Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-level lumbar disc herniation / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND:Navigation assisted minimal y invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation can precisely real-time guide a variety of operation under minimal y invasive sleeve, and implant the pedicle screws and interbody fusion cage and other implants safely and accurately, thus can determine the decompression parts. Minimal y invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is the typical approach in recent years for the successful application of minimal y invasive spine surgery techniques with the advantages of smal incision, less bleeding, slight tissue damage and faster recovery. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the short-term effect of minimal y invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with real-time three-dimensional navigation system and open posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS:Forty cases with single-level lumbar disc herniation were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were treated with minimal y invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with real-time three-dimensional navigation system (20 cases) and open posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (20 cases) respectively for the comparative analysis. The fusion duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, the length of postoperative hospital stay and the length of hospital stay were compared between two groups. The wound pain and function were evaluated after treatment with visual analogue scale score and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Al patients were fol owed-up for 7.7 months. The operative duration in the minimal y invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group was longer than that in the open posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group, and the difference was significant (P0.05).The results indicate that minimal y invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with real-time three-dimensional navigation system is an effective method for lumbar disc herniation with the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative drainage volume, smal trauma, short hospital stay and short-term efficacy.

The Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Single Level Fusion

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study that was done according to clinical and radiological evaluation. PURPOSE: We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is effective surgical method for treating degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: The study was conducted on 56 patients who were available for longer than 2 years (range, 24 to 45 months) follow-up after undergoing minimally invasive transforminal lumbar interbody single level fusion. Clinical evaluation was performed by the analysis of the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Kirkaldy-Willis score. For the radiological evaluation, the disc space height, the segmental lumbar lordotic angle and the whole lumbar lordotic angle were analyzed. At the final follow-up after operation, the fusion rate was analyzed according to Bridwell's anterior fusion grade. RESULTS: For the evaluation of clinical outcomes, the VAS score was reduced from an average of 6.7 prior to surgery to an average of 1.8 at the final follow-up. The ODI was decreased from an average of 36.5 prior to surgery to an average of 12.8 at the final follow-up. In regard to the clinical outcomes evaluated by the Kirkaldy-Willis score, better than good results were obtained in 52 cases (92.9%). For the radiological evaluation, the disc space height (p = 0.002), and the whole lumbar lordotic angle (p = 0.001) were increased at the final follow-up. At the final follow-up, regarding the interbody fusion, radiological union was obtained in 54 cases (95.4%). CONCLUSIONS: We think that if surgeons become familiar with the surgical techniques, this is a useful method for minimally invasive spinal surgery.

Results of One level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Degenerative Cervical Spinal Disorder: Comparison of 3 Arthrodesis Techniques / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with autogenous bone graft, ACDF with plating, and ACDF with carbon cage and plating for the surgical treatment of single-level degenerative cervical spine disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 60 cases who received single level ACDF for the treatment of degenerative cervical disorder with at least one year follow-up. Group A consisted of 21 patients treated by ACDF and autogenous bone graft. Group B consisted of 20 patients treated by ACDF and plate fixation, and group C consisted of 19 patients treated by Carbon cage and plate fixation. We compared 3 groups in terms of fusion status, change in Cobb angle and disc height, and clinical results using Odom method. RESULTS: The change of Cobb angle was -3.8 degreesin group A, -0.62 degreesin group B and 0.6 degreesin group C (p=0.042). The decreased disc height was 2.8 mm in group A, 1.4 mm in group B and 0.4 mm in group C respectively (p=0.001). In group A, the clinical results were excellent in 3 cases, good in 16 cases and fair in 2 cases. In group B, 4 cases were excellent, 13 good and 3 fair. And in group C, 5 cases were excellent and 14 good. CONCLUSION: ACDF with carbon cage and plate fixation proved an excellent surgical alternative that provided initial stability, maintained disc height and lordotic angle, and was accompanied by low donor site morbidity and reduced operation time for the treatment of single level degenerative cervical spinal disorder.

Single level of posterior closing-wedge and anterior extension lumbar osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis.

From 1993 to 1997 we treated 11 consecutive patients who had progressive spinal kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis by a posterior closing-wedge and anterior extension lumbar osteotomy and interspinous process wiring. The average correction was 44o (37-57) with a mean loss of correction after operation of 11.2o (6-20). The average operating time was 130 minutes (80 to 180) and blood loss was 486 ml (400-700). The osteotomy corrected all patients sufficiently to allow them to see ahead and improve their posture. There were no complication of implant failure as well as nerve root injury.