididymitis,which improved after anti-infective treatment.6 cases made stone analysis,with 5 cases of magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate,and 1 case of calcium oxalate dihydrate,calcium oxalate monohydrate and carbonate apatite mixed stones.One case of polyp was diagnosed by pathologists to be an inflammatory polyp.Follow-up was performed at 4,6,8,and 12 weeks after surgery.Hemospermia was cured in 24 cases,relieved in the other 8 cases at 8-week follow-up,who received oral antibiotic treatment afterwards.At the 12-week follow-up,the rest 6 cases in 8 got hemospermia recovered,with 2 cases still uncovered.Conclusions All-seeing needle is user-friendly and safe in transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy,with reliable short-term efficacy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To discuss the clinical effects of transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy in refractory hemospermia caused by seminal vesicle diseases.Methods The clinical data of 50 patients suffered from refractory hemospermia caused by seminal vesicle gland diseases were retrospectively analyzed from February 2012 to February 2014.Patients' age varied from 25 to 54 years old,mean (39.2 ± 9.2) years.The course of disease was (7.44 ± 2.6) months.There were 24 seminal vesiculitis,10 seminal ducts obstruction disease,and 16 seminal vesicle calculi disease.According to patients' priority,the patients were divided into surgical treatment group and conservative treatment group.In surgical group,there were 38 patients with age of (38.9 ± 8.8) years old,and the course of disease was (7.5 ± 2.5) months.There were 18 seminal vesiculitis,8 seminal ducts obstruction,and 12 seminal vesicle calculi.Whereas in conservative treatment group,there were 12 patients,with age of (40.2 ± 10.5) years old,and the course of disease was (7.3 ±2.9) months.Among them,there were 6 seminal vesiculitis,2 seminal ducts obstruction,and 4 seminal vesicle calculi.There was no significant difference between the two groups in patients age,course of disease and constitution of disease.The clinical data derived from the two treatment groups including the white blood cell counts (WBC) and red blood cell counts (RBC) in the seminal fluid,hematospermia rate,quality of life score,cure rate and improvement rate before and after the treatment were analysed.Results 1,3,6 months and 1 year after treatment,all observation indexes in the two groups had been ameliorated and had significant difference compared with those before treatment including WBC and RBC in the seminal fluid,hematospermia rate and quality of life score.No operative complications occurred in conservative treatment group.While a patient in surgical treatment group suffered from infection and recovered after levofloxacin treatment for a day.Six months after two kinds of treatment,in surgical treatment group,the cure rate was 55.2％,and the improvement rate was 36.8％.In the meanwhile,in conservative treatment group,the cure rate and the improvement rate were both 25.0％.A year after two different treatment,in surgical treatment group,the cure rate was 60.5％,the improvement rate was 34.2％.However,in conservative treatment group,the cure rate and improvement rate were both 8.3％.The effective rate of surgical group was much higher than that of conservative treatment group and the difference were significant.Conclusions Both transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy and conservative treatment have certain effects in relieving hemospermia.The transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy has obvious advantages over conservative treatment in improving the clinical effects of hemospermia after long duration.It could be used as a good supplement when medication fail.
ABSTRACT
We summarized our experience in transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy (TSV) for recurrent hemospermia by introducing surgical techniques, intraoperative findings, and treatment outcomes. TSV was performed in 419 patients with an initial diagnosis of persistent hemospermia at Shanghai Changhai Hospital (Shanghai, China) from May 2007 to November 2015. TSV was successfully performed in 381 cases (90.9%). Hemospermia was alleviated or disappeared in 324 (85.0%) patients by 3 months after surgery. Common intraoperative manifestations were bleeding, obstruction or stenosis, mucosal lesions, and calculus. Endoscopic presentation of the ejaculatory duct orifice and the verumontanum was categorized into four types, including 8 (1.9%), 32 (7.6%), 341 (81.4%), and 38 (9.1%) cases in Types A, B, C, and D, respectively. TSV is an effective and safe procedure in the management of seminal tract disorders. This study may help other surgeons to become familiar with and improve this procedure. However, further multicentric clinical trials are warranted to validate these findings.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ejaculatory Ducts/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Hemospermia/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Seminal Vesicles/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Urethra/surgeryABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical application of all seeing needle system system in diagnosis and treatment of patients with hematospermia. Methods From May 2015 to September 2016, 22 patients with hemospermia were treated with seminal vesiculoscopy and seminal vesicle lithotripsy by using a all seeing needle system instead of traditional seminal vesicle. Results All the patients were successfully found the seminal vesicle gland and successfully entered the seminal vesicle gland, 16 cases had chronic inflammation of the seminal vesicle, dilute iodine rinse, 6 cases of seminal vesicle, holmium laser lithotripsy, stone basket to remove. The average operation time was (15.7 ± 6.2) min. The catheterization was performed the next day after operation. The average hospital stay was 2 d. After follow-up for 3 to 6 months, 20 patients had disappeared (90.9％). No complication was found Disease and long-term complications. Conclusion The all seeing needle system can replace the traditional seminal vesicle for the operation of seminal vesicle. The puncture system is short, directional and maneuverable. It has advantages of short operation time, simple operation, easy to master and no complications.
