ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjustable single-incision sling(AjustTM) and tension-free vaginal tape(TVT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence(SUI).Methods A total of 88 cases with SUI in our department from January 2011 to December 2015 was retrospectively analyzed,including 62 TVT cases and 26 AjustTM cases.The definite diagnose and grading were based on the medical history,physical examination,cystoscopy,uroflowmetry,provocative test and ICI-Q-SF.All cases were followed up on 6 months after surgery and their uroflowmetry,provocative test and ICI-Q-SF were investigated.Results The average operation time of AjustTM group,(10.0 ± 4.2) min,was shorter than that of TVT group,(50.0± 12.6) min (P＜0.01),and the incidence of operative complications in AjustTM group(3.8％) was less than that in TVT group(6.7％),with significant difference(P＜0.05);The application of these two methods in recent cases showed no significantly statistical difference in objective cure rate,subjective satisfaction,intraoperative blood loss,new-onset OAB,dysuria,perineum discomfort and dyspareunia(P＞0.05).Conclusion AjustTM applied in the treatment of SUI has more advantages than TVT over simplicity,efficiency and safety.
ABSTRACT
Objetivos: Determinar la tasa de curación objetiva/subjetiva y complicaciones del tratamiento de incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo con banda suburetral transobutadora y single-incision sling. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes operadas de incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo (hipermovilidad uretral) con banda suburetral transobturadora (n: 37) y single-incision sling (n: 44) entre enero-2012 y enero-2015. Si se asociaba corrección de prolapso de órganos pélvicos, se colocaba banda transobturadora (TVT-O/ TOT) con internación. Si no precisaba corregir prolapso, se insertaba single-incision sling ambulatoriamente. Las evaluaciones fueron al mes, 6 meses y 1 año. El contacto a 2 años fue telefónico. De 37 bandas transobturadoras completaron seguimiento 35 a 1 año y 26 a 2 años. De 44 single-incision sling, completaron seguimiento 42 a 1 año y 19 a 2 años. Resultados: La edad media para transobturadoras fue superior: 65±9,7 vs 58,2±11,3 (p=0,005). Transobturadoras demostraron más prolapso asociado: 87,8% vs 63,3% (p=0,042) y mayor tiempo quirúrgico (minutos): 81,07±31,27 vs 36,79±11,09 (p=0,000). Hubo mayor morbilidad en transobturadoras, sin diferencias significativas. La continencia al año fue: 80% transobturadoras vs 83% single-incision sling (p=0,706) y a 2 años: 84% vs 79% (p=0,623). Se encontraban satisfechas al año: 80% transobutradoras vs 85,7% single-incision sling (p=0,586) y a 2 años: 88,5% vs 78,9% (p=0,512). Conclusiones: Single-incision sling presentan tasas de éxito y satisfacción similares a bandas transobturadoras, con menor morbilidad, coste y tiempo operatorio, pudiendo ser de primera elección cuando no exista prolapso sintomático asociado.
Objectives: To determine objective and subjective cure rate and complications of stress urinary incontinence treatment with transobturator tape and single-incision sling. Methods: We performed a retrospective study including patients diagnosed of stress urinary incontinence, treated surgically either with transobturator tape (n: 37) or with single-incision sling (n: 44), between January 2012 and January 2015. If pelvic organ prolapse was associated, transobturator route was preferred requiring patient hospitalization. If this correction was not needed, we performed single-incision sling, as an ambulatory procedure. Follow up visits were scheduled at 1, 6, 12 months after surgery and a telephone interview at 24 months. Results: Mean age was higher in transobturator group: 65±9.7 vs 58.2±11.3 (p=0.005). A statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in operating time (minutes): 81.07±31.27 vs 36.79±1.09 (p=0.000) and pelvic prolapse associated: 87.8% vs 63.3% (p=0.042). Morbidity rate was higher in the transobturator group, but without significance. After 1 year follow-up, there were no significant differences between the transobturator and the single-incision groups regarding continence (80% vs 83%; p=0.706) and satisfaction (80% vs 85.7%; p=0.586). We found similar results at 24 months telephonic interview. Conclusions: Single-incision slings are comparable to transobturator tapes in 12 and 24 months success rates and satisfaction, with significantly less morbidity, costs and operating time, becoming first line option when no pelvic prolapse is associated.