Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Rev. argent. neurocir ; 27(3): 96-103, sept. 2013. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-835718

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: La cirugía de reparación nerviosa es la primera elección en lesiones del plexo braquial. La artrodesis de hombro estabiliza y otorga cierta abducción por desplazamiento de la escápula. El objetivo del presente trabajo es: comparar la artrodesis de hombro versus la transferencia del nervio espinal accesorio al supraescapular. Materiales y métodos: se analizaron en forma retrospectiva 20 pacientes con parálisis completa del miembro superior y avulsión radicular de al menos 4 raíces. Diez fueron artrodesados, y en los otros 10 se realizó una única transferencia nerviosa para el hombro, antes citada. El seguimiento mínimo fue de 2 años. Se determinó la abducción en grados y se describió una escala para estudiar los resultados de ambas técnicas. Los resultados fueron comparados estadísticamente. Resultados: en los pacientes artrodesados el promedio, según la escala, fue 4,5 puntos, mientras que en los transferidos fue 4,8. La media de abducción en grados fue de 37 en artrodesados y 43,5 en transferidos. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos grupos. Conclusiones: los resultados de ambas técnicas son semejantes. La artrodesis escápulo-humeral es una posibilidad terapéutica aceptable del hombro paralizado en los pacientes con lesiones muy graves del plexo braquial y escasez de donantes nerviosos.


Objective: Primary nerve reconstruction surgery is the gold standard in brachial plexus injuries. Shoulder arthrodesis stabilizes and abducts the shoulder by the movement of the scapula. The goal of the present study is to compare shoulder arthrodesis versus spinal nerve transfer to supraescapular nerve. Materials y methods: 20 patients with complete brachial plexus palsy (flail arm) and at least 4 roots avulsions were analyzed retrospectively. Ten were submitted to shoulder arthrodesis, while in the other 10, only one nerve transfer was performed to reinervate the shoulder. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. The results were determined in degrees of abduction, also measured in a scale, and compared statistically. Results: the mean result in the patients with shoulder arthrodesis was 4.5, and 4.8 in the nerve transferred. Mean final abduction was 37 degrees in arthrodesis and 43.5 in nerve transfer. No statistical significant difference was found between groupsConclusions: the results of both techniques are similar. Shoulder arthrodesis is a viable option in severely injured brachial plexus patients where donor nerve are scarce.


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthrodesis , Brachial Plexus , Shoulder
2.
Journal of the Korean Microsurgical Society ; : 55-61, 2009.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-724671

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical and radiologic results of the shoulder arthrodesis in brachial plexus injury patients with flail upper extremity. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From Aug 1978 to April 2008, 29 shoulders in 29 patients with brachial plexus injury with shoulder fusion, we evaluated 20 shoulders in 20 patients, more than 1 year follow up. The average follow-up period was 6.45years (range: 1year~24years). There were 13 men and 7 women, and the mean age at the time of trauma was 32.0years(2~65 years). The type of injury was a motorcycle accident in 11 patients, in car accident in 5, pedestrian accident in 3, and fall from a height in 1. The lesion of injury was root and trunk in 1 patient, trunk and cord in 1, trunk in 18. Surgery was performed on the whole arm type paralysis in 12 patients, lower arm type paralysis in 8 patients. The preoperative visual analog scale score was 8.7(7~10). When the trapezius and serratus anterior muscle were in function, operation was performed. 18 patients were processed to the additional operation. Gracilis free flap in 6 patients, neurotization in 3, Steindler flexor plasty in 6, and tendon transfer in 3 were performed. Fixation was conducted with cancellous screws in 13 patients, Knoles pins in 5, and cancellous screws and Knoles pins in 2. The position of the arthrodesis at operation was 28.5degrees(20~45degrees) in abduction, 30.3degrees(20~45degrees) in flexion, and 30.8degrees(20~40degrees) in internal rotation. RESULT: The follow up visual analog scale score was 3.4(0~7). Postoperatively, shoulder spica cast was applied for 15.3weeks(8-20weeks). The median time to bony union was 17.7weeks(9~28weeks). Average range of motion was 32.0degrees(15~40degrees) of abduction, 24.0degrees(10~40degrees) of flexion, and 18.5degrees(10~30degrees)of internal rotation. CONCLUSION: The shoulder fusion in brachial plexus injury patients is one of the good methods to relieve pain, improve the function and stabilize the flail shoulder joint.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Arm , Arthrodesis , Brachial Plexus , Follow-Up Studies , Free Tissue Flaps , Motorcycles , Muscles , Nerve Transfer , Paralysis , Range of Motion, Articular , Shoulder , Shoulder Joint , Tendon Transfer
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL