ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare the bond strength to three different depths of remaining human and bovine dentin, through shear bond strength test, and to establish a possible relationship among the depths of the substrates to contribute for the replacement of human dentin in bond strength tests. Forty-eight human teeth (H) and forty-eight bovine teeth (B), freshly extracted, stored in distilled water and frozen at -18 ° C for at most four weeks were used in this study. 240-, 400-, 600- and 800-grit sandpapers were used to expose the dentin and standardize the smear layer at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0mm of dentin thickness. Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus adhesive system was used following the manufacturers instructions, on a standardized area of 4mm, followed by the incrementally application of Z100 resin composite (3M). The shear bond test was performed in the Instron Universal machine at cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA (p <0.05). There were significant differences in bond strength between H and B teeth, with the highest values for H teeth. There was a significant difference in bond strength to the depths analyzed but there was similarity in behavior between H (0.5mm) and B (2mm) substrates. Bovine substrate can be used for laboratory studies of bond strength as indicative of the initial performance of new products, although the differences related to human substrate should be observed.
O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar a resistência adesiva da dentina humana e bovina em três diferentes espessuras de remanescente, frente ao teste de cisalhamento, a fim de estabelecer uma possível relação de profundidade entre os substratos visando contribuir para a substituição da dentina humana em testes de adesão. Empregaram-se 48 dentes humanos (H) e 48 dentes bovinos (B), recém-extraídos, armazenados em água destilada e congelados a 18°C, por no máximo quatro semanas. Foram utilizadas lixas de granulação 240, 400, 600 e 800, para expor a dentina e padronizar a smear layer, com espessura de dentina de 0,5, 1,0 e 2,0mm. O sistema adesivo Scotchbond Multi-Uso Plus foi utilizado seguindo instruções do fabricante, em uma área padronizada de 4mm, seguido da aplicação incremental da resina Z100 (3M). O ensaio de cisalhamento foi realizado em máquina Instron Universal à velocidade de 0,5mm/min. Foi realizada análise estatística pelo teste ANOVA a dois critérios (p < 0,05). Houve diferença significativa entre a resistência adesiva em dentes H e B, sendo os maiores valores para H; houve diferença significativa de resistência para as profundidades analisadas; houve semelhança de comportamento entre os substratos H 0,5mm e B 2mm. O substrato B pode ser empregado em estudos laboratoriais de resistência adesiva como indicativos da performance inicial de novos produtos, observando-se as diferenças existentes entre eles.
Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Dentin , Shear StrengthABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In the unique metal iris method, the developing interfacial gap at the cavity floor resulting from the cavity wall property during polymerizing composite resin might affect the nominal shear bond strength values. The aim of this study is to evaluate that the iris method reduces the cohesive failure in the substrates and the cavity wall property effects on the shear bond strength tests using iris method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The occlusal dentin of 64 extracted human molars were randomly divided into 4 groups to simulate two different levels of cavity wall property (metal and dentin iris) and two different materials (ONE-STEP(R) and ALL-BOND(R) 2) for each wall property. After positioning the iris on the dentin surface, composite resin was packed and light-cured. After 24 hours the shear bond strength was measured at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Fracture analysis was performed using a microscope and SEM. The data was analyzed statistically by a two-way ANOVA and t-test. RESULTS: The shear bond strength with metal iris was significant higher than those with dentin iris (p = 0.034). Using ONE-STEP(R), the shear bond strength with metal iris was significant higher than those with dentin iris (p = 0.005), but not in ALL-BOND(R) 2 (p = 0.774). The incidence of cohesive failure was very lower than other shear bond strength tests that did not use iris method. CONCLUSIONS: The iris method may significantly reduce the cohesive failures in the substrates. According to the bonding agent systems, the shear bond strength was affected by the cavity wall property.