Influence of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between Composites and Resin Cement / INFLUÊNCIA DE DIFERENTES TRATAMENTOS DE SUPERFÍCIE NA RESISTÊNCIA DE UNIÃO ENTRE COMPÓSITOS E CIMENTO RESINOSO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on bond strength (BS) between composite and a resin cement trough microshear bond strength test. Seventy five discs (10x2 mm) of Filtek P90, Filtek Z250 and Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE), were divided into 5 groups according to the treatment: C= control - no treatment; sandblasting J= aluminum oxide (50µm); sandblasting JE = + 99.3% ethanol for 5 min; silica coating S = (3M-ESPE Cojet - 30 microns); SS = silica coating + silane. PVC tubes (0.5 x 0.80 mm) were attached on the composite disc, and then, inserted resin cement (3M ESPE-RelyX ARC). After 24 hours artificial saliva storage at 37oC, the specimens were tested for microshear crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Data were evaluated in two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%) for contrast. The results showed that sandblasting with aluminum oxide (J) was efficient in increasing the BS for composites Z350 and P90. For the Z250, there were no difference between treatments. Also, CS showed results similar to controls for all composites. SE showed the worst results for Z350 e P90. BS values were dependent on the type of composite and the surface treatment used. Sandblasting with aluminum oxide seems to be an effective surface treatment for composites and may lead to higher BS values, while the use of ethanol could be harmful.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência de tratamentos de superfície na resistência de união (RU) entre compósitos e um cimento resinoso. Setenta e cinco discos (10x2 mm) das resinas Filtek P90, Filtek Z250 e Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) foram divididos em 5 grupos de acordo com o tratamento: N= sem tratamento; S= jateamento com óxido de alumínio (50µm); SE= jateamento de óxido de alumínio + 99,3% de etanol por 5 min; C= jateamento de sílica com Cojet - 30 microns (3M ESPE); CS= jateamento de sílica + silano. Tubos de PVC (0,5 x 0,80 mm) foram fixados nos discos e o cimento resinoso (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE) foi inserido. Após 24 horas de armazenamento em saliva artificial a 37oC, os espécimes foram submetidos ao teste de microcisalhamento com velocidade de 1,0 mm/min. Os dados foram avaliados em ANOVA de dois fatores e no teste de Tukey (5%) para contraste. Os resultados mostraram que o tratamento com oxido de alumínio (J) foi eficiente no aumento da RU nos compósitos Filtek Z350 e P90. Não houve diferença entre tratamentos para a Z250. Grupo CS mostrou resultados semelhantes aos do controle para todos os compósitos. Já o SE mostrou os piores resultados de RU. Concluiu-se que os valores de RU foram dependentes do tipo de compósito e do tratamento de superfície utilizado. O jateamento com óxido de alumínio parece ser um tratamento de superfície eficaz e pode elevar os valores de RU, já o uso de etanol pode ser prejudicial

Evaluation of Finishing/Polishing Techniques on Low-Shrink Posterior Restorative After Mechanical Cycling / Avaliação de Técnicas de Acabamento/Polimento em Restaurações Posteriores de Baixa Contração Após Ciclagem Mecânica

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of a silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins subjected to different finishing/polishing techniques. Twelve disk specimens were prepared from each composite resin: P90®, Z350® and Charisma, divided into 12 groups according to the finishing/polishing technique: no finishing/polishing (control); finishing with 1112 FF diamond burs; finishing with 1112 FF diamond burs associated to Enhance/Pogo; finishing with 1112 FF diamond burs associated to Enhance/Pogo/Polishing/Poli I and II pastes/Fotogloss. After initial readouts of surface roughness, the specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling (1.200.000 cycles) and immediately subjected to final roughness readouts. Surface roughness means was statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test (α=0.05). SEM images were realized after finishing/polishing and after mechanical cycling. The P90 composite showed surface roughness values similar to other investigated composites. However, significant difference was observed in finishing/polishing techniques. The diamond burs group showed the highest surface roughness differing from the other composite resins (α < 0.05). Enance/Pogo showed the lowest results, which presented no difference compared to the polishing paste group (α > 0.05). The low-shrink posterior restorative showed similar surface roughness when compared to dimethacrylate composite resins and suitable to posterior restorations. (AU).

