Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 22(5): 402-411, Sept.-Oct. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-974242

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objectives: The role of viral co-detection in children with severe acute respiratory infection is not clear. We described the viral detection profile and its association with clinical characteristics in children admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. Method: Longitudinal observational retrospective study, with patients aged 0-18 years, admitted to 11 PICUs in Rio de Janeiro, with suspected H1N1 infection, from June to November, 2009. The results of respiratory samples which were sent to the Laboratory of Fiocruz/RJ and clinical data extracted from specific forms were analyzed. Results: Of 71 samples, 38% tested positive for H1N1 virus. Of the 63 samples tested for other viruses, 58 were positive: influenza H1N1 (43.1% of positive samples), rhinovirus/enterovirus (41.4%), respiratory syncytial vírus (12.1%), human metapneumovirus (12.1%), adenovirus (6.9%), and bocavirus (3.5%). Viral codetection occured in 22.4% of the cases. H1N1-positive patients were of a higher median age, had higher frequency of fever, cough and tachypnea, and decreased leukometry when compared to H1N1-negative patients. There was no difference in relation to severity outcomes (number of organic dysfunctions, use of mechanical ventilation or amines, hospital/PICU length of stay or death). Comparing the groups with mono-detection and co-dection of any virus, no difference was found regarding the association with any clinical variable. Conclusions: Other viruses can be implicated in SARI in children. The role of viral codetection has not yet been completely elucidated.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Viruses/isolation & purification , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Influenza, Human/virology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Reference Values , Brazil , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Retrospective Studies , Age Distribution , Coinfection/virology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
2.
Rev. cuba. med. trop ; 63(1): 30-37, ene.-abr. 2011.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-584967

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: en abril de 2009 las autoridades de salud de México reportan a la Organización Panamericana de la Salud un incremento de las hospitalizaciones por neumonía con tasas elevadas de mortalidad. El Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica, notó que este incremento se presentaba fundamentalmente en las edades de 20 a 40 años. Se identificó un nuevo virus influenza A de origen porcino subtipo (H1N1) como agente causal de la primera pandemia del siglo XXI. El 26 de abril de 2009 el plan nacional de enfrentamiento a la pandemia por influenza (H1N1) es activado por las autoridades nacionales de salud de la República de Cuba y el 7 de mayo se diagnosticó el caso índice de influenza pandémica (H1N1) en Cuba. Se estableció un sistema de vigilancia integrada con confirmación de laboratorio. OBJETIVOS: detectar e identificar el virus de la influenza pandémica durante la ola pandémica. MÉTODOS: durante las semanas epidemiológicas de la 37 a la 41 se observó un alza en el número de atenciones médicas. En este período se seleccionaron para este análisis solo las muestras colectadas de pacientes con diagnóstico clínico de infección respiratoria aguda grave divididas en tres grupos fundamentales, 370 niños y adultos graves, 55 gestantes graves y 30 fallecidos. El diagnóstico fue realizado por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real para los virus de influenza pandémica y reacción en cadena de la polimerasa convencional para otros virus respiratorios. RESULTADOS: el virus de la influenza pandémica se detectó en 65, 20 y 9 casos, respectivamente. El virus de la influenza estacional A (H3N2) en 81 casos de infección respiratoria aguda grave, donde se incluyeron pacientes de todas las edades; 10 gestantes graves y en 5 fallecidos, los cuales fueron detectados por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real. Otros virus respiratorios también fueron monitoreados por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa a punto final. CONCLUSIONES: el análisis integral de estos resultados constituye un aporte a la vigilancia nacional y regional de los virus respiratorios para el perfeccionamiento de los programas de prevención y control de las infecciones respiratorias agudas.


INTRODUCTION: on April 2009, the Mexican health authorities reported increased hospitalization indexes caused by pneumonia with high mortality rates to the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO). The National Epidemiological Surveillance System of Mexico noticed that this increase mainly occurred in the 20-40 year old population. A new type of swine influenza A (H1N1) virus was identified by laboratory studies as the etiological agent of the first pandemic of the 21st century. On April 26 2009, the National Anti-pandemic Plan was activated by the Cuban Ministry of Public Health, and on May 7th, the lab-confirmed index case appeared. An integrated surveillance system with laboratory confirmation was set up. OBJECTIVES: to detect pandemic influenza virus during the pandemic wave. METHODS: the epidemiological weeks 37 to 41 witnessed a rise of the number of sick people seen by the medical services. In this period, the samples taken from patients clinically diagnosed with severe acute respiratory infection were selected for this analysis; they were divided into three groups, that is, 370 children and adults in critical condition, 55 pregnant women in severe condition and 30 fatal cases. The diagnosis of the pandemic virus was performed by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (PCR). Other respiratory viruses were tested by conventional PCR. RESULTS: the pandemic influenza virus was detected in 65 children and adults, 20 pregnant women and 9 fatal cases. The seasonal influenza A (H3N2) virus was identified in 81 cases of severe acute respiratory infection covering all age groups, 10 pregnant women and 5 deceased on the basis of real time polymerase chain reaction test. Other respiratory viruses were also monitored by the end-point polymerase chain reaction. CONCLUSIONS: the comprehensive analysis of these results contributes to the national and regional surveillance of respiratory viruses for the improvement of the prevention and control programs of the acute respiratory infections.


Subject(s)
Adult , Child , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Acute Disease , Cuba/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL