ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To investigate the efficacy of robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair. 【Methods】 The clinical data of 3 patients with high vesicovaginal fistula treated during Jun.2020 and Jun.2021 were retrospectively analyzed. 【Results】 All operations were completed successfully, with no conversion to other surgical methods. Operation time: 98 min, 104 min and 115 min; Intraoperative bleeding volume: 15 mL, 20 mL and 22 mL; Postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. The catheter was removed after 1-month follow-up, and the patients had no bleeding, urine leakage, infection or other complications. There was no recurrence of urine leakage at the end of 12-month follow-up. 【Conclusion】 Robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair has the advantages of fine suture and minor damage, which can be an effective treatment of vesicovaginal fistula.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of the novel single-port surgical robotic surgical system in extraperitoneal urological surgery.Methods:From February to April 2022, patients was prospectively enrolled who required laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy and adrenal tumor resection in urology department. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years old; BMI 18.5-30 kg/m 2; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system grades 1 to 3; can cooperate with the completion of the visits and related examinations stipulated in the plan, and participate voluntarily clinical trials, and consent or the guardian agrees to sign the informed consent form; tumor indicators meet one of the following surgical treatment indications: kidney tumor T 1 stage, single, maximum tumor diameter ≤ 4 cm; prostate cancer, stage ≤ T 2b, preoperative PSA ≤ 20 ng /ml; Gleason score ≤ 7; adrenal tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm, for non-functioning adrenal adenoma, tumor diameter ≥ 3 cm. Exclusion criteria were: patients with other malignancies or a history of other malignancies and the investigators believe that they are not suitable for inclusion in this researcher; patients who have received the same type of urological surgery in the past and are not suitable for participating in this study as assessed by the investigators; included Those who have undergone other major surgery within the first 3 months and during the trial period, or who cannot recover from the side effects of any such surgery; syphilis, hepatitis B, HIV infection and carriers; long-term use of anticoagulants or blood system diseases; Unable to use effective contraception during the trial period and other conditions that the investigators deem inappropriate to participate in this trial. All operations were performed by a novel single-port robotic surgical operating system, and all surgical procedures were performed through an extraperitoneal approach. Surgical method: the surgical system is mainly composed of a remote console including a high-definition display, a surgical equipment trolley, a surgical execution system that accommodates a serpentine robotic arm, and a bendable serpentine robotic arm. In this study, the extraperitoneal approach was used. For radical prostatectomy, the patient was placed in a supine position, a longitudinal incision of about 3 cm was made below the umbilicus, the anterior rectus sheath was incised, the extraperitoneal space was separated, and an operating sheath was placed. A 12 mm trocar is placed between the right McBurney point and the umbilicus as an auxiliary hole. For partial nephrectomy and adrenal tumor resection, the patient is placed in the lateral position, and an 3cm incision is made 2 cm above the iliac crest on the midaxillary line as the main operating hole. The skin, subcutaneous tissue, and muscle were incised to the retroperitoneal cavity, and a 12mm trocar was placed at the level of the anterior superior iliac spine on the anterior axillary line as an auxiliary hole. The operation was performed after connecting each robotic arm. After the operation, the specimen was placed in the specimen bag, and a drainage tube is placed in the auxiliary hole, the specimen was taken out, and the incision was closed in turn. Preoperative basic information, operation time, blood loss, incision size, postoperative complications, preoperative and postoperative PSA score, eGFR index, postoperative pathological information and other perioperative information were collected. Results:A total of 17 patients were included in this study, including 6 with prostate cancer, 8 with renal tumor, and 3 with adrenal tumor. There were 9 males and 8 females, with an average age of (56.7±14.6) years and a BMI of (23.3±3.4) kg/m 2. The mean operation time of radical prostatectomy was (244.6±35.1) min, the mean operating time of the chief surgeon was (184.0±39.0) min, and the mean blood loss was (36.6±23.8) ml. Postoperative positive margin was found in 2 cases. The average operation time of partial nephrectomy was (189.6±49.4) minutes, the average operating time of the chief surgeon was (115±39.7) minutes, the average blood loss was (12.7±8.3) ml, and the average warm ischemia time was (23.1±10.8) minutes. There was no significant difference in the eGFR index before and after the operation ( P>0.05). The average operation time of adrenalectomy was (177.6±26.9) min, the average operating time of the chief surgeon was (99±20.4) min, and the average blood loss was (11.6±6.2) ml. The overall average operation time of the three surgical methods was (206.9±50.1) min, the overall average operating time of the chief surgeon was (136.5±51.1) min, the overall average blood loss was (21.0±9.2) ml, and the overall average incision size was (3.5±0.5) cm, all added a 12 mm auxiliary channel, and the overall average hospital stay was (8.1±2.7) days. All operations were successfully completed, and there was no conversion to open surgery during the operation, and no operation holes were added. There was no Clavien-Dindo≥grade 3 complication after operation. Conclusions:The novel single-port robot could safely and effectively perform radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy and adrenalectomy which are common in urology through extraperitoneal approach.