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a rugosidade superficial de resinas compostas à base silorano e metacrilato submetidas a diferentes técnicas de acabamento/polimento. Foram preparadas 12 amostras de disco de cada resina composta: P90®, Z350® e Carisma, divididas em 12 grupos de acordo com a técnica de acabamento / polimento: sem acabamento / polimento (controle); acabamento com ponta diamantada 1112 FF; acabamento com ponta diamantada 1112 FF associada a Enhance / Pogo; acabamento com ponta diamantada 1112 FF associada a Enhance / Pogo / Polishing / Pastas Poli I e II / Fotogloss. Após as leituras iniciais da rugosidade da superfície, os espécimes foram submetidos a ciclos mecânicos (1.200.000 ciclos) e submetidos imediatamente a leituras de rugosidade final. As medias de rugosidade superfícial foram analisadas estatisticamente por ANOVA e teste de Tukey-Kramer (α = 0,05). As imagens de MEV foram realizadas após o acabamento / polimento e após a ciclagem mecânica. O compósito P90 mostrou valores de rugosidade superficial semelhantes a outros compósitos investigados. Tough, mostrou diferença significativa nas técnicas de acabamento / polimento. O grupo de pontas damantadas apresentou maior rugosidade superficial que diferiu das outras resinas compostas (α <0,05). Enance / Pogo mostrou os menores resultados, que não apresentaram diferença em relação ao grupo de pasta de polimento (α> 0,05). O material restaurador posterior de baixa contração apresentou rugosidade superficial semelhante quando comparado as resinas compostas de dimetacrilato e são restaurações adequadas para região posterior. (AU).

Effect of different clinical applications on physico-mechanical properties of composite resins / Efeito de diferentes aplicações clínicas nas propriedades físico-mecânicas de resinas compostas

Although clinicians use fluoride agents to reduce the occurrence of caries, and surface sealing agents to protect composite restorations, the effects of these agents on composite resins have not yet been investigated. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of different surface applications (fluoride or surface sealant) on resin composites with different organic structures (Siloranes, Sonicfill, 3M Z550, Kalore). In this study, 120 discs and 120 bars made of composite resin were stored in water for three months before being thermally aged by cycling between 5°C and 55°C for 10,000 cycles. The discs were 15 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick; the bars were 25 × 2 × 2 mm. The surface sealant and fluoride were applied to the specimens, and evaluations were performed after 24h. Initial and final calculations were performed for flexural strength, microhardness, roughness, gloss, water sorption, and solubility. Silorane composite showed the lowest water sorption levels (p < 0.05) for both initial and aged groups. Silorane and SonicFill composite groups showed the lowest solubility (p < 0.05). Both before and after aging, the SonicFill group showed the highest values of flexural strength and microhardness. Silorane showed the highest roughness and lowest gloss values. Lower water sorption and solubility rates were seen on materials fabricated from hydrophobic monomers. High water sorption and solubility degrades the mechanical and surface properties. Fluoridation and surface sealant application can alter the surface properties but do not have any effect on the mechanical properties.

Embora os clínicos utilizem agentes de flúor para reduzir a ocorrência de cáries e agentes de vedação de superfície para proteger restaurações compostas, os efeitos desses agentes sobre as resinas compostas ainda não foram investigados. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar o efeito de diferentes aplicações de superfície (fluoreto ou selante de superfície) em resinas compostas com diferentes estruturas orgânicas (Siloranes, Sonicfill, 3M Z550, Kalore). Neste estudo, 120 discos e 120 barras de resina composta foram armazenados em água por três meses antes de serem envelhecidos termicamente por ciclos alternados entre 5 °C e 55 °C por 10.000 ciclos. Os discos tinham 15 mm de diâmetro e 1 mm de espessura; as barras eram 25 × 2 × 2 mm. O selante de superfície e o flúor foram aplicados nos espécimes e as avaliações foram realizadas após 24 horas. Cálculos iniciais e finais foram realizados para resistência à flexão, microdureza, rugosidade, brilho, sorção de água e solubilidade. O compósito de silorano apresentou os menores níveis de sorção de água (p <0,05) para os grupos inicial e envelhecido. Os grupos compostos Silorane e SonicFill apresentaram a menor solubilidade (p <0,05). Tanto antes quanto depois do envelhecimento, o grupo SonicFill apresentou os maiores valores de resistência à flexão e microdureza. Silorane apresentou a maior rugosidade e menores valores de brilho. Baixas taxas de sorção e solubilidade da água foram observadas em materiais fabricados a partir de monômeros hidrofóbicos. A alta sorção e solubilidade da água degrada as propriedades mecânicas e de superfície. A fluoretação e a aplicação de selante de superfície podem alterar as propriedades da superfície, mas não afetam as propriedades mecânicas.

