A comparative study of single layer extra mucosal versus conventional double layer anastomosis of intestines in elective and emergency laparotomy

Background: Gastrointestinal anastomosis has been a part of research since decades and is one of the key skills in surgeon’s armamentarium. This study compared the outcome of single layer anastomosis with double layer anastomosis.Methods: The study was designed as a prospective comparative study and 29 cases were included in the study during December 2016 to September 2017, who consented for being part of the study. Patients were alternatively allotted into the either group. Group A underwent single layer anastomosis and Group B underwent double layer anastomosis. Outcome parameters were analysed in the form of ‘duration required to perform anastomoses, ‘duration of hospital stay’ and ‘dnastomotic leak.Results: Mean duration required to perform anastomosis in Group A is 21.64±1.60 minutes and in Group B is 29.6±2.02 minutes. The difference between the mean duration required for anastomosis between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.005). Mean duration of hospital stay in Group A was 12.35±1.72 days and Group B was 12±2.44 days (difference was statistically insignificant), 3 (10%) cases in Group A and 2 (6.8 %) cases in Group B developed anastomotic leak and the difference was statistically insignificant.Conclusions: Our study concluded that there is statistically significant difference between the single layer anastomosis and double layer anastomosis in terms of time taken to perform anastomosis, however there is no difference in postoperative anastomotic leak and duration of hospital stay.

A Prospective Study on Single Layer versus Double Layer Anastomosis in Emergency Colonic Surgery in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Colonic anastomosis is mostly due to to primary colonic diseases like volvulus, carcinoma, strangulation, injuries and stricture .As a result intestinal ischaemia and gangrene develops and finally the affected bowel is resected and end to end anastomosis is done .The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of colonic anastomosis by single layer or double layer. Methods: 134 cases were selected for this study.69 patients were taken up for single layer and 65 for double layer anastomosis. Single layer anastomosis has a better outcome in terms of healing, less time consuming and minimal complications. Results: Single layer takes less time, post. Operative complications are minimal, duration of hospital stay is less and mortality and morbidity is reduced. Conclusion: Single layer anastomosis should be a preferred technique and a procedure of choice for colonic anastomosis.

A prospective comparative study of intestinal anastomosis, single layer extramucosal versus double layer.

Background: Intestinal anastomosis is an operative procedure that is of central importance in the practice of surgery. Intestinal anastomosis after resection of bowel may be of various types and techniques. This prospective comparative study is performed to evaluate the safety in term of anastomotic leak of single layer interrupted extramucosal technique as compared to conventional double layer technique. Methods: The patients selected for this study are those who were admitted with various clinical conditions requiring resection and anastomosis of small or large bowel presented to P.D.U. Medical College & Hospital, Rajkot between a period of August 2012 to December 2014. A total of 50 patients were included in the study. All the patients above the age of 18 years and less than 60 years, requiring intestinal anastomosis on emergency or electively, were included in the study and those requiring anastomosis to esophageal, gastric and duodenal anastomosis were excluded and randomly allotted single layer and double layer groups and results such as anastomotic leak rate, duration for anastomosis, number of suture material required noted. Results: Mean duration required for single layer anastomosis was 19.6 minutes and for double layer anastomosis was 29.5 minutes and double number of suture material used in double layer anastomosis with equal anastomotic leak rate (6%) in each group. Conclusions: Single layer interrupted extramucosal technique required significantly less duration for anastomosis, is cost effective with no significant difference in anastomotic leak rate and as safe as conventional double layer technique.

Anastomosis colónicas en una sola capa continua con poligliconato (maxon) vs. anastomosis en dos capas con catgut crómico y seda: Estudio experimental / Single layer colonic anastomoses using maxon vs. two layer anastomoses using chromic catgut and silk: structured abstract

Background. The safety of an intestinal anastomosis is usually measured by its complication rate, especially the incidence of anastomotic leakage. A wide variety of methods have been described to reestablish intestinal continuity including single-layer continuous or two-layer interrupted anastomosis. Objectives. To evaluate if the single-layer continuous anastomosis using polygluconate is safer and reliable than two-layer interrupted anastomosis with chromic catgut and silk. Material and methods. A prospective, experimental, randomized and comparative analysis was conducted in 20 dogs. They were divided in two groups; group 1 underwent two-layer interrupted anastomosis and group 2 underwent sigle-layer continuous technique. Anastomoses were timed. Both groups were under observation. Anastomotic leakage, and other complications were evaluated. The animals were sacrified and the anastomosis was taken out together with 10 cm of colon on both sides of the anastomosis. Breaking strength, histologic evaluation and hydroxyproline determination were performed. Results. Ten two-layer anastomosis and ten single-layer anastomosis were performed. A median of 25 minutes (range: 20-30 minutes) was required to construct the anastomoses in group 1 versus 20 minutes (range: 12-25 minutes) in group 2. All animals survived and no leakage was observed. Wound infection ocurred in four dogs (20%). Median breaking strength was 230 mm Hg in group 1 and 210 mm Hg in group 2. Hydroxyproline concentration was 8.94 mg/g in group 1 (range: 5.33-16.71) and 9.94 mg/g in group 2 (range: 2.96-21.87). There was no difference among groups about the inflammatory response evaluated by pathology. There was no statistical significance in any variable evaluated. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that a single-layer continuous is similar in terms of safety to the two-layer technique, but because of its facility to perform, the single-layer technique could be superior.