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the feasibility, safety and aesthetics of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a single-port through the umbilicus in patients with chronic cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis. Methods From Jan 2007 to Jun 2017, the clinical data of 4790 patients who underwent single-port, 4426 patients conventional three-ports, and 3304 patients two-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospec-tively studied. Results There were no death in all the three groups. There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative bleeding, bile leakage, biliary tract injury and other significant short-term complications (all P>0. 05). The operation time of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was significantly longer than that of two-ports and three-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy [(35. 3 ± 9. 0) min vs. (28. 4 ± 7. 2)min vs. (23. 3 ± 6. 4)min, P<0. 05]. Looking only in a single year, there was no significant difference in the operation time of the three groups in the year 2017 (P>0. 05). There were no significant differences among the three groups in intraoperative blood loss, first postoperative passing of flatus, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay (all P>0. 05). The satisfaction score of surgical scar in the single-port group was higher than that in the two-ports and three-ports groups [ ( 9. 6 ± 1. 6 ) vs. (7. 6 ± 1. 9) vs. (6. 7 ± 2. 0), P < 0. 05]. Conclusions Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safe and feasible, with good aesthetics and other advantages. It was more difficult than the traditional laparoscopic technique. After the learning curve, the operation time could be comparable to the three-ports technique.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To study the feasibility, safety and aesthetics of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a single-port through the umbilicus in patients with chronic cholecystitis with cholecystolithiasis.@*Methods@#From Jan 2007 to Jun 2017, the clinical data of 4790 patients who underwent single-port, 4 426 patients conventional three-ports, and 3 304 patients two-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively studied.@*Results@#There were no death in all the three groups. There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative bleeding, bile leakage, biliary tract injury and other significant short-term complications (all P>0.05). The operation time of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was significantly longer than that of two-ports and three-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy [(35.3±9.0)min vs. (28.4±7.2)min vs. (23.3±6.4)min, P<0.05]. Looking only in a single year, there was no significant difference in the operation time of the three groups in the year 2017 (P>0.05). There were no significant differences among the three groups in intraoperative blood loss, first postoperative passing of flatus, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay (all P>0.05). The satisfaction score of surgical scar in the single-port group was higher than that in the two-ports and three-ports groups [(9.6±1.6) vs. (7.6±1.9) vs. (6.7±2.0), P<0.05].@*Conclusions@#Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safe and feasible, with good aesthetics and other advantages. It was more difficult than the traditional laparoscopic technique. After the learning curve, the operation time could be comparable to the three-ports technique.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical safety and efficacy of self-made single-port retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection for chyluria. Methods From Feb 2013 to Mar 2016, clinical data of 34 patients were collected. Of them, 16 cases underwent self-made single-port retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection and 18 cases underwent three port retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection. No significant difference was shown in age, body mass index between the two groups (P > 0.05). Mean operative time, estimated bleeding volume, drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain evaluation, satisfaction scores of incision were compared between the two groups. Results All procedures were successfully performed without conversion to open surgery. Compared with the three port surgery group, results in the single-port group were superior in terms of mean operative time [(102.3 ± 16.1) versus (132.4 ± 21.6) min, P < 0.05], there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, the date in postoperative pain evaluation, satisfaction scores of incision shown that single-port group was superior to three port group. Conclusion Our initial experience revealed that single-port retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection was a safe, effective, cost-effective and less-invasive procedure for chyluria with improved postoperative pain and cosmetic results.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>Objective</b>To compare the clinical effect of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy combined with improved double hernia needles with that of traditional open surgery in the treatment of hydrocele in children.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We retrospectively analyzed 35 cases (54 sides) of pediatric hydrocele treated by transumbilical single-port laparoscopy combined with improved double hernia needles (laparoscopy group). We recorded the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, scrotal edema, and postoperative complications and compared them with those of another 46 cases (58 sides) treated by traditional open surgery (open surgery group) during the same period.