Influence of enamel acid-etching on mechanical properties and nanoleakage of resin composite after aging

The aim of this study was to evaluate how acid-etching of the cavosurface enamel in Class I resin composite restorations influences the bond strength to the pulpal wall and the restoration, Knoop microhardness and nanoleakage after thermomechanical aging. For this research 76 fresh human molars were selected and restored with Silorane or Clearfil SEBond/Z350XT composite divided in 4 groups (Silorane system restored with or without enamel cavosurface acid-etching and Clearfil SEBond/Z350XT with or without enamel cavosurface acid-etching). To induce artificial aging, samples were subjected to thermomechanical cycling through 200,000 and thermal cycling between 5 and 55 °C with 30 second filling and 15-second drainage steps. Microhardness and microtensile bond strength were evaluated in 32 teeth (n=8) each and nanoleakage evaluation was performed in 12 teeth (n=3). Samples restored by Clearfil SEBond/Z350 XT without cavosurface acid-etching showed significantly lower microtensile bond strength results. The resin composite Z350XT presented higher values of Knoop microhardness. It was observed little or no infiltration for Silorane groups and moderate infiltration for Clearfil SE Bond groups. Acid-etching of the cavosurface enamel during restoration procedure with Clearfil Se Bond resulted in a stronger bond after thermomechanical cycling. Silorane groups showed less infiltration than Clearfil SE Bond groups (AU)

Effect of water storage on flexural strength of silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effect of water storage on the flexural strength (FS) of low shrinkage composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 165 bar-shaped specimens (2 × 2 × 25 mm) were fabricated of 2 low shrinkage composites (Filtek P90 [3M ESPE], GC Kalore [GC International]) and a conventional methacrylate-based composite (Filtek Z250 [3M ESPE]). The specimens were subjected to 3-point bending test at 6 time intervals, namely: immediately after curing, at 24 hours, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year following storage in wet and dry conditions. The FS of the specimens were measured by applying compressive load at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Data was analyzed using 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test. RESULTS: Three-way ANOVA revealed significant interactions between time, type of composite, and storage condition (p = 0.001). Tukey's multiple comparison test revealed significant reductions in FS of all composites after 6 months and 1 year of storage in distilled water compared to dry condition. CONCLUSIONS: Filtek P90 showed the highest and GC Kalore showed the lowest FS after 1 year storage in distilled water. The immediate high strength of Filtek Z250 significantly decreased at 1 year and its final value was lower than that of Filtek P90.

Effect of filling technique on the bond strength of methacrylate and silorane-based composite restorations

Abstract The bond strength of methacrylate (Z350, 3M ESPE) and silorane (P90, 3M ESPE) restorations, using different cavity filling techniques, was investigated. Cavities (6 × 3 × 3) in bovine teeth were filled using bulk, oblique, or horizontal increments. A push-out test was carried out after 24 h. Data were statistically analyzed (α = 5%). Methacrylate-based composites and the horizontal filling technique showed the highest bond strength values (10.2 ± 3.9, p < 0.05). Silorane-based composites showed no statistically significant differences regarding the filling techniques (p > 0.05).