ABSTRACT
Seminal vesiculoscopy is a new technology in uro-andrology developed in recent 10 years, which is a set of clinical operational techniques for observing the ejaculatory duct, seminal vesicle, ampullar region of the vas deferens and their surrounding structure, determining the cause, location and degree of the disease, and accomplishing such treatment procedures as irrigation, resection, incision, fulguration, hemostasis, expansion, drainage, and removal of hematocele, stones or obstruction in the distal seminal duct region. Therefore, it is not only an etiologically diagnostic technique, but also a minimally invasive surgical approach to the management of common diseases of the distal seminal duct region. Seminal vesiculoscopy has irreplaceable advantages of safety, effectiveness, minimal invasiveness, rapid recovery, and few complications.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Calculi , Diagnostic Imaging , General Surgery , Drainage , Ejaculatory Ducts , Diagnostic Imaging , Endoscopy , Methods , Genital Diseases, Male , Diagnostic Imaging , General Surgery , Hematocele , Diagnostic Imaging , General Surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Seminal Vesicles , Diagnostic Imaging , Vas Deferens , Diagnostic ImagingABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare three different pathways for transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy (SVS) and investigate the reliability and efficiency of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided SVS (TRUS-SVS).@*METHODS@#We retrospectively analyzed 90 cases of seminal vesiculoscopy conducted directly through the ejaculatory duct or prostatic utricle or under the guide of TRUS. We compared the success rate and complications among the three approaches.@*RESULTS@#Operations were successfully performed in 87 (96.67%) of the 90 cases, 30 through the ejaculatory duct, 37 via the prostatic utricle, and 20 under the guide of TRUS, the operation time ranging from 25 to 75 minutes. Sperm was detected from the seminal vesicle fluid in (92.06%) of the azoospermia patients (58/63) during the surgery and in 77.78% of them (49/63) in semen analysis at 1 week postoperatively. Fifteen hematospermia and 12 spermatocystitis patients were cured. Postoperative follow-up found 20 cases of water-like semen and 3 cases of orchiepididymitis, but no such complications as retrograde ejaculation, incontinence, or rectourethral fistula.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Transejaculatory duct and transprostatic utricle pathways are two common approaches to SVS, while TRUS-SVS may achieve a higher success rate and avoid injury of both the prostate and the rectum.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Azoospermia , Diagnostic Imaging , Ejaculatory Ducts , Diagnostic Imaging , Epididymitis , Diagnostic Imaging , Genital Diseases, Male , Hemospermia , Diagnostic Imaging , Operative Time , Prostate , Diagnostic Imaging , Rectum , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Semen , Semen Analysis , Seminal Vesicles , Diagnostic Imaging , Spermatozoa , Ultrasonography , MethodsABSTRACT
Ejaculatory duct obstruction (EDO) is one of the obstructive factors for 1－5% of all cases of male infertility and it is, however, surgically correctable. Congenital developmental abnormality is a most common cause of EDO. The clinical manifestations of EDO are varied, typically with the decline of four semen parameters. Transrectal ultrasonography is an important imaging method for the diagnosis of EDO and guidance in its surgery. MRI provides high-resolution images of the reproductive system as evidence. Transurethral resection of the ejaculatory duct (TURED) is a classical operation, the application of transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy has become a new trend of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of EDO, and the latest flexible vesiculovasoscopy (FVV) or vasoscopy techniques may further improve the diagnosis and treatment of EDO.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Ejaculatory Ducts , Diagnostic Imaging , General Surgery , Genital Diseases, Male , Diagnostic Imaging , General Surgery , Infertility, Male , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Semen , Ultrasonography , Vas Deferens , Diagnostic ImagingABSTRACT
<p><b>Objective</b>To summarize the experience in the diagnosis and treatment of refractory hematospermia and ejaculatory duct obstruction by seminal vesiculoscopy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 42 cases of refractory hematospermia and 6 cases of ejaculatory duct obstruction with azoospermia. We investigated the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the diseases.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the patients underwent pelvic MRI and seminal vesiculoscopy. MRI for the 42 refractory hematospermia patients showed that 21 (50.0%) had cystic dilatation in the uni- or bilateral seminal vesicles, 25 (59.5%) had abnormal internal signal intensity in the uni- or bilateral seminal vesicles, 12 (28.6%) had both the problems above, and 4 (9.52%) had no obvious abnormality in the seminal vesicle area. The bilateral seminal vesicles were <1 cm in width in 3 of the 6 cases of ejaculatory duct obstruction, and obviously enlarged in the other 3, but without abnormal internal signals. No recurrence was found during the 3－36 months follow-up.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The history and physical examination play important roles in the diagnosis of refractory hemospermia, and MRI is more valuable than TRUS in the diagnosis of seminal vesicle diseases. Seminal vesiculoscopy is an effective option for the management of persistent hematospermia and ejaculatory duct obstruction.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Azoospermia , Ejaculatory Ducts , Diagnostic Imaging , Endoscopy , Methods , Hemospermia , Diagnostic Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Seminal Vesicles , Diagnostic ImagingABSTRACT
Objective To refine the technique and improve the efficacy of seminal vesiculoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of seminal vesicle disease.Methods The refined techniques of seminal vesculoscopy,using a patent catheter into the slit-like ejaculatory duct orifice through the verumontanum and another patent catheter introduced into seminal vesicle lumen,were performed in 58 cases,including intractable hematospermia in 42 cases and azoospermia in 16 cases.Results Seminal vesiculoscopy was successfully entered into the seminal vesicular lumen in 46 patients (79％) within 2-3 min.There was no obvious ejaculatory duct orifice in 12 of 16 azoopermia cases,and transurethral resection of verumontanum was performed,then seminal vesiculoscope was directly entered into seminal vesicle lumen.Symptoms of hematospermia were disappeared in 25 cases (60％),improved in 11 cases (26％),and azoospermia were cured in 6 cases (37％),improved in 5 (31％),unchanged in 5 (31％) during the follow-up period of 6-36 months (average 18 months).There were no major or minor complications in this series,and no urine reflux into ejaculatory duct in 19 cases demonstrated by contrast medium.Conclusion Refined seminal vesiculoscopy was technically safe,efficient,simple,and potentially widely used in the cases of hematospermia and ejaculatory duct obstructions.