Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 3233-3236, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-612251

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To observe clinical efficacy and safety of tiotropium bromide combined with budesonide formoterol in the treatment of severe bronchial asthma in adults. METHODS:A total of 110 adult patients with severe bronchial asthma were selected from our hospital during Mar. 2013-Mar. 2016 were divided into control group and observation group according to random number table,with 55 cases in each group. Control group was given Budesonide formoterol powder for inhalation,2 inhalations each time,bid;observation group was additionally given Tiotropium bromide powder for inhalation 18 μg,qd,on the basis of con-trol group. Both groups were treated for 6 months. Clinical efficacies as well as ACT scores,respiration function indexes and the times of acute attack of asthma before and after treatment,the occurrence of ADR were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS:The efficiency rate and total response rate of observation group were 54.55% and 96.36%,which were significantly higher than 32.73%,78.18% in control group,with statistical significance(P0.05). After treatment,ACT scores of 2 groups were significantly higher than before treatment;FEV1,FEV1/FVC and PEF were significantly greater than be-fore treatment,PEFR was significantly lower than before treatment;and the indexes in observation group was significantly better than control group,with statistical significance(P0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Tiotropium bromide combined with budesonide formoter-ol in the treatment of severe bronchial asthma in adults can effectively relieve the severity of disease,improve respiration function, reduce the times of acute attack of asthma,and have good therapeutic efficacy and safety.

2.
Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics ; (6): 156-157,160, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-659965

ABSTRACT

Objective To observe the effect of montelukast combined with budesonide on FEV1%, symptom score and adverse reaction in moderate to severe bronchial asthma patients. Methods 70 patients with moderate to severe bronchial asthma from April 2016 to April 2017 were randomly divided into single group and combined group. 35 patients in a single group were treated with budesonide, combined group 35 patients were treated with montelukast combined with budesonide, and the therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups after treatment. Results There were no differences in the scores of lung function and symptoms between two groups before treatment, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. After treatment, the lung function index, symptom score and total effective treatment of the combined group were obvious better than that of the single group (P<0.05). Conclusion Montelukast combined with budesonide in the treatment of moderate to severe bronchial asthma has good effect and high safety. It reduces the number of asthma attacks and improves the lung function of patients. It is worthy to be widely used and widely used in clinical practice.

3.
Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics ; (6): 156-157,160, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-657660

ABSTRACT

Objective To observe the effect of montelukast combined with budesonide on FEV1%, symptom score and adverse reaction in moderate to severe bronchial asthma patients. Methods 70 patients with moderate to severe bronchial asthma from April 2016 to April 2017 were randomly divided into single group and combined group. 35 patients in a single group were treated with budesonide, combined group 35 patients were treated with montelukast combined with budesonide, and the therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups after treatment. Results There were no differences in the scores of lung function and symptoms between two groups before treatment, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. After treatment, the lung function index, symptom score and total effective treatment of the combined group were obvious better than that of the single group (P<0.05). Conclusion Montelukast combined with budesonide in the treatment of moderate to severe bronchial asthma has good effect and high safety. It reduces the number of asthma attacks and improves the lung function of patients. It is worthy to be widely used and widely used in clinical practice.

4.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 3252-3254, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-504899

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of aerosol inhalation of magnesium sulfate and salbuta-mol sulfate in the treatment of acute attack of severe bronchial asthma in children. METHODS:85 children with acute attack of se-vere bronchial asthma were divided into control group(45 cases)and intervention group(40 cases)in accordance to even and odd number of hospitalization time. Based on routine treatment of glucocorticoid intravenous injection,oxygen uptake,sedation and nu-tritional support,control group was given aerosol inhalation of salbutamol sulfate,0.6 ml each time,once every 20 min,for 1 h;intervention group was additionally given aerosol inhalation of magnesium sulfate,0.6 ml each time,once every 20 min,for 1 h, on the basis of control group. Therapeutic efficacy,improvement time of shortness of physical examination indexes (breath, wheeze,coughing),lung function indicators and ADR were observed in 2 groups,and discharge time was recorded in 2 groups. RESULTS:The total effective rate of clinical efficacy of intervention group was 95.00%after 1 h treatment,which was significant-ly higher than 77.78% in control group,with statistical significance (P0.05). CONCLUSIONS:On the basis of conventional treatment,the aerosol inhalation of magnesium sulfate and salbutamol sulfate shows good clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of acute attack of severe bronchi-al asthma in children.