Impact of light-curing time and aging on dentin bond strength of methacrylate- and silorane-based restorative systems

AIM: To evaluate the impact of different light-curing times on dentin microtensile bond strength of two restorative systems after 24 h and 6 months of water storage. METHODS: Standardized Class II preparations were performed in 56 freshly-extracted human molars (n = 7), restored with methacrylate- or silorane-based restorative systems, and light-cured using a light-emitting diode at 1390 mW/cm2 by the recommended manufacturers' time or double this time. After storage for 24 h at 37 oC, the teeth were sectioned to yield a series of 0.8-mm thick slices. Each slab was trimmed into an hourglass shape of approximately 0.64 mm2 area at the gingival dentin-resin interface. Specimens were tested using universal testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure, after 24 h and 6 months of storage. Data were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The highest bond strength values were recorded for the groups restored with methacrylate system (p<0.001) as well as for extended light-curing time (p = 0.0034). There was no statistically significant difference between 24 h and 6 months storage on bond strength (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Bond strength was influenced by the material and light-curing time, but the 6-month storage did not affect the bond strength of restorations...

Repair on silorane-based composite

Introduction: Silorane-based composites have low polymerization shrinkage and good color stability. However, the effectiveness and the best surface treatment to carry out repairs to this type of restoration is unclear. Objective: To evaluate the effect of different types of repair made on a silorane-based composite. Material and methods: 80 disks of silorane-based composite were prepared (Filtek P90, 3M ESPE) and divided into eight groups (n = 10), according to the surface treatment being carried out before repairs of either the same silorane composite or a dimethacrylate material (Filtek Z350, 3M ESPE) were conducted. In two groups the immediate adhesion without repair (positive control) was evaluated. In other two groups repairs without any surface treatment (negative control) were evaluated. Surface treatments before the repair of the four remaining groups included the application of adhesive systems specific to silorane (Silorane System Adhesive, 3M ESPE) or to dimethacrylate (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE) and roughening followed by application of adhesive system. All groups were stored into distilled water at 37°C for 1 week prior to the microshear bond strength evaluation. Results: The group immediate adhesion silorane-dimethacrylate and group repair silorane-dimethacrylate without surface treatment showed lower microshear bond strength values and were statistically different from groups with surface treatment and immediate adhesion silorane-silorane (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Surface treatments with application of adhesive systems compatible with the repair material or roughening prior to the application of these adhesive systems are suitable for repairing silorane-based composites.

Durability of silorane repair with silorane and methacrylate resin / Durabilidade do reparo de resina composta à base de silorano realizado com a mesma ou com resina à base de metacrilato

Objective: The durability of bonded interface between silorane (SIL) and methacrylate-based (MET) composite resins wasn’t investigated yet. The purpose was to evaluate the repair strength (RS) and nanoleakage of the SIL repair using silorane- or methacrylate-based materials immediately [IM] or after 6 months of water storage [6M]. Material & Methods: fifteen resin blocks (Filtek P90, 3MESPE) were polished, sandblasted with 50-μm aluminum oxide sandblasting and cleaned with 37% phosphoric acid. Then the specimens were divided into three groups: SIL-SIL (adhesive and composite resin); SIL-MET (silorane adhesive and methacrylate based composite) and MET-MET (methacrylate-based adhesive and composite resin) were used for the repair. Composite-composite bonded sticks (0.9 mm2) were sectioned and divided to be tested in tension (1.0 mm/min) IM or 6M. Two sticks from each tooth, at each time, were immersed in a 50% silver nitrate solution and evaluated by SEM. Data were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey´s tests. Results: The RS of the SIL was not dependent upon the adhesive and composite used for the repair. A significant reduction of the RS was observed for all groups after 6M. Conclusion: Both materials can be used for the repair of the silorane composite, despite degradation occur after 6M.

