ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the predictive value of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) for 28-day mortality in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS).Methods:Retrospective analysis of 125 patients with PCAS who were treated in Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) of Wenzhou People's Hospital from July 2016 to July 2021. Clinical data were collected, including age, gender, underlying diseases, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ), SOFA score on admission to EICU and 28-day mortality. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression model was constructed to analyze the influencing factors of PCAS patients, which was used to examine the independent correlation between SOFA score and 28-day mortality. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to determine the best predictive value of SOFA score and 28-day mortality in PCAS patients.Results:Among the 125 PCAS patients, there were 91 males and 34 females with an average age of (58.7±15.1) years old, and 97 died and 28 survived within 28 days. The overall SOFA score ranged from 7 to 15 points, with an average of 10.9 (10.0, 12.0) points. The SOFA score of non-survival group was significantly higher than that of the survival group [points: 11.0 (10.0, 12.0) vs. 9.5 (9.0, 10.0), P < 0.05]. This difference between SOFA score mainly caused by the neurological and cardiovascular systems. After excluding neurological factors, the SOFA score of the non-survival group was still significantly higher than that of the survival group [points: 8.0 (6.0, 8.0) vs. 6.5 (6.0, 7.0), P < 0.05]. SOFA score was found to be an independent risk factor for 28-day mortality in PCAS patients by multifactorial Logistic regression analysis [odds ratio ( OR) = 1.97, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 1.24-3.04]. The correlation between neurological score and mortality was the highest in subgroups ( OR = 3.47, 95% CI was 1.04-11.52). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) predicted by SOFA score was 0.81 (95% CI was 0.73-0.89). When SOFA score cut-off value was 10.5 points (10 or 11 points), the sensitivity and specificity of SOFA score for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with PCAS were 67.0% and 82.1%, respectively. Conclusions:The SOFA score is quite accurate in predicting 28-day mortality in patients with PCAS.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the effect of early bundle therapy on prognosis of patients with sepsis/septic shock and analyze the risk factors for death.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted to select patients with sepsis/septic shock at the Second Soochow University Hospital betweenJanuary 1,2016,and December 31,2016.Data pertaining to demographic variables,compliance rate of bundle therapy,and incidence of organ failure were collected.Patients were categorized into the nonsurvivor or survivor groups based on 28-day mortality.Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for 28-day mortality.Results Totally 118 sepsis/septic shock patients were included in the analysis;28-day mortality was 32.2％.Compared to the survivor group,patients in the non-survivor group were more likely to have chronic heart dysfunction and cerebrovascular disease,lower lactate clearance,lower 6-h compliance rate of bundle therapy and higher incidence of failure of one or ＞2 organs.Age,leukocyte,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine,brain natriuretic peptide,sequential organ failure score and acute physiological and chronic health scores Ⅱ on admission,and lactate after bundle therapy were higher than that of the survivor group.Logistical regression analysis showed that age ≥ 75 years [odds ratio (OR)1.012],6-h lactate clearance ＜30％ (OR=1.122),chronic heart failure (OR=1.741),failure of ＞2 organs (OR=1.769),and 6-h compliance rate of bundle therapy (OR=1.958) were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality.Conclusions Patients with sepsis/septic shock need early diagnosis and resuscitation to improve the compliance rate of bundle therapy and reduce the mortality.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury usually develops in critically ill patients in the context of multiple organ dysfunctions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of changes in associated organ dysfunctions over the first three days of renal replacement therapy on the outcomes of patients with acute kidney injury. METHODS: Over a 19-month period, we evaluated 260 patients admitted to the intensive care units of three tertiary-care hospitals who required renal replacement therapy for > 48 h. Organ dysfunctions were evaluated by SOFA score (excluding renal points) on the first (D1) and third (D3) days of renal replacement therapy. Absolute (A-SOFA) and relative (D-SOFA) changes in SOFA scores were also calculated. RESULTS: Hospital mortality rate was 75 percent. Organ dysfunctions worsened (A-SOFA>0) in 53 percent, remained unchanged (A-SOFA=0) in 17 percent and improved (A-SOFA<0) in 30 percent of patients; and mortality was lower in the last group (80 percent vs. 84 percent vs. 61 percent, p=0.003). SOFA on D1 (p<0.001), SOFA on D3 (p<0.001), A-SOFA (p=0.019) and D-SOFA (p=0.016) were higher in non-survivors. However, neither A-SOFA nor D-SOFA discriminated survivors from non-survivors on an individual basis. Adjusting for other covariates (including SOFA on D1), A-SOFA and D-SOFA were associated with increased mortality, and patients in whom SOFA scores worsened or remained unchanged had poorer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to baseline values, early changes in SOFA score after the start of renal replacement therapy were associated with hospital mortality. However, no prognostic score should be used as the only parameter to predict individual outcomes.