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The laparoscopy group showed a significantly shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, milder scrotal edema, and fewer hospital days than the open surgery group (all P<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Subcutaneous emphysema developed in 2 patients in the laparoscopy group, which disappeared after 1－3 days of oxygen inhalation and other symptomatic treatment, while scrotal hematoma occurred in 1 and incision fat liquefaction in 2 patients in the open surgery group 3 days postoperatively, which healed after debridement suture and daily dressing, respectively. The patients were followed up for 3－6 months, which revealed no late complications in the laparoscopy group but 1 case of unilateral recurrence and 2 cases of offside recurrence in the open surgery group, all cured by laparoscopic internal ring ligation.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Transumbilical single-port laparoscopy combined with improved double hernia needles is superior to traditional open surgery for the treatment of pediatric hydrocele and therefore deserves clinical generalization.</p>
Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Blood Loss, Surgical , Edema , Diagnosis , Laparoscopy , Methods , Length of Stay , Ligation , Needles , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications , Diagnosis , General Surgery , Postoperative Period , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Scrotum , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Testicular Hydrocele , General Surgery , UmbilicusABSTRACT
La cirugía mínimamente invasiva (CMI) en el manejo de las neoplasias ginecológicas se ha incrementado considerablemente en la última década. La posibilidad de realizar los procedimientos quirúrgicos necesarios para tratar el cáncer ginecológico ha mejorado el cuidado y la calidad de vida de las pacientes. En el presente artículo se revisa las innovaciones en CMI y se discute las aplicaciones así como la experiencia del Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas de Perú en el manejo del cáncer de cérvix, endometrio y ovario.
Minimally invasive surgery in the management of gynecologic malignancies has increased considerably in the last decade. The ability to perform minimally surgical procedures has revolutionized care and quality of life outcomes for patients. In this article, we review innovations in minimally invasive surgery and its applications are discussed as well as the experience at National Institute of Neoplasic Diseases of Peru in the treatment of cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the function of specialized training course in training singleport laparoscopic skills.Methods The specialized training course for single-port laparoscopy included cutting rubber bands into‘Z’shape,cutting‘petaloid’folded slips and peeling oranges.Twelve residents were enrolled into traditional laparoscopy training for one week and then randomized into two groups:6 trainees performed the specialized training course for 2 h daily and the others as the control group continued to practice the traditional course for 2 h daily.One week later,the trainees were tested on performing porcine single-port laparoscopic nephrectomy.Operation time and performance was compared.T test were performed using SAS 9.1.3 statistics software,and a P＜0.05 was considered to be statistical significance.Results Operation time of the specialized group was decreased significantly(59.2±17.3)min vs.(87.0±25.5)min,P=0.049,and the total global rating scale score increased significantly(26.3±2.2 vs 18.2±2.8,P=0.000 17).Conclusion The specialized course is beneficial to the training of single-port laparoscopic skills.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the feasibility of the single-port laparoscopic transvesical prostatectomy in pigs, and to summarize the technique difficulties, so as to lay a foundation for future clinical application. Methods: Six uncastrated male pigs were used in this study. The skin stomas were made through bladder exstrophy and the TriPort system was inserted into the bladder. Radical prostatectomy was performed as did in human using laparoscopic instruments through the TriPort system after inflating the bladder. The bladder and abdomen were closed after vesicourethral anastomosis, and the prostate specimens were removed through the skin stoma. Results: The first three procedures failed due to inappropriate positioning of TriPort system, limited space of bladder, and the high tension of vesicourethral anastomosis. The other 3 procedures were successful, with the periods used being 190 min,160 min, and 110 min. The whole prostates were resected completely, and the completeness of the urinary tract was recovered using interrupted suture (6 sutures). Conclusion: The single-port laparoscopic transvesical prostatectomy is a feasible procedure, but there are technical difficulties. Further experiments are needed on human cadavers before clinical application.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To try to perform single-port laparoscopic nephrectomy in pigs, and to summarize and improve the basic skills, so as to decrease risks in clinical practice. Methods: From Apr. to May 2009, we performed 10 times (5 pigs) of nephrectomy on porcine model using Triport system. The experience was summarized with respect to the following issues, the choice of endoscopy and instruments, insertion of Triport single port system, and optimization of the basic operation procedure. Results: All the procedures were successful, without bleeding, organ injury or other complications. Operative time decreased from 75 min at the first time to 23 min for the last one. Clashing of instruments was the biggest frustration in the process; "X" shape crossing can partially resolve the problem, based on which four kinds of basic operating modes were designed. Conclusion: Single-port laparoscopy nephrectomy in pigs can help the new learners to quickly improve their skills and decreases clinical risks.