Objetivo: A durabilidade da interface de união entre resinas à base de silorano (SIL) e à base de metacrilato (MET) ainda não foi estudada. O objetivo foi avaliar a resistência de união ao reparo de (RS) e nanoinfiltração da resina SIL com ela mesma ou com MET imediatamente (IM) ou após 6 meses de armazenamento em água (6M). Material e Métodos: quinze blocos de resina composta (Filtek P90, 3MESPE) foram confeccionados, polidos, asperizados com jato de óxido de alumínio 50-μm e limpos com ácido fosfórico 37%. Em seguida, foram divididos em três grupos: SIL-SIL (adesivo e resina à base de silano); SIL-MET (adesivo à base de silano e resina à base de metacrilato) and MET-MET (adesivo e resina à base de metacrilato) para o reparo. Foram seccionados palitos de aproximadamente 0,9 mm2, divididos entre IM e 6M e levados para máquina de microtração (1,0 mm/min). Dois palitos de cada bloco, de cada tempo, foram imersos em nitrato de prata 50% e avaliados em MEV. Os dados foram avaliados por ANOVA de dois fatores e teste de Tukey. Resultados: A RS da resina SIL não foi dependente da resina ou do adesivo utilizado para o reparo. Uma redução significativa da RS foi observada para todos os grupos após 6M. Conclusão: ambos os materiais podem ser usados para reparo de resinas SIL, apesar de a degradação ocorrer após 6M.

Silorane-based composite as repair material: a six-month randomizedclinical trial / Resina composta à base de silorano como material de reparo: estudo clínico randomizado de seis meses

Objective: This study investigated the clinical performance of a silorane-based composite resin when used for repairing conventional composite restorations. Methods: Defective dimethacrylate-based composite resin restorations were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: Control group - Adper SE Plus + Filtek P60 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, EUA) and Test Group - P90 Adhesive System + Filtek P90 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, EUA). All repaired restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at six-month recall. The parameters examined were marginal adaptation, anatomic form, surface roughness, marginal discoloration, post-operative sensitivity and secondary caries. The restorations were classified according to modified USPHS criteria. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the groups. Results: Of the 100 restorations repaired in this study, 93 were reexamined at baseline and 91 at 6-month recall. Drop-out was about 9%. No statistically significant differences were found between the materials for all clinical criteria, at baseline and at 6-month recall (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were registered (p > 0.05) for each material when compared for all clinical criteria, at baseline and at 6-month recall. The hypothesis tested in this randomized controlled clinical trial was accepted. Conclusion: After the six-month evaluations, silorane-based composite exhibit a similar performance compared to dimethacrylate-based composite when used as repair material.

Objetivo: Investigar o desempenho clínico de uma resina de baixa contração à base de silorano quando utilizada para reparar restaurações convencionais de resina composta. Métodos: Restaurações defeituosas de resina composta à base de dimetacrilato foram aleatoriamente reparadas por um de dois grupos de tratamento: Grupo Controle - Adper SE Plus + Filtek P60 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, EUA) e Grupo Teste - Sistema adesivo P90 + Filtek P90 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, EUA). Todas as restaurações reparadas foram avaliadas em baseline e ao longo de 6 meses. Os parâmetros analisados foram a adaptação marginal, forma anatômica, rugosidade superficial, descoloração marginal, sensibilidade pós-operatória e lesões de cárie. As restaurações foram classificadas de acordo com os critérios do Serviço de Saúde Público dos Estados Unidos modificados. Os testes de Mann-Whitney e Wilcoxon foram utilizados para comparar os grupos. Resultados: Das 100 restaurações reparadas neste estudo, 93 foram examinadas uma semana após terem sido reparadas - baseline e 91 após 6 meses. A perda foi de aproximadamente 9%. Nenhuma diferença estatisticamente significativa foi encontrada entre os materiais para todos os critérios clínicos, em baseline e ao longo de 6 meses (p> 0,05). Conclusão: A hipótese testada neste ensaio clínico controlado randomizado foi aceita. Após 6 meses de avaliações, resinas compostas à base de silorano apresentaram desempenho clínico semelhante às resinas compostas à base de dimetacrilato quando utilizadas para reparar restaurações de resina composta à base de dimetacrilato.