Antecedentes. Una de las preocupaciones más importantes en cirugía colorrectal es la presencia de dehiscencia o fístula de la anastomosis. Múltiples técnicas han sido descritas para realizar anastomosis, entre las que se incluyen las anastomosis en una sola capa o en dos capas. Objetivos. Evaluar si la anastomosis colonica en una capa con poligliconato es más segura y efectiva que la anastomosis colonica en dos capas con catgut crómico y seda. Material y métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo, experimental, aleatorio y comparativo en 20 perros. Se dividieron a los animales en dos grupos; grupo 1: anastomosis en dos capas y grupo 2: anastomosis en una sola capa. Se evaluó el tiempo de duración de la anastomosis. Todos los animales se mantuvieron en observación evaluando datos de complicaciones como fístulas colocutáneas o dehiscencia de la anastomosis. En el día diez del postoperatorio se sacrificaron. Se resecó el segmento de la anastomosis abarcando 10 cm proximales y 10 cm distales. Se midió la presión de ruptura, se realizó análisis histopatológico y se determinó la cantidad de hidroxiprolina de la línea de la anastomosis. Resultados. Se incluyeron diez perros en el grupo 1 y diez perros en el grupo 2. La mediana del tiempo de duración de la anastomosis en el grupo 1 fue de 25 minutos (rango: 20-30 minutos) y en el grupo 2 de 20 minutos (rango: 12-25 minutos) (p = NS). No se presentaron datos de fístula, dehiscencia o estenosis de la anastomosis. Cuatro perros presentaron infección en la herida. La presión de ruptura del grupo 1 fue de 230 mm Hg (115-360) y del grupo 2 fue de 210 mm Hg (100-300). La concentración de hidroxiprolina en el grupo 1 fue de 8.94 mg/gramo (rango: 5.33-16.71), y en el grupo 2 fue de 9.94 mg/gramo (rango: 2.96-21.87). No se encontró diferencia significativa en las variables analizadas. Se comparó el grado de reacción inflamatoria en ambos grupos, no hubo diferencia estadística. Conclusiones. Los dos procedimientos son seguros y confiables de realizar, aunque por su mayor facilidad, estos datos apoyan la utilización del método de una sola capa.

Gastroduodenostomy after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Comparative study of the single-layer and two-layer sutured anastomosis

PURPOSE: The technique of anastomosis for gastroduodenostomy is thought to be of importance to success in the postoperative period and to the development of certain complications. Most surgeons a use two-layer anastomosis method. However, interest in single-layer anastomosis has increased. Therefore, we investigated the differences between single-layer and two-layer methods for anastomosis by comparing clinicopathological parameters and clinical courses. METHODS: This report is a retrospective clinical analysis of 265 patients of gastric cancer who underwent gastroduodenostomy following distal gastrectomy at the Department of Surgery, Chonbuk National University Hospital from Jan. 1991 to Dec. 1999. RESULTS: There was no significant difference observed between the two groups with regard to the mode of presentation, mean age, sex, or pathological characteristics of the tumor. The time for the anastomosis was shorter in the single-layer group (30.1+/-1.0 vs 37.1+/-2.1 minutes, p<0.001), the time of gas out was earlier in the single-layer group (4.4+/-1.1 vs 4.7+/-1.2 days, p=0.027) and the time of food intake was earlier in the single-layer group (5.7+/-0.8 vs 6.3+/-1.4 days, p<0.001) than in the two-layer group. Although the complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups, anastomotic leak was observed in 4 cases (2.7%) of the single-layer group and 3 cases (2.6%) of the two-layer group, and passage disorders were observed in 4 cases (2.7%) of the single-layer group and 5 cases (4.3%) of the two-layer group. CONCLUSION: A gastrodudenostomy using the single-layer anastomosis method has an advantage over the two-layer method for anastomosis with respect to the time for anastomosis, the time of gas out and time of food intake. Therefore the single-layer anastomosis method can be effectively employed in gastric cancer surgery.