5.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 3270-3272, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-504898

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:To observe clinical efficacy and safety of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in the treatment of mod-erate and severe bronchial asthma. METHODS:98 patients with moderate and severe bronchial asthma were selected from our hospi-tal were included in the study and were randomly divided into control group(49 cases,3 cases withdrew from the test and 46 cases completed the test)and observation group(49 cases,2 cases withdrew from the test and 47 cases completed the test). Control group was given Budesonide aerosol preparation,1 dose,bid;observation group was given Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate inhala-tion,1 dose,bid. The treatment course lasted for 2 months. Clinical efficacy,lung function indexes,the time of clinical symptom disappearance,FEV1,PD20,ACT score,asthma attack times within half an year,EO%and ECP in serum and sputum,and the oc-currence of ADR were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS:After treatment,total effective rate of observation group was signifi-cantly higher than that of control group(95.73% vs. 76.09%);FVC,FEV1 and PEF and other indexes of 2 groups were increased significantly,and the observation group was significantly higher than the control group;the disappearance time of pulmonary rales, wheezing,dyspnea and cough in observation group were significantly shorter than in control group;PD20 and ACT score of 2 groups were significantly increased,ACT score of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group;EO% and ECP in serum and sputum of observation group were significantly lower than those of control group,there was statistical significance (P0.05). All ADRs disappeared after drug withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS:Therapeutic efficacy of salmeterol and fluticasone propio-nate is better than budesonide in the treatment of moderate and severe bronchial asthma,and can effectively improve lung function, shorten the time of clinical symptoms disapperance and reduce the level of inflammatory factor with and good safety.

6.
Rev. cuba. pediatr ; 85(3): 311-319, jul.-set. 2013.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-687732

ABSTRACT

Introducción: las enfermedades alérgicas y el asma incrementan su prevalencia en Cuba y a nivel mundial. Los ácaros del polvo se encuentran entre los alérgenos perennes más prevalentes en todo el mundo. Objetivo: determinar la sensibilización a 3 especies de ácaros domésticos en los niños asmáticos severos de la Escuela Especial Celia Sánchez Manduley, de Tarará, provincia La Habana. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal en 91 alumnos, durante el curso escolar 2011-2012, y a toda la muestra se le realizaron pruebas cutáneas por punción (prick test), utilizando extractos Vallergen-BT (Blomia tropicalis), Vallergen-DS (Dermatophagoides siboney) y Vallergen-DP (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) confeccionados por el Centro de Biopreparados, en Cuba; además se determinó IgE sérica total. Resultados: la rinitis alérgica resultó la comorbilidad alérgica más frecuente. El total de los pacientes presentó reactividad cutánea positiva a los ácaros, así como IgE sérica total elevada. La sensibilización frente al D. pteronyssinus se reportó en el 93,4 por ciento de los pacientes. No existió diferencia estadísticamente significativa en el diámetro del habón. Existió correlación entre la positividad de la IgE sérica total y la sensibilización cutánea a los 3 ácaros del polvo estudiado. Conclusiones: existe una estrecha relación entre el asma bronquial y la sensibilización a ácaros, con predominio de la especie D. Pteronyssinus


Introduction: the prevalence of allergic diseases and asthma grows in Cuba and worldwide. Dust mites are one of the most prevailing perennial allergens throughout the world. Objective: to determine the sensitization to 3 domestic mite species of severe asmathic children from Celia Sanchez Manduley special school located in Tarara, Havana province. Methods: a cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out in 91 students during the 2011-2012 academic year. The whole sample was performed prick tests using Vallergen-BT (Blomia tropicalis), Vallergen-DS (Dermatophagoides siboney) and Vallergen-DP (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) extracts prepared by the National Center of Biopreparations and their total serum IgE were additionally estimated. Results: allergic rhinitis proved to be the most frequent comorbidity. All the patients showed positive skin reactivity to mites as well as increased total serum IgE. Sensitization to D. pteronyssinus was reported in 93.4 percent of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the habon diameter, but total serum IgE positivity and skin sensitization to the three dust mites under study were correlated. Conclusions: there is close association between bronchial asthma and sensitization to mites, being D. Pteronyssinus predominant


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Status Asthmaticus/complications , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Pyroglyphidae/immunology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epidemiology, Descriptive
7.
Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-556032

ABSTRACT

1∶2,inspiratory press

8.
China Pharmacy ; (12)2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-533660

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of lidocaine on respiratory failure and the airway peak pressure in patients with severe asthma. METHODS: The severe bronchial asthma patients treated with mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. The change in airway peak pressure, man-machine counteraction, and the correcting time of respiratory failure of the two groups were recorded. RESULTS: The average airway peak pressure was(41.18?10.66) cmH2O in the control group vs.(29.23?9.07) cmH2O in the treatment group; the incidence of man-machine counteraction was 100% for the control group vs. only 40% for the treatment group; the correcting time of respiratory failure was(6.42?1.73) h for the control group vs.(3.31?1.08) h for the treatment group. There were significant differences between the two groups in the above mentioned indexes(P

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL