ABSTRACT
Gardner–Diamond syndrome (GDS), or autoerythrocyte sensitisation, is a rare cause of recurrentpainful bruising with a typical anamnesis and prodrome. We describe a patient with GDS and discussthe literature surrounding this unique condition.
ABSTRACT
Background: The pattern of contact sensitisation should be monitored in order to detect the changing trend of sensitising allergens. We aim to evaluate contact sensitisation in adults suspected to have allergic contact dermatitis. Methods: This is a five-year retrospective review on contact sensitisation in adults patch-tested with the European Standard and extended series between 2011 and 2015 in the Department of Dermatology, Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Results: There were 689 adults (M:F= 1:2.04; mean age 40.5 years) who were patch-tested. The majority (175, 25.4%) were white collar workers and 118 (17.1%) were healthcare workers. The provisional diagnoses of patients included contact dermatitis (80.8%); endogenous eczema (7.9%); hand eczema (3.2%); hand and foot eczema (3.5%); foot eczema (1.4%) and photodermatitis (1.2%). The allergens selected for testing were based on past and present history of exposure. Almost all (688, 99.8%) were patch-tested with the European standard allergens and 466 (67.6%) were tested with the extended series. About three quarter (528, 76.6%) developed at least one positive reaction. The top five most frequent reactions were to nickel sulphate (35.3%); potassium dichromate (16.5%); methylchloroisothiazolinone (12.9%), fragrance mix I (12.6%), and cobalt chloride (10.2%). The commonest sensitisations identified in the extended series were palladium chloride (23/105, 21.9%), stannous chloride (18/85, 21.2%), miconazole (7/44, 15.9%), gold(I)sodium thiosulfate (16/105, 15.2%) and thimerosal (29/202, 14.4%). Conclusion: Contact sensitisation was detected in 76.6% of adults patch-tested. Nickel sulphate was found to be the most frequently sensitising allergen. The rising prevalence of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone sensitization poses significant concern.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, ContactABSTRACT
Introducción: La prevalencia de sensibilización al látex es variable. Se describen diversos factores de riesgo para la sensibilización al látex, como riesgo genético, atopia y múltiples intervenciones quirúrgicas. Objetivo: Caracterizar los pacientes con sospecha de alergia al látex, analizar sus características clínicas y factores de riesgo. Pacientes y método: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, en niños derivados a la Unidad de Inmunología pediátrica por sospecha de alergia al látex y para confirmación diagnóstica. Se revisaron síntomas por contacto o exposición a materiales con látex. Se identificó factores de riesgo para la sensibilización al látex: patologías con múltiples intervenciones quirúrgicas (espina bífida, mielomeningocele, escoliosis y alteraciones nefrourológicas), atopia (rinitis o asma, dermatitis atópica), y se realizó prick test y/o IgE específica para látex. Se efectuó un modelo de regresión logística multivariado para asociar síntomas de exposición al látex con enfermedades de base y condiciones de riesgo. Resultados: Se reclutaron 106 pacientes, de los cuales 50 fueron analizables. El 96% eran mayores de 5 años de edad al momento del diagnóstico. La mayoría de los factores de riesgo descritos en la literatura eran observables en estos pacientes (múltiples cirugías, malformaciones neurológicas y nefrourológicas, intervenciones quirúrgicas antes del año de edad y cateterismo vesical repetido). Luego de la exposición, las manifestaciones cutáneo-mucosas fueron las más frecuentes (52%), seguidas por las respiratorias (36%). El 100% de los pacientes estaban sensibilizados al látex. Conclusión: La sensibilización y alergia al látex es un problema relevante en niños con factores de riesgo. Los resultados mostrados plantean importantes desafíos en relación con medidas preventivas.
Introduction: The prevalence of latex sensitisation varies according to the population studied. There are various risk factors that increase latex sensitisation, such as genetic risk, atopy, and multiple surgeries. Objective: To characterise patients referred to an Immunology Unit with suspected latex allergy, and to analyse their clinical features and risk factors. Patients and method: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted on children suspected of latex allergy. Their medical records were reviewed in order to assess symptoms with contact or exposure to latex materials. Known risk factors to latex sensitisation, such as pathologies requiring repeated surgery (spina bifida, myelomeningocele, scoliosis and nephro-urological alterations), atopy (rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis) were investigated. A prick test and/or specific IgE to latex were also performed. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to find associations between symptoms triggered by exposure to latex with underlying diseases and other risk conditions. Results: A total of 106 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 50 were evaluable. At diagnosis 96% of patients were older than five years. Most of the risk factors described were observable in these patients, such as multiple surgeries, neurological and nephro-urological malformations, surgery before one year-old, and repeated bladder catheterisation. After latex exposure, mucous cutaneous manifestations were the most common (52%), followed by respiratory symptoms (36%). All patients were sensitised and allergic to latex. Conclusion: Latex allergy is a significant problem in children with risk factors. The results shown in this study raise important challenges for preventive measures and awareness.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Skin Tests/methods , Latex Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Prevalence , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Latex Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Latex Hypersensitivity/etiology , Hospitals, PediatricABSTRACT
El látex o caucho natural es un producto vegetal que se obtiene de la savia de la Hevea brasiliensis. Ampliamente utilizado para la fabricación de productos de uso doméstico (guantes, preservativos, globos, etc.) y del área de la salud, donde se estima que el 50% de los artículos médicos contienen látex. La alergia al látex es un problema de salud mundial. Se estima que la prevalencia de sensibilización al látex en población general es del 1%. Clínicamente, puede generar una reacción de hipersensibilidad tipo I, IgE mediada, en respuesta a las proteínas del látex que se manifiesta como una urticaria hasta la anafilaxia. También se describe dermatitis de contacto irritativa y la dermatitis de contacto alérgica, 12 a 96 horas luego del contacto, por una reacción de hipersensibilidad retardada tipo IV, secundaria a los aditivos del látex. El diagnóstico se basa en la sospecha clínica, confirmado con pruebas cutáneas y medición de IgEs específicas. Realizar una anamnesis que permita sospechar una alergia al látex y si se determina que el paciente tiene riesgo, realizar el estudio complementario para confirmar el diagnóstico. El enfrentamiento se basa en la prevención de la exposición y el tratamiento de la reacción aguda. Es necesario conocer los alérgenos y procesos implicados en la alergia al látex pues de este modo se podrá sospechar e identificar a pacientes o funcionarios que puedan sufrir o estar en riesgo de presentarla, disminuyendo de este modo las posibles complicaciones.
Latex or natural rubber is a vegetable product which is obtained from the sap of the Hevea brasiliensis. It is widely used to manufacture domestic products (gloves, condoms, balloons, etc.) and used in the health area, where it is estimated that 50% of medical articles contain latex. Latex allergy is a global health problem. It is estimated that the prevalence of latex sensitization is 1% in the general population. The clinical presentation can be a type I hypersensitivity reaction, IgE mediated, in response to latex proteins, manifested as a rash or even as an anaphylaxis. Irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis, 12 to 96 hours after contact, is also described, due to a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction, secondary to latex additives. The diagnosis of latex allergy is based on clinical suspicion and confirmed with skin tests measuring specific IgEs. Management is based on the exposure prevention and treatment of the acute reaction. A detailed anamnesis must be made to suspect a latex allergy and if the patient is at risk of presenting it, perform additional study to confirm the diagnosis. It is necessary to know the allergens and processes involved in latex allergy, to be able to suspect and identify patients or staff who may suffer or be at risk of presenting it, thus reducing potential complications.