Restauração em dente posterior com resina de baixa contração: relato de caso clínico / Restoration in posterior tooth with a low-shrinkage composite resin: clinical case report

A contração de polimerização ainda é um grande inconveniente dos materiais restauradores adesivos diretos. Com o objetivo de minimizar esse problema, foram introduzidas no mercado resinas de baixa contração. Uma delas é a resina à base de silorano, que combina as vantagens do silorano, o qual lhe confere hidrofobicidade, e o oxirano, que resulta em baixa contração volumétrica. Assim, por suas boas propriedades mecânicas e baixa contração volumétrica, ela é indicada para restaurações em dentes posteriores. O objetivo do presente artigo é apresentar o caso clínico de uma restauração de classe I realizada com resina de baixa contração à base de silorano.

Polymerization shrinkage is a major drawback of direct restorative materials. In order to minimize this problem, low-shrinkage composite resins were introduced. Silorane-based composites combine the advantages of the silorane, which conveys hydrophobicity, and oxirane which results in low volumetric shrinkage. They are indicated for restorations in posterior teeth due to their suitable mechanical properties and low shrinkage. The aim of this paper is to present a clinical case of a Class I restoration performed with low shrinkage silorane-based composite resin.

Avaliação em curto e médio prazo da sorção e da solubilidade de resinas compostas à base de metacrilato e de silorano em saliva artificial / Evaluation of short- and medium-term sorption and solubility of methacrylate or silorane-based composite resins in artificial saliva

Introdução: A absorção/adsorção de moléculas de água por monômeros hidrofílicos dentro de materiais resinosos expostos à umidade da boca pode resultar em degradação. Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou sorção e solubilidade de resinas compostas à base de metacrilato e silorano em contato com saliva artificial, nos períodos de um dia (curto prazo), e 30 e 90 dias (médio prazo). Material e Método: Sessenta corpos de prova foram confeccionados com as resinas Filtek® Z250 e Filtek® P90 Silorano (3M/ESPE), e depois imersos em saliva artificial a 37 ± 1 ºC durante um, 30 e 90 dias. Os dados foram analisados usando-se ANOVA um fator/dois fatores seguido dos testes Tukey ou Tamhane (α = 0,05). Resultado: As médias de sorção das duas resinas aumentaram com o tempo (p = 0,001). A sorção de Z250 (1 e 90 d) foi significativamente maior do que de P90 (p = 0,008), com valores semelhantes após 30 dias. A solubilidade das resinas também aumentou com o tempo, com diferença significativa entre todos os períodos (p = 0,001), exceto para a resina P90 (entre 1 e 30 d). Não houve diferença estatística significante entre os grupos Z250 (1 d) e P90 (1 dia), Z250 (1 d) e P90 (30 d), e Z250 (30 d) e P90 (90 d). Para os demais pares, comprovaram-se diferenças significativas (p < 0,001). Conclusão: As propriedades de sorção e solubilidade das resinas compostas testadas foram influenciadas pelo tempo de exposição à saliva artificial. O silorano teve desempenho ora melhor ora semelhante à resina de metacrilato.

Introduction: The absorption/adsorption of water molecules by hydrophilic monomers within the resinous material exposed to the humid environment of the mouth may result in degradation. Objective: This study evaluated the sorption and solubility of methacrylate-based resin and silorane in contact with artificial saliva after 1 day (short-term), 30 days and 90 days (medium-term). Material and Method: Sixty samples were prepared with Filtek® Z250 and Filtek® P90 Silorano (3M/ESPE) and then immersed in artificial saliva at 37 ± 1 ºC for 1, 30 and 90 days. Data were analyzed using one-way/two-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey or Tamhane tests (α = 0,05). Result: The sorption and solubility of two resins increased with the evaluation time (p = 0.001). Sorption of Z250 (at 1 and 90 days) was significantly higher than that of P90 ( p = 0.008), and similar values were registered at 30 days. Resin solubility also increased with time and there were significant differences for all time periods (p = 0.001), except for P90 at 1 and 30 days. There were no significant differences between Z250 (1 day) and P90 (1 day), Z250 (1 day) and P90 (30 day), and Z250 (30 days) and P90 (90 days). Significant differences were shown for other pairings (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The solubility and sorption properties of the composites tested were influenced by time of exposure to artificial saliva. Silorane performed better than or similar results to methacrylate-based resin.